Added:

Topic	Date	written by	Section	Merit	status
_________________________________________________________________________	____________________	________________	___________________	_______	______________
Global structure of merit networks	May 08, 2018	sncc	Meta	80+

Very nice topic like your other ones. Are you planning to post an update about it and make it possible for users to explore it? There is a similar tool from Piggy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4584759.0) but I'm still Jr. Member there.

I can expect that it's a lot of work, so just as a suggestion if you want to do it and have time because such studies are very interesting.  

---

Also added:

Topic	Date	written by	Section	Merit	status
_________________________________________________________________________	____________________	________________	___________________	_______	______________
Analysis – Net Post evolution in (some) Local Boards	March 28, 2019	DdmrDdmr	Meta	new

No need to be so rude here, hate is a very hard word. 

Some of the points Brainboss mentioned there are maybe a little bit uncommon and it's usual on DT that different people have a different point of view. There are also points I disagree with like OPs view of not giving negative tags to plagiarizers. I would have no problem to tag them and warn people from sending sMerit to them. If an account is banned for plagiarism we can't see it right now directly and it would be a pity to waste the scarce sMerits for banned plagiarizers.

(Slightly) different opinions are an important factor of DT and I think theymos has nothing against it. The community is always evaluating how to judge things and adjust them if abuse is detected. OP hasn't done a favor to himself by posting his guidelines for DT but I don't see a reason to affect his Merit Source application in a negative way. I would like to support him, too. 


Well, that's very far-fetched. 

Wüsste ich nicht, gibt nur das hier für ein paar Accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topusers
Aber habe direkt nachgefragt. Mal sehen, was bei rum kommt: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125387.0

Does someone know about a tool where it's possible to count the received Merit for the last 120 days automatically? Counting all Merits manually is still possible but not very fast (depending on the number of earned Merit)

The only site I know is this one, but it's limited to a few accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topusers

Someone asked this today in the German local board.

If there is no tool yet I'm sure that LoyceV or DdmrDdmr will do a good job in creating it.  

Super, dass das geklappt hat. 
Das mit den 5 Merits finde ich auch eine gute Sache, um Shitposter effektiv auszusortieren. Dass die Merits sich nur auf die letzten 120 Tage beziehen, ist mir aber neu. So Anforderungen führen natürlich auch zu Ungereimtheiten, Hhampuz war not amused: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124993.0

---

Immer doch, hatte das gerade gestern noch gesehen und dachte, das stelle ich schnell hier rein. Gratulation an alle, die akzeptiert wurden und ich wünsche allen ein gutes BTC.

Kein Ding, da geht es dir genauso wie mir. 
Mein sMerit ist ebenfalls schon wieder alle, ich gebe es einfach zu schnell aus. Muss echt mal zusehen, dass ich mich nächsten Monat als Merit-Source bewerbe, auch im englischen Teil komme ich so oft über gute Posts, die ich auslassen muss, weil ich am sMerit sparen bin.

Zu empfehlen ist auch der Merit Airdrop von qwk (garantiert legit und kein KYC erforderlich). 

Und auch Gratulation an mole0815 für den Hero Member. 

Ich glaube, die Statistik ist ein wenig verzerrt, da sie die kürzlich verdienten Merits (je nach Spalte) stärker berücksichtigt und da hatte ich etwas Glück bzw. qwk war nicht so aktiv.
Die über 1 Jahr gemittelten Werte sehen so aus:
qwk (2031-12-16)
1miau (2036-07-17)
mole0815 (2037-09-22)
Lafu (2042-10-26)

Generell bekommt qwk eh viel zu wenig Merit für die Qualität seiner Posts, da er (es / sie (Katze)) schon Legendary ist. Das sollte man bei der Statistik auch bedenken, dass sich die verdienten Merits ab Legendary deutlich verlangsamen werden. Sonst hätte qwk schon die doppelte Menge. 

Mit 10.000 Merit kann man auch garnichts anfangen, da ist es bei neuen Nutzern viel besser aufgehoben. 


Sehe ich genauso, das Forum scheint mir sehr zeitlos (wie auch das Design xD).

I'm out of sMerit, so feel free to drop here a few of them:

Some useful links for BBCODE Signature design etc.
Description: compilation of useful links for BBcode design
Category: compilation of useful links
Section: Beginners and Help

Re: MLM – a dangerous marketing strategy
Category: opinion
Section: Beginners and Help

Re: Be careful, Google knows more about you than you can imagine!
Category: technical answer
Section: Serious Discussion

It's up to you how you spend your Merits and when you think he deserves 20 it's absolutely no problem to do so.

The only way of Merit abuse needs to have a really clear pattern for giving huge amounts of Merit to shitposts or send a Merit to your own alt. As long as the post of cryptobaro isn't a bounty submission I'm totally ok with your intention to spend your sMerit.


That's how the Merit system works, you can't defend yourself against receiving Merit. 

At first, thanks for addressing the concerns here, @St4yInTh3D4rk

I believe you that you might not have the intention to scam anyone here and you look more trustworthy than the original owner (more due to the fact that the original owner pulled an exit-scam). But honestly I can't do much here. You know well that involvements in account sales are discouraged and accounts involved in it risk to get a red tag:

http://archive.is/OEDOK#selection-925.0-925.13

In comparison to most account buyers who deny their actions, I appreciate it that you admitted it having bought your account.

Since I'm relatively new to DT and not an experienced sold account detector I don't want to be a decisive factor about your account being tagged or not and I'm open to change my rating if some other DT members think you should be untagged. In addition, I will talk to your bounty manager.
Buying accounts is not a good idea, you know that. The date of your account purchase was way too late to be considered as legal (I don't know exactly when the view of the community regarding account sales changed).

And your story about Facebook is also a little bit weird, especially that your account was without mail. Like DireWolfM14 said I think it's not possible to have an account without mail and the questioned point of time was only a little bit than 1 year ago.

I would like if you can list the steps how you got the account from your first action until you posted the first post here. But I don't want to make too much hope for you, I don't know any case where a detected account buyer escaped without red tag lately.

Another reason besides security measures to move all coins from exchange "wallets" to wallets where you own the private key. In case if a wallet should lock you out of it and try to enforce KYC before you can access the service and the coins again it would only be possible to move the funds after the submission of your personal data. But if you have the private keys you can abandon the service and restore your wallet somewhere else to move the coins.

Furthermore, I don't see a way how KYC for Electrum or Ledger etc. should work since it would be useless to enforce KYC for existing users due to the reason mentioned above...

Yes.

Aber eine fehlt, ist allerdings auch erst vor ein paar Stunden veröffentlich worden (von Hhampuz):

[OPEN] LiveCoin Signature Campaign | Hero/Legendary Members | Up to 0.02BTC/Week

Alle Boards erlaubt
10 Posts Minimum pro Woche, bis zu 50 werden bezahlt

Auszahlung:
Hero - 0.00035BTC/Post
Legendary - 0.0004BTC/Post

LiveCoin ist eine Exchange (also kein Gambling). Wenn ihr bei Interesse schnell seid, könnte es klappen. 

Echt krass, was die in ihrer Bounty da abziehen, von 3.000 Bounty-Teilnehmern (auf bounty0x.io) sollen nur 111 bezahlt werden, weil MenaPay nach Ende der Bounty noch eine Regel hinzugefügt hat (App herunterladen plus 5 Sterne-Bewertung vergeben). Wer das nicht macht, erhält keine Token für die getane Arbeit. 

Und im Telegram schieben die Devs die Schuld auf bounty0x.io, dass sie die Teilnehmer über die nach Bountyende eingeführte Regel nur unzureichend informiert haben, wie ironisch...

Verständlich, dass bounty0x.io das nicht auf sich sitzen lassen möchte: https://www.publish0x.com/bounty0x/menapay-transparency-report-xggyr

Gibt noch mehr, unter anderem von yahoo62278, der neben DarkStar_ und Hhampuz als sehr guter Manager gilt. Aber die meisten Kampagnen sind leider über Gambling und erfordern Posts im Englischen Gambling-Bereich:


Windice.io Signature Campaign(FULL)

25 Posts pro Woche
5 Post pro Woche in Gambling
Lokale Boards erlaubt

Auszahlungen:
Member - .0015 btc/week
Full Member - .003 btc/week
Sr Member - .005 btc/week
Hero - .0075 btc/week
Legendary - .010 btc/week

---

bustadice signature campaign(FULL)

25 Posts pro Woche
keine spezifischen Anforderungen, dass Posts in Gambling gemacht werden müssen
Lokale Boards erlaubt

Auszahlungen:
Member- 25$ per week in btc
Full Member- 50$/week
Sr Member- 75$/week
Hero+ 100$/week

+20$ Bonus für 5 Leute, die in der Woche das meiste Merit bekommen haben.

---

Bitsler Signature & Avatar Campaign (Rates Changed again)(FULL for now)

25 Posts pro Woche
keine spezifischen Anforderungen, dass Posts in Gambling gemacht werden müssen
Lokale Posts zählen als halber Post

Hero Member- 125$/week in btc
Legendary-150$/week in btc

Die Kampagnen von yahoo62278 zahlen also ganz ordentlich.

---

---

OgNasty hat auch eine Kampagne, gibt aber kaum Regeln dazu  

[CLOSED/RUNNING] SIGMA POOL SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN

0.02 BTC/Monat - Legendary
0.01 BTC/Monat - Hero
0.005 BTC/Monat - alle anderen Accounts

---

---

Und hier etwas, das mal nicht über Gambling ist, aber die Regeln sind auch recht streng:

[FULL] [SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN] CODEX EXCHANGE _____________________________________ von julerz12

20 Posts pro Woche auf 5 Tage verteilt (max. 4 pro Tag werden gewertet)
Nur 5 Posts aus lokalen Boards

Auszahlungen:
Member/Copper = 0.003 BTC/Week
Full Member = 0.005 BTC/Week
Senior Member = 0.006 BTC/Week
Hero/Legendary = 0.007 BTC/Week

---

Oder halt Stake.com, aber die Kampagne steht in der Kritik, Spam zu fördern, da bis zu 1000 Posts pro Woche bezahlt werden.  
Stake.com (SteveStake) is encouraging spam.

The ChipMixer hat suits pikachu very well 



Look how happy it is!


But the quality of the picture is not very good, especially the hat... 

+1
I've left another feedback. Maybe he hasn't much to say to prove it wrong. 

Honestly, I wouldn't trust the old owner either for letting his investors "in the dark" about Zonecoin and failing to pay back his loans: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1576405.msg17025366#msg17025366

Alright, that's the same impression I had about social media accounts, especially if the mail address expires, someone can take over all the social media accounts by re-registering the mail and resetting the password via mail. (if they haven't changed hands already before in addition to the Bitcointalk account sale)

He posted some documents containing his name + some other information here. I don't know in which way these documents are manipulated but in case if it would be necessary to verify it, there's an address of the company he communicated with (goodall barnett james). It's an existing company but I think there's no need in contacting them, I don't know how serious shitcoin scams / failed projects were handled in the past.

---

Today St4yInTh3D4rk was active again but it seems he has no interest to respond here although yahoo62278 sent him a PM...
I'm busy tomorrow and will wait another day before taking any action although I think the case is clear.

You can also move the topic by yourself:



Go to the bottom of your topic, click move topic and select Reputation as section in the drop-down menu. 

Sometimes reading things carefully can avoid much trouble. 

At least it's likely that Merit sales will lead to red trust since it's an abuse of the system. It's only not directly mentioned in the rules because Merit sales will be arranged outside of Bitcointalk instead.

Honestly, I can't imagine that someone will remain untagged if he starts a topic in Meta offering crypto for Merits. 

You can search in the modlog, there are some other reports also deleted. But I don't know the reason, probably it got deleted by accident: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php



Just submit your bounty report again, if the bounty report is posted in the bounty thread it should not be a problem.

You can add https://bitcoingarden.org/, but the number of members is relatively low compared to Bitcointalk. And for technical knowledge is https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/ a useful source similar to the boards Development & Technical Discussion and Bitcoin Technical Support here.

There are a few other crypto forums, but the spam in incredible in some of them:

https://cryptocurrencytalk.com/
https://bitco.in/forum/
https://www.bitcoinblackhat.com/
https://cryptoinforum.com/

And for crypto gambling:

https://forum.stake.com/
https://forum.primedice.com/