On a globe the horizon is a physical (solid) barrier about 3 miles from a 6' observer at sea level. With a factory modified Nikon P1000 IR camera I can put the horizon so far beyond 3 miles that the Earth can't be anything other than a plain. This is proof beyond a reasonable doubt that what we observe (flat & motionless) is in fact true.

It looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck. Even with an unmodified P900 the horizon is too far away (on a clear, cool, calm day) for any kind of reasonable explanation on a globe.

Don't take my word for it, get a good zoom lens, find some landmarks of a known distance and see for yourself (on a clear, cool, calm day). Here's the distance to the horizon calculator if you suck at math: http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm

If you hug your dog for too long, would you classify his reaction as "emotional"?

The Moon landing hoax is a communist (atheist) conspiracy. The Moon is not a physical object, prove me wrong!

Look at you guys, your whole fucking world of illusions comes crashing down. The Eagle lander was a cardboard box retrofitted with foil, roofing paper, BMX brand bicycle parts, curtain rods and cellophane tape. Do you atheist retards actually believe Stanley Kubrick's finest cinematic work is for real, or are you just fucking liars who need a bullet?

The Moon is a light in the sky, you might as well try and land men on a street lamp. Think about that, how fucking dumb you are for believing men can land a vehicle full of clowns on a street lamp, have another drink bozo.

I can put the horizon where the globe can't reach it with a Nikon P900.

If you believe they landed men on the Moon in a cardboard box wrapped in foil and streamed it live on TV in 1969, men who then proceeded to call president Dick "I'm not a crook" Nixon for a live interview, then I'm afraid your delusion is much, much, much stronger.

KYS faggot.

Modern science much like modern art is an embarrassment.

A huge step back? How long do you keep searching for Waldo before you realize he's not even in the picture and that you've been punked?

^^^ A human skull retrofitted with an orangutan’s jaw and chimp’s teeth means Piltdown Man is a fucking hoax! The evidence for evolution is manufactured i.e. fraudulent and you've got the fucking balls to ask me if I've ever completed a doctoral thesis on evolutionary biology?

^^^ So instead of providing evidence the Earth is billions of years old to support the theory of evolution you're just going to go along with the establishment consensus that it is [billions of years old] and attack me, got it.

I can prove NASA astronauts are hanging from wires and that they landed a cardboard box on a the Moon but that's not the issue here. If you want to make the extraordinary claim that men "evolved" from monkeys then much like "outer space" you need to provide some evidence that isn't manufactured.

I've provided one reference so far that shows that evidence for evolution is in fact being manufactured. In your response you supported two three additional hoaxes, attacked me and, spammed links to a vast list of unproven radiometric dating techniques where results very widely. You need to cite actual evidence that the Earth is billions of years old.

If you claim we fell out of a monky's ass, then you need to back this extraordinary claim up with some credible evidence.

So you can't prove the Earth is the billions of years old that evolution requires then? I can poke hols in radiometric dating techniques all day, the evidence for an Earth billions of years old is very weak.

I'm confident that I could turn organic plant and animal tissue into stone in a time-frame of weeks or days with a concrete-like process. That being said what proof does "science", and when I say "science" I don't mean the scientific method but instead, the authority-based crap the government and media forces on the public, what proof do they have that the Earth is older than 10,000 years?

I don't buy radio-carbon dating. Evolution as described by "science" requires billions of years, what proof is there of "billions of years ago"? I know the Earth is an engineered structure and for it to be any older than thousands of years is ridiculous.



"It turned out to be a human skull retrofitted with an orangutan’s jaw and chimp’s teeth" -- Piltdown Man: The Secret Life of Charles Dawson (2003)

"get"? I like how the narrative is always that weather weapons don't already exist, that this new idea needs to be developed. This is just globalist mind control propaganda to hide [occult] weapons that have existed for thousands of years. They use these weapons to keep the orphan trains running on time.

"The weather"
"Journal of Abnormal Psychology"
"psychological stress"
"American Psychological Association"

global*******
global*******
global*******

California is gone.




"An ARkStorm (for Atmospheric River 1,000 Storm) is a hypothetical but scientifically realistic "megastorm" scenario developed and published by the Multi Hazards Demonstration Project (MHDP) of the United States Geological Survey, based on historical occurrences. It describes an extreme storm that could devastate much of California, ..."

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARkStorm

Sorry but nginx forbids it.



@noname,

   radeon settings --> gaming --> global settings --> gpu workload --> compute

... because when you need to compute hashes for minting coins you go to the section for playing games while stuck to the outside surface of a sphere spinning 1000 mph in a vacuum, such intuitive gui design.

In response to everything after the first question, no.

show me the watts.

I bet you could fry an egg on that thing @ 33MH/s.

Dinosaurs are a hoax, giants including animals and plants are the historical reality.



They show you a giant fossilized dragonfly in school and on TV and in book & magazines then, they tell you it's millions of years old and it's a different species that evolved into a dragonfly because "convergent evolution". They go on and construct a Tyrannosaurus Rex out of a fragment of giant chicken bone and carve footprints in a dry riverbed to support their story and skeletal model.

Evolution, dinosaurs and timescales beyond 10,000 years are complete horse shit. There's massive intellectual fraud in the "professional" sciences [pseudo].

Here's proof YouTube rigs their 'flat earth' search results,
in support of globalists with a violent message:





This begs the question,



does YouTube need more attitude adjustment?