Spondoolies-Tech is posting random pictures

[Quickseller]

User Spondoolies-Tech is posting nothing but random, off topic pictures of dogs in this thread. These posts are attempting to derail the thread, are off topic, are no value posts, and are annoying.

I have counted 14 of these useless posts in the above thread alone all of which were posted in the last few days.

This person should be prevented from making subsequent of these off topic posts and the posts of his containing only pictures should probably be deleted.

[KenR]

That is the result of sequence of events in the same and the previous thread.Some kind of fuss between dogie and him.See the feedback left on his profile by dogie ,must have something to do with it.

[dogie]

1. Guy Corem/Spondoolies wasn't paying its creditors (including employees), so an Israeli court forced them into a ~bankruptcy.
2. The assets are being auctioned to help pay the employees and creditors
3. Guy Corem started deleting posts in his self moderated thread while spreading false accusations and then implying its suspicious that no one was replying to them (because he was deleting the replies)...
4. A non-self moderated sister thread was made so discussion could be had without deleted posts.
5. Because he was no longer able to delete posts he didn't like, he instead started spamming with large irrelevant quoted posts combined with giant, vulgar images in order to find them.
6. Tupsu and Roadstress (who has either sold the account or gone crazy) supporting with additional spam.

This is no one elses fault

[Lauda]

Some kind of fuss between dogie and him.

That does not matter in the eyes of the staff. Whoever breaks the rules should be punished accordingly.
I've already reported some of them and requested a ban.

[prettybuds]

So you guys consider banning someone who's posting dogs in a thread but not the one who posts utterly racist pictures and xenophobic content all over?

Okay, I understand. Not.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Yeah I'd say that's a bit harsh.  In fact, I'd say that's way harsh, but I'm not staff and I do think older members should be held accountable for their posting habits as well.  I would think a warning would suffice in this case, no?

[Quickseller]

1. Guy Corem/Spondoolies wasn't paying its creditors (including employees), so an Israeli court forced them into a ~bankruptcy.
2. The assets are being auctioned to help pay the employees and creditors
3. Guy Corem started deleting posts in his self moderated thread while spreading false accusations and then implying its suspicious that no one was replying to them (because he was deleting the replies)...
4. A non-self moderated sister thread was made so discussion could be had without deleted posts.
5. Because he was no longer able to delete posts he didn't like, he instead started spamming with large irrelevant quoted posts combined with giant, vulgar images in order to find them.
6. Tupsu and Roadstress (who has either sold the account or gone crazy) supporting with additional spam.

This is no one elses fault

Yea I read the other thread and am aware of the situation. The fact that they are scammers, were acting shady, ect doesn't matter here. They are derailing threads and posting random off topic garbage which is not allowed.

So you guys consider banning someone who's posting dogs in a thread but not the one who posts utterly racist pictures and xenophobic content all over?

Okay, I understand. Not.

As long as what is being posted is not off topic, and at least somewhat contributes to the conversation then it is generally allowed. The pictures being posted are neither on topic nor are they contributing to the conversation.

[hilariousandco]

I removed them all yesterday.