Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:52:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 »
6421  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Would i be better off waiting for the 16nm miners? on: September 24, 2015, 09:30:12 AM
My opinion is we wont see any 16nm until 2016 so if you want to wait that long to get into mining or you take the S7 which as of right now is the best option available to the public

 December 2015, Lketc / Innosilicon, from reading between the lines of some of the stuff they've already announced.

 Pretty close to 2016 though - and it's not fully optimised 16nm so won't be better efficiency (per their announced specs) than the SP50 and only a hair better to the same as the S7.

 I'm mostly just hoping it ignites a serious price war.

 The KnC and Bitfury announcements were only for tapeout - though it appears they have done fully optimised designs, not "cell based" stuff that's less efficient.
 I suspect KnC has been rolling theirs for a short while, but are having yeild issues.
 Bitfury probably won't have production chips till sometime mid-to-late 2016.

 Spondoolies claims .15J/GHs for their new 28nm chips, which narrows the margin quite a bit but you better have SERIOUS money if you ever want any of that hardware.
6422  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: September 24, 2015, 09:24:37 AM
Anyone else having issues getting to the Hashnest website at all?

 (edit) it fixed - and PACMIC v3 IS STILL (or is again) available, 30000 TH available per my JUST looking at it (0521 CDT 21Sep2015)
6423  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: September 24, 2015, 09:22:23 AM
*NIX is more common than you think.

 Pretty much every router "appliance" runs some form of LINUX (Cisco is the only major exception, they have their own propriatary OS stuff).

 Most of the Internet runs on some sort of *NIX - the exceptions are mostly (again!) Cisco boxes in the bigger routers.

 Many older smartphones run on a *NIX of some sort, though propriatary seems to be making a comeback lately with Android getting popular.

 Do keep in mind that the Mac OS is *NIX under the hood.

 To get technical, Windows "borrowed" a LOT of *NIX design concepts in the NT series and it's later derivations, and somewhat to a lesser degree MS-DOS and consumer Windows versions did as well. MS-DOS also borrowed heavily from the older DEC RT-11 OS though (both RT-11 and UNIX borrowed from older OSs as well).
6424  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Mining Profitable? on: September 24, 2015, 09:09:46 AM
Gross income /= profit.

 Just because a S5 might be pulling in close to 0.01 bitcoin a day does NOT make that 0.01 it's PROFIT - and as the electric cost for most folks doesn't change more than once a year, every 1% loss in GROSS INCOME usually represents quite a bit higher lost PROFIT.
 The only exception to that is if your electric is FREE (or effectively free, like you have electric heat and you're using your S5 to do part of your heating, WHILE you need the heat).

 The current diff drop is a very short-term phenomon related to Bitmain shipping a bunch of S7 units they sold (and obviously were mining with before they sold them), rate will buck back up and then some once the buyers recieve them and get them back online.

6425  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: What do you think about this miner? on: September 22, 2015, 08:47:21 AM
Waste of money for badly outdated stuff.
6426  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: with S7, bitmain vs spondoolies becomes interesting on: September 22, 2015, 08:46:19 AM
I suspect Bitmain's real competiton will show up around December - Lktec powered by Innosilicon.

 I'd be happy for Spondoolies to prove me wrong though.

6427  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: "Modern" home mining hardware? on: September 22, 2015, 08:45:18 AM
http://www.bitcrane.com/goods.php?id=2

You can find the T-110S around for sale.  The S is supposed to stand for silent but I never owned one.

 OP asked for modern, not "already outdated by late 2014 technology standards".

 Both the S5 and the Spondoolies "rockerbox" based machines blew away anything Bitcrane made.

 
 For "winter use only electric sorta-portable heater" usage, any miner will work.
6428  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: I speculate that 21 Inc. is insane with their preorder momputer for $400 on: September 22, 2015, 08:43:18 AM
I think the device is a joke.

 I'm still holding judgement on 21 itself, the mining chip(s) IN the joke device appears that it might have some decent specs.
6429  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Would i be better off waiting for the 16nm miners? on: September 22, 2015, 08:41:41 AM
I'd wait not so much on 16nm, but on "what other companies come out with to compete with the S7" right now.

Bitfury and KnC aren't going to be selling to the public, and BitFury in particular isn't going to be selling 16NM at all for months at best (they just announced tape-out earlier this month, it takes MORE months sometimes a year+ to get working production hardware from that point).
6430  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Design suggestions needed for new bitcoin miner. What NOT to do. What to avoid. on: September 22, 2015, 08:39:41 AM
usb connections. Bloody unreliable long-term, nothing more than an IRRITATION.

Excessive power levels per unit.
The 600W ballpark the S5 was was fairly nice, gave lots of options for powering them.
The 1200+ of the S7 is way too high for a "home" miner.

Modular design actually tends to INCREASE the cost overall, though the flexability can be nice *IF* you can get the hashing boards seperately at a resonable fraction of the cost of an entire unit.

*IF* you are going to use an integrated PSU, use something with a STANDARD size, not something propriatary with very few options to replace it when it dies.
Better yet, do NOT use an integrated PSU, gives the end user more options.

Rack mount case sizing is ... not really a good idea for a home miner, unless you don't mind wasting LOTS of space on at least 3U form factor.
Cooling in 2U is a pain, cooling in 1U is a MAJOR pain, and the fans get LOUD for decent airflow at anything less than 3U (you can fit 120mm fans in a 3U form factor case).

Massive single chip miners are a pain, and tend to be very inflexable on usage of the chips.

 Don't even get me started on the very poorly designed power control circuitry on the Gridseed stuff - if you want examples of HOW NOT TO DO THINGS just look at everything Gridseed did (except chip reliability, that was pretty good). BAD board design to the n'th degree, the whole stupid "mine 2 different algorythms on one chip" idiocy that they have continued into the SFARDS iteration....
6431  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 21 co introducing bitcoin [mining+] computer for $399.99 (unofficial thread) on: September 22, 2015, 08:28:33 AM
I don't see this "first product" being of intrest to many folks. WAY too low on performance, WAY too espen$ive, even for a "development tool" it's bloody overpriced.

 I've got to wonder what the REAL "intended use" for this thing is, the comments 21 has made on it so far make exactly ZERO sense to me.
 Technology demonstrator perhaps?
6432  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NEW: Hashnest PACMiC V3 - 0.666 BTC/THS on: September 21, 2015, 11:55:40 PM
PACMIC v3 contracts aren't likely to "sell out" as Bitmain keeps replenishing them to the 30000 (appx) available level.

 They MIGHT stop offering them once they switch to a v4 (S7 "based" type) contract.
6433  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Is a 2Gh/s ASIC good? on: September 21, 2015, 11:53:30 PM
For 2GHs, directly mining the bitcoin will be waste of time, money and electricity. But, if you mine an alt coin t the same 2GHs, it'll at least give some return.

 Can't mine altcoins (for the most part) with a SHA256 miner - and none of the few altcoins that DO use SHA256 return noticeably better and are generally LOWER return than Bitcoin mining is in value per GH.

6434  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: GekkoScience BM1384 Project Development Discussion on: September 21, 2015, 11:51:32 PM
In my experience, USB connections are noticeably more reliable (though still get flaky occasionally) on LINUX machines.

 Slackware in my case, been using it since shortly after Yggdrasil "apparently" died (Yggdrasil eventually put out ONE more version of their distribution, about 2ish years after I'd already switched, THEN died).


6435  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S7 is available at bitmaintech.com with 4.86TH/s, 0.25J/GH on: September 21, 2015, 11:48:03 PM
Funny how the hash rate is dropping as soon as the orders start shipping. I'll bet the fans show up nice and dusty but Bitmain will say they are brand new units.

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty

 Nah, if they're smart they'll dust off the units before they ship them.

 They did at least that much on my officially "used" S5s.
6436  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S7 is available at bitmaintech.com with 4.86TH/s, 0.25J/GH on: September 21, 2015, 11:46:33 PM
I'd actually guess "price adjust" - they're always "sold out" for a while when they adjust the price.
6437  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: BTC mining profitability on: September 20, 2015, 12:13:11 AM
I forget what the EU/USD exchange rate is, but assuming 1:1 that would be about 10 cents/KWH - and a bit on the expensive side to mine with at this time unless you can get your mining hardware CHEAP.
6438  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: which site is the best for mining? on: September 20, 2015, 12:12:01 AM

Hmm. Something about this doesn't seem right. Decreasing maintenance fees looks fishy to me, unless they're paying less or no electricity at all.


 S7 uses half the electric (appx.) per GHS that a S5 does.
6439  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: What do you think about this miner? on: September 19, 2015, 11:25:42 PM
eats more than 1 watt per GHs = loss unless you have free or near-free electric.

 Waste of time and money as a general rule.
6440  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Is a 2Gh/s ASIC good? on: September 19, 2015, 11:24:08 PM
2Ghs is totally worthless for the current Bitcoin market. Anything old enough to be THAT low on mining rate is going to eat more electric than you make in Bitcoin by quite a bit, unless you have FREE electric or only plan to use it in the winter a space heater (effectively free electric).

 Even the sidehack/novak stick miner has pretty close to zero chance to achieve RoI if you have to pay for your electric - and it's the best "stick" miner available by a wide margin at this time.


 SHA256 miners can NOT be used to mine non-SHA256 coins like Litecoin (or Dark or Doge etc). For Litecoin and Doge you need a Scrypt miner, for Dark at this point there are no ASIC at all (dunno if Dark is mineable at a profit with GPUs but that's the only way you have a prayer of doing so).
Pages: « 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 [322] 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!