|
^^^ Those videos do show a minimum horizon distance based on landmarks (Google Maps) and, the margin of error from using approximate camera height is too insignificant to effect the outcome. Refraction is also too insignificant to affect the outcome. We are left with one and only one conclusion, that the Earth is flat.
A gyroscope proven to react to a 15°/hr rotation can't detect any Earth rotation and this is proof we are not rotating.
The 1887 M&M experiment shows that the Earth has a velocity of ZERO! The 1939 D&P replication of the Sagnac experiment falsified relativity and the Earth's velocity remains at ZERO!
It can be proven that NASA has Masons hanging from wires and bouncing around zero-g airplanes. They landed a foil wrapped cardboard box on the Moon and took composite/airbrush photographs of Earth from the lunar surface of Los Vegas. They're a fucking propaganda agency that puts out WWE tier adult entertainment with free atmospheric refraction tables.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Nice, soyboy cranks arm during a rigged sporting event. He's just reeling that event horizon back in folks. 15 miles... 12 miles... 9 miles... 6 miles... 3 MILES!!!!!! He's done it, he's reeled the horizon back within the physical limits of the globe. Maximum soy folks!!!!   Source: http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm |
|
|
|
^^^ Distance to the horizon is a test you do yourself with your own camera you goof. If the test in the video(s) doesn't meet your standards then do it yourself! "Flat Earth rising: meet the people casting aside 2,500 years of science"So let me get this straight, when I point out that atmospheric refraction was unknown 2500 years ago and reject observations that don't account for the phenomenon [of refraction] I'm casing aside science? I've got an idea, why don't the producers of this video go hang themselves with piano wire? |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Even if the strictest most scientifically possible setup is employed it doesn't change what is being observed, the horizon is farther than can be explained by a globe. If you want some proof the Earth is flat that can be replicated by almost anybody, well there you go; distance to the horizon.
|
|
|
|
Anybody with a good zoom lens can see for themselves if the Earth is flat, look how easy it is to prove: Simple Flat Earth Distance to the Horizon Test -- https://youtu.be/X8YrYoCyw0g |
|
|
|
Something's amiss here.  |
|
|
|
Why would (((they))) neglect to tell us that California was an island, in school, on TV and in every book and magazine ever printed?  |
|
|
|
^^^ Albert Michelson, Edward Morley, Georges Sagnac, Alexandre Dufour and Fernand Prunier, that's five scientists not two and they're all big names.  "It's Photoshop but, but it has to be" -- NASA explaining how photographs of Earth are made. |
|
|
|
You guys are fucking idiots.  "satellite" |
|
|
|
|
^^^ It's not about what makes me feel good, it's about observed and documented results you absolute faggot.
Do I reject claims about earth based on observation of celestial objects that were made before the properties of atmospheric refraction were understood? Yes I do!
Do I reject an experiment where two heavy balls were observed through a hole drilled in a 17th century garden shed with a telescope, an observation of motion from a claimed force so small it would be utterly undetectable due to the nature of electrostatic forces? Yes I do!
Do I reject an experiment that claims to be influenced by earth rotation when it's got a built-in motor hidden purposely from the observer? Yes I do!
NASA produces images of astronauts hanging from wires and inside zero-G planes. The images of earth are paintings, composite images, photoshopped or high altitude pictures taken with a fisheye lens. NASA doesn't just lie about some things, they lie about everything you cock smoker!
Why don't you just kill yourself instead of being suckered into believing a puppet show with actors is real? If you believe there are Masons flying around in heaven like superman above your head right now, then you need to put that shotgun to your head and pull the trigger!
|
|
|
|
|
M&M 1887 is the experiment and it is observed that the earth is not moving. Silvertooth replicated the M&M experiment in 1986 with modern equipment and confirmed the results.
BADecker and his claim the earth moves is just full of shit, I can't believe this has go on for 500 years now.
The current model of gravity and a spinning globe is based 100% on relativity. Relativity states that light will act independently of any medium by some unknown magic. The static aether model says light is wave in a medium and will act as such. The Sagnac experiment performed with an interferometer in uniform rotation confirms via direct observation (D&P 1939) that, light is a wave in a medium; the observed behavior of light is not consistent with relativity.
|
|
|
|
 The Earth does not move. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Shut up you fucking idiot, odolvlobo tried to make the no aether relativistic argument as an explanation for the results [a stationary earth] of the 1887 Michelson & Morley experiment, but he veiled the argument with the speed of light instead. The Sagnac Experiment proved that displacement of a static aether is occurring thus falsifying relativity. Relativistic theorists claimed since rotating frames of reference weren't accounted for in the SE that relativity was still a valid hypothesis. However in 1939 Dufour & Prunier's replication of the SE took rotating frames of reference into account and removed this last roadblock proving the static aether.
These other experiments are needed to prove the aether, it's the M&M experiment that proves the earth doesn't move you absolute faggot.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Cats Meowing Loudly -- https://youtu.be/wrdAEmNvEj4 *** RECOMMENDED VIDEO ****Dufour & Prunier conducted a replication of the Sagnac experiment that took rotating frames of reference into account thus, falsifying relativity and removing all objections to the static aether. You're dismissed. ref: "Georges Sagnac , born on October 14 , 1869 in Périgueux and died on February 26 , 1928 is a French physicist who left his name to the Sagnac effect , a phenomenon that is the basis of interferometers and gyrolasers developed from the late 1970s. He was also the discoverer of fluorescence. X" -- wiki"Alexandre Dufour is a French physicist who succeeded Georges Sagnac as lecturer in physics for the PCN certificate ( 1st year of medical studies) at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Paris in September 1920. He obtained the title of professor without a chair on April 1 , 1927 , then was appointed full professor on October 1 , 1931 .
He was the inventor of the cathode oscillograph , which he described the process from 1914 1 , before publishing the detail of the device in 1920 2 ." -- wiki"Fernand Maurice Daniel Prunier is a French anti-relativist engineer, born on October 21, 1897 and died on September 21, 1971 1 , 2 ." -- wiki"Summary : In a first series of experiments, here accessories, but which nevertheless had to be realized, we used an entire optical circuit integral with the rotating platform as in the previous works of Sagnac. In these conditions we have found that the observed fringe displacements are the same to within 6%, that the light source and the photographic receiver are involved in the rotation of the platform, as in the Sagnac experiments, or that they remain fixed in the laboratory. The second series of experiments described here was intended to study the movement of the fringes due to rotation, under completely new conditions characterized by the fact that the optical circuit of the two superimposed interfering beams is formed of two parts in series, one of which remains fixed relative to the laboratory while the other is secured to the platform in rotation. The displacement of the fringes, obtained under these new conditions, has been that which can be foreseen by classical theory. In the case where the optical circuit is entirely integral with the rotating disk, as in the Sagnac experiments, the observer does not have the means to make a choice between the interpretations of the placement of the fringes obtained respectively given by the theory. classical and by relativistic theorists. But, in the case where there is a part of the circuit which remains fixed in relation to the laboratory, the relativistic theorist can not remain in agreement with the classical theorist, nor with the results observed, supposing, as he had done so far, here, that the center, where it is supposed to be placed to make the calculation of the experiment, can be chosen arbitrarily on the rotating platform. This center must be confused with the center of rotation of the platform." -- On a displacement of fringes recorded on a platform in uniform rotation, with Alexandre Dufour (1940) |
|
|
|
M&M (1887) is the most famous failed experiment because it failed to measure any motion [of the earth] other than a drift caused by the wake of rotating stars above.  KYS stands.   |
|
|
|
^^^ KYS  Ammunition: The 1887 Michelson & Morley experiment - empirical proof the earth is stationary. @BADecker,  |
|
|
|
^^^ Your the one who wants to fuck an injured soldier's open wound and pump it full of salty liquid. Have you asked your psychologist about this morbidly homoerotic fantasy of yours? If he's a Jewish shrink he's going want all kinds of details... Lucy, you got some splainin to do! I Love luficer Transvestigation -- https://youtu.be/4G4l1VbLkzU |
|
|
|
^^^ Can you guess what Victoria's secret is?  . |
|
|
|
There is a mirage. You can see it clearly at the very end of the video when the birds fly by. Though that doesn't explain why the view of the bottom of the boat is blocked by water. It's not blocked by water, the atmosphere is causing light to refract and it creates an angled mirror that the ship passes through. The first part to enter and become engulfed by the mirage (a narrow mirroring band that covers the horizon line that reflects the sky) is the bottom of the ship. The area that becomes covered by the mirror zone reflects some of the ship (proportional to the covered area) from directly above it. The ship then gets smaller, the effects of being engulfed, mirrored and shrunk results in the ship eventually disappearing from view. The water line you see is not the horizon line, the actual horizon line is covered by mirroring from the narrow band mirage. That edge you see is the start of the mirage and it starts just below the actual horizon line where the apparent angular size of objects becomes too shallow. If you're wondering about objects being blocked by the ground, yes it happens but it depends on the situation. Because of your perspective, if your camera/eye is on the ground/water things like waves and sea swell can have a "ramp-up" effect that can physically obscure the bottoms of objects. A perspective so low to the ground creates such an extreme apparent compression of objects that, combined with the "ramp-up" effect of waves or grass in front of the object, distance to the horizon is greatly reduced such that it becomes a physical line of grass, bumps or waves etc. The situation changes for more distant objects, they can be affected by atmospheric magnification (looming). A refractive lensing effect where water droplets form a compound magnifying lens and objects apparent sizes are enlarged. Magnified objects have part of the bottom obscured because there is no increase in elevation as their size increases, this is a masking effect on an optically enlarged object. The curvature in that image is clearly due to the lens -- even the closer objects are distorted. You can't use a simple photograph to show curvature because you don't know how much of that curvature is due to distortion by the lens That's not proof we're on a globe, it's a cry for help. Also, that's a lot of fucking garbage they've left on the peak. Distance to the horizon is solid proof of a flat earth; we see too far with a good zoom lens.
...[clip]...
Well, thank you. So, you admit that they are tricking you into thinking that the Earth is flat, when all the science says that it is a globe.
Btw, Sandra is a girl's name. Did you know that?
...[clip]...
Let me use anime to explain this:  She looks cute right? No, it's a soldier who's been severely injured in battle and has a festering, gaping wound between his legs. Now you want to go and fuck his open wound like like some kind sick bastard and aggravate his injury?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
