The future of trolls :  Dont let this happen to you, stop behaving like a troll before its too late !! |
|
|
|
these are just the ramblings of a madman .... please ignore me, i cant help myself.
edit : oh my, did he just deleted his post ? |
|
|
|
damn, why does it take so long for my BTC to clear.. grr
1 out of 3 confirmations.
2014-08-17 23:30:16 BUY 0.00408889 122.09942852 0.49925113  grrrrrr  |
|
|
|
|
oh damn, they are buying back in.. 4029 buy
BTC .. clearrrrrr
|
|
|
|
|
damn, why does it take so long for my BTC to clear.. grr
1 out of 3 confirmations.
|
|
|
|
wait.. we are on a ship ? no wonder if feel seasick all the time |
|
|
|
I have found this. SplitUpMoney is based on "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" (With 10K, it's not, I will test this more) ! 1000
2014-08-17 22:09:30 auto -- nTotalBalance 100000000
2014-08-17 22:09:30 auto-- nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:09:30 keypool added key 1003, size=1001
2014-08-17 22:09:30 keypool reserve 3
2014-08-17 22:09:30 auto-- split amount 20000000
2014-08-17 22:09:30 nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:09:30 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 29000000
2014-08-17 22:09:30 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 97500000
2014-08-17 22:09:30 CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=a45e4ff30d82fe5c745147e6ab70115111ce2846f274d57d328b70c953691a93, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=7, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(9cf4bd6148e3372ed6d54f9d38dc350a19d94044077839a3e83ec348da377646, 0), scriptSig=3045022014d5c4d0d1b76fd7)
CTxOut(nValue=0.12500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=999.81150000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 87c97ee3775a)
! 500
2014-08-17 22:13:17 auto -- nTotalBalance 100000000000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 auto-- nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:13:17 keypool added key 1002, size=1001
2014-08-17 22:13:17 keypool reserve 2
2014-08-17 22:13:17 auto-- split amount 20000000000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 24005000000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut 24016250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 48021250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut 48016250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 72021250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut 72016250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 96021250000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:13:17 CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=81ec3202f9930ac52337621d50579d64d813685f52973a585b57e25945a62c24, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=15, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(f86312d16043677b3dde0f35e806a9a3041c54bd3f280b04c2bfe3d89e86fcb1, 0), scriptSig=3046022100c3aaec5abb8257)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.12500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=39.81150000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 963a9bdc9a71)
! 600
2014-08-17 22:20:07 auto -- nTotalBalance 100000000000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 auto-- nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:20:07 connection timeout
2014-08-17 22:20:07 keypool added key 1002, size=1001
2014-08-17 22:20:07 keypool reserve 2
2014-08-17 22:20:07 auto-- split amount 20000000000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 24005000000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut 24016250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 48021250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut 48016250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 72021250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut 72016250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 96021250000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 99997500000
2014-08-17 22:20:07 CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=1d0fabb7cf72de1cebfca5fe250208975d78f61b2ad4b896d54e03342610bc56, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=15, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(b38b336abf9dfa6715ed105a4b369bed22895f1f04bd3f3ef84e846548c07425, 1), scriptSig=3045022100b3d364bcb34897)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=39.81150000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.12500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=200.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
CTxOut(nValue=40.00000000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1cf8934de120)
! 1000
2014-08-17 22:28:29 auto -- nTotalBalance 100000000
2014-08-17 22:28:29 auto-- nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:28:29 keypool added key 1002, size=1001
2014-08-17 22:28:29 keypool reserve 2
2014-08-17 22:28:29 auto-- split amount 20000000
2014-08-17 22:28:29 nTotalOut 0
2014-08-17 22:28:29 nTotalOut + ((nTotalBalance/5) + (nTotalBalance/5/5) + 0.01*COIN) 29000000
2014-08-17 22:28:29 nTotalBalance-(DARKSEND_COLLATERAL) 97500000
2014-08-17 22:28:29 CommitTransaction:
CTransaction(hash=b9a42a51c3e33886f5a1d3255b5871a96a3ac7a551d2fdb40eefad7037c16b10, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=7, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(666912dcf3fbe3a569a7f5a357d8e78a93829cac26c64563548da383425eeee0, 0), scriptSig=3045022100ede21ee7b31f94)
CTxOut(nValue=0.12500000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=999.81150000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
CTxOut(nValue=0.01250000, scriptPubKey=OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b14e0bedc7a9)
Thanks for yr info ... i'm testing a 20K wallet on Testnet and its splitting up just fine when its set for 8 rounds, amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized : 19.000 shouldnt i be getting splitting up money problems as well then with such large wallet ? I have some 3000 DRK thats anonymized to 8 rounds and Darksend Denominate transactions keep popping up for the other rounds (a lot of inputs have reached Darksend Round 7 too) Edit : i think i may have misread yr post .. you just stated an observation about behaviour between 1K and 10K wallets. So never mind my post. |
|
|
|
I think Chaeplin is onto it. I'm going to go do the poor decisions thing now. ;-)
I deleted all the screenshots cuz someone was perpetually refreshing them to soak my pipes. I got your IP and you know who you are... Haters gonna hate...
so yr not gonna reply to our requests for more info ? do you even read our msg's here ? i repeat : what did you set for "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" ? try setting it 10% below yr Total Balance (at least set it higher then 200) also at what Darksend Rounds does it stop ? (check yr inputs on List Mode) and how many Darksend Rounds did you set ? I set it to 4 rounds. This test, I used 300% of the total wallet since I already tried the smaller quantities. There's only 1 page of "stuff" in list mode, all -3 and -2. Not even 1 round. For smaller quantities, it denomed and worked fine as long as I did not send in any more. If it reached say, 3 or 4 rounds, and I sent in another hundred or so, it just stopped. Even when I wanted it to only denom 50 coins. I'm not trying to avoid you. I've just had enough of the forum bullshit and have other things to do than appease the demands of people who will undoubtedly just call me a liar/troll anyway. I've contemplated adding the forum to my router blocks just so I'm not tempted to waste my time... pls set yr amount to anonymize below yr Total Balance !!!! Evan warned us that with larger wallets the amount of Darkcoin set to anonymize should be lower than yr Total Balance , if you set it higher it will never do any more Darksend Rounds. I was just trying stuff since I already tried what was suggested and it didn't work... Telling me to do it again, after I already tried it over a dozen times... I appreciate that you're trying to help, but already tried it. Not going to waste my time anymore. It's been noted. No need to keep dicking up the thread. I only pushed the matter until someone finally acknowledged it. No need now. The haters are just mad that I refused to back down until it was acknowledged. I led those losers on for a little while, as I do with all trolls... They know where I live if they want to make good on their threats. I've actually gotten death threats from several supposedly respectable posters. By all means, bring it! I love killing trash. It's a lot of paperwork, but soo worth it to make the world a better place by removing them from it. okay fair enough .. and sorry about how yr birthday went, hopefully next year this all will look like a bad dream and you can celebrate properly |
|
|
|
I think Chaeplin is onto it. I'm going to go do the poor decisions thing now. ;-)
I deleted all the screenshots cuz someone was perpetually refreshing them to soak my pipes. I got your IP and you know who you are... Haters gonna hate...
so yr not gonna reply to our requests for more info ? do you even read our msg's here ? i repeat : what did you set for "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" ? try setting it 10% below yr Total Balance (at least set it higher then 200) also at what Darksend Rounds does it stop ? (check yr inputs on List Mode) and how many Darksend Rounds did you set ? I set it to 4 rounds. This test, I used 300% of the total wallet since I already tried the smaller quantities. There's only 1 page of "stuff" in list mode, all -3 and -2. Not even 1 round. For smaller quantities, it denomed and worked fine as long as I did not send in any more. If it reached say, 3 or 4 rounds, and I sent in another hundred or so, it just stopped. Even when I wanted it to only denom 50 coins. I'm not trying to avoid you. I've just had enough of the forum bullshit and have other things to do than appease the demands of people who will undoubtedly just call me a liar/troll anyway. I've contemplated adding the forum to my router blocks just so I'm not tempted to waste my time... pls set yr amount to anonymize below yr Total Balance !!!! And higher than 200 !! Evan warned us that with larger wallets the amount of Darkcoin set to anonymize should be lower than yr Total Balance , if you set it higher it will never do any more Darksend Denominate's edit : the higher than 200 is because there seems to be a bug that stops Darksend denominates when a 10K or higher wallet is set on 100. |
|
|
|
I think Chaeplin is onto it. I'm going to go do the poor decisions thing now. ;-)
I deleted all the screenshots cuz someone was perpetually refreshing them to soak my pipes. I got your IP and you know who you are... Haters gonna hate...
so yr not gonna reply to our requests for more info ? do you even read our msg's here ? i repeat : what did you set for "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" ? try setting it 10% below yr Total Balance (at least set it higher then 200) also at what Darksend Rounds does it stop ? (check yr inputs on List Mode .. thats in yr coin control) and how many Darksend Rounds did you set ? |
|
|
|
Or did the splits just stop randomly at one point? (link to test block explorer is not working for me for some reason)
I left mine running since last night. Nothing. It just stops. There is no debug.log chatter to cut and paste because it's not doing anything... what did you set for "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anonymized" ? try setting it 10% below yr Total Balance also at what Darksend Rounds does it stop ? (check yr inputs on List Mode) and how many Darksend Rounds did you set ? |
|
|
|
@GhostPlayer @Mangled Blue Could do test with "Amount of Darkcoin to keep anoymized : 100" with above 10K ? amount : 100, keep splitting, https://i.imgur.com/fBa1w43.pngafter changing amount 100 to 1000, instant denom happen. https://i.imgur.com/zC7A75w.pngI think this behavior already reported http://jira.darkcoin.qa/browse/DRK-28post address, I will send darktest@sv1:~> darkcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 91231,
"protocolversion" : 70035,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 229337.93232363,
"blocks" : 16200,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 14,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.26152176,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1405792853,
"keypoolsize" : 969,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
Chaeplin... trying to understand you... I have A LOT OF TEST darks on the way. My plan id to create a new wallet and send ALL the funds to that new wallet address. Then setup up 8x rounds with over the total balance, an test the time and calculate total fees. Do you propose something different ? i think he wants you two to test the boundries of the ''amount of darkcoin to keep anonymized'' .. from 100 (which appearently gives problems starting Darksend denominate) to higher (trying to find the boundry where it doesnt give problems starting Darksend denominate with large wallets). At least thats how i read it. |
|
|
|
I really don't get it why is drk crashing so hard?? Huh
rc4 seems a success, yes it is till closed source but it seems to work.
People went crazy when rc3 was released and now we have a real working anon solution what cant even be compared to rc3 and instead of gaining some value its falling more and more. I really dont get it .. bitshares still doing good did I invest in the wrong anoncoin..? I must say I am/was really convinced about drk so I took a large amount of my btc in the last weeks to buy drk but I'm questioning myself now if it was a big mistake. And still when I think about it, it should be gaining value, all of the improvements that have been made lately and all the things you can do with these masternodes. Its a brand new concept that seems to work with probably endless possibilities and yet price is only falling ??
Can someone enlighten me ? I really don't get it. Or is everybody in the dark on this one ....?
Thanks TROLL DETECTED LOLOLOLOL This is ridiculous if your serious. Holding more than 2000drk you cant say on every question people are asking that they are trolling look at my post history you can see I am NOT a troll. Just a concerned drk holder who is trying to understand the current situation. Making me mad to be honest to be accused of trolling this quick. +101 I think we need to be careful. We have had so many trolls that we might be in danger of overreacting to every question, view or genuine attempt to identify problems. (did i get that right? getting very slowly pissed. Sun, sea, and much sauciness don't make it easy to post) i found it rather funny seeing a troll (McHammer) shout troll to another user .. ofc for the other user not knowing that person is a troll and already ignored by many thats rather insulting... dont worry bamsterdam, only the troll thinks yr a troll |
|
|
|
nope.. after each ok click the walletaddress gets empty and capcha refreshes .. so you do need to enter yr walletaddress again. Maybe for you but not for me :-) must be my internet explorer getting a bit.. uhm .. senile |
|
|
|
I really don't get it why is drk crashing so hard?? Huh
rc4 seems a success, yes it is till closed source but it seems to work.
People went crazy when rc3 was released and now we have a real working anon solution what cant even be compared to rc3 and instead of gaining some value its falling more and more. I really dont get it .. bitshares still doing good did I invest in the wrong anoncoin..? I must say I am/was really convinced about drk so I took a large amount of my btc in the last weeks to buy drk but I'm questioning myself now if it was a big mistake. And still when I think about it, it should be gaining value, all of the improvements that have been made lately and all the things you can do with these masternodes. Its a brand new concept that seems to work with probably endless possibilities and yet price is only falling ??
Can someone enlighten me ? I really don't get it. Or is everybody in the dark on this one ....?
Thanks TROLL DETECTED LOLOLOLOL This is ridiculous if your serious. Holding more than 2000drk you cant say on every question people are asking that they are trolling look at my post history you can see I am NOT a troll. Just a concerned drk holder who is trying to understand the current situation. Making me mad to be honest to be accused of trolling this quick. absolutely not sir, ignore McHammer is on my ignore list so please dont quote him. you have very valid questions and its not a simple one line answer. there have been many things at play here and their nor all obvious. there has been some serious market manipulation with darkcoin. Dark has been easy pickens for this kind of manipulation because it has lots of liquidity. there are of course other things at play everything from panic when rc4 wasnt picture perfect to is some small part less then i ideal official communication plus look around us... hell ltc is at $4.60 and btc under $500. i let our senior more members add to this. read this article bamsterdam .. i found it very informative. https://altcoinherald.com/bloodbath-alt-street/ |
|
|
|
|
i kinda wish they made the inputs on List Mode default under coin control.
|
|
|
|
nope.. after each ok click the walletaddress gets empty and capcha refreshes .. so you do need to enter yr walletaddress again. |
|
|
|
Request going out for darkcoin community members to forward a list of TROLLS & FUDDSTERS.
please include any information you may have on the individual.
I want start making this JPG/Gif format list later this afternoon.
Thanks.
this won't help.. trolls are trolling, the problem is uncertainty about rc4. people are afraid that there are bugs, things have to get sort out wether there are some or not. evan should take some time on that i think, i know he likes coding more but it lacks a bit of his response to the "issues" posting screenshots of working rounds is useless imo, especially on test net. we are on mainnet already, the average user doesn't care about test net. Show me another way to test over 10K I really don't think somebody like Camo is going just gonna send me 10K plus from Main-net to test with. Right .32? - ugh edit - besides - I see NO issues with DRK RC4 Ok... please... everyone send me test DRK's to this address... mvZud4QZT6roVqYLSfWzwjR9YRm5ip98Cf 'll send myself my entire balance, thus de-anonymizing it. Please send lots! The more the merrier! When I have a shitload of them, I'll run the test again!!! I'm running a 11K plus test - You should run a 100K plus test :-) Hold on.. there's the test faucet right? never used it... going to it now... yep .. only 100 clicks --> https://drkipn.com/test/faucet/(after each click you need to enter yr walletaddress again...) edit : best to put Darksend off --> wait for all transactions to be confirmed --> send it all to a new internal adress to yrself with coincontrol --> have it confirmed --> put darksend back on --> enjoy all incoming transactions (which will be a lot) |
|
|
|
We have progress...... All the coins went back to TOTAL BALANCE....... But as we learned from my previous test (before I was rudely told to do this in ONE LUMP - lol j/k) DRK will denominate this huge batch - one 900DRK lump at a time. Slowly it will work it's way there this list. .... http://imgur.com/dGh5sZ8I got this all figured out - NOTHING IS WRONG WITH DRK!!!!! As I was JUST about to post this - the next 900DRK kump is now being worked on :-) Hmmmm... you reached round #1... so one of 900 was denominated... and look how it worked for me https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg8396979#msg8396979interesting... keep it running and then start over with my settings pls (amount eq 100) and I'll try with amount eq 15000 now PS. if someone is following my progress here - breaking in two 6K didn't worked for me, same story again EDIT: YAY! as soon as I set it to 15000 and hit apply it started to denominate!! yeah.. putting Amount of Darkcoin to anonymize on 100 is wayyy too low when you have received 1000's of tdrk's .. try to keep it some 10% below yr Total Balance wow. that sounds like good news. we should send that info over to camo. Yep, but I don't see why that "too low" situation exists at all - this need to be fixed or explained. Anyway I'll start over increasing amount step by step to find out approximate amount where it "breaks" see the ''Amount of Darkcoin to anonymize'' as a lower boundry .. yr wallet needs to work up to that boundry and then it can stop anonymizing. You also cant set it higher then yr Total Balance as that will stop further Darksend Rounds.... specially with large wallets. |
|
|
|
correct, thats why we are simulating some large wallets on testnet right now. Its looking good so far with my 20K wallet.. although i'm getting drowned with incoming transactions |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
