When the BTC rocket is starting I will bloodbuying altcoins. DNET buy target is below 150SAT  So market cap now of 45 BTC, aprox. 20k $. Like PTC, for example, a coin with almost no usage here in Spain and a little development on going. Well, maybe you are correct, but it seems a very low objetive at least in the short term for me. And if decrease in the POW phase is implemented, more difficult to reach. |
|
|
|
Really? What's the point with this? Just for laughs? x)
seems like it haha, but thats cool with me, maybe we can get it on yobit and have something "lisky" to play with till real lisk launch ;  ) Good idea,coins for fun. Please dev, make a tuiter account of DarkLisk developers so we can tuit yolo about it a bit better. |
|
|
|
When trying to start darknetd I recieve this mesage:
darknetd: res_query.c:262: __libc_res_nquery: Assertion `(hp != ((void *)0)) && (hp2 != ((void *)0))' failed.
Where my mistake?
Thanks
Solved, I was messing my controller and masternode config files  |
|
|
|
|
When trying to start darknetd I recieve this mesage:
darknetd: res_query.c:262: __libc_res_nquery: Assertion `(hp != ((void *)0)) && (hp2 != ((void *)0))' failed.
Where my mistake?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
My CYG wallet wont sync does anyone have any suggestions?
See the previous post and add some nodes from that list. |
|
|
|
I can also confirm that my test deposit that I made 12 hours has shown up on Bittrex now. Thanks for keeping us updated. You guys should utilize twitter more. Mine was not a test deposit  , but fortunately now is shown perfect. I made it yesterday morning, a little before problem was announced. Seems problem is solving. |
|
|
|
taking bathrobhero's suggestion into account, I like how the numbers look after the first year. They are not too low, but are low enough. What are your thoughts??
REWARDS REDUCE EVERY 7 DAYS: [10080 Blocks]
Year 1: 117,269,200
Year 2: 2,671,200
Year 3: 2,620,800
Year 4: 2,620,800
Year 5: 2,620,800
After 5 Years: Max Coin Supply: 143,355,080
First 6 months of PoS
250 - 2,520,000
240 - 2,419,200
230 - 2,318,400
220 - 2,217,600
210 - 2,116,800
200 - 2,016,000
190 - 1,915,200
180 - 1.814,400
170 - 1,713,600
160 - 1,612,800
150 - 1,512,000
140 - 1,411,200
130 - 1.310.400
120 - 1,209,600
110 - 1,118,800
100 - 1,008,000
90 - 907,200
80 - 806,400
70 - 705,600
60 - 604,800
50 - 504,000
40 - 403,200
30 - 302.400
20 - 201,600
Year 2:
10 - 100,800
5 - 50400 x 51 weeks
Year 3 +
5 - 50400 x 52 weeks
It sounds good. 6M coins less than in the first proposal and a smooth decrease of PoS reward which promotes staking till distri is enough. Thanks for the detailed quantities, very helpful s3v3nh4cks.  |
|
|
|
Maybe PoW rewards should decrease slowly to 50 DNET per block by the time PoS starts?
There has been mined aprox. 21 M coins for the moment. So if PoW rewards start to be smoothly decreased I think 100-120 M coins is achievable without a big drop in production. I have to recognise I have not done the maths for the moment. And yes, I don't know if this will suppose big tech changes and challenges.  Edited: Sorry, I was writing this post while you write yours. Now I see it  |
|
|
|
Also think that 150 M are too much coins. And imho, the idea from bathrobehero of not making so "hard" coin drops it's good to maintain mining and maybe then staking stability.
You totally just contradicted yourself there... Why??? I think a number of total coins about 100-120 M don't dilute too much the value of the already POW mined coins. And yes, to make a bigger number of steps in the decreasing of the supply for generating same amount of total coins add stability to the coin price in my opinion. Don't see the contradiction while maintaining the same amount of coins. |
|
|
|
|
Also think that 150 M are too much coins. And imho, the idea from bathrobehero of not making so "hard" coin drops it's good to maintain mining and maybe then staking stability.
|
|
|
|
I will show development plan on monday
ok, can't wait to see that ;-) Also me, I hope to see it very soon. Or it was next monday?? Anyway, holding a bunch of these. |
|
|
|
|
How are you going to assing the social media bounties??
Interesting project anyway. Watching.
|
|
|
|
I dowloaded the wallet again a still not syncing. Any reason for this?
Thanks
Try adding some nodes: (Add to warp.conf) addnode=109.235.71.102 addnode=104.255.33.99 addnode=23.227.190.202 addnode=24.48.120.173 addnode=70.83.227.32 Salute |
|
|
|
I was running a masternode without any problem in v1.0.1.0, but after update to v1.0.2.0 I'm not able to restart it again. I recieved this message when asking masternode status in windows qt wallet masternode status. Not capable masternode: Could not connect to XX.XXX.XXX.108:51472 I have scanned port 51742 online and it's open Any help will be appreciated  Without more information no one can help you. Is this a local Masternode, or a remote/local setup? Did you do anything in your data directory when upgrading? Any other information you can think of? Sorry, it's true, very few info. It's a unique local masternode. To update the wallet, I simply closed the program and replace the old version for the new one in my ...\roaming\darknet directory. When I restarted the program and typed masternode status I recieved a first message of "status" : "Not capable masternode: Wallet is locked." That I haven't received never before. If I unlock the wallet and try to restart the masternode the message of the top start to appear. |
|
|
|
I was running a masternode without any problem in v1.0.1.0, but after update to v1.0.2.0 I'm not able to restart it again. I recieved this message when asking masternode status in windows qt wallet masternode status. Not capable masternode: Could not connect to XX.XXX.XXX.108:51472 I have scanned port 51742 online and it's open Any help will be appreciated |
|
|
|
looks like no one want to dump below 100 satoshi we have a floor for our little moon rocket  And the first submission proposal is about to end. I thought CYG would have been dumped lot more with that unusual development timetable (ok, most of the roadmaps are never fulfilled, I know) but it has been able to maintain a quite stable value all this time. Waiting for the evolution of price next week. |
|
|
|
Good moment to abandon this one. It's quite funny that free market seems to have killed Trumpcoin  S***coin without development = 0 sat |
|
|
|
Don't stop now, kids. Those movements between 15k and 30k if the last days have been very profitable. |
|
|
|
after trying addnode "x" "onetry" in console with a few diff nodes i still have no peers.. what am i doing wrong?
Be sure that conf- opts - use UPn is checked and try this addnode 178.33.209.212 onetry
|
|
|
|
guys how can i solo mining? I push the button on the windows wallet. but i cant see no mining tool. how long need i mine for one block?
No block mined since 10:58 gmt with 3 threads in a i5 proccesor. Botnets have won the game, if you wanna mine this, the sprnova pool now is the best option. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
