I take this one:

As a one-man team? Running a successful betting operation is much harder than many people think. It's certainly not something one person should attempt to do as a hobby. You need qualified staff to help you run all parts of the business. A security department to oversee the money and protect the site from outside forces; support personnel to handle client inquiries, a legal department for licenses, regulatory work; developers to help the site and the games run efficiently, and take care of all errors and bugs that will appear, etc. 

I see. I take it that you bought it as non assembled and assembled the parts yourself. Otherwise, you could have purchased the assembled unit with the correct Pi Zero v1.3 from BTC Hardware Solutions. The Jade supports Bluetooth, though, while the Seedsigner doesn't.

They do have an option to generate entropy from a picture you take with the device's camera. I can't comment on the technical part of it, though or how secure such seeds are. I hope the Jade has been put under severe tests to verify that the generated entropy from the device is strong enough. It's not exactly the most popular HW (which is also true for the Seedsigner) and surely doesn't generate as much interest as the major brands.

You forgot to mention the battery. How do you like its performance?

That's why I always like to wait with new updates unless it's something major that fixes serious vulnerabilities. And that's not the case with the new Trezor Suite whose biggest change is in the UI. Bugs and errors are expected.

Not sure how they want to battle that. You can't prevent someone to send crypto to an address, and when they do, that transaction will be displayed in the transaction history. Perhaps there will be an on switch to hide zero value transactions and possibly fraudulent ones or display a warning of a possible poisoning scam if a similar address is noticed or if the second transaction occurred seconds after your own legitimate transaction. Poisoning scams usually appear seconds after you make or receive a normal transaction.   

It seems like an interesting device, especially for its airgapped nature and affordable price. I might consider buying one. How long have you had it, and how satisfied are you with the battery performance? Since you mentioned Seedsigner, what made you buy the Jade and not the Seedsigner, for example? They are quite similar in several ways. The SeedQR is an invention by the developers of Seedsigner, unless I am mistaken.

Have you discovered any major cons or do you regret buying the Jade?

Monero has been battered lately after Binance announced that it would soon delist it from their platform. That caused a big downward trend for the value of the coin. Binance is just the latest big exchange that has turned its back on Monero, many others before it did. Privacy coins are constantly under attack by regulators and governments that see them as a bigger threat than stablecoins. Whatever bitcoin is going through, in terms of being called a haven for scammers and thieves, monero is subjected to double of that. All of that has affected the price and overall interest for the coin.

Every time I visited the exchange website in the last couple of days, XMR was always at 0. But you are right. It was showing a little bit above 121 when I saw your quote. A few minutes later and it's back to 0 again. There is great demand for no-KYC monero.

Yeah, I don't see that happening, and even if it does, you can always use an older version of the same software where those changes were not made.

Coldcards, like most other hardware wallets, have a maximum size limit for signed transactions. I wasn't sure how big these were, so I had to look it up quickly. For the Mk3 model, the maximum size is 384k-bytes. Also, the transaction can have 20 inputs and up to 250 outputs. The Mk4 offers much more: 2M bytes in size and many more inputs and outputs. The source says they successfully tested signing a transaction of 250 inputs and 2000 outputs.

https://github.com/Coldcard/firmware/blob/master/docs/limitations.md

I would rather use the SeedQR method instead of QR PIN unlock if I had a Blockstream Jade. It's quicker to gain access to your hardware wallet by just scanning a QR seed code then scanning multiple QR codes both on the hardware device and a secondary device. It's true though that you need some time to set up your SeedQR, but it's worth it.

I have a question about the reserves you display on your website. My apologies if it was already asked, but this thread has 16 pages, so it's quite time-consuming going through each one looking for the exact thing I want to ask. I have noticed that you always display your XRM reserves as 0, but in the 24h trading volume, we can see how much Monero was exchanged. Is the total Monero reserve a secret or can't the site display it for some other reason? 

Ja koliko vidim na Betfury stranici, oni obečavaju i veću dobit od onoga što si ti naveo. Na primjer, za USDT, stranica trenutno procjenjuje APR na 150%. Ali pošto staking period traje samo 7 dana to je neko zamazivanje očiju. Ako stejkaš USDT, onda od tebe ne traže da si se prethodno kockao na njihovoj platformi. Za staking BTC-a i ETH-a potrebno je da si igrao bar za $500 u posljednjih 30 dana na Betfury kasinu.

https://betfury.io/crypto-staking

No, you don't. Not unless you have reset your device to factory settings, which wiped the seed phrase from it. If it still works and the seed is in it, then open Trezor Suite on your device, go to the settings menu, and start the upgrade process. Read Update Trezor device firmware for more information.   

You haven't scammed JackpotRacer regardless of how many times he says it. He first needs to figure out what he wants and that's not happening. It seems that he wants to be back testing/playing blackjack on Blackjack.Fun and I don't think that's going to happen either. Perhaps it will after he conducts KYC, which he doesn't want to do.

No need to create a new ANN thread. You already have one. Reopen it and continue with your work. Other players might have valid questions or posts that they want to write there, but now they can't. Negative comments are unfortunately part of the game.

---

holydarkness has covered most of the questions I wanted to ask and that I asked in the scam accusation thread that JackpotRacer opened.
The issue with the wrong license has been solved, but do you want to comment on why the wrong one was there for so long?
The second issue is the Provably Fair logo. Are your games provably fair and can you prove it?

A few questions and comments on the bugs that JackpotRacer found.
What can you tell us about the timer reset bug? Are you working on it, has it been fixed, do you not want to fix it?
JackpotRacer does not have a case, but he did find several bugs. You fixed some, but the timer reset seems to be a major one that directly influences the outcome of a round. If that is true, you shouldn't be hosting real-money games until that is fixed.

OK, thanks for the mention which made me aware of this. Last time I checked, they still had a link to the Curacao logo, but I also see the one for The State of Anjouan now. I have never heard of it either, but that's a different topic of discussion. What's important is that the correct one is now displayed. My only question remains if they should have the Provably Fair logo or not.

Going there now.

No, you shouldn't import your wallet because that includes entering your Trezor seed into a web wallet. The seed and everything it holds would then be much less secure, and you essentially turn it into a seed from an online web wallet. Don't do that. Creating a new wallet and connecting the Trezor with Metamask is what you want to do. In that case, your private keys remain on the Trezor and you will be using Metamask as the software interface instead of Trezor Suite.

I use the Bitcoin-only firmware with my Trezor, so I can only speculate why that is. Perhaps you need to add every single token in the settings of your Trezor Suite. Or it could be that Trezor Suite doesn't support those particular assets. Take a look at https://trezor.io/coins and see if your tokens are supported there in Trezor Suite. If they aren't, you will not be able to see them. But that's why you have Metamask, to interact with your tokens through that software. Also, you can always check everything you need to know about your address on Etherscan.

Both? What's the second one? OP's coins/tokens are on the Trezor, not on Metamask. Metamask only has his public keys if he established a connection to it with his Trezor. No transaction from the hardware wallet can take place without a physical confirmation on the Trezor.

I don't know about the first two models. But I think they should all work. Coldcards are airgapped offline signing devices. They create partially signed bitcoin transactions that you import to micro SD cards and broadcast on an online machine. As long as each Mk model can do that, they essentially work. I believe DaveF was complaining about Coinkite dropping support for the older models and not adding new features to it. But their main (signing) purpose can't and shouldn't simply stop working all of a sudden.

I am not sure what it is that you want to achieve here or why you locked your thread and than quoted my post from there in this discussion. Unless, I am mistaken, I don't think anyone appointed you as our representative on Bitcointalk. When I say 'our', I mean of the members who participated in the Sinbad signature campaign. We are very capable of defending ourselves if there are problems that we believe should be handled or brought to the community's attention.

Na stranici nisam uspio nać neki dio gdje su korisnici, partneri ili investitora ostavljali svoje komentare ili utiske. Od društvenih mreža, imaju link za Telegram grupu gdje imaš nešto komentara i upita na engleskom a nešto na ruskom. Tu su još GitHub i Reddit ali nisam uspio ni tamo naći utiske korisnika.

I don't like it either, but I understand why they do it from a business perspective. Why have the users move the funds they want to exchange from the hardware wallet and into a third-party exchange if we can create the same type of service and have them do it on our terms? Plus, we earn a small commission from it. I also don't buy the marketing hype of how it's cheaper than doing the swap directly through the 3rd-party exchange.   

It's usually bad news that travels fast, but this time it was good news that travelled fast. My guess is that Royce consulted a legal expert and needed some time to figure out whether and how he can move those coins. Even after all these months, it's only the escrow address from Sinbad that is still on the official OFAC sanctions list. Incredible work done by the government agencies with great attention to detail.