Dear Jimmothy,
@Stuartuk: Did you discuss your concerns with Mr. Anonymousg64? I have absolutely no idea what you refer to. Senile dementia is a bitch. I'll remind you  Mirceau is getting a bit nervous now. Let's keep it on topic. The only scammers on here are EVERYBODY except MPEx.
Mirceau Popescu is NOT a scammer - he is a BILLIONAIRE! What billionaire wouldn't run a scam-site and 'scam-bet'TM making him 50k max a year?
Popescu loves us all and want's for us all great success - just like Borat.
... I'm some d00d named mikemikemike. If you disagree, go fight it out with Anonymousg64, the other forum crazy ...
assume your choice is between buying hardware, a cloud contract or PETA shares
... You're overlooking a rather obvious alternative -- keeping your coin and not "investing" it at all. *But sure, all mining operations offered to the public have either lost money for the "investors," or simply stole it. See your exchange-mate, COG. you overlooked the rest of my post mikemikemike? No, simply pointed out the logical fail on which your entire post pivots. Thus far, I've been accused of being Eduardo de Castro, Mircea Popescu, crumbs, Icebreaker, and various others. Adding mikemikemike to the list. *My name is Legion: for we are many. Have you been taking drugs again as you described on your blog? What drugs do you take Mircey? I think I might like to try some of them.
Please stick to the regiment I've prescribed: Massive doses of Lithium with a chaser of Thorazine syrup. Don't improvise  |
|
|
|
...
@NotLambChop I have been operating under the assumption that you were Crumbs who might be MPOE-PR which in turn would make you Mireacu P. this entire time. I hope that you don't mind if I continue with this assumption.
What an odd thing to ask. Are you saying that if I do mind, you'd stop making idiotic assumptions? |
|
|
|
...Crypto Capital Corp is providing an open source exchange available for anyone qualified to operate an exchange, WLOX.io ... Lol. |
|
|
|
Dear Jimmothy,
@Stuartuk: Did you discuss your concerns with Mr. Anonymousg64?
|
|
|
|
Mirceau is getting a bit nervous now. Let's keep it on topic. The only scammers on here are EVERYBODY except MPEx.
Mirceau Popescu is NOT a scammer - he is a BILLIONAIRE! What billionaire wouldn't run a scam-site and 'scam-bet'TM making him 50k max a year?
Popescu loves us all and want's for us all great success - just like Borat.
... I'm some d00d named mikemikemike. If you disagree, go fight it out with Anonymousg64, the other forum crazy ...
assume your choice is between buying hardware, a cloud contract or PETA shares
... You're overlooking a rather obvious alternative -- keeping your coin and not "investing" it at all. *But sure, all mining operations offered to the public have either lost money for the "investors," or simply stole it. See your exchange-mate, COG. you overlooked the rest of my post mikemikemike? No, simply pointed out the logical fail on which your entire post pivots. Thus far, I've been accused of being Eduardo de Castro, Mircea Popescu, crumbs, Icebreaker, and various others. Adding mikemikemike to the list. *My name is Legion: for we are many. |
|
|
|
This is a thread dedicated to the failings of Active Mining, a "a virtual identity totally owned by the Active Mining Corporation (Belize) that represents both itself and its profits." And the wacky antics of its CEO, an elderly alcoholic from Missouri, Kenneth E. Slaughter. <==As in:  Kindly keep on topic |
|
|
|
Stuartuk: Idée fixe? Thorazine. "We got a drug for that TM... Ken's not flashy like Danny -- he's more of a slow 'n steady guy, more mature. He's not vain like Danny, he doesn't mind keeping his head down and looking like a bumbling fool. That's how he grinds, and successful guys mostly grind. No pyrotechnics, but gets the job done and he comes out on top. Fascinating to watch. |
|
|
|
...
Okay, good point. But if you're a cop and you walk in on someone getting raped you can't just say, "Well, heck he's already banging her against her will so I might as well let him finish!" That's the way I see this. In both scenarios it would only be prudent to stop the fucking in progress.
This is a bit of a tangent, but I'm beginning to doubt that what we're seeing is, in fact, rape. It certainly looks like a rape, but one man's rape is another man's surprise buttsecs. Let's assume for a second that Active Mining investors aren't as clueless as they appear. let's assume that after reading the original prospective and learning that ActM C-tier execs shared the last name "Slaughter," after reading the guileless, childlike wording of that lulzy document, they understood and were enthralled by the implications. What then? As creepy and difficult to comprehend as sadomasochistic relationships may be to us, the mundanes, such are no less justifiable than, let's say, a foot fetish. If the participants have reached the age of consent, we may be interrupting a curious, though perfectly legitimate avocation. This position neatly accounts for the rabid anger projected at us by all parties involved, as we blunder in to offer our so-called "help." Something to think about... |
|
|
|
Since Vince (and?) zum, teh august brain trust of Active Mining Belize, don't seem to agree with my synopsis, I'll just leave it here: ...
if you offer illegal securities to US citizens and you defraud them you have very serious problems that only get compounded with each additional misrepresentation that may cause further damage to your investors.
... I think this is way past the point where Ken could "minimize the damage to investors" and walk away relatively clean. Like a hapless bank robber who ends up shooting a guard, he sees doubling down as the only way out. He did not plan for this sloppy endgame--it's unlikely he planned past the [second] IPO at all. I imagine this started as a short con, and he simply played it by ear after raising some coin. He had some help along the way, who I'm sure he'll try to sell out, but fail. Things like this, lasting over a year, create an incredible web of interconnected crap. I don't know what I would do was I unfortunate enough to find myself in the spot he's in now. No happy endings here. |
|
|
|
|
^What if... For a limited time only, as an introductory offer, I he drops the 1% fee and gives YOU an extra 1%???
Any established members offering THAT?
Didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
... industrial plug included... Thorough, detail-oriented approach and intimate understanding of teh Bitcoin community. I like the cut of your jib, young man. *and I'm stealing "a expert." |
|
|
|
...
I'm not vitriolic about it, but I really dislike any kind of unthoughtful, meme-y kind of speech. Or rather: I can't really take the rest serious if someone throws in meme-style speech patterns.
... We The Enlightened had a choice: rely on tedious and fallible cryptology, or use meme-riddled, apparently thoughtless speech patterns and hide in plain sight amongst the oda.krells  <==decoy smiley |
|
|
|
... I can't disagree there. my opinion is this is hardly a golden goose. hosted mining operations are substandard offerings which have been done to death, and executed poorly before in the past, even investing in commodity mining hardware recently, especially trusting any form of preorder is a losing proposition over buying BTC outright unless you know what you're doing. Despite that I'm invested regardless in PETA for some other reasons & not planning to sell any time soon. that's not nervous bagholder code words either. I've done own due diligence prior to investing and see come across few things nobody yet has mentioned, although they are acting like they've seen behind the curtain now they've liquidated their position. Let's see if I end up in soup kitchen like I would have If I touched neo or activemining for drinking PETA kool-aid, you can bring this up and have a laugh. Heh, it's not that I've "seen behind the curtain," that sort of stuff doesn't bother me. I don't even get irked when an honest attempt to hang some semblance of a curtain has been made. But this... As I was taking my usual evening walk, stifled grunts from a nearby window drew my attention. I looked up, and there it was! No curtain, not even a half-drawn shade -- butt naked and brazenly shameless! Backlit by harsh sodium glare, huge hairy beasts cast shifting shadows onto the sidewalk below. Lost in the throes of their throbbing sodomy [NSFW NSFW!] I apologize in advance to my gentle reader, but a curtain would have spared me from that which could never be unseen. TL;DR: Does it seem like the cons are getting more and more desperate? Does no one bother with proper form any more? Have the jewel thieves of yesteryear all devolved into clumsy pickpockets fighting over the same mark? |
|
|
|
... Why delete valid questions, regardless of who asks them?
I imagine because they said they were going to delete certain individuals; and now just following their word. They aren't deleting bitcoin-assets crew posts despite the critique, are they? ... Well, that only begs the question "why did they say they were going to delete certain individuals"? Self-moderation has always been the last resort of failed scammers -- from CoinLab to ActiveMining to NeoBee. It usually prolongs the charade, adds to the lel, but... not for long. |
|
|
|
|
Why delete valid questions, regardless of who asks them?
|
|
|
|
|
^No link to the eBay shop? Worried that someone might steal your "parting junk washing machines" idea?
|
|
|
|
...
assume your choice is between buying hardware, a cloud contract or PETA shares
... You're overlooking a rather obvious alternative -- keeping your coin and not "investing" it at all. *But sure, all mining operations offered to the public have either lost money for the "investors," or simply stole it. See your exchange-mate, COG. you overlooked the rest of my post mikemikemike? No, simply pointed out the logical fail on which your entire post pivots. Thus far, I've been accused of being Eduardo de Castro, Mircea Popescu, crumbs, Icebreaker, and various others. Adding mikemikemike to the list. *My name is Legion: for we are many. you say no yet you still missed the body of my post mikemikemike keeping your coins leaves you with a predictable fixed return, such would not work for a stock, buy B.MINE if you truly believe in that strategy. Yes, not investing my coin leaves it exactly as it is, excellent point. "Investing" in *any* mining stock, on the other hand, has a long and sordid history of ending in fail and AIDS. Unless you're fond of surprise butsecs, I would advise against it. Of course, the above completely ignores third-party risks, such as unlicensed Panamanian exchanges pulling up stakes and going all OKTHXBI! Hopefully this addressed most of your concerns, Anonymousg64. If it helps you to think of me as mikemikemike, by all means do. I realize those protective hats are unreliable now that The Lizards replaced quality tin with cheap ersatz aluminum. |
|
|
|
...
assume your choice is between buying hardware, a cloud contract or PETA shares
... You're overlooking a rather obvious alternative -- keeping your coin and not "investing" it at all. *But sure, all mining operations offered to the public have either lost money for the "investors," or simply stole it. See your exchange-mate, COG. you overlooked the rest of my post mikemikemike? No, simply pointed out the logical fail on which your entire post pivots. Thus far, I've been accused of being Eduardo de Castro, Mircea Popescu, crumbs, Icebreaker, and various others. Adding mikemikemike to the list. *My name is Legion: for we are many. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
