Un lien et un titre qui parlent de "C02"(sic) , ça commence mal...  |
|
|
|
@Saint-Loup la sélection naturelle n'existe plus chez l'homme depuis l'ère moderne.
Un très bon exemple est par exemple les maladies de type Crohn et autres qui sont liées au génome.
Dans une théorie de sélection naturelle ces maladies finiraient par disparaître car les individus sont plus fragiles/meurent/ne sont pas attirants.
Aujourd'hui notre société/système de santé change cela, et ce qui ressemble plus à la sélection naturelle sont en fait les attributs physiques qui vont rendre une personne attirante ou non... Mais là encore les moches vont avoir tendance à se contenter de moches pour faire simple. Donc pas vraiment de sélection non plus.
Justement je n'ai pas parlé d'ère moderne, d'oú mon exemple avec les animaux. F2B parlait de manière générale "d'amélioration de la situation" et l'homme pré-historique au sens litteral du terme, avait bien evidemment des situations à gérer : prédateurs, famines, climat, catastrophes naturelles, virus, etc. L'ancien testament/Torah nous le rappelle avec le récit des Dix plaies d'Egypte dans le livre de l'Exodus (dsl je ne connais pas l'orthographe hébréophone  ) |
|
|
|
|
Si tu penses que l'optimiste bénéficie d'un avantage comparatif par rapport au pessimiste, il faut le dire à Starensen qui affirme lui-même que l'homme possède naturellement un biais pessimiste le protégeant du danger.
Si c'était les optimistes qui s'en sortaient le mieux, alors ce biais aurait disparu grâce à la sélection naturelle.
On dit que des espèces animales(comme le dodo par exemple) ont disparu parce qu'elles n'étaient pas naturellement effrayées par de nouveaux prédateurs introduits par l'homme dans leur ecosystème...
Pour ce qui est de Bitcoin c'est juste un point de vue en effet mais qui est couramment admis, BTC permettant l'échange de valeur en dehors de tout système bancaire et étatique.
|
|
|
|
I disagree with that, everyone needing to sell an important amount of BTC could have interest in BTC futures.
For example if you need to buy a car or a flat in June you will be happy to be able to secure now a virtual sell of your bitcoins at 10800$ on a future exchange Makes no sense if you ask me You can just sell your bitcoins for dollars (or whatever) and get done with that. Or not sell anything at all and just keep your bitcoins intact until you actually need them, and hopefully with their price risen by that time. The example you provide makes sense for producers who buy raw materials in advance and want to secure current prices for future production because it affects their profits. With direct consumption like buying a car or whatever futures are pretty much useless (not even speaking of trade costs they incur) But thankfully to futures you can just sell your BTCs in June at the current price (even a little bit higher in fact). Of course you're free to gamble on the price in June on the spot market, and just wait until then to see... but if Bitcoin worths $7000 in June finally, you will lose almost 40%... |
|
|
|
Mettre cette douce musique lors de la st-valentin pendant que tu pilonnes ta douce. Il faudra le suggérer à un certain branleur BG  |
|
|
|
Record de température battu en Antarticque où pour la première fois une température supérieure à 20° a été enregistrée...
Bientôt on va pouvoir aller à la plage au pôle sud  _Bah tu prends pas ton manteau? _Non tkt je vais au pôle sud |
|
|
|
I guess the OP didn't include both underlining and literally highlighted texts as it is somehow the same size and seems to not calls off attention as much as his tips did, because even I myself don't see underlining being worth to have enough attention especially if the post/replies were too long and the subject or idea to be embossed is in the middle of the context.
I also see that the OP's tips is mostly used in formats in the world of Academe/Universities, as it offers not to be so simple and not to be exaggerated at the same time.
I don't think words in italic are more visible than underlined ones. So I'm not sure you're right to assume that's for this reason. Moreover underlined sentences are often used in titles, even in academic articles. |
|
|
|
@Saint-loup, @Stalker22, I'm not saying that Eurovision isn't popular, but these 150-200 million people watching it mainly comes from Europe. While Olympic games or World Cup is watched by billions. And as you can see, Eurovision is far from being in the list of most watched TV programs https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-watched_television_broadcasts#ListYeah, Eurovision is shown outside Europe, but it's not on main TV channels with biggest ratings, maybe except Australia. And I used USA just as example, there could be another country like Brazil, Nigeria or whatever you want. Until 2019 it wasn't shown there on big TV network, until Netflix bought it. And here is one of articles where it's explained why Eurovision isn't a thing in USA: https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/86543/five-reasons-why-americans-will-never-understand-the-point-of-eurovision/amp/And yeah, Madonna was there, but obviously not because Eurovision is popular in States. She just got lot of money for performance, same like on her World Tours and that's all. It takes place once a year while it's only every 4 years for FIFA world cup and Olympic games... So it's 200 millions viewers every year. As I understand you're not american, that's why you think american people have no culture and don't care about Europe and the rest of the world, but you're wrong.
Germany and UK (and Spain and France) always perform very poor ranking wise.
I agree with you for France, and this year it's even worse than the previous years, it's a totally unknown folk/blues singer(in fact his father is a famous humorist) singing in english. If I can bet France not reaching the top 10, I will do it |
|
|
|
Obviously a moderator thought nuking a poison-pen letter writer using an anonymous brand new account was appropriate. I wouldn't say it isn't personally. (Only newbie accounts can be nuked by moderators AFAIK)
If scam accusation was valid he should have been banned and not nuked, imho. Moderators can't ban accounts AFAIK, they can only nuke them. It's a GM and administrator role. |
|
|
|
|
Obviously a moderator thought nuking a poison-pen letter writer using an anonymous brand new account was appropriate. I wouldn't say it isn't personally. (Only newbie accounts can be nuked by moderators AFAIK)
|
|
|
|
Si tu veux nous rejoindre contacte moi sur telegram. C'est pas exactement un groupe public  Je demanderai aux autres membres avant de t'inviter. Donc ce n'est pas exactement ce dont parlait l'OP. Lui il semble vouloir créer un groupe public même si la raison m'échappe un peu. |
|
|
|
I thought the rules only apply if you post unsolicited referral links.
That's for PMs: if someone asks for it, sending referral links by PM are okay No I think UserU is right. According to mprep himself it's ok to post referral links in this situation. That is to say, only the "spam" of referral codes is forbidden. 4. No referral code (ref link) spam. [1] If you are posting a reply on a thread, and your answer is relevant. Would adding your referral link instead of the plain url be a problem? For example, you are suggesting service a-dot-com as an answer's to OPs question. Would a ref link (a-dot-com?ref=my-ref) be allowed? and is constructive (i.e. not just parotting content that was already posted), it's allowed. |
|
|
|
Very interesting. I was among those who thought Bakkt would boom once launched, because I'd figured that hedge funds and other big-money investors would want in on the crypto game, and the only good way to do that would be through futures and options. Apparently the reception is tepid at best, and I'm kind of surprised to see that.
Even the volume on the CME seems pretty low. I've no idea what's going on behind the scenes, but my guess is that if business doesn't pick up on Bakkt, they'll shut their doors My take is that no one is actually interested in Bitcoin derivatives How come? The reason for that is simple. You can store Bitcoin without any hassle and the requirement to pay storage and transportation costs, for example (apart from transaction fees, obviously). And in this regard Bitcoin is strikingly different from gold, oil, gas, and other material assets. With them derivatives make perfect sense as you can buy and sell paper gold, etc. But paper bitcoins simply don't cut it as you can just as easily have real bitcoins totally under your control in your personal wallet I disagree with that, everyone needing to sell an important amount of BTC could have interest in BTC futures. For example if you need to buy a car or a flat in June you will be happy to be able to secure now a virtual sell of your bitcoins at 10800$ on a future exchange. You won't want to have to look at the price everyday till june while praying the Savior for the price to not drop. |
|
|
|
Ghost wallet mean, Its no one owner that address. Im just copy wrong the charracter  Unlike Bitcoin there is no checksum in the usual ethereum addresses, so you have to be very careful when you use them. Not everyone knows it but there is a checksummed format for ethereum addresses. The EIP55 one. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-55.mdIt's exactly the same address as your current one, but in a case sensitive derived form. You can obtain it by typing your ordinary address on etherscan.io for example. If your wallet doesn't support the checksum feature, you can use online validators https://tokenmarket.net/ethereum-address-validator |
|
|
|
Justement on est pas là pour compenser tes lacunes et corriger nous-mêmes tes déficiences. Un hyperlien c'est fait pour être cliqué, si tu ne veux pas qu'il soit cliqué tu le rends non cliquable, mais là tu pourris le forum avec des pointeurs foireux. Et pour les graphes et images tu n'essayes même pas de les poster ou de donner au moins leur lien, tu nous demandes carrément de nous démerder nous-mêmes. On dit rien parce qu'on est tres tolérants ici (comme avec tes écritures non françaises récurrentes) mais quand ça devient systématique ca compromet l'ensemble de la lisibilité et de l'ergonomie du forum. |
|
|
|
C'est lourd vos liens cassés au bout d'un moment. Si en plus vous rajoutez le bail du "regardez dans mon lien le 4eme graphique à droite et comparez-le avec la 6eme image à gauche", ca devient complètement inintelligible. SVP faites un effort d'utiliser les balises [url] et [img] correctement c'est quand même pas bien compliqué... Si vous n'êtes pas capable d'apprendre à utiliser ça on peut franchement douter de vos capacités cognitives et donc de votre légitimité à débattre de sujets aussi pointus, désolé de le dire... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
