Not all types of work require extensive schooling and knowledge. Some require bravery, a strong physique, being funny, or not being afraid of public appearances and speeches. A certain type of industry requires big schlongs or silicon breast.

There is a funny saying I heard some time ago and it goes like this: "Education is important but big biceps are importanter".

It's not really a revolutionary prediction you are making there. A new product is getting developed that is meant to eliminate the shortcomings of its forerunner. Once released, it makes the old device less attractive and outdated. Isn't that the way that technology works outside the scope of hardware wallets as well?

I am just saying that it's going to take time. The production of the old Nano S could stop in a month, but you are still going to be able to use your device and they will surely keep making software upgrades for it as well for some time until their clients either purchase a newer Ledger brand or switch to a different company all together. 

I have never considered those important. If you tagged me for being a scammer based on proof and for a legitimate reason, and out of revenge I tagged you as well adding nothing but profanity in the comment box, that tag has no weight or value whatsoever.

Spammers know that if they started writing their low-value posts in Meta, it would end badly for them very soon. Some of the best posters and various forum detectives would put them under surveillance, reporting their posts, finding connections with previously banned accounts, and ultimately getting them banned. That's why they prefer to stay far away and in sections like the altcoin boards or off-topic.

Ma jok. Neće to bit moguće jer moraš fizički odobriti svaku transakciju sa svog hardverskog novčanika na način da pritisneš one tipke na njemu da transakciju potpišeš i emituješ. Bez toga ništa ne može. Ako bude moglo, znaći da imaju naše privatne ključeve ili seed-ove svo ovo vrijeme.

Odabrat ćes iznos kojeg prebacuješ na debitnu karticu manuelno i to bi trebalo biti to.

Da, Baanx.
https://www.baanx.com/
https://cl-cards.com/waiting-list/

In the same way that we have members who can whitelist newbies to not having to pay the evil fee, we can have users with whitelisting capabilities for threads in the marketplace boards. By default, that option should be turned off. If you want to create a self-moderated thread in the marketplace, you need to explain the reasons for wanting to do that. Just having such a thread should not be allowed.

A few suggestions:

- Everyone who doesn't have a history of scamming others should be allowed to request self-moderated threads.
- Brand-new accounts can't request it.
- Accounts with negative trust for legitimate reasons can't have self-moderated threads.
- If you can show the people who do the whitelisting that you have been targeted unfairly by certain members in the past who have spammed your threads and tried to prevent you from carrying out your business, you would be allowed to self-mod your threads in the marketplace.

Some parts of the NFT industry are interesting. But most of it will be forgotten in the same way that other hyped trends were as well.

NFTs are digital artworks. If you want to sell those, I see no reason why you cant do that in the Digital goods forum. Is there someone or something that prevents you from doing that? Are such threads getting locked by the admins? NFTs don't need to be integrated into the forum software and I doubt that will ever happen on this or any future Bitcointalk forum.

It's all connected in different ways. Money and wealth gives you access to things that you wouldn't have with knowledge alone. Your knowledge can get you accepted in a great college, but you need money to pay the tuition (unless you get a scholarship). Knowledge can land you that dream job you always wanted. But you need money to find a new apartment in a new town or maybe country where the position is located. New clothes, suits, travel expenses, etc., etc.     

You will see an incoming transaction as soon as the sender signs and broadcasts it on his end. If it's valid and picked up by nodes and included in their mempools, Electrum will show it to you, but in a green standard address and not a yellow change address.

I prefer selecting UTXOs from the "coins" tab instead of the "addresses" tab. You can have multiple UTXOs on the same address and using the "coins" tab is easier in such situations. But let's not confuse the OP with this right now.

Even if the production stops, the device will still be supported for some time. It won't happen overnight. They are not going to prevent you from accessing Ledger Live or their services with it. Even the old HW.1 still works (kind of) as mocacinno showed in this post. 

Check my reply to you regarding this in one of the other threads in this sub.

They have already released information about the secure element in one of their blog posts that highlighted everything that happened on the Ledger OP3N conference they just held. There is a link to the article in my previous post. For better visibility, let me quote the part where they mention the secure element:

https://www.ledger.com/blog/ledger-op3n-conference-product-launches-updates-our-next-milestones

Considering that the OP hasn't been online since July last year, I would say that it doesn't look very good. He isn't around to inform the community of any updates, the wallet can't be ordered and is out of stock, and it was mentioned elsewhere that there is no activity on their GitHub whatsoever.

Those can all be reset. You forget your password, you reset it and request a new one over your email. If you lose or forget your email, you contact your bank, verify yourself, and have them change whatever details are needed so you an have access to your account again. And like o_e_l_e_o mentioned, you can use 2FA with online banking. Who are you going to contact if you lose your passphrase or get it hacked/stolen? There is no customer service to change it for you and give you a new one. You are the customer service, the bank director, and the bank clerk.

Yeah do that if it's safe and malware-free. Brand-new from the shop or just recently had its OP reinstalled.   

What kind of shitcoins are you into that Ledger doesn't support them? They support over 1.000 different assets. That's not a reason to store your seeds digitally, nothing is. 

 There is this thing called a pen and paper. Some would say that it's obsolete technology, but it still works wonders you know!

How do you accidently click on wrong links all the time? Yes, it can happen sometimes, but it shouldn't. You are not careful about anything Jerry.

You are asking what to do, but you have already made up your mind to keep all your files, so keep them. Some of them may or may not be infected, who knows.

Not necessarily. If I wanted to steal your crypto and your seed phrases, I don't need access to your email. 

That's why you check what you click on before you click on it.

And? What do you want us to do about it? Your AV picked something up. It could be connected to the site you visited or it's from something earlier.

Changing them from time to time is a good idea anyways. Why not do it now when there is a possibility of an infection.

There is something seriously wrong with you.

That's the whole point of having 2FA. No one can access your accounts with just the standard login details unless they also have the 2FA code. Jesus Christ!

JSON files just encrypt your private keys. If you have multiple copies of your seed phrase (written down on paper Jerry, not in password managers) you don't need copies of private keys or JSON files.

Any of them is better than having none. Here, use this source for some more info.   

That's irrelevant. If you stick your dick into a beehive, you are bound to get stung. 

About a possible threat because one uses the same network? I assume we are talking about internet networks. Instead of one, use two different internet networks. Don't connect your phone to the same network that your computer is connected to. You could use your mobile data, for example, when you want to access your 2FA codes instead of WIFI. 

That is a possibility, but if it's all just a cheap attempt to get someone else to send him the necessary funds (something that he has already refuted), I seriously doubt it will work. The OP doesn't contain information such as a promise to pay back a part of the profit, which could lure someone into doing it.   

Whether he does it or not, it's up to him. That's the only way he could see those funds move into his own wallet.

I am sure there are such members, but I don't think that group is that big for it to be considered a major problem. Especially now when it's possible to get whitelisted manually by a number of high-ranked users who have been given permission to do that. If the evil fees were the biggest obstacle, they can now try again to get around it.

Life is a bitch and will find ways to kick their ass and punish them in ways much worse than the negative treatment they received here. Users can sometimes be harsh with newbies but just dust yourself off, get back up, and do your best. That shouldn't be a reason for them to give up and hopefully they will be ready to try again. We could use some fresh blood in the Croatian sub as well.

I suggest you take a look at the bonus terms on the link below. It will explain what you need to do.
https://www.clubriches.com/en/contacts/bonus-policy

Their wagering requirement is 30X.
The source says that both the deposited money and the bonus money count towards the wagering requirements. But a deposit has to be made.

If you decide to try and fulfill the requirements, you need to know that not all games contribute equally to the wagering requirements. The only games that contribute 100% are slots and Slots and Scratch Cards. The rest contributes 10% or less. What does that mean for you? If you play Blackjack, for example, and you wager €100, due to a 10% wagering contribution, it's like you only wagered €10. But if you play slots or scratch cards, a €100 bet is considered a €100 wager.

It's all explained in the bonus terms I linked above. Read through it.

All those JDK versions that were mentioned in the quotes (those older than 6u211, 7u201, 8u191, and 11.0.1) are from 2018, so they are quite outdated. I think the latest versions are 17.something. How big of an impact can this discovered vulnerability have on open-source bitcoin projects? Bitcoinj uses Java for example.   

The earth will never stop rotating and news about bitcoin and crypto will continue to be reported. Not all of it will be life-changing, but you will still be able to keep track of it and discuss its impact on the market as a whole or a certain region. We will see new crypto companies being developed and new features and improvements introduced. You can perform experiments and create your own projects based on publicly available and open-source code. Those ideas can grow and make networks run more efficiently. There will be new BIPs and proposals that will be discussed. Those with the required knowledge will talk about what that means for the blockchain.

I have no doubt that there will a lot of good things coming our way.   

We have arrived to the point where you can almost safely assume that everything you receive in your email that resembles promotions or giveaways can be classified as spam and a scam attempt. You need to be careful even with emails you expect to receive. Always double-check if it really comes from the official location and if in doubt, just delete it. No point clicking or giving any data to someone you aren't really sure about.

It is possible that the production will stop at one point in the future. The new Nano S Plus seems like a bigger competitor to the Nano X than to the old Nano S though. Bigger screen, better secure element, more internal memory, but no crap like Bluetooth or faulty internal battery. Maybe they are giving up on both the Nano S and X.