Be very careful if you're planning to invest in the early stages.Just now Ohion.io got dumped .Either invest in a very established start up or always ask for a damn escrow!
|
|
|
Drugs are pretty good these days if i do say so myself. has anyone ever tried kratom? pretty herbal plant, it helps life easier. Is cheaper too and some companies are selling it online for this is not illegal in most states. check this krakenkratom.com
That's more like Indonesian or Philippines scene isn't it ? However Saliva is the best alternative if you want to trip balls.
|
|
|
However, when you think about it, food is hazardous to your health, as well. Think of it. If you are hooked on food, you eat a lot, or you eat the wrong thing, and die from being overweight or from a heart attack. Like as we need food in proper kinds and proportions, even so we need drugs... just in smaller quantities. To tell you'll a story,I have been a weed smoker since last 7 years.I smoke 5 times a week almost everyday.Not like I'm addicted but I enjoy it.There are days when I'm with parents like for a month and I don't get to smoke weed ,I feel I'm completely normal and I don't have an urge for it.In this period of 7 years I have tried everything ,crack,cocaine,Mushrooms,LSD,salvia etc and to my conclusion I found weed is the best drug ,rest all is just a suicide trip.
|
|
|
That is the result of sequence of events in the same and the previous thread.Some kind of fuss between dogie and him.See the feedback left on his profile by dogie ,must have something to do with it.
|
|
|
Coins should be burned because logically no one knows who owns them and anybody can pull claims they do.
Maybe I was talking about the lost coins and they should be destroyed so thieves don't get hold of them later ?
|
|
|
You don't really know anything about how Bitcoin works do you.
No I don't.I'm just a random user fascinated by 1's and 0's.At times I'm good at solving the Ciphers and encrypting my porn links with SHA and MD5. How did you become a Hero member without leaning anything?
I don't know maybe Shit Posting ?
|
|
|
bitcoin needs to go mainstream but it cannot go
You can buy pizza,weed,vape,drugs with bitcoins. Isn't it mainstream already ? The corporations and companies are in favor of increasing the block size to handle the increasing number of transactions. The massive consumer adoption and bitcoin moon moment is not going to happen without this change.
Corporate and companies are only trying to centralize bitcoins. Could it be that satoshi had envisioned this crisis long before? or did he design it in such a way that this crisis ensures bitcoin does not go mainstream and bitcoin remains a low player, very much suitable for criminal activities alone?
Don't know where that is coming from .Doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
That's exactly how you "Don't" use bitcoins.Pretty sure you're trolling ,for the people who get it ,its not a bad troll.It actually happens with the newbie users.
|
|
|
I don't know if I understood your idea correctly but there is something called as slock.it which runs on blockchain and they have good IOt projects.A simple remotely controlled lock for example.Right now they haven't based bitcoins as their primary methods but yeah the underlying idea is still the same IE blockchain.
|
|
|
if I lose 50 BTC I will not be sad, because when I bet with a very big amount, it means I have a lot of BTC.
Doesn't matter how many bitcoins you have , a loss of 50 BTC is still a loss .Your ego will be damaged more to see it losing on a sports match.I feel sad that OP took the decision of putting all in one together.Gambling is bad ..mkayy
|
|
|
destroying somebodys coins would be the end of the btc. how could you trust this if your coins could just suddenly be burned!
No,that won't be the end of BTC but the end of those coins only.Maybe the can have an impact on the older coins.Coins should be burned because logically no one knows who owns them and anybody can pull claims they do.I think theymos makes sense here.
|
|
|
It totally matters. If you're going to accuse someone of something, I want to know who's accusing. And so does the accused. Especially in silly bullshit like this.
How does that matter,mate ? Don't you think the point being made has more weight rather than the person behind it ? Anonymity is much appreciated on the internet.
|
|
|
Hi there.Project is in its initial stages ,any beta version out yet ? Like a custom ROM that could be run on existing Android ?Is it open source ? Does it support native apps ? Are you planning to release a developer version ? I think its too early to spread the news as people would like to see at least screen shots of your project.You know Ubuntu and Mozilla OS are also in later stages of development,they can be quite a competition.
|
|
|
What advertising your are talking about ? Do you mind sharing the profiles of the person charging you $50 ? That's way too much.You might as well want to open your terms in a new thread with the cheapest rates you can afford.Members will directly contact you.Simply wasting $100 for one member is a rip off.You have been fooled.
|
|
|
You might as well wanna pay Quick Seller his 2.5BTC that you stole from him.People are not idiots,you should be thrown out of DT too.I'm assuming you already are!
|
|
|
I can't find the brand B & H Silver .The below one to be specific ,need a few boxes shipped to the UK.What is the possibility of this happening ?
|
|
|
Disagree. If some one is going to slander or make a accusation it should be from their main account as then we can judge the accuser and the weight of the accusation more clearly.
So you mean,an accusation made by a DT member has more weight over an accusation made by a newbie account ? Sounds illogical to me.I think the base of the accusation decides how weighted it is regardless of its creator. If you where accused would you rather not face the person or just have this unknown person accuse you of wrongs?
I would love to face the real person but if he is hinting at the right directions which do sound true to me or he has proved that I'm wrongful of my things ,then its perfectly fine to face him anonymously.Again,it doesn't matter who the person is ,he proved I have done wrong matters. When you weigh a discussion you should take all factors into play. Knowing the person has past history of vague/false accusations would sway the discussion for sure. We are not able to judge his trust or character. The accuser should be held to the same flame otherwise the accusation for me is a wash.
Maybe you can weigh the discussion based on people's personality or character ,I don't.If the point being made is correct,it qualifies for the rightful.To extend your opinion further ,if a thief ever makes a case that he is being raped guess what you will never believe him right ? Just because he is a thief,he has a bad history and his opinions shouldn't be valued.Makes sense?
|
|
|
Posting under a new account just takes away all aspects you present because you are unwilling to stand behind your real account. Right or wrong its more a issue to me that you think that doing so would fly.
It doesn't matter what account is.More importantly,the point being conveyed should.I think its completely fine to create a new account if you're too bothered about your reputation or any other aspects that are keeping you off from posting through the main account.People are more concerned about what the problem is rather than who the person is.As long you have proofs to base your opinions and desire to fight the case I think its fine.Agree there are troll's who bring up crap against people but you know that's never taken too seriously.
|
|
|
So if anyone posts something bad about the website ,this user makes sure to give you negative feedbacks from his alt accounts.Typical loser.Please don't buy the website as I don't think his intentions are good.Dumbass your feedbacks don't mean shit .
|
|
|
|