Where are the trains and the rockets guys? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fholcad.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2FHappiness.jpg&t=663&c=wPu__PtmHSiahA) Too happy, can't roar
|
|
|
You're wasting your breath. Pearls before swine. Thank gawd we have a prime minister who has no more vote than any other minister, and not some despot with absolute powers (and a veto). That video fried my brain when it came out. Everyone, from the norwegian news site where I originally saw it to the youtube comment section, seem to think what he's saying is correct. I got IT crowd flashbacks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBsm0LzSP0
|
|
|
Get ready for lift off gents. Trump will force Mexico onto Bitcoin. https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/pay-for-the-wallOn day 1 promulgate a "proposed rule" (regulation) amending 31 CFR 130.121 to redefine applicable financial institutions to include money transfer companies like Western Union, and redefine "account" to include wire transfers. Also include in the proposed rule a requirement that no alien may wire money outside of the United States unless the alien first provides a document establishing his lawful presence in the United States.
Looks like Mr. Trump is gonna have to ban Bitcoin to make his Mexican Paywall work. He probably won't tho. Right? g... guys? Good luck banning decentralized exchanges like Bitsquare. https://bitsquare.io/"One may describe Bitsquare is as a fully decentralized version of LocalBitcoins,"...Yay! More shady meetups with cp vendors and drug dealers! You can use SEPA, OKpay, etc. The exchange is just starting, but it has lots of potential. At least, it is impossible to take down. ... or registered fiat transactions to aforementioned lost souls. Don't get me wrong, I'm curious to see how this works out, but I'll probably watch from the sidelines. The anarco nutters will probably fap their back out with this though.
|
|
|
Altcoin troll boxes getting nervous now ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) LOL! They're packing their parachutes.
|
|
|
It's interesting how nutters assume other nutters are normal people with ill intent.
|
|
|
Forked-tongue lying Stolfi
Fucking Brazillians. Never trust anyone from Spain, Russia, Brazil, a girl with a scorpion tattoo, or anyone that wants to play cards that's named after a city. Itīs not were you come from, but who you are. I wouldnīt trust a roach with a scorpion tatoo, thought ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Viva mexico, cabrones!!. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F24.media.tumblr.com%2F3bd7cd4de0755791746af8190e390848%2Ftumblr_mmuui9I9ax1r90ooxo1_400.gif&t=663&c=JNSiZYyCD2ldvQ) (Prob not helping)
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. Do you know how much of it is witness data and how relevant this would be to the kind of usage patterns we have today? Are these kinds of segwit block sizes perhaps more relevant for when LN is launched? LN is a other story because it is off-chain. just the start and the end is manifested in the blockchain. the other whole lifecycle of certain LN activities do not affect the blockchain. SegWit is a speration of data from the blockchain which is not immediate necessary for txs. and because of this you can see blocks of 3.6 MB. the data which is necessary is stored in the blockchain and the other data is seperated. in sum you have data of 3.6 MB for example but the necessary data is just 0.9 MB. The reason I ask is that, as I understood, the ins and outs of the LN streams are some of the few txs which would use that much witness data. In any event I'm guessing these tests will be used to block any notion of a maxblocksize hf as it's pretty close to the 4mb total they agreed upon with the miners earlier this year. It will be interesting to see what LN does to centralization over the coming years. I hope it's not the beginning of the end. i guess as soon segwit is activated and LN nodes occur we will see stress tests to attack the mainnet. then we know what for a amout of txs (on-chain and off-chain) is possible with 1MB+SegWit+LN. imagine if we will come to a consensus to reduce the blocksize to 0.5 MB in 2017/2018 because of fees are to low. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Careful now. You'll be quoting Bible verses with Luke-Jr soon.
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. Do you know how much of it is witness data and how relevant this would be to the kind of usage patterns we have today? Are these kinds of segwit block sizes perhaps more relevant for when LN is launched? LN is a other story because it is off-chain. just the start and the end is manifested in the blockchain. the other whole lifecycle of certain LN activities do not affect the blockchain. SegWit is a speration of data from the blockchain which is not immediate necessary for txs. and because of this you can see blocks of 3.6 MB. the data which is necessary is stored in the blockchain and the other data is seperated. in sum you have data of 3.6 MB for example but the necessary data is just 0.9 MB. The reason I ask is that, as I understood, the ins and outs of the LN streams are some of the few txs which would use that much witness data. In any event I'm guessing these tests will be used to block any notion of a maxblocksize hf as it's pretty close to the 4mb total they agreed upon with the miners earlier this year. It will be interesting to see what LN does to centralization over the coming years. I hope it's not the beginning of the end.
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. Do you know how much of it is witness data and how relevant this would be to the kind of usage patterns we have today? Are these kinds of segwit block sizes perhaps more relevant for when LN is launched?
|
|
|
You two are a bit slow aren't ya?
|
|
|
I saw we touch $420 on 4/20 and then a rise to $450
What's this obsession with Hitlers birthday? How does it relate to Btcoin? maybe because some ppl are thinking Bitcoin is coming from the dark? all the old Bitcoin stuff websites were black and and we were afraid to browse these sites on work because colleagues could think it's some sort of porno. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I saw we touch $420 on 4/20 and then a rise to $666
i think 420 has something todo with cannabis stuff tho ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Ok, let's hope the unholy trinity of Bitcoin, Drugs and Hitler will send this mofo to the moon then. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.forumcinemas.ee%2F1000%2FEvent_6083%2Fgallery%2Firon%2520sky%25201.jpg&t=663&c=J7F9d8T2rfOuVA)
|
|
|
I saw we touch $420 on 4/20 and then a rise to $450
What's this obsession with Hitlers birthday? How does it relate to Btcoin?
|
|
|
The evolution of the bid sum on Huobi for the last 30 days suggests an upcoming pump.
Tzupy bullish... One ticket to the moon please... ... And about bitcoiners. We're paying poor children in India to pump Bitcoin. Bullish? That's too much to say. I am 1.5x long, and looking for a strong Chinese pump to add to my position upto 3x. If there will be no pump soon, within a week, there will be no moon (actually, rally to ~800$), within 2 months. Good enough for me. CHOO CHOO hgnfgnhhhdffff...move..hgggnnfngh...
|
|
|
The evolution of the bid sum on Huobi for the last 30 days suggests an upcoming pump.
Tzupy bullish... One ticket to the moon please... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FCLqkKPaWcAA5WCQ.png%3Alarge&t=663&c=Ze0pr3-tzztGsQ) And about bitcoiners. We're paying poor children in India to pump Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Fudgepop! This block thingy is harder than I thought!
|
|
|
DEGREASING INITIATED![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FimpLNKclJZQ%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&t=663&c=-Bz40-8e8xz18w)
|
|
|
according to blockchain.info, almost all recent blocks are full except for those mined by antpool, which are completely empty. mempool filling back up.
Most antpool blocks are full, and BTCC mine empty blocks as well. At least Bitmain sell their gear to the public.
|
|
|
|