Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2024, 02:38:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 [380] 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 ... 458 »
7581  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: As a store owner who accepts bitcoins, anyone who wants can track my income on: May 09, 2013, 12:41:44 PM
Bitcoin addresses seem to work a lot like I.P addresses, yes, people can see what you're doing, but you can always take steps to mask that and like with I.P addresses because there are so many of them it would take a particularly determined person to find out what's going into your account. I'm pretty sure though as people have said there are methods to avoid people stalking a particular address to find out just how much you're getting. I wouldn't be surprised if in the future people started developing VPN style security specifically for Bitcoin addresses so people can't spy on you at all.

I find Bitshop particularly interesting because it stores the Bitcoins on a code and you can take it out like a seperate account from that code to your Bitcoin client so maybe you should look at something like that perhaps for your business, it is a concern, don't get me wrong, but like with I.P addresses I think people shouldn't be too worried just yet until we start hearing about courts using Bitcoin addresses as viable evidence or criminals actively stalking addresses that shift a lot of Bitcoin.
7582  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin needs to be simplified for the stupid. on: May 09, 2013, 09:55:55 AM
I don't know about making things simple but whatever you do could be explained a lot better, there have been years or months I've spent arguing with people to give better explanations from all professions not just people using cryptographic currencies. Someone just needs to get off their arses and write a very simple tutorial for mining the alternate currencies for example, then there's the fucking programming tutorials where they leave bits out and don't explain why they've told you to do something and so on.

Like I said, I'm not asking you guys to simplify anything, I think Bitcoin has actually been explained quite well which I suspect is why most people use it but good luck with the other stuff, it amazes me that people went and made stuff like Litecoin and didn't think about how the average person was going to use it. Just make sure that when you do something or you ask them to change a setting etc. you explain why, or for example you can give absolute beginner explanations for people just starting out rather than assuming everyone knows how to code already.

As embarrassing as it is I must have spent a good few months trying to figure out why my photoshop paintings were so damn blurry then I discovered it was just the brush hardness because none of the painting tutorials I followed mentioned that's what you need to get nice clear images. That and a high enough resolution that wouldn't break your computer and cause photoshop to freeze, all just because people forgot to mention things like that to beginners.
7583  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk needs to evolve on: May 08, 2013, 08:39:18 AM
Speaking from experience, when you enforce too many ridiculous rules and try to make people post the way you want rather than just leave them alone forum communities like this one usually become ghost towns with only a few staff here and there and their supporters who think everything fantastic. Seriously, if you think you know better then go and set up a forum yourself, don't go usurping someone else's just because you don't like how things are run.
7584  Other / Off-topic / Re: How i troll my neighbours on: May 08, 2013, 08:29:17 AM
The fuck?! LOL!
7585  Other / Off-topic / Re: Why would China on: May 07, 2013, 07:53:45 PM
That scenario assumes the US would default on the debt.
*facepalm*...
He's banking on the simple fact that opening with *facepalm* makes any argument irrefutable.
*facepalm* *facepalm*

Oh no! You've thwarted my point with sarcasm and irrelevant attacks on the way I've posted!

There are two main options that America has when it comes to keeping the dollar, default on their debt or try to hyperinflate their way out of the problem which as we've seen with other countries who have tried hyperinflation it doesn't work. So therefore their only real option is to default on the debt, you could of course try austerity, but good luck staying in power with a huge percentage of the country wanting your head for selling them out. I'm terribly sorry if I've hurt the feelings of any American Imperialists lurking on these boards by telling them the truth because I know they're out there.
7586  Other / Off-topic / Re: Why would China on: May 07, 2013, 03:33:08 PM
*facepalm* People need to read up on economics Smiley

If they could debase the USD quicker then that would mean the USA's infrastructure would all collapse and the Chinese could buy everything up that isn't government owned, it'd be the equivalent of an all out invasion but without the guns, everything would become far cheaper for them to buy and they could get all the physical stuff because the U.S would be forced to sell to them at a cheaper price.
7587  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin to $41,000 ?!? Interesting write-up on: May 07, 2013, 02:58:52 PM
The thing is you may be billionaires or millionaires in the dollar, the pound or the euro, but that's only because they've devalued the crap out of it and Bitcoin is simply an honest reflection of how screwed up the major currencies are, the only reason people can spend so much with Bitcoins is because it's held its value against the other currencies far better and the central banks are working hard to keep the illusion that their paper is worth anything going.

Once the major currencies lose their purchasing power and more and more people adopt Bitcoin everyone will probably be a billionaire or millionaire in paper money but in Bitcoin there will probably be only a select few who have thousands or millions of Bitcoin as was the case before with paper money when they didn't go into a frenzy with it.
7588  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Regulation is coming....(probably a good thing) on: May 07, 2013, 11:06:29 AM
All this will do is make people adopt Bitcoin entirely and other alternative currencies over paper money to avoid having to deal in paper at all, they're digging their own graves.
7589  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin 0.8.2. What do you think? on: May 07, 2013, 08:11:05 AM
I've been wrapping my head around the whole thing for awhile now and it just seems like one of those bans/limitations to a much larger problem ( If it is as much as a problem as people seem to think ) but to me it does seem as if some miners are desperate to get there way an awful lot when it comes to Bitcoin even if it means wrecking who whole currency just so they can profit more in paper money. If you remember we had a load of them ranting about the hard limits put on Bitcoin too and ASIC miners, screaming about the end of the Bitcoin.
7590  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Boycott 0.8.2 on: May 06, 2013, 06:22:14 PM
I'm no religious person by any means, but thank god for open source, no matter how this turns out there will now always be alternatives.
7591  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: WTF - Kiddy Porn in the Blockchain for life? on: May 06, 2013, 03:10:40 PM
I think implementation of IP addresses should be required for bitcoin transactions, it would look good all the way around for bitcoin users, and on the side for governments as well, especially since the big negative about bitcoin is that silkroad site. It would be a win-win for everyone

That would mean that all law-abiding people will have their IPs tracked, and all criminals will still stay private by using Tor. Why do you want to spy only on the law abiding people?

Because he's a self-righteous scumbag who thinks it's okay to spy on everyone else as long as it isn't him, but honestly, if people want to make all these horrible ideas why don't they go and make their own altcoin that supports it and get government sponsorship? Or are they not intelligent enough to do that?
7592  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Anti-Bitcoin Socialist Propaganda in New Zealand on: May 06, 2013, 02:58:08 PM
These guys are on the same level as Ben Bernanke and Paul Krugman all they are is a bunch of paid spokespeople for various pro-imperialist and neo-keynesian ideologies, lots of different opinions on how it should be done but they all follow the same thing.
7593  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Trying to use ScryptMiner GUI with Feathercoin pool on: May 06, 2013, 11:11:28 AM
Well how dumb of me, I was trying to set up a CPU miner to mine on a GPU, I'm using GUIMiner now and it's working great.
7594  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Trying to use ScryptMiner GUI with Feathercoin pool on: May 06, 2013, 10:20:23 AM
Bumping, if it's okay guys I'd like some parameters to mess with because I tried searching around and couldn't find an answer for why I'm getting such low K/hashes on a 6970.
7595  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Anti-Bitcoin Socialist Propaganda in New Zealand on: May 06, 2013, 08:03:46 AM
Cheesy

These are the first crazy people that have genuinely made me smile.
7596  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Trying to use ScryptMiner GUI with Feathercoin pool on: May 06, 2013, 07:34:18 AM
LOL! Thanks! That's what I get for not checking things over carefully.

Edit: It's working fine now, my only problem is I'm only getting at most 6.0 k/hash at best, so I'm probably going to have to look for some AMD settings somewhere >_<
7597  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Trying to use ScryptMiner GUI with Feathercoin pool on: May 06, 2013, 07:19:19 AM
I signed up to https://featherpool.com/ and I've tried following the instructions but the miner so far refuses to work, I get the following errors:

Quote
HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible

Quote
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds


What my config file looks like:

Quote
threads=4
scantime=5
url=http://featherpool.com:/
username=Lethn
password=xxxx
port=9999
miningPoolIndex=0
poolApiKey=c7045a618260d90fe2fee9c549a23dcbab216c1d1bd130f76fd323b3ad01ce96

I'm using the ScryptMiner GUI that they provide.
7598  Economy / Economics / Re: Selling Digital Goods with Bitcoin on: May 06, 2013, 06:42:55 AM
Quote

If you have your own website this is a good option Smiley
7599  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Space Program on: May 06, 2013, 06:20:42 AM
Why don't you guys practice shooting up satellites and unmanned probes into space first? Then move onto bigger projects when you have the funding, they'd be a lot cheaper to make and you wouldn't have to worry about deaths on your hands.
7600  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would increasing divisibility help the current situation? on: May 06, 2013, 05:49:05 AM
Now you're making me even more unsure of this plan the OP has, I'm happy as long as the amount of times a Bitcoin can be divided stays fixed though just like with the amount of whole Bitcoins there are. It'd be a bit like taking a cookie and giving every child in the world a crumb, eventually it's just going to be nothing.
Pages: « 1 ... 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 [380] 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 ... 458 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!