Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. this is from the german board: Gevotet vom Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676Li can not translate the article.... but it says something like the named persons have been voted from the ark-ico account. Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is. haha all it takes is one downvote from max or oliver and you are not forging anymore. Wonder if that has anything to do with constant shilling from bitbanksy?  Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
..."the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released." Well this sounds like the way forward. Much fairer! But how can this arrangement be formalized to prevent individual profit taking and encourage ARK Crew delegates to use forged Lisk in the ways you have described? And that's probably why ARK didn't reached its target Canna... Because guys like you don't want to explain anything and interpret any question or criticism as a personal attack against you. I mean what are you even trying to accomplish here? Nothing, just FUD. You just want to attack me and ARK to try and preserve your vote by max and oliver. It's obvious. |
|
|
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. this is from the german board: Gevotet vom Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676Li can not translate the article.... but it says something like the named persons have been voted from the ark-ico account. Well I guess we are not the only one seeing how unethically the misuse of ICO funds is. haha all it takes is one downvote from max or oliver and you are not forging anymore. Wonder if that has anything to do with constant shilling from bitbanksy? Per the original direction of Lisk management, it was recommended that those interested in becoming delegates for Lisk solicit votes by offering to use the forging rewards on Lisk related projects. Ark was founded to be able to run as a blockchain which can be bridged to Lisk and operate as a blockchain application with Lisk, so Lisk developers would have access to the blockchains bridged to Ark and Ark developers would have access to the Lisk blockchain applications, so it qualifies as such a project. Since there are very few salaried positions with Ark, and the current budget is under $15,000 USD per month, the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released.
The current operation of Ark is completely within the guidelines originally presented by Lisk management.
..."the use of Lisk forging positions as alternate compensation to develop a Lisk related project allows the current funding level to last much longer, and to have the cash on hand for hiring additional developers as blockchain qualified candidates to fill as needs and opportunity arise, to pay for other operating expenses, and for marketing when mainnet is released." Well this sounds like the way forward. Much fairer! But how can this arrangement be formalized to prevent individual profit taking and encourage ARK Crew delegates to use forged Lisk in the ways you have described? we don't have to explain or even do what you are asking. |
|
|
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet lol Would that be 5 bucks you forged using misappropriated ARK TEC funds Canna? Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK.
Here's for an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging!Oh now I know for sure. |
|
|
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. Weak. bet you 5 bucks you're a bitbanksy sockpuppet just from the bolded text you both like to use. lol |
|
|
|
Why are ARK TEC funds being used for ARK crew personal gain. Why can't they be used to up vote an ARK TEC Delegate for Lisk forging?
An ARK delegate with all forged Lisk reinvested in furthering ARK! Developers, marketing, smartbridging.. you name it.
Better that than lining individual's pockets.
Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK!
Okay, let's try this from a different angle. ARK doesn't have the funds to vote up delegates. Currently the minimum entry into 101 is 7m lisk, ARK hold 4.7m not even close to make any delegate active if that delegate doesn't already have a lot of votes. And if an individual delegate already have millions in weight that is because they have been working on gaining in for months now, most 8-10 months. Do you think any of this individual would be willing to say, "I give up" just use my gathered weight to fund ARK. I don't think so. So ARK delegates in Lisk are not happening. Period. Try the flip side of that. An individual doesn't have enough funds to vote themselves up. Therefore you use the ARK TEC funds to do it. Travesty. Instead, Why don't you mandate that any individual who wishes to use ARK TEC for personal gain does it by lended their weight to the ARK TEC delegate and gets a return. Majority used to support ARK project. No? Makes too much sense! Down with the Raiders of the Lost ARK! lol mandate like a king? You do know that crypto is about decentralization and people being able to take charge of their own decisions. Not to be dictated like, well a dictator. It's supporting ark, just depends on how you look at it. |
|
|
|
Yeah, it is a pretty good plan, better plan than almost any other altcoin group has for funding their project.... Yeah we must admit it's a good & well thought plan. Make the most of it while it last... you sound more and more like phoenix1969 every day Bitbanksy. GL with the bridge burning though. Remember be careful not to disclose to much about GTD like you did already... you wouldn't want to be trown out the group again, would you?  i've never been thrown out of the group and there's nothing we're hiding. we're not the Illuminati. Here's some dumb stuff you've said, btw I don't delete my PMs here. If you notice the timestamp, it's even after the date you posted on the image fudding me, lol.  what a clown Why don't you post your reply too? I would be very interested to know if you have the courage to post it unedited  and? Fudding me for trying to be nice to you at one time? |
|
|
|
Yeah, it is a pretty good plan, better plan than almost any other altcoin group has for funding their project.... Yeah we must admit it's a good & well thought plan. Make the most of it while it last... you sound more and more like phoenix1969 every day Bitbanksy. GL with the bridge burning though. Remember be careful not to disclose to much about GTD like you did already... you wouldn't want to be trown out the group again, would you? i've never been thrown out of the group and there's nothing we're hiding. we're not the Illuminati. Here's some dumb stuff you've said, btw I don't delete my PMs here. If you notice the timestamp, it's even after the date you posted on the image fudding me, lol. what a clown |
|
|
|
First we are not ex-liskers....
 slip of the tounge and finger, so sue me. |
|
|
|
Yeah, it is a pretty good plan, better plan than almost any other altcoin group has for funding their project.... Yeah we must admit it's a good & well thought plan. Make the most of it while it last... you sound more and more like phoenix1969 every day Bitbanksy. GL with the bridge burning though. |
|
|
|
We never promised we would not use our lisk for our own benefit.... That's what the community needed to hear. Thanks for clarifying your real intentions. To sum up: 30 ex-liskers have found a way to get paid while setting up a copycat... as for the ICO funds? Unless ARK does succefully setup a foundation as promised, the team reserve the right to spend funds the way they wish without being held accountable... Bravo! That's a good plan  Hmmm ok that's interesting. Would it not have been better for the ARK project if the ARK TEC funds were used to vote an ARK Community Delegate whereby the funds generated from forging could be used to further the ARK project! Forged Lisk could be reinvested into ARK Community proposals, mainnet stabilization, IoT integration. The TEC funds should be used to further the ARK project as a whole and not to benefit individual members of the ARK crew. To use TEC funds for individual benefit when there is a clear alternative to use them towards the betterment of the ARK project is completely unethical. Furthermore it strengthens Lisks position over ARK by focusing individual efforts on Lisk forging rather than on ARK. How can this be condoned! Canna let's see you explain this one! so basically you are saying we should give you more. There's nothing unethical about it. I don't need to explain it. That's just the way it is. Like it or not, it's not like you invested in ARK. You exchanged your coins for ARK tokens to be used on the ARK platform. Nothing more. Having these tokens don't entitle you to any decision making and or explanations. |
|
|
|
We never promised we would not use our lisk for our own benefit.... That's what the community needed to hear. Thanks for clarifying your real intentions. To sum up: 30 ex-liskers have found a way to get paid while setting up a copycat... as for the ICO funds? Unless ARK does succefully setup a foundation as promised, the team reserve the right to spend funds the way they wish without being held accountable... Bravo! That's a good plan setting up a copy cat of what exactly? Lisk is a clone of Crypti which the founders are here with ARK. Lisk used an exact clone of crypti to do their ICO.....................and our developer Fixcrypt was critical in making sure Lisk mainnet launched on time, fun fact, it would not have launched on time after the first month long delay if it wasn't for fixcrypt. Yeah, it is a pretty good plan, better plan than almost any other altcoin group has for funding their project. Too bad it's not a copycat, our testnet code runs smoother than lisk by leaps and bounds already. Now scram. |
|
|
|
your claim of forging and dumping is again just that a claim. It's a freaking blockchain go and check... cannabananadelegate > 6100762652200070019L > Poloniex https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/6100762652200070019L that's one example.... But let me be generous on that one: max 15% of GTD are genuinely contributing to the growth of Lisk... Their transparency reports proves it quite clearly. The rest? they are still forging solely for personal interest or let say using Lisk as a mean to generate an income while working on ARK... Overall you know very little of the delegate system... Enough to see that the mainnet is currently monopolised by groups like yours... How convenient. You were not around long enough to cannabanana have chats with you, he was quite busy in the last few months.
Unless you are aware of some other stash, he can answer by himself to that one... we most certainly didn't promise that we won't use if to vote, quite the opposite, we very much intended to do so and will do so.... How will the forged LSK be used?
Toward the development of ARK?
Will the ARK community have a say or power to decide how the ICO funds will be used in the future?lol, I don't care if I dumped all my lisk. It's mine.... Duh. what are you gonna do? cry to max and oliver and have them unvote me? they already know I don't like them personally and that's why I don't get a vote from them already. Oh wait, I got almost 10 million votes without max and oliver, if you lost their vote you would have less than 1 million votes. Talk about someone being held up, all that brown nosing is making it into your mouth and causing your breath stink dude. monopolized by groups like us? We play the delegate game by the rules Max and Oliver set up for Lisk. If it wasn't meant to be played this way then why is the voting system a perfect match for what GDT is doing? We never promised we would not use our lisk for our own benefit. It's none of your damn business what we use our forged lisk for, if we use it for the development of ark, well I guess we'll be funded for a very long time won't we. All good things for the future of ARK imo. Your fud = weaksauce. |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... Oh yes, the same associates that got you in again? Who got me into what? I helped and played a big role in starting BOTH groups............... Unlike you who without the vote of Max and Oliver would not even be forging. Which role did you / do you play in TD & GTD? Do you still have your stash of Lisk? The 300K you mentioned once? Why do you keep threatening your own associates every time I post something here? keep making up lies, makes my case look better. Yeah you're right.... I will keep making up lies and you better shut up if you still want to forge. lol, So fkn stupid. Yeah laugh my friend, laugh... you bet your ass I am. But you are still avoiding these questions: Which role did you / do you play in TD & GTD? Do you still have your stash of Lisk? The 300K you mentioned once? I was the person who first came up with the idea of a TD group by trading votes from other lisk community members and adding their handle to my signature spot and also in developing the whole team in the early days. GDT is TD. There's no Roles, we're all equal. I have no idea what you're talking about 300k, never said or have had that much lisk. now GTFO with your BS |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... Oh yes, the same associates that got you in again? Who got me into what? I helped and played a big role in starting BOTH groups............... Unlike you who without the vote of Max and Oliver would not even be forging. Which role did you / do you play in TD & GTD? Do you still have your stash of Lisk? The 300K you mentioned once? Why do you keep threatening your own associates every time I post something here? keep making up lies, makes my case look better. Yeah you're right.... I will keep making up lies and you better shut up if you still want to forge. lol, So fkn stupid. Yeah laugh my friend, laugh... you bet your ass I am. |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... Oh yes, the same associates that got you in again? Who got me into what? I helped and played a big role in starting BOTH groups............... Unlike you who without the vote of Max and Oliver would not even be forging. Which role did you / do you play in TD & GTD? Do you still have your stash of Lisk? The 300K you mentioned once? Why do you keep threatening your own associates every time I post something here? keep making up lies, makes my case look better. Yeah you're right.... I will keep making up lies and you better shut up if you still want to forge. lol, So fkn stupid. |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... Oh yes, the same associates that got you in again? Who got me into what? I helped and played a big role in starting BOTH groups............... Unlike you who without the vote of Max and Oliver would not even be forging. Which role did you / do you play in TD & GTD? Do you still have your stash of Lisk? The 300K you mentioned once? Why do you keep threatening your own associates every time I post something here? keep making up lies, makes my case look better. |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... Oh yes, the same associates that got you in again? Who got me into what? I helped and played a big role in starting BOTH groups............... Unlike you who without the vote of Max and Oliver would not even be forging. |
|
|
|
As I said it from the beginning: Voted by the Ark-ICO Account thepool • traderbill • techbytes • doweig • cad789 • cannabananadelegate • idealisk • bitseed https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/9569486828221897676LUsually you can do what you want with your money. But this is the money of the investors to develop ARK and not your private fund. And if you vote up your members in the Lisk Top 101, this fund should not be touched. Otherwise these members lose their position as active delegates. And that means: Realistic, you only have 167 BTC now for development and to pay your big team...?? https://blockchain.info/address/3A8TEQ9dNPnJyG3BHyNERPbgZpE5DqvFeYYou should publish a clear statement about your financial situation and how you want to realize all this. Currently it looks as opaque as at the beginning. It's simple: they've found a way to suck the milk of mothership. You're just a shallow turdburger. Don't be surprised when your actions here like this start to affect others that you associate with in our groups. It's just a matter of time till the internal investigations are over....... |
|
|
|
i will support this Already submitted a ticket, do so too !! Thanks! Most of us have already sent a request too. Polo coin selection is a mystery, hopefully the decide to pick up the ARK. Poloniex mods already know this coin, so does busoni. I recommend don't spam in polo too much. what block explorer do incent use?I need this information to fill up in coin request form on poloniex. I am not techy so I need help on this  this is our testnet explorer http://texplorer.ark.io/but we don't have a mainnet one setup yet as our mainnet hasn't happened yet. I would just add the testnet explorer for now. thanks! |
|
|
|
Your link is correct. And my opinion about you has not changed. You're a troll. So I'm waiting for a statement from a competent team member. Whether you understand it or not. This is not your forum, this is a free forum, I ask the questions that I think is right.yup it's free, so you get the answer I think you deserve. Maybe you should re-evaluate your importance in any of this situation. Yeah, I'm a troll but at least I don't lie about my associations to make my case look better like you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
