I don't see any option that you can pay 1 sat/byte where honestly you see this option?
If you're on the latest version, just play with the two sliders... slide the top one all the way to the left (Low Priority)... then slide the bottom one all the way to the left (will probably say 0 sat/byte)... the 2nd from the left isn't tooo bad (9 sat/byte when writing this)... Have a play with the sliders to find the fee you want. I still don't understand why they don't just create a text box that you can simply type the fee into  |
|
|
|
you need to restore the seed to the nano... when the nano asks if you want to configure as a new device, select the button marked with an "X":  You will then be able to enter the KeepKey seed into the Nano which should effectively "clone" your KeepKey wallet into your Nano... you THEN use Electrum and select "use a hardware device"... it will detect your Nano and create a "watching only" wallet from the Nano's master public key. This will ensure your seed is not exposed to any computer... it is completely entered (in a very long and tedious, but secure process) on the Nano itself. NOTE: if you're unsure how to "reset" the Nano to get the "Configure as a new device?" message, (make sure you already have it's current seed safely written down if there are any coins on it  ) and then simply insert an incorrect PIN 3 times... |
|
|
|
|
No wallets actually do this... The best they can do is have functionality that allows you to use external services like ShapeShift from within the wallet.
Otherwise, the only way to convert from one coin to another is by using some form of exchange like kraken, changelly, ShapeShift, cryptopia, bittrex, poloniex etc
|
|
|
|
Okay, the Seed thing working wow O.o But it have 0.00 BTC  Idk why :/ Np maybe i can somehow open my Multibit.wallet file, any tips?  Firstly, stop using "bold" text...  Secondly, what was the "Derivation Path" that you used with your MultiBit Seed when you created the wallet in Electrum? If you left it as the default (m/44'/0'/0') it wouldn't work... you need to use m/0' Watch this youtube video (made by MultiBit)... it shows step by step how to recreate your multibit wallet in Electrum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-KcY6KUVnY |
|
|
|
You should not need to open the wallet to get to the config file... it is probably in the Application Data directory... if you are on windows... try looking in C:\Users\YOURUSERNAME\AppData\Roaming and see if there is a directory named something like "InterZone" or similar... have a look in there... You should see an "interzone.conf" file which you should be able to edit with a text editor. NOTE: to get \AppData directory (and/or interzone.conf) to show in explorer properly, you may need to show hidden files/folders and get windows to show file extensions properly... refer to these 2 links: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/14201/windows-show-hidden-files and https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/865219/how-to-show-or-hide-file-name-extensions-in-windows-explorerAnother shortcut is to use: Start -> Run and type "%AppData%" (without the quotes, but including the % symbols) and press enter: |
|
|
|
|
The issue is that it sounds like you have a LOT of small, unspent outputs (hence why b.info says consolidate them)...
For instance, if you try and send say 0.1 BTC and you have 100x 0.001 BTC outputs, you'll end up with a transaction that is like 15,000 bytes... And if you set a fee of 100 sats/byte that equates to a fee of 0.015, which means you'd need to add in another 15x inputs which adds MORE fees which adds more inputs etc... Until you get to the point where you finally see to send 0.1, you have 0.05 or worse in fees! And that's with only 100 sat/byte fee... With 400 says/byte fee it is even worse.
So rather than get complaints about ridiculous fees for ridiculously large sized transactions, b.info give you the warning and tell you to consolidate the coins.
Unfortunately, they don't seem to offer any solutions or instructions on how to do that.
Like I said, send all your coins back to yourself... Use minimum of 10 sats/byte custom fee... Use ViaBTC TX accelerator... All your problems solved.
And, if possible, stop receiving small amounts of BTC. Anything less than 0.005 is really starting to get too small and will cause this issue again in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Most likely dumping the private key out of the wallet and into either a text file or the screen has allowed someone to get access to your private key... It is the only logical explanation for why all your coins got moved without you transferring them.
It is hard to know if your new wallet is compromised or not... The only way to be completely sure is to completely wipe the entire system, reformat and reinstall your operating system...
|
|
|
|
You can't set things in euro, and then talk also about bitcoin amounts... it's a bit confusing I'm not sure if you've now set the fee as 1,50 euro per byte, or the actual total fee was 1,50 euro... as far as I was aware, the blockchain custom fee let you specify what the "per byte" fee should be... I really hope you didn't set it to 1,50euro PER BYTE!!?!  |
|
|
|
That looks more like AES256 encrypted text... looks nothing like a "seed"... or is that the output from the extract script that comes with btcrecover?  |
|
|
|
Passphrase and/or locked wallet ONLY affects the wallet.dat file... if the hacker had your private key, then all the passphrases in the world won't save you. Did you ever export the private key for the address: 1Q1PDnwmbFkNaYbpsiPVUBJe1pEM7m8zYH? As annmarie suggested, that entire wallet should be considered compromised and you should no longer receive ANY coins to it. I recommended moving any coins you have left to a new wallet immediately. I see that 1Q1PDnwmbFkNaYbpsiPVUBJe1pEM7m8zYH just received more coins today. You need to STOP using that address immediately and move those coins as soon as possible. You should probably also scan your computer for viruses/malware. |
|
|
|
It sounds like you must have received a lot of "dust" sized transactions. Cloud mining? faucet collecting? Unfortunately, to consolidate using blockchain.info could be quite costly, unless they let you specify the fees, as a large number of inputs = large transaction size = large fee. Last time I checked, there was an advanced setting on the "send" dialog, that let you set the exact "custom" fee rate that you wanted to use. If you want to minimise the amount of fees, without worrying about your transaction getting stuck for being "low fee", I would personally send ALL the bitcoins to a new "receive" address in your wallet using a custom fee of 10.001 sats/byte (or 0.00010001 BTC/kB depending on the units used by your wallet). This will then allow you to use the services of the ViaBTC TX Accelerator to make sure your transaction gets confirmed within ~12 hrs (usually within an hour or so). NOTE: That there is a risk that if you don't get the fee right (or it spends outputs from unconfirmed parent transactions), ViaBTC may not accept your transaction for acceleration and your transaction may get stuck for an extended period of time.Anyway, once all your bitcoins are in one address, the number of inputs used in your transactions will be greatly reduced so your fees become lower And finially, just to clarify... you don't have the bitcoins in multiple "wallets" as such... what you have is multiple "addresses" within ONE wallet ("My Wallet")! |
|
|
|
wait... does your config file literally contain these lines at the beginning?: Your error message seems to say that these lines are in your file? If so, I'd suggest removing the first two lines ("It have format:" and "Code:") as I think you've copy/pasted something from some instructions incorrectly. Your config file should only contain the following (NOTE: DO NOT copy the "code:"... only copy the text INSIDE the box starting with "rpcuser": rpcuser=here you enter any word with several alphanumeric characters
rpcpassword=here you enter any word with several alphanumeric characters
listen=1
port=11994
masternode=1
masternodeprivkey= along with my key and now I cannot open wallet.
You should be able to modify the file with any text editor |
|
|
|
Import - adds private key(s) into the current keystore (NOTE: This is NOT currently possible with Electrum HD wallets)... you need to create a wallet using "private" keys as opposed to using a "seed". Export - Outputs private key(s) (usually in "Wallet Import Format" aka WIF, long hex string that starts with a "5", "K" or "L") eg. 5HueCGU8rMjxEXxiPuD5BDku4MkFqeZyd4dZ1jvhTVqvbTLvyTJ Sweep - Sends the coins controlled by private key(s), to another address (can theoretically be ANY adddress, you don't have to sweep into your Electrum wallet)... effectively it is just a "normal" transaction, but you need to enter the private key(s) for the addresses being used as inputs. Usually (but not only) used to send the contents of a "paper" wallet to a different wallet without having to first import the paper wallet. |
|
|
|
You did interpret it wrong... did you not read the whole post or something? Why isn’t Bread picking a side?
We are picking a side. We side with our users. And even though many of our users strongly disagree with one another about the merits of Chain A or Chain B, it is not our job to tell any of them what to think. Bread is comprised of a group of individuals, any of whom will gladly give you their personal opinion on the matter, but as a company we have to stay true to our two promises: Keep customer funds safe, and give customers a choice.
They are not explicitly supporting ANY chain... by design, SPV wallets will follow whatever turns out to be the main chain... it *could* be S2X, it *could* be Core... Bread, by default, will just use whatever is the longest chain... UNLESS you take the precautions they talk about (tethering the app to a specific node working on a specific chain etc). Also, their #1 recommendation is: Do Nothing! The safest course of action is to refrain from making transactions until the fork confusion is resolved. This is our #1 recommendation to users. They even go as far as to warn about the issues around replay protection... Not quite sure how you interpreted ANY of that article as "Bread Devs back S2X" |
|
|
|
You see that is the thing; I did select Dynamic Fees and I also slid the bar all the way to the right which is max (150%) ... I don't understand why this time it took the longest it has ever taken and was stuck for hours. I'm lost  Interesting... I can only theorise that you sent the transaction just as the number of transactions in the mempool started to spike along with an increase in fees... sometimes it is just a question of "bad timing"™... The only real solution to that is to mark all your transactions as "RBF" (replace-by-fee)... This would allow you to increase the fee if the transaction is unconfirmed for a while to try and get it confirmed. Electrum offers this functionality. I use "Propose Replace-By-Fee" = "Always"... I can't think of any reason NOT to mark a transaction as RBF. i am a new user of electrum i did a transfer from a paper wallet to my electrum account. is been about 6 hour now. Please help.
Can't help without a TXID... otherwise, you get the standard "you probably sent with low fee, try a transaction accelerator" reply |
|
|
|
Well, hopefully he makes contact with you then... he hasn't been active since August 30th, so I wouldn't hold your breath. Perhaps a friendly PM to him might send him a notification and you can get it all sorted? |
|
|
|
If you don't want to manually calculate fees and would like the best chance at quick confirmation, you should simply set Electrum to use "Dynamic Fees" (Tools -> Preferences -> Fees, and then tick the "Use Dynamic Fees" box)... then on the "Send" tab, slide the fee slider all the way to the right. This will likely end up with relatively "expensive" fees, but it means your transactions will generally use a fee rate that is consistent with quick confirmation times in the current network environment at the time of sending. Otherwise, if you're looking to try to "save" coins on fees, you will need to either slide the slider a step or two to the left and accept some delay in confirmation and/or calculate your fees manually using resources like https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ and https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx and https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count to judge how "busy" the network is and what the current fee rates being used are. Your final option is to use one of the free transaction accelerators like ViaBTC or confirmtx.com and pray for the best NOTE: the amount of coins you are sending has no bearing on fees... $1 dollar or $1million dollars, the network doesn't really care... it is all about the data size of the transaction in bytes! |
|
|
|
And yes, I messed up - actual wording at paragraph 1.4 says "Segregation customer's assets from proprietary assets" that means exchange does not really have to segregate each user's assets from each other individually, just keep em separate from exchange's own wallet. Still I see some hole in this, since exchange can't instantly deduct it's trade fee from user's wallet so there is a period, when assets of both user and exchange are mixed up in a wallet. I still wonder how real exchange manage their wallets.
I wouldn't think this is the case... You don't really have any "assets" after depositing to an exchange... In effect, you basically have a promissory note or "IOU" for the value of your deposit. This is your "number in a database". When an order is executed, they simply update 4 values in the database... The "buy" and "sell" coin totals for yourself and the trading partner... There "fee" is automatically created by simply crediting your account with a lower number than your trade... ie. if you bought 10 BCH with a 0.1% fee, they'd only increase your balance by 9.999 BCH. As far as I can tell, it really doesn't require any changes to any "wallets" until "settlement" occurs when users wish to withdraw (or deposit more funds). For instance: User account = 0 BTC, 0 BCH Exchange BTC Wallet = 100 BTC Exchange BCH Wallet = 1000 BCH User then deposits 1 BTC:user account = 1 BTC Exchange BTC wallet = 101 BTC Exchange BCH walelt = 1000 BCH User then exchanges 1 BTC for 10 BCH:User account = 0 BTC, 9.999 BCH (assuming 0.1% fee) Exchange BTC wallet = 101 BTC Exchange BCH wallet = 1000 BCH User then withdraws BCH:User account = 0 BTC, 0 BCH Exchange BTC wallet = 101 BTC Exchange BCH wallet = 9990.001 BCH As you can see, pretty much limitless trades can occur without the actual wallet values actually changing... they only change when deposits/withdrawals happen... and by simply crediting users with lower values than the "true" value of the trade they generate their fee. |
|
|
|
Step 1. Export private keys from Electrum Step 2. Import private keys into Bitcoin Gold Wallet of your choice (not that I can see any... not even on bitcoin gold website ) Step 3. ? ? ? Step 4. Profit? Honestly, they've got 7 days until the fork... and looking at their github hardly anything on their ToDo list is done ( https://trello.com/b/P1rLw1G9/bitcoin-gold-todos) |
|
|
|
Electrum dev made it ridiculously easy to transfer your MultiBit HD wallet to Electrum by making it so you can enter "custom" Derivation Path's for BIP39 seeds... like the custom path that MultiBit HD uses... And the MultiBit people even created a video showing how to do it after they dropped support for MultiBit HD... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-KcY6KUVnYSo, I'd recommend importing your MultiBit HD wallet words into Electrum on your desktop You'll be safe to delete MultiBit HD as long as you have the "wallet words" written down safely |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
