I have always had this thought about tainted bitcoins: when bitcoins becomes tainted, do they remain tainted for good and not get clean or does exchanges seize them and then resell them for them to become clean again? Because, I guess that’s the only way it can get clean, because if you put it on coins mixers it’s just going to get worse. Although I do understand the fact that this is for own good in a way, because this will be a way for them to be able to keep track and know bitcoins that were gotten through negative means.

Well, I guess that’s what you have to face when you have anonymity. If you’re not going to do this then people who do bad things to get their coins will go scot free. But then at the same time this is affecting the good guys, because if you use a peer to peer means to buy coins, you wouldn’t really know whether they are tainted or not.

Now we have just end of first half and after bad start from PSG they are recovering very good through Wijnaldum 2 goals give them better lead before end of first half. Messi's absence is not good for them, but today they are playing very good, a better team against very weak opponent. Hopefully we will have some good number of goals from these quality strikers in second half because now they have some better combination.

In one other match 10 men Dortmund is also leading against Ajax it's very interesting match which is going to be had some better result for home team because they have red card in very early stage of game.

Only the time required for spotting out an arbitrage trading opportunity might be too long but once you find the price gap then you can easily make profits instantly. Arbitrage trading must need lots of patience. You must need to watch and compare price levels across exchanges to figure out the possibilities of arbitrage trading. This is the reason, almost all the traders hate it but if I come across then definitely I will go for it; who do not want instant profits?

Bitcointalk profile link:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93949
Current amount of posts (including this one):  574
Amount of merit EARNED in the last 120 days:  9
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1q0nv4amx43luyn06j0nu8ygs52h43n32kmjc3xl

Your bitcointalk profile link:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93949
Your current posts count (including this one):  574
Amounts of merits that you earned in the last 120 days:  9
Your blackjack.fun username:  add1ct3dd

I have heard about NEAR, but I have not invested in it yet. I’m yet to do any serious research on it to understand it better, maybe when I do I would develop much interest and start investing money it. As for SOL, I already invested in it for long now and its sure is a good choice that I made for myself. These coins just come out of nowhere and they are on top.

I don’t know about the other two coins that you have mentioned on the list (Ltx and PYR). I still go old school when I am investing, I have Ethereum and it has been a great choice for every year, I never regret buying it. Binance Smart Chain (BSC) is something else, really good choice too! BNB and BSC are the same thing, although they are two different coins that are owned by the same Binance, but I don’t see any much price difference.

Yeah, but here we are discussing about how you are going to exit those investments. It means that we are considering lots of criteria for making an investment or trade hence do we need to consider same kind of criteria for exiting to confirm our profits? In my opinion, yeah we should consider all the criteria which are related to change of trend.

Unfortunately most traders are not following any technical analysis for exiting/profit booking. They are all going for booking profit blindly or going by fixed target level; in my opinion this will definitely have a negative impact on our profit levels in the end.

Personally, I don’t think that is going to be possible to regulate cryptocurrency directly, except the ones that are centralized from the start. The only thing they can do is to have more centralized exchanges and wallets that will be regulated by the government. Then as for volatility, I don’t think there’s anything that we would be doing about that, I know that it discourages a lot of newbies from becoming part of the cryptocurrency community, but at the same time it is what makes a lot of people to enjoy being part of the community, because they are benefiting from it.

Lastly I think this is a process and it isn’t something that we’re going to have to rush, as time goes on people will be adopting it.

Yes, I also feel in this way, but having two matches at home can give them some advantage after having very good start in this season. If they want to go in next round then surely next match is very important for them because this can change all positions and then Sheriff will have some more chance for qualifying for next round if they lost all remaining matches then surely they will be moved into UEFA Europa League because they have already done enough work for playing this League and Shakhtar will be out of this competition. Inter is also having some good results in last matches.

That depends, but if you have got no idea on what trading is all about and how it works, then it wouldn’t be bad if you can take out time to take the course. And if you’re going to be taking a course on trading you should make sure that you’re taking the course from the best teacher, because if at the end of the day you don’t understand what you’re thought, then it’s all waste of time and money.

There are some teachers that are not really good at teaching and can’t really break it down to the level that everyone would understand, so I am going to advise you to make sure that you look for the best.

Yeah, technology must be playing big role on making trading strategies to be outdated. For example, these days we are overwhelmingly hearing about AI technology and when more number of traders are using it then market will start behaving differently than usual. This will impact on all other existing strategy somehow. So, traders may find hard time with their existing strategy.

Yeah, because strategy is a kind of weapon which is being used by trader to compete against all other tradera and when all other traders are using better weapon and you are using an old one then obviously the traders who are using latest weapon will win.

No I never trade based on any website or third party signals. What we do get from any kind of open resources should be used only for references and not for exact trading. When we try to use any predictions published by such portals may not be effective to get us profits. Even they are effective, we could not expect it to be effective consistently.

Even these days, paid signals are not good for predicting market direction accurately then how we could expect "free resources" will help us in profit making.

It is not about just being new, but also not being big neither, so it is so new that it is not even done so much enough to have a good LP neither. Which is why people should not be focusing on anything that is as new and as risky and as little interest as this right now.

There are so many other options that you could do right now that would be a lot better in the long run, so focus on that and you would be doing a lot better in the long run. What I believe we should be doing right now is going with the high LP stuff and swap between them if we want to, both of these have a lot better stuff they could be swapped, focus on that and you would be doing a lot better.

At this rate I am pretty sure that people are realizing that they getting their information at the hands of facebook and they are sharing that with other people and everyone is okay with it.

The reality is that with the cambridgeanalytica we should have seen some sort of situation where it is looking like people are actually doing something about it and we shouldn't be saying stuff like this but the reality is that people are actually still fine with it. It is proven that facebook could be used to win even elections let alone something else, and we are still doing fine about it for some reason. I do not get why people are free and fine about it, it should be something that we all get mad about but we do not and accept the situation for some reason.

Bitcoin is a better choice in so many ways than using Fiat. But a lot of people have reasons why they are scared to make use of Bitcoin, and I think one thing that scares them most is the fact that it is volatile. Though from what I have understood, these people wants to make profit, but they are not ready to take the risks for making that profit, they just want the money they put into a crypto wallet to keep increasing in value while they don’t experience the loss side of it at all.

These are people who are looking for quick gains, unfortunately it doesn’t work that way, it only favors those that are ready to have patience and plan themselves rightfully.

You cannot expect market to remain at the peak price levels all the times once it has reached there. People might have started book profits which must be one of the reason why we have slight downfall after every rally. So, we may ignore that 4.43% decline now and may assume that we are still into bullish mode. Only breaking the support levels will lead us to think about start of bearish trend.

As of now, we are still into bullish trend hence getting into $100,000 level is still possible. It may happen even within November month also as speculation of arrival of FOMO is getting intensified on crypto space right now.

I guess this current rally will not have any stop until we hit $100k levels. This way, I am not expecting that we are going to see $50k levels any more. Bitcoin market is known for falling down up to 70% from its peak price levels but when considering on what $60k levels will be 70%, then we will get into $200k levels. So, I am expecting the current rally will launch bitcoin markets into $180k to $200k zones in next 2 months of time.

Moreover, some people are speculating about getting into $400k levels but after having the recent downfall up to $28k levels, I guess that we are having less possibilities for getting into anything beyond $200k levels.

I would say that no account should be getting "dormant" or basically terminated just because they did not deposited anything for a while. There are other places that does something similar but for the accounts that had "never" deposited and that would understandable but right now we are talking about the people who did deposited but didn't for a while, there is a difference because in one of them you actually did deposits at one point. This is why I believe that if you haven't been here for a year then that is fine, if you never deposited that is fine, but the accounts that did deposit at one time and haven't in a while shouldn't be getting terminated.

One week must be very short period of time and within that time we cannot analyse anything because sometimes just because of luck factor many traders might make profits in very short period of time in the beginning days but consistently making profits from crypto market must be more challenging and for that you must need at least three months of time.

Yes, consistently making profits for more than one year of time must be very big task for any level of experienced trader because even professional traders are not consistent in profit making with crypto markets in long run.

I don't think so. People are easily sharing about their trading strategy because these days when social media are paying for the contents then you will definitely go for sharing all your moneymaking ideas. This way, traders and their trading strategies are no more a secret; this is the reason you could find millions of trading strategy based videos on YouTube.

A strategy for trading is not specific for some coins. It means you can learn any strategy and then you can make use of it for any coin. Because, I am understanding that you are looking for some strategy for some specific coins but the strategies and trading are not working differently for different coins.