Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 12:09:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 ... 444 »
6421  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: February 03, 2017, 05:10:40 PM
Could someone direct me to where exactly this lifeboat vanitygen is? Can I download it from github or am I missing something? Also could you link me to where it's explained what is does/if it's different/why it's better? Googling just keeps coming up with reddit post after reddit post but no real information for me... Sorry for the newb questions rofl.

http://lifeboat.com/oclvanitygen

 It will start the download right away.
6422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help please my bitcoin transcation not appearing in blockchain on: February 03, 2017, 05:01:00 AM
ok here's the thing i send btc to my other wallet and the transaction got stuck!I pay for fee's around 50k sat but it does not appear on my other wallet.

I just send almost 0.30

here's the transcation ID

e1c9cf1f944d1793dbe512ac915b1af845a401b0329a32888674ec66b23e6371

i got this message on blockchain.info i don't know what is this

Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: An outpoint is already spent in [DBBitcoinTx{txIndex=217065672, ip=219.117.241.96, time=1486083071, size=225, distinctIn=null, distinctOut=null, note='null', blockIndexes=[], nTxInput=1, nTxOutput=2}] [OutpointImpl{txIndex=216706305, txOutputN=0}, Outpoin

is my money gone?

Im using electrum 2.7.9



 What is the txid of your previous transaction.  It appears you have previously spent some coins and they have not been confirmed yet.
6423  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My fiend got hacked for 81 BTC on: February 03, 2017, 04:55:18 AM
3 total transactions with the wallet ...

February 1 @ 04:21 AM
Sent
To:
1CKav2MDgWxwSq1uPUFtuUBjTJHxVD8PM2
From:
My Bitcoin Wallet
Add a description
47.12411475 BTC                           ** the hacked transaction**



January 31 @ 11:56 AM
Sent
To:
3Bs4fCRpin2VxndjADy6NGAmsaZaN2iNbj
From:
My Bitcoin Wallet
Add a description
40.0001469 BTC       **this transaction i sent the bitcoins to Bitstamp**


January 27 @ 11:57 PM
Received
From:
1FUw3p2LnveF8ZBoRTRJF8aDpmjbNkmmRR   ** this transaction was the closed coinbase account where i moved my bitcoins here**
To:
87 bitcoins      

 This is getting more confusing.  OP said you sent coins to Bitpay.  Is it Bitstamp then?
6424  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My fiend got hacked for 81 BTC on: February 03, 2017, 04:38:43 AM
I used blockchain.info wallet on my cell phone as a bitcoin wallet. I set up all of the security bells and whistles on it..... then the dreaded withdrawal i saw when I logged in the person sent the bitcoins to this address 1CKav2MDgWxwSq1uPUFtuUBjTJHxVD8PM2

 I see.  That's not the way it is presented in the original post.
How many times had you moved those coins in the previous days?
6425  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My fiend got hacked for 81 BTC on: February 03, 2017, 04:28:17 AM
And they probably do more than one tx on each address.

I know that when I buy from an online merchant with BTC (not dark web, I'm talking mainstream big commerce sites that take BTC) , if I check the send-to address they give me on a block explorer, it's usually got a few transactions other than mine. And usually has more BTC than the amount I sent. Usually not a lot more, but some. like maybe they use each address for 3 or 4 incoming transactions before switching to another.
Yes it is normal to exchange platform, poloniex also do so and i think this is to reduce transactions fee.

Sorry for your friends loss 81BTC is really big amount, i prefer paper wallet printed on offline computer or hardware wallet for long term storage. Web wallets are not good place to store such a huge number of bitcoin.

+1 to all that.

 The problem with that explanation is that Blockchain.info is not an exchange. The Blockchain.info wallet is solely owned by a single user and the coins are not shared.  There is something that doesn't add up in your story.  Perhaps you mixed up which coins came from where?

6426  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My fiend got hacked for 81 BTC on: February 03, 2017, 03:55:18 AM
He did one thing right (bought 4 years ago and held it, also owned BTC silently, he told no one).

But he did a lot wrong (kept a lot of BTC on web wallets, accessed accounts on computer used for everything, didn't have anti-virus on one of his computers, had his desktop computer with the BTC wireless, not wired and more.

Whole story is on this episode: https://www.freedomfeens.com/?p=13678 We also cover simple preemptive counter measures, if he'd done them, he'd still have his BTC.

Was his life savings. Bought it when it was half this price. He's crushed by it. I don't blame him.

Was stolen from his IP while he was out of town. I suspect key logger, or war driver of router. He was NOT using default router password.

I've walked him through closing all the holes, but there's nothing left now.

He's too busy working and doesn't feel like talking about it, but he's fine with me posting on here with the transactions in case anyone wants to sleuth it and see if they can track where it went. Not expecting to get it back, but I know people always are interested in the tx info when this happens:

This is the 47 Bitcoin stolen from his online wallet on BitPay:
https://blockchain.info/address/1G4zDfdPRdANgGRv2SHeSzyusa6vm1GhBL

This is the 34 Bitcoin stolen from his online wallet on Blockchain.info:
https://blockchain.info/address/17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528

  You showed us 2 links to a specific addresses where coins were transferred from his online wallet; one presumably blockchain.info and the other presumably Bitpay.  I want to focus on the Blockchain.info "wallet".
 This link - https://blockchain.info/address/17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528 - takes us to a specific address rather than a specific transaction.  This is a screen cap of the web page with some specific information highlighted:



 


How do you know that these are specifically the coins previously belonging to your friend?  If all those coins came from one address and were moved to 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528, I wouldn't have reason to ask this question but if we back out and look at the entire transaction rather than just one individual address containing 34 bitcoins:


 


We can clearly see that these are the same transaction IDs and the 34 coins in the address 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528 allegedly belonging to your friend were part of a larger group of coins residing in the multisig address 39xfyaTTefAPtRiTopLdWzaYXzPzpTkcdR!
 So how is it possible that he only lost 34 of these coins from a blockchain.info wallet?  How was the thief able to discern which of the 34 coins were your friends in order to move them to 17paadXLu4ryTgCR8ZwUxyGrP7wuAG1528.  Who owns the other coins from this multisig address?!  I'm not a Bitcoin forensics expert but this story doesn't make sense to me based on the information you have provided.



6427  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Transaction stuck at unconfirmed for hours? on: February 03, 2017, 01:52:55 AM
I'm a bit of a noob with BTC, but when sending BTC from my Electrum wallet it almost always take a few minutes tops to be confirmed. But today I sent .5 BTC several hours ago and absolutely nothing seems to be happening. This despite paying what appears to be the highest transfer fee I have ever paid. Can anyone make an educated guess why this is happening? My wallet shows -.500261 unconfirmed.   

Transaction ID= 0a546f6a539ce0a0c08b5c039648d4149d45903f15856004b55e19f9b377187f

 You paid only 50 satoshis per byte.  Not nearly enough for a quick transaction these days.
Check out https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
6428  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Amish are taking over Bitcoin! on: February 02, 2017, 08:17:40 PM
OmG,  did that guy just shit out a car?!
6429  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Amish are taking over Bitcoin! on: February 02, 2017, 01:11:12 PM
It is a commonly-held scientific speculation that beards grow faster on men who haven't had sex in a while.  If you see a man with a very long beard, he probably needs a girlfriend. Wink


Wrong. I know these people are allowed to marry more than one woman. Same as with Muslems they marry up to 4 women and I think they have a lot of sex because they make up to 6 or more children from a single women. They almost all have long beards so this scientific proofs is not true for the case.

 Mine was a satirical post but here are a couple of salient points:

2) Greg Maxell is not Amish.
1) The Amish are not polygamists.


 Edit: sorry to rain on your otherwise humorous thread Gleb.
6430  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Amish are taking over Bitcoin! on: February 02, 2017, 03:22:47 AM
It is a commonly-held scientific speculation that beards grow faster on men who haven't had sex in a while.  If you see a man with a very long beard, he probably needs a girlfriend. Wink
6431  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: 1 MONTH FREE DIRECTVNOW 120 CHANNELS GUARANTEE LEGAL WORLDS CHEAPEST HBO CINEMAX on: February 02, 2017, 02:16:49 AM
One week into my one month free trial; time for an assessment.

 wallet4bitcoin is helpful and quick to respond.  He wasn't sure if the service worked with PIA VPN when I asked but offered to sign up for PIA in order to find out.  He also offers a cheap VPN service if you require it.  (I didn't need it because Private Internet Access works well).

 The Directtvnow service works well and picture quality is generally awesome.  I have seen the image blur periodically but instances of this are quite rare, short-lived and usually occur when first starting up the service.  I've been using it through Internet Explorer 11 with the Silverlight plug-in - haven't tested it with Chrome.

 As well as the live TV, there is a good selection of movies and archived shows.  Searches will turn up movies, archived shows and even upcoming live events.  Pretty cool.

 

  
6432  Economy / Goods / Re: Trade Ski House in Vermont, USA for Bitcoin on: January 31, 2017, 05:04:24 AM
That's a beautiful house.  What are the property taxes?


6433  Economy / Economics / Re: How world currencies compare to Bitcoin in terms of "market capitalization" on: January 31, 2017, 04:56:41 AM
Well, I know there are 16 million bitcoin in existence but if you call the number of bitcoin in existence 100%, then you've just done what I thought would be cooler but I will have to defer to you and your uber-cool moustache wrt what is cooler Wink
6434  Economy / Economics / Re: How world currencies compare to Bitcoin in terms of "market capitalization" on: January 31, 2017, 04:19:48 AM
It would have been cooler had you expressed the market cap of the countries in terms of Bitcoin.

Edit:  I meant to also say that this is quite interesting and to thank you for all the effort.
6435  Other / Off-topic / Re: Your songs on: January 30, 2017, 02:06:44 AM

 To quote David Bowie, "It's not a very good song, is it?"
6436  Other / Off-topic / Re: Learning a foreign language on: January 30, 2017, 12:52:49 AM
I find a really effective method is to marry someone who speaks another language especially if their family does not speak your language.
What language(s) were you thinking about learning?
6437  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammed by user paltoco on: January 29, 2017, 09:45:15 PM
paltoco has positive trust from two legendary members with green trust Blazed and KWH.  I suggest this trust is no longer valid.
It looks like you are confusing neutral trust with positive trust. In this case, the user in question does not have any positive trust from a DT member.

Anyways, tagged.

 Thanks for the tagging and the schooling Lauda.  Much appreciated.
I was confused but I shouldn't have been.  I know that "trusted feedback" is meant for me based on my settings - but I confused it with positive feedback for paltoco because it doesn't appear in red.  I see now that he doesn't have any positive trust conferred to him though I do see the negative.


6438  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Missing components, software dilemma on: January 29, 2017, 07:17:28 PM
hmph, nobody is responding, did i post in the wrong section?

 You're in the right place but don't bump your post more than once in 24 hours; that's a no no which violates board rules.
It's the weekend - people are playing at other things. Give it some time and you'll get some answers.

6439  Other / Off-topic / Re: [FACTS] North / South = SCAM ! on: January 29, 2017, 07:05:31 PM
Well this certainly has negative repercussions for the English language as well.  There can be no more eating up, drinking up, smoking up, dressing up, knocking up, taking up, looking up, making up, feeling up, blowing up, showing up, keeping up, ending up... they too must be scams!  What a let down.  <--- also a scam


 edit: OMG what will become of waking up?
6440  Economy / Scam Accusations / Scammed by user paltoco on: January 29, 2017, 06:50:44 PM
What happened:

 I purchased 3 months of IPTV for 0.042 BTC which stopped working days later.  I have sent a PM which has gone unanswered though I have seen him active on at least two occasions since which is why I have opened this accusation.
 
Scammers Profile Link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=235980

Reference Link:

HD IPTV USA, EU & POLAND, AFRICA, ASIA - Live TV without hardware! 12hr trial!
Amount Scammed:

0.042 BTC

Payment Method:

Bitcoin

Proof of Payment:

https://blockchain.info/tx/7a56eb79300b29306f628e476e98806236099b8fc5c3649cdc8c0b7d0243b055
address: 14m9DcfmMBaNraxfo4zaQ3rmnU29CFw3Mn
Message: "xhomerx10 has paid 0.042 BTC from this address to paltoco @ 17NiWTR2Sc71iN9LcKADHx92R3RkzuG6Yv"
Signature: Hz5FsRitJt2XjvbGeE7ArS7K/KttFj13OxbRP9u9PaYCE6XX+9XUrT8hKhC+tMVfGIGS4JFNYMuyLvJgKjcOCcw=

PM/Chat Logs:



Additional Notes: {edited: Jan 29/2017 @ 21:48 UST}

 paltoco has positive trust neutral from two legendary members with green trust Blazed and KWH.  I suggest this trust is no longer valid. Don't be fooled as I was!
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 ... 444 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!