Also one weird thing. The hashrates reported by the miners are pretty random. On one run it reports 5.4~5.5, on another it reports 5.0, try it again and it reports 4.2. You just have to restart it again and again until you see 5.4  like a dice roll. And then on the pool side it's actually reporting 5.4 ish. Quite funny. I've seen this weird behavior too, on Win and Linux too. |
|
|
|
there IS amd miner and much faster then cuda ...
Have you got any proof, numbers, or you just talking to the air? |
|
|
|
|
Nice comparsions, I like all those number,
but, let me ask you a question, I see your ambient is 36-40 degrees, I think it's in Celsius.
Where are you testing those cards, on the beach?
|
|
|
|
based on this and the hash of the 980ti, it should do nearly 20MH or around that, but i would not be surprised if it can do more, like in lbry where the 980ti is a joke in comparison
How much is 980ti doing on lbry? for about 200/220Mhs, depends on your settings |
|
|
|
so, check today I'm getting 31.5MHs ETH and 200MHs DCR @ 1900/4800 Win7 64bit, 372.54 Drivers, it should work for you too. btw, now I can mine ETH with 750Ti in win7 at astonishing speed of 1.5MHs  WITH WHAT MODEL NVIDIA GPU? -- I am speaking of an EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti GPU. I have never clocked the core greater than the low-to-middle 1400s. I am, however, downloading driver 372.54 as I type this. I just checked, it is available as an official download for Win 7 x64. I did not go to the nVidia site and download a driver unfit for my system. If you have a 10XX series card, your numbers may be real. But, at 1900 core, my card would likely throw sparks and flame out. The new 10XX series circuits are able to tolerate much more extreme clocking. They use less energy, and run much cooler. Thanks for the reminder! --scryptr Oh, yeah, I was just surprised, that I can mine ETH with GTX1070 in Win7, so I forget to mention card type. Sorry for confusion. |
|
|
|
anyone know how to fix wallet out of sync problem?
create Stratis.conf in Appdata/Roaming/strati folder, paste this: addnode=158.69.126.156 addnode=81.161.137.189 addnode=106.80.203.61 addnode=138.68.6.25:16178 addnode=95.154.20.23:16178 addnode=136.243.50.159:16178 addnode=128.199.122.61:16178 addnode=151.226.150.87:16178 restart wallet |
|
|
|
For some strange reason, top-end nVidia cards do not "scale" in proportion to their compute capacity when mining Dagger-Hashimoto. I have an EVGA CLASSIFIED 980ti, and it mines ETH/DCR at 22MH/s / 210MH/s, but my EVGA 970 FTW cars get 20MH/s mining ETH (with Genoil's miner). On other, more compute intensive algos, the top-end cards perform better. My 980ti is on Win 7 x64, driver 368.81.
Thanks for clarifying, is that the best performing driver for Win 7 x64? We are now running the latest one, maybe we can get a bit higher speed with another driver? I CHECKED YESTERDAY-- No new nVidia drivers for my Win 7 x64 system. There are newer drivers (designated with a higher number than 368.81), but not for my system. As for speed, Claymore's miner is actually faster in hash rate than Genoil's 1.1.7 by about ~1MH/s. I get just under 22MH/s , whereas Genoil's miner was mining at just over 20MH/s. My Linux-based GTX 270 cards mine at just under 20MH/s with Genoil's miner. Claymore's miner has only mined with driver 368.81 on my Win 7 system, so I can't compare perforrmance on driver versions. I was mining Library Credits (LBC) with my GTX 980ti because it can perform as well as 5 GTX 750ti cards mining LBC, about 250MH/s. And, while the GTX 750ti cards will mine at a steady 50MH/s each, the GTX 980ti card will fluctuate between 220MH/s and 250MH/s because of temperature throttling. The GTX 980ti card will start off higher than 260MH/s, but rapidly throttle down. I try to use cards on algos where they do well. With Claymore's miner, I miine ETH/DCR. --scryptr so, check today I'm getting 31.5MHs ETH and 200MHs DCR @ 1900/4800 Win7 64bit, 372.54 Drivers, it should work for you too. btw, now I can mine ETH with 750Ti in win7 at astonishing speed of 1.5MHs |
|
|
|
Excuse me if this has been asked before, but how much hashrate do the 390s pull at lbry?
For me it's 163 Mh/s. Whats the reward (approx) for 163 Mh/s? According to https://www.whattomine.com/coins/164-lbc-lbry, 163 Mh/s gives you about 18.45 coins per 24 hours which amounts to $3.66 per 24 hours. your numbers would be accurate at diff maybe 45K, but last day avg diff was 66K |
|
|
|
|
Hi Claymore,
are you planning to release v6.0 also for linux?
I see only miner for windows.
|
|
|
|
what happens to FIBRE, BLITZ, and TVE?
You should ask in dedicated threads. |
|
|
|
what is the mature age of the stratis?
also, someone have some nodes? I see only 1 peer.
From Cryptobe 138.68.6.25:16178
95.154.20.23:16178
136.243.50.159:16178
128.199.122.61:16178
151.226.150.87:16178 All of them are working, thank you. Also, anyone know about that maturity age? Can't find it anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
what is the mature age of the stratis?
also, someone have some nodes? I see only 1 peer.
|
|
|
|
can i ask a noobish question  i am still new what are the advantages of mining spreadcoin on the pool if i can mine it fine in solo? are there any pluses in using pool at all compared to solo ? thanks there is no plus, it's only for those, who don't know how to solo mine |
|
|
|
|
I see there is lot of offtopic as usual.
So some ontopic info: If you still argue I'm not getting invites, and so on, try to check your spam folder,
today I found 3 emails from lbry.io in spam folder.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm folding with 4GPUs, 3x750Ti and 1x GTX 1070,
and my CPU usage is 100%. CPU is AMD FX-4300 Quad Core.
And I turned off, CPU folding in settings.
Is this normal?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it necessary to create another duplicated thread?
|
|
|
|
Hello
Sorry for keep hammering this but I can't make CUDA work with the GTX 1070.
I was able to mine using OpenCL with ethminer (-G (opencl)) but with (-U (cuda)) no luck, with ccminer i have the exact same error.
Driver is 367.35, CUDA 8 installed.
nvidia --version reports cuda 8
$LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to cuda 8
The driver is working otherwise it would be impossible to mine with OpenCL which i am doing now.
the error still is the same:
CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version
any idea what can cause this?, anyone has found this issue?
running xubuntu 14.04 x64.
thanks!
indkt
All I can say is that, I'm running running fine both, ethminer and ccminer with 367.27 drivers and CUDA8. Your problem is really strange. Maybe try to install this driver, and when you compiling try to point straight to cuda8 directory. |
|
|
|
I found exchange just today, and I'm already missed Promo  Nevermind, created account, set-up 2FA, will see how well it will do. And I'm not sure, if it's just my feeling, but it seems a bit slow for me, but maybe it's because I have opened 200 tabs  |
|
|
|
If a coin is mined via CPU only what set up will you recommend? Please give me all the details, specs, name of brand and also the price. Thank you very much.
No CPU can make a profit. Botnets will take it over. Such an amateur mistake to launch a "CPU only" coin. But I have read that the zcash team will require 8GB of RAM to to prevent botnets from taking over. I have no experience in mining so I do not know what the effect of more RAM is in mining. Can you care to explain this more? It should be 1GB per 1thread |
|
|
|
|
@felixbrucker
find yourself a better thread for your eth, hw related problems, you're totally OT in here,
so please stay on-topic, thank you.
e: sorry, my fault, sometimes happens when reading 10 threads at once...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
