mindestens 4mal im jahr - pro quartal eines  Ja das wäre doch schön. Und für alle anderen Altcoins auch.  Aber das ist keine Garantie, dass ich das immer mache. Gerne lasse ich anderen den Vortritt und gebe dann selbst etwas BTC in den Pool. Bewerbungen für das Gewinnspiel "Gewinnspiel: Wo steht BTC am Ende des 4. Quartals 2019?" können gerne schon eingereicht werden und dann stimmen wir ab, wer das Gewinnspiel aufsetzen darf.  |
|
|
|
I'm not saying that the project will work so much time 100%. The life of the project is our assumption based on previous experience, and we have a very rich experience in investing in such projects.
+ we analyze all indicators and even at the slightest doubt we tell all our partners to take their money immediately.
+now the project added the ability to upload private keys and it follows that even if the project closes, you can always pick up your cryptocurrency directly from the Ethereum wallet.
How would you do that to give an estimation how long a ponzi will be running? That's not possible. There might be some ponzi scammers just waiting to make a fast scam and close the platform very early and some will wait longer to get more victims when existing customers bring in referrals. Yes, of course it's depending on how a ponzi is paying, if it's 1% daily like Bitconnect it will last longer than a ponzi paying 10% per day. And I wouldn't call it "estimation" or "analysis", rather "hyip gambling". |
|
|
|
You can buy bitcoin in this forum as well. You can buy with paypal, skrill, netellar. Check the marketplace of this forum and find out the best method for you. Don't forget to use escrow.
Would be a good choice and I would also always recommend to use an escrow. According to that list most escrows charge a minimum BTC, not depending on the amount you want to escrow. So I don't know if that would increase the percentage of fees too much for you. I know someone from the German section, he was doing escrow for free for a time but can't say if he's still doing it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1466069.0 (Last edit March, 28 2019). If you're from a country where some ATM are around you can also try this. For low amounts KYC isn't required sometimes (depending on the ATM): https://coinatmradar.com/Is it really that hard to exchange currency for bitcoin or am I missing something?
Other way round it seems to be easier when you want to cash out. For withdrawals Bitpanda from Austria doesn't need KYC for low amounts. They've different tiers depending on how much you want to sell. But buying BTC without KYC is also not possible there: https://www.bitpanda.com/en/limits |
|
|
|
Schade, den habe ich verpasst Nicht schlimm. Hoffentlich werden noch viele weitere Gewinnspiele folgen. Verschiedene Altcoins gibt es ja zur Genüge. Wenn ich was sehe, gebe ich es auf jeden Fall hier bekannt. |
|
|
|
Hier ist alles erlaubt, gebt mir Saures  Ok Wie fändest du es, dass man auch Beiträge anderer Nutzer hier für Merit nominieren kann, sowas wie das hier: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source. Wenn du pro Monat viel ungenutztes sMerit über haben solltest. Wäre ja schade, wenn es verfällt. Wenn du daran Interesse hast, könnte dein verwendetes Format vom bestehenden [Airdrop/Bounty/ANN] verwendet werden und die Leute schlagen darin vor, wie viel Merit der Beitrag ihrer Meinung nach erhalten sollte. Vielleicht solle man dann aber noch mit anführen, dass die Beiträge mindestens (z.B.) 2 Tage alt sein sollten, um zu sehen, ob der Beitrag nicht schon von alleine genug Merit erhält. 1x up. Wie findest du die Idee @qwk?
@aundroid Sehr komisch aber die Ansicht ändert sich teilweise täglich. Gut möglich dass er morgen „einfach so“ aufscheint Das Problem hatte ich auch und in "[Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ..." die Lösung zu gepostet. Problem ist, dass standardmäßig nicht alle Nutzer im Merit-Netzwerk angezeigt werden und man das manuell justieren muss: Man kann im Dashboard nämlich die Anzahl der Personen ("Nodes") verändern und der Standardwert ist dabei offenbar nicht 100% aller Nutzer, von denen man Merit gesendet bekommen hat. Bei mir waren daher nur 111 von 145 Personen in der Grafik angezeigt worden:  |
|
|
|
Bezüglich Bitcoin & die Steuer gibt es einen interessanten Beitrag auf t3n, allerdings ist der Inhalt nur gegen ein stattliches Entgelt erhältlich... Wenn aber dennoch jemand Lust hat: Krypto und Steuern: So bringst du Bitcoin und Co. in deine Steuererklärung 2018 Folgende Punkte werden unter anderem behandelt:
- Wie sind Kryptowährungen per Gesetz definiert?
- Ab wann ist der An- und Verkauf gewerblich einzuordnen?
- Wann wird Umsatz- oder Einkommensteuer fällig?
- Gibt es Freigrenzen?
- Wann müssen Banken oder das Finanzamt in Kenntnis gesetzt werden?
- Welche Verbrauchsverfolgeverfahren kommen infrage?
- Wie ist mit Verlusten aus vergangenen Jahren umzugehen?
- Wie sind ICOs und STOs per Gesetz definiert?
- Was ist mit weiteren Sonderfällen wie Mining, Staking oder Lending? Aber fragt sich natürlich, ob es das Geld auch wert ist, das meiste dürfte bereits bekannt sein beziehungsweise bei strittigen Punkten Auslegungssache. |
|
|
|
Explaining Bitcoin and crypto to Newbies is one of the most important points in my opinion. Having more users participating in crypto will give BTC a better base of support and acceptance. Everyone of us can spread a positive word about crypto and also help Newbies to understand how crypto is working. I can imagine most people are feared to own some Bitcoin because they think it's too techy and difficult to understand (which isn't true ) It's not much different from other areas: If you help others you'll always get back a good karma (and maybe also some help if you're needing it). Telling about known mistakes in crypto, giving advice which wallets / investment strategies / etc. are bad / good can help a lot to save Newbies from losses and save them time to search all over the internet. Newbies having losses or difficulties to understand things can get discouraged very fast and leave. With some guidance it's much more likely that they won't have to face such problems and stay instead. If I should explain the basics of Bitcoin I would always try to use simple words, explain everything step by step even if it's sometimes very time consuming. Better explain something more detailed than missing a part. A nice and simple but detailed style of writing and explaining everything well (especially by using pictures) should not be underestimated.
I do believe most media and social media are poison and many talk to much whiteout knowing anything.... When I read in Belgium an article involving BTC, then the article is always written right after a massive DUMP or a massive PUMP.... Starting with nonsense lines of FUD or just non-related stuff and guessing by fools...... Rarely I read something thats OK, still its normal what can a random journalist know ??
Yes, we had a very misleading article recently where the author claimed that Tether would be Bitcoin's gold standard and Bitcoin + the whole crypto market is based on Tether. LOL Such stupid BS articles are doing a big favour to educate Newbies. 
I must say the forum generally is doing her best in guiding newbies be it directly or indirectly and no doubt about users of the forum waiting to help new members get enlighten and educated on bitcoin and other aspects of the blockchain technology. Over my period of been active here I have notice a sudden increase in the zeal for users to assist each other especially after the introduction of the merit system. Not saying it wasn't there before but the merit system gave it more motivation.
I don't know how it was before but I have the same impression that many guides and important stuff wouldn't be here if there would be no Merit. At least the quality would not be as outstanding as it is currently.
And I like the fact that people in BTC are very positive. It's always big advantage in life. |
|
|
|
überlege schon die ganze zeit, wieder bei der LiveCoin kampagne auszusteigen...
Ist auf jeden Fall riskant, yahoo62278, der ebenfalls gute Signaturkampagnen managt, hat alle Bewerber auf die Livecoin-Signaturkampagne geblacklistet, also wird er sie bei all seinen Kampagnen ablehnen: Allerdings ist er bereit euch von der Liste wieder zu entfernen, wenn ihr die Bewerbung zurückzieht und den Bewerbungs-Post entfernt. Die Frist dazu wären 72 Stunden: Any user on this list may be removed if they remove their application in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166711.0 this thread and pm me showing it is removed. Users in this list have 72 hours to do so, or they remain on the blacklist permanently. July 23rd 6:20 am is the deadline Dort, wo yahoo62278 diesen Post geschrieben hat, wird übrigens auch diskutiert, ob Teilnehmer in der Livecoin Kampagne negativen Trust erhalten sollen: Livecoin participants should be tag? Finde auch das Verhalten von Livecoin selten dämlich. Sollen sie doch einfach die Scam-Anschuldigung lösen, dann ist das Problem aus der Welt geschafft.
Edit: LOL I'll start tagging the participants, let's see where it ends EDIT1: Tagged all members that applied on the first page, will do 2nd page tomorrow. |
|
|
|
man könnte fast meinen die notenbanker sind selbst bitcoin hodler.
Ist wahrscheinlich tatsächlich so. Wenn die nicht komplett auf den Kopf gefallen sind, werden sie wohl merken, dass sie mit ihrer Strategie früher oder später an die Wand fahren werden, im besten Falle gibt es eine schleichende Inflation aber selbst dieser Effekt für Fiatbestände sollte für Leute à la EZB-Draghi abschätzbar sein. Wenn nicht, wäre ich höchst besorgt... Wäre aber ein schönes eigenes Thema wert: Wie sichern sich EZB-Draghis privat gegen Inflation und Krisen ab? |
|
|
|
Danke für die Info, aber ich denke, ich werd´ da erstmal drüber nachdenken müssen, Gründen dürften bekannt sein Abwarten wäre auch die Entscheidung meiner Wahl, ich halte es zwar für sehr unwahrscheinlich, sich dabei den Account zu beschädigen aber sicher ist sicher. Für die paar Milli- BTC wäre es das nicht wert und wer weiß, wie lange die Kampagne überhaupt läuft. Vielleicht schließen sie sie direkt wieder, wenn es zu viel Gegenwind gibt. Dagegen spricht allerdings, dass sie trotz des ganzen Desasters weiter im Forum werben wollen, scheint sich also für sie zu lohnen. Mehr Informationen über die Diskussion diesbezüglich gibt es hier: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166722.0Werde ich mir gleich mal komplett durchlesen. Zudem nutzt Quickscammer die Gunst der Stunde um wieder mal gegen Hhampuz zu hetzen. |
|
|
|
Most crypto haters are nocoiners which where missing to buy BTC and they are pissed now that they didn't buy it / keep saying it's a scam when prices goes down and are quiet when it's rising. Always the same story. The best move for them would be to read information about crypto by themself and they would understand how great the opportunities are. Maybe they will get it later that they were wrong (yes, unlikely ) but it shouldn't be our problem. We are the positive ones, not the haters. Haters go to hell.  |
|
|
|
In fact, the Cloud Token project deserves attention (even taking into account the fact that it is most likely just a hyip project). In such projects, the most important thing is the ability to take their profits at the right time and stay in a big profit. Cloud Token according to the calculations of our investment company will work at least another 6-15% months for which you can earn well (10-15% monthly + profit from the growth of the CTO token). There is a similar plus Token project that has been running for over 1 year and is still paying out money. Therefore, who has a desire to participate in the project or learn more about it, write to me in Telegram @profitmaxe. If you want to receive 1.5 times more profit in the cloud Token project, then register with the code: 4901547258. After registration, write to us in the telegram @profitmaxe let us know that you have registered and let us know the last 4 digits of your account in the Cloud Token. Within 10 minutes you will be answered by our Manager and we will transfer you every 24 hours 50% of the referral profit to your Cloud Token wallet.
Nooo. You can't know how long a ponzi will exist and there's no way to "calculate" the profits by using another ponzi and compare how long it paid. If the scammers of that ponzi have made enough money, they will shut it down, no chance to make a calculation. The vast majority will lose money in ponzis. But hey, shill your ponzi here if you think it's a good move to make profits from your referrals losses. And in fact, Cloud Token project deserves attention especially the scam accusation. |
|
|
|
I got a notification in my email that I received some TGN tokens at tokpie, which is very strange because I didn't do the KYC  . Those who also transferred their stakes to Tokpie please check if you also got the tokens I'm curious why this is happening since judging from their Telegram chat they are still insisting on bounty hunters to do KYC Most likely KYC is required on tokpie if you want to withdraw your funds. Terragreen seems to be somehow related to tokpie / have a partnership. I hope you can move your funds out of tokpie exchange, but I'm in doubt. 
It appears hunters have the option to sell their bounty stakes for ETH on an exchange. Those who bought those stakes will have to undergo KYC also before they can convert the stakes into tokens.
No, those who bought bounty stakes on Tokpie exchange don't need to upload any documents to get TGN on their tokpie accounts' balances. Actually, today, all of them have received their TGN. Tokpie has internal KYC procedure only for those traders who buy/sell on more than $25k. Yes, because you have to do KYC on tokpie. There is no way to get paid without submitting personal documents. I strongly against any scam accusation in that case, because: 1. Bounty rules can be changed as was stated in the bounty thread. 2. TerraGreen doesn't request KYC in order to avoid paying to hunters otherwise they didn't prolongate kyc procedure on 10 days. But they prolonged it as hunters requested. Proof: https://t.me/terragreencoin/944333. TerraGreen Team doesn't hide. Core members pass kyc on icobench https://icobench.com/ico/terragreen and icoholder https://icoholder.com/en/terragreen-28096 They would not do that if they were a scam project. 4. Also, i have never seen a scam project that makes so many publications in good media (check media section here: https://terragreen.io/) 1. That wasn't why I created the scam accusation. The problem is that Terragreen is also refusing payments in BTC or ETH. They claim it wouldn't be allowed for them to send their tokens without KYC (I don't know if it's true, but ok, let's assume they are right (even if they don't have a proof, see how generous I am )). There is exactly no problem to reward them with collected funds instead for their work but Terragreen is refusing that! That's a scam of the worst kind. 2. That doesn't matter, they can prolong it to lifetime it's still requiring KYC to receive rewards. 3. I haven't claimed that the project itself is a scam, but people are at high risk at losing money when dealing with them (like it happened to bounty participants). 4. Read 3. Besides from that 4. isn't true because there are many scam projects faking media publications. It would be a ridiculous situation if a project like TerraGreen gets scam accusation.
It would be easy for them to fucking PAY all of the users for the work the TerraGreen team received. They can easily use BTC or ETH where no KYC is required, but wait, that would cost them real money, not their worthless shitcoins. It's up to them if they want to have the tag removed. |
|
|
|
Latoken hat schon eine Beschwerde bei Google eingereicht. Aber das kann dann ja auch noch dauern bis die App dort verschwindet
Ja, das kann bestimmt etwas dauern, danke jedenfalls für die Warnung. Und wieder mal ein Versuch, durch phishing / fake apps etc. die Leute zu scammen, das ist ein Trend, der in den letzten Jahren stetig zugenommen hat: Die größte Fehlerquelle sitzt vor dem Rechner, da kann man noch so sichere Wallets verwenden, wenn man selbst nicht aufpasst, ist man schneller dran als einem lieb ist. Und die Scammer werden immer dreister, dagegen hilft nur vorsichtig sein, Warnungen lesen und auch selbst welche teilen, wenn man davon hört. |
|
|
|
lol mein account wurde gehackt denke ich meine coins wurden an nen andren acc geschickt abe rnicht von mir.
mal schauen hab dem support geschrieben, aber wie ich gehört hab ist das ja eh tot.
Ohman... Sieht wohl wirklich so aus, als ob das Projekt nicht ernsthaft weiterverfolgt wird. Es gibt ja nichtmal regelmäßige, offizielle Updates. Einen Versuch wars wert, ich hebe mir das Passwort mal auf, man kann ja nie wissen. (Sofern mein Account nicht auch gehackt wird ) Glaube also nicht, dass dir der "Support" antwortet. Wenn doch, wäre es ein schönes Lebenszeichen. Vielleicht sollte man Palai mittlerweile als Shitcoin listen. |
|
|
|
Well, I keep my email on Bitcointalk profile not hidden (and I don't know why). But obviously, it's not my main email, I created this address just for crypto things. I use it for all less important registrations. But fact thst my email address is public means that's spammed seriously - it's full of ads, scams and phishing links. But I don't care about it. I wouldn't never keep my email or phone number in public.
If your mail provider doesn't delete your account if you are inactive for a long period of time, that might not harm. But as far as I know some mail providers are deleting them after a defined time of inactivity like gmx and the same mail address which has been used before is available for a new person. If you are still registered somewhere, that could lead to account hacks if the person is a scammer and tries to reset passwords by using "reset via mail". But I don't know if mail.ru is doing the same. I think satoshi had a mail from gmx and that was a problem. Well, I'm still checking this email quite often, so there is no risk thst they may delete my account for inactivity. But probably I should at least change my Bitcointalk email because I'm not feeling 100% safe with this provider. Ok, if you are checking your mails regularly, that should be safe. I'm using gmx.de and web.de (they are similar) because they are very popular here in Germany but now switching to Gmail lately if I have to create a new mail address. I've also tried outlook.com (or live.com) but they've blocked all my accounts without any reason.  |
|
|
|
If you are looking for a more effective way to getting good rating I suggest you should think about helping this forum by cleaning up spammers,till date we still have many rules breakers using multiple accounts and avoiding bans one way or the other so if you are good,kinda like a detective i think this is worth a short.
If you are referring to ratings of trust from DT ("positive trust ratings"), you have to be proven a trustworthy person if you've made a successful trade with another user here. Like if you could have scammed your trading partner during a trade but you didn't. That's trust. Getting trust ratings for detective work is rather an exception and only likely if you are a very well known scammer hunter. By doing so you prove to dedicate some work and time to the forum here and that's a sign that it's unlikely that you'll risk a well known account for scams. And I think you've also confused s pammers and s cammers. S pammers are only annoying, you can report their posts to moderators by clicking "report to moderator" if you think the post breaks one of the rules. S cammers are trying to steal money from others and if you think you've spotted a scammer you can create an accusation in Scam Accusations. But make sure to have a strong evidence, otherwise you might get marked as liar. |
|
|
|
Using separate addresses for crypto is also something I'm recommending to every newcomer. There are some services just collecting mail addresses to sell them and besides from that it's also possible that even a legit service can be hacked and your mail + password gets exposed. Therefore, I'm also recommending to use different passwords for each account. Should a scammer have success to find out your password and you are using it on different websites, all account can be hacked. And of course for crypto-spam reasons to avoid a huge mess in your main account. Surprisingly, I don't get any spam on my crypto mail addresses, most spam goes to my personal address which I never used on crypto sites. Well, I keep my email on Bitcointalk profile not hidden (and I don't know why). But obviously, it's not my main email, I created this address just for crypto things. I use it for all less important registrations. But fact thst my email address is public means that's spammed seriously - it's full of ads, scams and phishing links. But I don't care about it. I wouldn't never keep my email or phone number in public.
If your mail provider doesn't delete your account if you are inactive for a long period of time, that might not harm. But as far as I know some mail providers are deleting them after a defined time of inactivity like gmx and the same mail address which has been used before is available for a new person. If you are still registered somewhere, that could lead to account hacks if the person is a scammer and tries to reset passwords by using "reset via mail". But I don't know if mail.ru is doing the same. I think satoshi had a mail from gmx and that was a problem. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
