I will check/fix all pools that you mention here within 24 hours.
Claymore the man! Ethereum's "stratum" is a bit of a disaster. Tons of different implementations that vary slightly. |
|
|
|
I cannot find any Ethereum mining info on "f2pool.com". Perhaps it does not accepts wallet addresses but requires Login.Worker username format, such pools are not supported.
https://www.f2pool.com/help" eth.f2pool.com:8008 How to mine Ethereum at F2Pool? Please configure your eth-proxy set either WALLET to your payout address or MONITORING_EMAIL to your F2Pool user name or login email. If you leave MONITORING_EMAIL empty, the workers page is available at https://www.f2pool.com/eth/<account>. Otherwise you can also check your account info on your logged-in dashboard. " Based on the console output, it just seems your miner doesn't understand the work JSON. |
|
|
|
If the miner doesn't work with some pool - let me know its address and port, I'll check it.
f2pool (which works fine with eth-proxy) doesn't work Stratum - connecting to 'eth.f2pool.com' <139.196.206.207> port 8008 Stratum - Connected Received error: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"result":["0x54909b5742f7b3d326ff65764cbd1926c6d7d5bc9aaf6057a2cc0a78209e965c","0x67f3589ac683de3f41fe727f3860c421a c1eb1b0fdf36289f99b3cbe89a2b3a3","0x00000001ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff"],"error":null} |
|
|
|
I've updated eth-us.suprnova.cc and eth-mine.suprnova.cc to new versions and also improved performance quite a lot, there shouldn't be any timeouts or "JSON RPC error.." anymore.
Are you able to offer stratum on eth-us.suprnova.cc ? Getwork is so ugg; would be nice to use qtminer or genoil w/ stratum on this pool. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like payments are slowly starting to roll out again (seems to be starting from the largest owed payments first and moving down slowly)
You can bet that today's Eth rally was in part because of the biggest pool having locked up funds that couldn't be dumped! =p
Withdrawals started flowing, and the price turned around immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
Payments have been stopped for almost half a day.
No response from admin to emails. Beware until resolved - 1000s of Eth piling up in pool account.
|
|
|
|
|
Topic hasn't been posted to in a while... but, it appears payouts have stopped on dwarfpool.com at the moment.
No Eth payouts in last 6hr, when they are usually done hourly.
Lotttta Eth stacking up there.
|
|
|
|
I use catalyst 14.9 + miner 9.1 for 14.x cata .. i see message in start (warning: Linking two modules of different data layouts x5) later miner work.. hashrate on pool normal, maybe can not pay attention to this warning?
Try to add this to .bat file: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 no effect Just use 13.12 then. |
|
|
|
Anybody who has burned a GPU board from OC'ing will recognize it as such. GPUs are not a comparison here... you're comparing apples to oranges and making yourself look like a multi-posting fool. That board is used, anyone who says otherwise is misleading everyone.
I don't think anyone has said it was unused. It isn't heavily used, and the PCB isn't dicoloured from mining extensively or some bullshit like that. I'm certainly not trying to mislead anyone, however, your obvious attempts to talk about things you do not know are very clearly manipulation. Maybe you're manipulating your own small mind too and seeing things that aren't there tho. Trying to speculate from that one picture that Alpha-T has been mining with these rigs for some time, is paramount to stupidity and gives them way way too much credit. These guys are incompetent and stupid, not criminal masterminds. |
|
|
|
Apartments are usually tiny from a square footage perspective and have heat included (almost always). If you're into a upstairs unit you're also more then likely receiving plenty of heat from the unit below you. That might be true where you live... it certainly is not the case everywhere - far from it... some people pay $1000+ to heat a 500sqft condo over the winter. Having close to that number of GPUs, I can tell you it will maybe heat a small house using x11. Blast furnace my ass. You have no idea how many BTUs a normal furnace puts out to heat your home (hydronic or forced air). Gas is ridiculously cheaper and so are furnaces. HAHAHAH... NO! You can easily spend $3000-5000 on oil to heat a house over the winter months. Or, you can mine $5000 worth of crypto, and make the same heat. Not everyone uses the excuse 'hobby' to operate at a loss. If that's you, obviously talking about trade offs and profit doesn't apply to you. There are plenty of people who got into GPU mining to make a profit, I'd say most people did. The residual may be hobbyists after everything crashes and burns, but we're in the middle of crashing right now, which is why I'm trying to talk to people in various ways. Who said anything about operating at a loss? If people are super negative they should sell, trying to get the word out about more efficient algos and hoping I change some minds as far as that's concerned, so people wont be so negative. More efficient algos? What? I totally don't understand this statement. Change what minds about what? Opportunity cost, depreciation, and artificially depressing the market. Opportunity cost being paid for in spades - all calculations considered. Also - what's your lost opportunity cost if there is say, a few days in the future where GPU mining is immensely profitable? Artificially depressing the market - I also don't understand what you're talking about here... Either non-sense or, well, something close to non-sense as far as I can see. There isn't anything artificial about it, and I don't know how actively mining is depressing the market. |
|
|
|
If they're fingerprints, it's a very high coincidence for them to be sitting right over those pads. Instead it's possible that the reflow oven they used didn't put any solder there, and they used an iron at far too high of a temp to do so by hand. Or it's smudges, or it's something else, but those traces don't appear damaged so there'd be no point for the PCB to be burned there. This is frankly, a decent analysis. Much more appropriate then "used board", which is quite frankly, ridiculous. I am all for remembering and recognizing everything Alpha-Technologies has done wrong and illegally, and let us not forget all their broken promises (contractual obligations..?..).. But please, let's be objective and not point out obvious bullshit about PCB discoloring like complete fools talking about things they do not know. I stand by my own opinions regarding the boards having seen significant use. I've had hundreds of GPUs pass through my hands and PCB boards don't look like that when they are new. Believe what you like. Obviously it's only my opinion, just as you have yours. GPUs are not a comparison here... You're comparing the boards of giants (AMD/Asus) to ants (Dextrel/Alpha-Technologies/The Akrams). My opinion is better then yours, at least in this case - period - sorry. Again, I think the Akram father and sons should never be forgotten as the fraudsters they are... but, that is not a picture of a "heavily used board"... |
|
|
|
If they're fingerprints, it's a very high coincidence for them to be sitting right over those pads. Instead it's possible that the reflow oven they used didn't put any solder there, and they used an iron at far too high of a temp to do so by hand. Or it's smudges, or it's something else, but those traces don't appear damaged so there'd be no point for the PCB to be burned there. This is frankly, a decent analysis. Much more appropriate then "used board", which is quite frankly, ridiculous. I am all for remembering and recognizing everything Alpha-Technologies has done wrong and illegally, and let us not forget all their broken promises (contractual obligations..?..).. But please, let's be objective and not point out obvious bullshit about PCB discoloring like complete fools talking about things they do not know. |
|
|
|
I love the "wrecking it for other people" part. Stop mining because I want diff to go down!  Bingo. It's not very many comments capable of earning that many L's and O's strung together. Nothing in technology that is profitable for a home user is likely to stay that way. Economies of scale are simply too advantageous, and where there is profit (or these days, free or heavily subsidized heating), there will be those who take advantage and those who cry about it. |
|
|
|
People are fucking retarded if they're using their GPUs as space heaters and using that as part of their profitability equation. That means in spring, everyone is going to be super negative, everyone will sell their rigs (or hold them till next winter?), and the economy will bomb again. I wondered what was going on, but this is so asinine I don't even know what to think of it.
What's wrong with subsidize heating? You don't like free heat? It absolutely makes sense to mine for heat even if you're only breaking even on power costs... Only short-termers sell rigs in the spring... It might only take a week of highly profitable mining to make hanging onto 30 cards worthwhile vs selling them. And if you've got large spaces or several buildings to keep warm during the winter, then you can save yourself thousands in heating costs. Breaking even with power costs is not the same as making money, especially considering how much you could have if you sold your cards. They DO depreciate, which happened recently with the release of the 970/980 and AMDs price cuts to all their cards because of it. People that are using their GPUs as space heaters (and using that as part of their profitability equation) are just wrecking things for themselves and other people. Slightly above breaking even with power costs is the minimum required to make money.. Sell cards? Why? Wrecking it for other people? LOLOLOLOLOL Efficiency is hash/watt That's one way of looking at it - you could also say that the most efficient miner is the one that's producing the most hashes... depends what matters to you... wattage won't necessarily matter to everyone's idea of mining efficiency. Miners don't magically scale up, people buy them. People aren't going to buy them if they aren't remotely profitable. There are some (stupid) people that have been clinging to their hardware till winter to switch it on and use it as a space heater, but they'll die off in spring time. Otherwise it doesn't magically scale up. There is opportunity cost and if say a 280x was making a dollar a day, it'd still take a half a year of those prices to pay it off. As it stands right now, most people didn't get to pay off their loans from their mining hardware if they bought it last January or later (not nov or dec). You call it stupid, I call it smart. All my hardware made ROI long ago (of course, after paying for the power), and is well in profit. Now it's the most efficient heater you could ever imagine (it pays for itself and then some!) I don't think anyone would tell you it's a good time to get into crypto mining on GPUs right now. Oh definitely, I can't see who would invest right now. But if you already have the GPUs, and you're keeping them for some reason (people will have various reasons), why not have free heat for the winter? |
|
|
|
Xn7cuHRKzMDkTTDxs5jtcXGZkLT5y6QDF9 That's amazing~! Another subtitle: INNOVATION in Darkcoin! lol... innovation? https://code.google.com/p/gource/You know he just recorded a video in low quality of an open source app that can create such a video from any git, svn, mercurial, etc repo, right? |
|
|
|
|
Lol, guys... those dark spots in that picture do not suggest the board is used... far from it. If anything, that looks like someone's dirty finger marks.
Not to mention the guy who circled stuff in red above can't seem to tell the difference between PCB discoloring (which it clearly is not) and lighting variance/poor image quality.
Seriously, you give Alpha too much credit if you think they're mining with a whole ton of assembled vipers right now.
|
|
|
|
Hello
Say please message below problem or i can work ?
warning: Linking two modules of different data layouts
Try reading/searching the thread you're posting in before posting a question: also got this error
WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil64-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl'
but miner continue to work
You get that from running mismatched miner and driver versions. Strange error on latest miner, linking two modules of different data layouts.
Add this to .bat: setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 So... first make sure you're running 13.12 drivers, and the 13.12 miner. Then if that doesn't help, try setting the GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR environment variable. |
|
|
|
Checking out Flirt Coin may not be a bad decision often profitable to get on the coin before it launches. Seems to be the best chance at profiting with the older miners now. One of the reasons we decided to go with Sha 256. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=851123.0haven't look yet your thread but sha256.... is clearly not for gpu, unless you ban asic so basically it will be high power consumption for absolutely no coin And basically guarantees the coin will be instamined, and then left stranded at a high difficulty that will never drop again. One successful coin per algo... that's the eventual future in blockchains. You're never going to compete with bitcoin for SHA hashrate, so don't try. I think you should rather try to understand the agenda of the guy who posted that thread... (manipulation on bitcointalk works usually both way... ) Actually I already read half of it long ago, and the only thing I think is that some people have way too much free time (spending time looking into pdf signature  while actually it doesn't mean anything at all except they launched without a white-paper... but considering the absence of success of their coin, you might wonder more why at some point they wrote one... which is a lot more puzzling... except to try to pave MNR way... (then you might start to wonder what is the relationship between BCN & MNR dev... and how MNR dev "discovered" BCN...) Also MNR was mined for about 2 months with nobody caring, then cpu/gpu dev looked at them seeing something which could be interesting (then a few months later you got the miners ) if you call that fair launch... well what is an unfair one ? Just FYI: I had never actually read that thread I linked to before, but I knew from material facts I collected myself that BCN and cryptonote were developed and released in 2014, and definitely not prior to that. I linked you to one article on the topic (first google result) because you seemed rather ignorant of the facts. The whitepapers clearly show that the devs have no problem falsifying dates, so you can take a short step in logic and conclude that believing their posted launch date is paramount to ultimate stupidity (and believing the dates on the blockchain would be equally as stupid). I'm confident you'll never have proof that BCN existed before 2014 (because it didn't) - which is why I suggested you should find proof, not to provide a reference to the scamcoin's website that anybody can read (but only someone with half a brain would actually believe). And that's a completely inaccurate description of Monero's launch. I'm done trying to show you the truth tho - even in the face of glaring evidence contrary to your prior comments, you're still arguing. That makes pretty clear that you're just trolling, and certainly not trying either learn or educate. You see... I've read everything you say, and I didn't instantly presume I knew better; but, any amount of digging makes endlessly clear that I definitely do know much more about this topic then you. And if you're not actually interested in learning, then this conversation is pointless. Feel free to have the last word on this if you want tho - it'll probably provide a bit of satisfaction to your over-inflated ego. |
|
|
|
Speaking of innovation, cryptonote is almost as old as btc so I don't really see any innovation in that.
Stopped reading here, because he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about. If you really believe BCN existed for that long, then I have a bridge you might want to buy... you are right only 2 and half years of existence... so new (no thanks, keep the bridge someone sold you ) Doesn't even know the history behind BCN... *mind boggled*. Why people try to talk about things they know nothing about is beyond me. If BCN was around a year ago, and you can provide ANY solid evidence and proof of this, I'll eat my hat and the bridge is yours free! You really are a moron, because you act like if you were knowing the coin while you clearly don't and didn't even bother looking While the only thing I did was to go to their website and check the date rather than making assumption BCN was launched the 4th of july 2012 Bon appetit. ROFL! Go do some research (see my edit above). They lied about the launch date and there is endless evidence. Epic stupidty calling me a moron without even doing a simple google search! This is, btw, the main reason for Monero's existance. XMR was a fair launch of an impressive new technology. BCN was majority pre-mined under false pretences before launch. It says a lot about you that, "the only thing [you] did" was read the website of a scam coin and conclude you knew everything... lol you don't even make sense, why anybody would give a wrong launch date ? Knowing that everybody would say it would it has been instamine during a year. You sure like to have the last word, but at least use one which make a little sense, that would change (and XMR and BCN are probably the same guys... ) If you believe half of what you just wrote here you are particularly deluded. Go read up on BCN's history. Everyone with half a brain does know it was a pre-mine scam. You're lack of any attempt to do the most minor research is appalling. They faked the launch date (and there is TONS of proof - the white papers were made with software not released until 2014; the "2012" whitepaper refers to a bitcointalk post from mid 2013...) so they could pass off their story of a "deep web" coin that was just surfacing. I believe everything I've said because I actually do research and verify facts. I don't just go to a website, read 1 thing, and conclude I know everything. Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=740112.0If you still think you know better then me after you read that, then I definitely give up on your hopeless mind. I hope you'll open your eyes tho - purposeful ignorance is far from becoming. |
|
|
|
Speaking of innovation, cryptonote is almost as old as btc so I don't really see any innovation in that.
Stopped reading here, because he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about. If you really believe BCN existed for that long, then I have a bridge you might want to buy... you are right only 2 and half years of existence... so new (no thanks, keep the bridge someone sold you ) Doesn't even know the history behind BCN... *mind boggled*. Why people try to talk about things they know nothing about is beyond me. If BCN was around a year ago, and you can provide ANY solid evidence and proof of this, I'll eat my hat and the bridge is yours free! You really are a moron, because you act like if you were knowing the coin while you clearly don't and didn't even bother looking While the only thing I did was to go to their website and check the date rather than making assumption BCN was launched the 4th of july 2012 Bon appetit. ROFL! Go do some research (see my edit above). They lied about the launch date and there is endless evidence. Epic stupidty calling me a moron without even doing a simple google search! This is, btw, the main reason for Monero's existance. XMR was a fair launch of an impressive new technology. BCN was majority pre-mined (82% premine!) under false pretences before launch. It says a lot about you that, "the only thing [you] did" was read the website of a scam coin and conclude you knew everything... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
)
