FTFY
Speaking of karma, did you get arrested yet for the terrahash scamming? You must have had a long day the day you deleted your entire posting history off this website and pretending you sold your user account  So predictable, I'm just happy everyone can see how you come up with conclusions and justifiably mark you as a mad dog. It seems to never occur to fools that merit and good fortune are closely united. ha! i remember that day.
Was a hilarious day indeed, many a troll left scratching their neckbeard. |
|
|
|
Several? 80% of his over 350 posts in this thread are directed towards KnC. Very funny how you THINK that some people are KnC, but you DON'T THINK that some people are against KnC...
Do you expect my posts in the KNC thread to be directed towards BFL? Many of my posts are reporting facts stated by knc (e.g. "All current paid orders will be shipped no later than October 15th") and calling them on it when those things didn't happen. Or kicking up a fuss when we were going 7 days without a single news update from them. I expect better service than that for me and everyone else, considering the amount of money we all paid knc. I can back up any of my statements from the list yesterday because they have ignored my emails to CS, I have rang their offices in office hours (Swedish time) and they have not answered etc. What do you expect - I'm going to clap my hands together and shout how great knc are when they cost me $2000 shipping late and then finally shipping me a faulty miner which is still plaguing me to this day? If they'd shipped me a fully working miner on time, believe it or not, I'd be full of praise. But I've been served a shitkarma-sandwich from kfc and I'm not going to shut up just because you might like that. Until the issue is resolved, I will keep reporting my experience. And my experience with knc so far has not been good. I believe I fall into the same category as Cyper reported - not Day 1/2 orders, therefore a second class customers in knc's eyes. The problem is I paid just as much as the Day 1/2 orders, so there is no reason I should not be treated exactly the same. To be continued... FTFY |
|
|
|
he responded to Redacted,
trying to figure out what you are going on about
I am the host for Redacted's box, So I am the one who shipped the broken modual off, and he and I have been in very close communication. Well that clears things up much more. |
|
|
|
Hi,
Please write in large writing on the box RMA 131029-12 and send the board back to the following address:
KnCMiner
Birger Jarlsgatan 33
11145 Stockholm
Sweden
We will review the cause of the issue and get back to you as soon as possible with the new board.
Thanks
Emilia
Your return arrived today, was processed and repaired today, and left here by courier today. In and out the same day. That two week stuff is nonsense, you weren't even issued the RMA until the 29/10/13 (last Friday) it's in the RMA code itself. It looks like KnC should have gotten it last Friday, but UPS royally fucked up the address somehow. [Even though I handed the store the email from KnC, and they packed+shipped it] https://wwwapps.ups.com/WebTracking/track?HTMLVersion=5.0&loc=en_US&Requester=UPSHome&WBPM_lid=homepage%2Fct1.html_pnl_trk&trackNums=46808822179%0D%0A&track.x=TrackI owe you an apology for that. But as far as the time line goes, it still took a week to get the rma number... CS just kept delaying it. EDIT: I got just off the phone with UPS. Not only was the address provided in the RMA email wrong (according to UPS), but it still has not been delivered and is scheduled for tomorrow.... meaning either you or UPS is lying. The tracking would indicate UPS is right... and at least my UPS Account Rep has the decency to get back to me in a timely manner. Haha. You also blatantly lied about it having been received. Now have confirmation from both UPS and KnC that it has not arrived... care to explain yourself? "Hi, This has not yet arrived at our location. Could you please provide a tracking number so that we can chase it? Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanks Emilia Med vänlig hälsning | Best regards Emilia Cole Kncminer www.kncminer.comOffice: +46 8559 253 20 " Quoting this again... Bitcoinorama lied pretty dam clearly here... he responded to Redacted, trying to figure out what you are going on about |
|
|
|
|
I wish I could come in this thread and say that Crumbs is the only one acting like a child with his pictures and internet slang but sadly I come in here to the pitter patter of shareholders that can't stomach their own decisions.
As said multiple times now, Enjoy the Ride and stop the bickering if at all possible.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have an educated guesstimate of what the NRE for a 20/16nm asic would be?
Apple maybe? We know the cost of 28nm Full Custom is somewhere around 4-6M (Entire Process including Chips) so I imagine slightly below double that possibly. |
|
|
|
On that note, this is Lab Rat doing a good deed. It's up the the shareholders to maintain their shares and stay "in the loop". Lab Rat doesn't have time to babysit shareholders when he's babysitting 10's and potentially 100's of GH worth of Equipment.
agree he's doing a good deed by putting a good faith effort forward to not steal from customers, but disagree that his business doesn't need to babysit shareholders. A business babysits shareholders (customers); a hobby only cares about hashrate. If it is too much for him to do both (run a business and a mining farm), he should compensate himself more, find a partner, or accounted for it as part of his business plan. You fail to realize that we are not shareholders in the actual sense of the word. We are Bond Holders. Very different indeed, I just used the word Shareholders as a catch-all. All we get are dividends, we have no vote, we have no say, this is what you knowingly purchased if due diligence was used. Sorry this is how it is no matter what you may want changed, Lab Rat has full control and we do not have any stake in the company. This isn't a bad thing just truth, I for one an comfortable with what he is doing currently and is making the best out of a bad situation. |
|
|
|
So are we waiting until Dec 2 when bitfunder pushes the remaining shares to you or do you have a plan to execute the transfer before then. You could savea lot of time by simply freezing the asset and downloading the asset list. Bitfunder is dead officially now. You have better things to do than prod people to transfer. This is easy Ken.
You hurting for some dust dividends? It doesn't matter if he does it now or then. Maybe Ukyo is providing him with more information than is normally provided come Dec 2nd. You've waited this long, what's 3-4 more weeks™ |
|
|
|
General point - why are we still talking about this?
It really doesn't sound like anyone is going to get screwed here, LR has basically said so, and I don't think anyone will lose out here really, so can we just put this to bed?
Agreed, If you can sign the address you have on file with BitFunder you will be fine If you can't and the address is invalid it will likely be destroyed the the shares absorbed. It is as simple as that, nothing Lab Rat can do to make an invalid Address Valid. On that note, this is Lab Rat doing a good deed. It's up the the shareholders to maintain their shares and stay "in the loop". Lab Rat doesn't have time to babysit shareholders when he's babysitting 10's and potentially 100's of GH worth of Equipment. Regardless of circumstance (Death, Vacation, Forgetting, etc...) It is up to you in the end to be vigilant with your investments (Unless you pay a broker to do that for you! Maybe Grnbrg wants to get in on that as well  ) |
|
|
|
I would imagine that most vendors would look very long and hard about how viable moving to 22nm or lower is in the next couple years. The only real benefit would be the lowered power consumption; 22nm is likely close to as expensive on a per transistor basis as 28nm even outside of NRE. If a 22nm wafer cost the same to process as a 28nm one there might be a cost savings, but that's obviously not the case.
Performance wise, there really are going to be no benefit moving from 28nm to 22nm. Bitcoin is embarrassingly parallel, so there really isn't a performance penalty with using three 100mm^2 28nm dice in place of two 22nm ones at the same area to get the same hashrate.
My gut feeling (not backed up with any market research, BTW) is that the volume of shipments needed to justify the NRE on 20/22nm vs just dropping clocks and voltage on 28nm to reach the same power consumption will likely by much more than the market will be able to bear.
However, once margins become that thin if you are the first with 16/20/22nm tech and it is superior even in just power consumption, that company alone would have no competition since no one else would be able to get their NRE back from being second or third. Hell First might not get it back, but it definitely would be close and secure your place as Industry Leader. |
|
|
|
Good luck selling, did you try eBay those people tend to buy products that will never ROI. At 2.6 coins at current price that thing will never ROI, well it would if difficulty would plummet to only increasing 35% a month and then you would atleast level get .04 coins out of it. 35% forever is unrealistic, there will be some large jumps and then when difficulty gets a certain height the jumps will only be 5-10% |
|
|
|
Answer me this, guys!!!
How wrong is it that Ukyo screws over all USA investors... by making them sell below market... THEN shuts down BF, and suggests transfer assets to issuers (which will probably relist elsewhere, higher?)
I can't believe it.
I'm trying to wrap my head around how he forced you to do this. Can you elaborate? What were other options? Can you elaborate? Not Selling? Migrating to Direct Shares/BuyBacks pretty much anything else actually... Would be up to the securities not the exchange. |
|
|
|
Hi All
I just spoke with Hashfast regarding an updated delivery schedule and they asked me to hold off on announcing it for another 24 hours, when they'll make the information public.
Really sorry I can't give you more information at the moment, but I do not want to risk breaching the NDA with a premature announcement.
Anyone starting to feel like everyone's in on the joke but you? That's called Bitcoin Securities |
|
|
|
Hi All
I just spoke with Hashfast regarding an updated delivery schedule and they asked me to hold off on announcing it for another 24 hours, when they'll make the information public.
Really sorry I can't give you more information at the moment, but I do not want to risk breaching the NDA with a premature announcement.
|
|
|
|
Hi All
I just spoke with Hashfast regarding an updated delivery schedule and they asked me to hold off on announcing it for another 24 hours, when they'll make the information public.
Really sorry I can't give you more information at the moment, but I do not want to risk breaching the NDA with a premature announcement.
Thanks for this at the very least. I really do hope they make it right to you (A customer who spent >$2M with them) |
|
|
|
I am searching for BFGMiner love. I have the newest version 3.5 running but it doesn't identify my miners. Is WinUSB the correct USB driver to use?
Try downloading 3.4.0 Haven't tried 3.5.0 Tried both 32 and 64 bit (on a 64 bit OS) but no dice. Try the part in bold then run the latest BFGMiner This is a workaround version of BFGMiner until a new firmware update for the chilisHere's a modified version of BFGMiner, I also included the driver inside of it as well that should fix your problem. (I don't know much about CGMiner though) http://www.speedyshare.com/uKncp/BFGMiner-Chili.zipOpen up bfgminer.conf and change the Pool and Username to whatever you want (It currently uses mine so make sure you change it) Run CDM v2.08.30 WHQL Certified.exe to install the correct driver for windowsOnce you do both of those, just open up bfgminer.exe and it should read from the config automatically and start hashing for you. If it doesn't see the Chili, all you have to do is keep BFGMiner open, unplug the USB, Plug it back in, press M then + then type all or auto and enter. It should find it. Please note if it still isn't working then you need to exit BFGMiner, unplug you chili power, plug it back in and wait for all the lights to stop blinking. If you try to find the miner while it's "Booting up" it will have issues. "Booting Up" is the two most right LEDs (Closer to the Power) blinking back and forth. Again once all the LEDs are not blinking anymore it should be ready to start hashing, start your BFGMiner and follow the above steps. Let me know if this helps  |
|
|
|
I am searching for BFGMiner love. I have the newest version 3.5 running but it doesn't identify my miners. Is WinUSB the correct USB driver to use?
Try downloading 3.4.0 Haven't tried 3.5.0 |
|
|
|
Thank you. I received what I ordered in within a week of when it was estimated.
Kudos. That sets you apart from the competition.
The equipment exceeds my expectations, and all the other equipment I own (considerable).
I look forward to my next shipment, and future purchases from your company, as you have done, in my case, what you promised.
Hopefully some balance in a truly poisonous forum...
:-/
I can count the number of people that have (Serious) issues with KnC on one hand. I'm talking about the people that are on here every day hooting and hollering about how bad of a company KnC is because of this and that. Having 5 Disgruntled customers out of ~8,000 units shipped isn't so bad. While I'm aware there are more issues than this, it seems the majority of customers are getting fixed by Firmware or their RMAs seem to be working. |
|
|
|
As for bar, please don't make yourself look silly providing really weak and easily countered excuses you come up with off the top of your head. There is nothing to "game". A customer could not order and claim to or they could order and claim they never got the product. OH NOES ordering stuff can be gamed I guess KNC will stop selling products. KNC deals with the "risk" of being gamed on orders but can't on RMA.
Relax, I understand you are under a lot of pressure with Hashfast currently no need to take it out on me. If someone calls in and asks for an advanced RMA and doesn't return their "Broke One" (Which for this scenario it isn't broke) then they now have an extra module and effectively skipped the lines. Worse yet, they actually took a working module away from someone that needed an RMA (I assume they don't have many modules just floating around). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
