Thanks, it's working now  There was only a small complaint about missing bignum.node upon startup, but that was an easy thing to fix with "npm install bignum". Hello, i had same problem at first it needed async, then bignum, I sort this out, but now I'm not able to install multihashing at all. I tried nodejs v0.1, 4, 6, 7, different versions of npm, but any of those won't work. Can you help me with that? cheers |
|
|
|
|
I have the out of date problem too, dev fix plz
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I would like to buy activated, fully working Google Cloud Account,
PM me your offers.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a CPU mining thread, not GPU.
|
|
|
|
Can somebody shed some light, as to the difference between solo mining and using the miner built into the wallet? I thought it would give the same results?
both is solomining, but in standalone miner, there is a chance, that it could be more optimized, and of course, you need only one wallet, on multiple pcs |
|
|
|
Try to build it in ubuntu but i get error over error.
If i fix one stone the next popping up..
e512.o -c heavy/cuda_blake512.cu
/usr/bin/gcc-4.9: No such file or directory
Makefile:1772: die Regel für Ziel „heavy/cuda_blake512.o“ scheiterte
make[2]: *** [heavy/cuda_blake512.o] Fe
hm why hardcoded gcc-4.9? is there a away to tell him to use the current one?
I had this error too, just install that gcc, and you'll be fine. |
|
|
|
Ok guys let's make a briefing.
I've worked on this project many hours and received less than 0.1 BTC in donations.
Instead, what I've received plenty, are criticisms because I didn't make a windows binary.
Now, I've worked a lot more on this and I could publish the new code, for a >20% improvement.
What do you think I should do?
Put some developer fee to your miner, with option to turn off a fee with decreased speed. You deserve some beers for your effort, no questions about it. Ignore the trolls, enjoy their free bumps  When you see beers coming, you should start improving other algos too. It would be fine to have some competition in developing nvidia miners. That's my 2c. |
|
|
|
is the speed a good speed for 6x 480er AMD cards?
09/06/16-20:25:41 - New job received from mine.moneropool.com:3333
Speed: 3865 h/s, TotalHashes: 936K, DevHashes: 22K Mining time: 00:04
better ask in monero related threads, this is ethereum dual mining |
|
|
|
Hi ocminer, I've compiled your miner already, but when I look in to the help, I see that, I can only run sha-256 and scrypt algos with this branch. So I'm not sure which setting I have to use for successful run. Can you help me with that? cheers e: should I use, something like this? minerd -a scrypt:1048576 -o -u -p ? |
|
|
|
|
@igolnx, @myagui
Can you guys post links with exact dependencies?
I can try it then.
|
|
|
|
New commit: "Removed mpir library dependency".
libmpir is not needed as long as cpu validation stays disabled, as it is now.
(need to rerun autogen.sh and configure)
Yes, can confirm, now it's working fine. Thank you. |
|
|
|
@pallas: My build environment is broken, so no Win build from me at the moment. I do plan on fixing the damn thing, will just take me a couple days or so to get to it... From long ago, I recall some complications with MPIR being a dependency for Windows specifically, though it might no longer be needed? Once I can fix my build environment, I'll have a go at this.
Thanks. Cpu verification is disabled, so the mpir library shouldn't be needed. Hi pallas, I'm trying to compile your m7 branch, I was able to compile that patch branch without any problem, but when I'm trying to build master branch I'm getting this error g++ -O3 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda-8.0/lib64 -o ccminer ccminer-cpu-miner.o ccminer-util.o sph/ccminer-bmw.o sph/ccminer-blake.o sph/ccminer-groestl.o sph/ccminer-jh.o sph/ccminer-keccak.o sph/ccminer-skein.o ccminer-hefty1.o ccminer-scrypt.o ccminer-sha2.o sph/ccminer-sph_sha2.o sph/ccminer-tiger.o sph/ccminer-ripemd.o sph/ccminer-neoscrypt.o sph/ccminer-Lyra2.o sph/ccminer-Sponge.o heavy/cuda_blake512.o heavy/cuda_combine.o heavy/cuda_groestl512.o heavy/cuda_hefty1.o heavy/cuda_keccak512.o heavy/cuda_sha256.o ccminer-fuguecoin.o cuda_fugue256.o sph/ccminer-fugue.o ccminer-groestlcoin.o cuda_groestlcoin.o ccminer-myriadgroestl.o cuda_myriadgroestl.o JHA/jackpotcoin.o JHA/cuda_jha_keccak512.o JHA/cuda_jha_compactionTest.o quark/cuda_quark_checkhash.o quark/cuda_jh512.o quark/cuda_quark_blake512.o quark/cuda_quark_groestl512.o quark/cuda_skein512.o quark/cuda_bmw512.o quark/cuda_quark_keccak512.o quark/quarkcoin.o quark/animecoin.o quark/cuda_quark_compactionTest.o heavy/heavy.o cuda_nist5.o sph/ccminer-cubehash.o sph/ccminer-echo.o sph/ccminer-luffa.o sph/ccminer-shavite.o sph/ccminer-simd.o sph/ccminer-hamsi.o sph/ccminer-hamsi_helper.o sph/ccminer-shabal.o sph/ccminer-whirlpool.o sph/ccminer-haval.o sph/ccminer-sha2big.o qubit/qubit.o qubit/qubit_luffa512.o x13/x14.o x13/fresh.o x13/x17.o x13/x13.o x13/cuda_x13_hamsi512.o x13/cuda_x13_fugue512.o x13/x15.o x13/cuda_shabal512.o x13/cuda_whirlpool512.o x13/cuda_haval512.o x13/cuda_sha512.o qubit/doom.o x13/goalcoin.o x13/whirlpool.o Algo256/cuda_keccak256.o Algo256/keccak256.o Algo256/cuda_blake256.o Algo256/cuda_groestl256.o Algo256/cuda_skein256.o lyra2/cuda_lyra2.o lyra2/lyra2RE.o pluck/cuda_pluck.o pluck/pluck.o x11/x11.o x11/cuda_x11_luffa512.o x11/cuda_x11_cubehash512.o x11/cuda_x11_shavite512.o x11/cuda_x11_simd512.o x11/cuda_x11_echo.o x13/cuda_m7_sha256.o x13/cuda_mul.o x13/cuda_mul2.o x13/cuda_ripemd160.o x13/cuda_tiger192.o x13/m7_keccak512.o x13/m7.o qubit/deep.o -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lcurl compat/jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread -lcudart -fopenmp -lcrypto -lssl -lmpir -lcrypto -lssl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmpir
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [ccminer] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory No matter what I do, I can't get rid of that mpir error. Can you tell me how to solve this? cheers |
|
|
|
1 GHASH of LBRY is currently paying 0.02085BTC
1 980ti can do 300MHASH with my mod. 0.3*0.02085 = 0,006255BTC = $3.787 - 3.3%= $3.66
1 980ti can do 230MHASH with the opensource 0.25*0.02085 = 0,0052125BTC = $3.148355
Increased Profit per card per day:
+$0,513674
I have 1.25gh its paying .019btc a day!But you have 980ti and 970 cards right? Then you can boost to 1.4 gh and getting 0.024btc per day with the sp-mod #3 0.05 more btc per day. 20 days to roi it's 0,005 more, not 0,05 0,019+0,05=0,069 0,019+0,005=0,024 right? |
|
|
|
it's true that lbry will be added for dual mining? this will kill nvidia miner lol, i hope claymore will choose another coin
whichever coin is added to dualmining, it's profitability is killed instantly, that's true |
|
|
|
This is my result with ccminer-rel1.8.1-vc2013  . hmm, I see, your first card is doing 240MHs and second one 280MHs, are both cards clocked at 1733/3402? |
|
|
|
Balance is not confirmed - all right?  It takes 2 days, 2 hours to confirm I think you should add big red label on veltor pool about it. Otherwise you will answer to the same question every day I think people should read coin specs, before start asking basic dumb questions. |
|
|
|
|
Why can't yo add this coin to the pool?
What is that about?
I'm a bit confused of this "request".
|
|
|
|
Can anyone confirm that he could paid please ?
Yes, I can confirm, that payouts from suprnova, are working without any problem. |
|
|
|
Selling 2000VLT for 2BTC |
|
|
|
|
What about coin supply, halving,and so on?
Where I can find all of these specifications?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
