|
Offtopic:Im Not buying,
(Paypal With escrow, even the words don't sit together well)
|
|
|
|
|
You guys are no fun,
ther's scope for,
1page :up arguments
1page:down arguments
1page:sideways
2pages:backwards
1page:seconding
|
|
|
|
I speculate that the price will either rise or fall, one of those two.
I speculate sideways............... |
|
|
|
|
Replies:12183 Views:280965
Where better for Fear mongering than here?
Not that it has any bearing on reality.
|
|
|
|
|
dwolla + Technocash + Liberty reserve + okPay : As of now i don't see liquidity problems on Gox.
Neither did the market dip unexpectedly reacting to the news. We see normal volatility.
From India it seems bit tougher coz we need 3rd party services for INR to USD conversion to Gox.
Im personally not changing my trade plans coz of such news as of now. Well see if it has any effects at all in a few days
|
|
|
|
|
So long as there is no bottleneck in International Bank wire transfers to exchanges,it doesn't effect currency inflow or liquidity.
All large fiat transfers use Bankwires.
Okpay, LR and Web money is for small to medium transfers.
|
|
|
|
Something resembling a tiny wall @ 130.  |
|
|
|
Knocking lightly at the doors of 130,  |
|
|
|
|
Sold @ 128 (hope it turns out good)
I think it might dip a bit further. Momentum.
Buy order @ 120
|
|
|
|
Hope the dip is over ?
Damn trading from the wrong timezone hurts. had orders set , went to sleep.
Had an buy @ 125 which was filled.
Well... if you had a buy order, you wanted to buy, right? I was expecting a dip, hence the buy @ 125, &should have sold and got out @130, that dint happen  , cant figure out if the selling pressure is over. i'm going to bed now and i'm placing my bid at... 118.5! You will fill my order shortly  lol. Sorry adam, hope it doesnt break 120 downward. just hope no TA fu behind that. |
|
|
|
Hope the dip is over ? Damn trading from the wrong timezone hurts. had orders set , went to sleep. Had an buy @ 125 which was filled.  |
|
|
|
|
looks like there is no wall @ 135 or @130.
I see the nearest wall @140.
|
|
|
|
Proof on top of proof because i was saying that your proof of cgminer is a reporting error. Hence you need something else to prove it. U value converges = Run for hours , you dint have time apparently. I say the pool results could be skewed due to time, the same apples for cgminer. since im saying its a firmware reporting error,hence cgminer is erring, other than a web UI i cant figure out how to look at the speed.
The formula works,after the U values converge in cgminer, but i dont think youll want to waste your time doing that,
Its not perfect ,I know it has errors, but i see no other ways to look at speed, the longer you run the miner the more accurate it usually gets, it averages out over time usually.
just help us verify speed if you can via a screenshot of a pool Dashboard after running a few hours, with shares accepted, else it would be skewed due to time.
|
|
|
|
|
I did tell you guys about results being "skewed by time".
No matter how many times you recompile cgminer, the error will stay till the devs fix it in a new version.
|
|
|
|
|
or somebody could have posted it on the Lancelot main thread calling for Kanos attention, you know somebody
|
|
|
|
Atleast we all know that we as going to get a minimum of 800mhash each board as they 2X chips are used!
For Wilson^^ who is still maintaining its 800Mhps. Its a 500Mhps max perboard (250 per chip) Again, It does 500MH/s
End of story - anyone thinking it does 1GH/s is being scammed by misrepresentation.
It's run time is 2 minutes so the MH/s numbers don't mean anything either.
You can fake the MH/s number up by giving the code the incorrect --icarus-timing or incorrect --icarus-options ... I know I wrote the code.
I told them politely to run it for hours, instead of putting it straight in their face, they don't take heed. They needed the dev to come here personally and say it right in their face that's its a "fudged" figure, to make them understand. Oh, and before I forget - you can get them in bulk at $260 each.  I wonder what brought Kano here |
|
|
|
Do you intent to correct the firmware reporting error, i read its near 500Mhps.
(A sellers is trying to rip off customers using the cgminer stats ie,1Ghps.)
or Do you have a 1Ghps version?
Kano explained in the other thread that the variable frequency of the v42 firmware gives incorrect hashing speeds  Im waiting for Kanos clarification. Can you post a link, im looking for it. edit: i though this was the original thread. oops got Kanos verification as a bug, its 500Mhps max |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
