|
How's the actual development going? Is there an ETA?
I see nobody is selling waiting for further news. But nobody is asking much. Can you give us an update on the roadmap?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
maybe you should add what youre willing to pay someone for these services as well. you might see a little more interest that way.
Thanks. I thought it was implicit when I say hire. But I'll add a note. |
|
|
|
|
I'm looking to hire someone with good knowledge of the cryptocurrency markets and finance in general.
You should be able to analyze my questions about supply, distribution and inflation and come up with solutions for my ideas.
This is not about trading.
You should be able to prove your knowledge. PM your rate.
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Let´s say I have a puzzle. I want to publish the solution online at the same time I present the puzzle to the public, but the solution should be encrypted.
How can I do this is practical terms? I want to prove that the results of the puzzle were uploaded and untouched, only protected by a key. Therefore impossible to manipulate.
The key would be given out to the public in the future to prove the solution.
Thanks
Hash the solution if possible and provide the hash. It allows users to check whether their solution is correct. It does allow for a brute force attack on the hash, but depending on the complexity of the solution that should be no problem. Yeah, how does one do such thing? E.g. here -> http://www.xorbin.com/tools/sha256-hash-calculatorEnter your solution as "data", click Calculate... and publish the hash. E.g.: I hashed (sha256 using the above site) a number between 1 and 10, this is the hash 6b86b273ff34fce19d6b804eff5a3f5747ada4eaa22f1d49c01e52ddb7875b4b which number was it? Sounds more complicated that I thought. No idea what the number is. |
|
|
|
Hi,
Let´s say I have a puzzle. I want to publish the solution online at the same time I present the puzzle to the public, but the solution should be encrypted.
How can I do this is practical terms? I want to prove that the results of the puzzle were uploaded and untouched, only protected by a key. Therefore impossible to manipulate.
The key would be given out to the public in the future to prove the solution.
Thanks
Hash the solution if possible and provide the hash. It allows users to check whether their solution is correct. It does allow for a brute force attack on the hash, but depending on the complexity of the solution that should be no problem. Yeah, how does one do such thing? |
|
|
|
|
To be honest, great name for such poor logos.
I was expecting something more innovative. There is nothing representing a swing.
Anyway, since I can't vote, and if I had to, I'd choose nr 2.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Let´s say I have a puzzle. I want to publish the solution online at the same time I present the puzzle to the public, but the solution should be encrypted.
How can I do this is practical terms? I want to prove that the results of the puzzle were uploaded and untouched, only protected by a key. Therefore impossible to manipulate.
The key would be given out to the public in the future to prove the solution.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
so there's no ICO if we're already mining? pretty cool then...
ICO launch and mining can work together You should make ICO under mining cost just to piss off everybody. Miners will have much fun when they hear the ICO price. The first ones that generated a lot of blocks will have a good return for sure. First I have to get confirmation from Yobit. Scheduled for a dump, dus. |
|
|
|
so there's no ICO if we're already mining? pretty cool then...
ICO launch and mining can work together You should make ICO under mining cost just to piss off everybody. |
|
|
|
Looks like a good coin but no pool  Il keep my eyes open.. Hopefully soon Please check the OP. The first pool is open. We will launch the official pool soon. I am installing MPOS (pool software) as we spreak.No doubt this man is dutch. At least that. |
|
|
|
|
{
"blocks" : 291,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 7.39556609,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 135578564,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
|
Was wondering why this wasn't a thing already.. Good idea, of course.
|
|
|
|
 In case anybody would like to drop a line to the dev... |
|
|
|
Ok, so the artist doing the assets is going to give me a couple Swing logos to choose from. I think I'll put them up in a poll and let you guys vote once I get them.
How are the logos coming? Just touched base with the artist. He said he should have the logo choices done by the weekend (thurs / fri). When I double checked that he could get all the art done within the month he said "yes definitely". So you can probably expect logo voting to begin within a day or two. Sounds good. Looking forward. |
|
|
|
Ok, so the artist doing the assets is going to give me a couple Swing logos to choose from. I think I'll put them up in a poll and let you guys vote once I get them.
How are the logos coming? |
|
|
|
ah c'mon not again...
ded is nir bruh |
|
|
|
Just realised ETH has 3500BTC volume on polo. Haha no wonder there is no excitement anywhere else. Shitty gains for that kind of vol too.
First time seeing over 3000btc vol at polo. 4000 yesterday. |
|
|
|
It was a successful distribution, despite some of the holders deciding to sell their coins into the buy wall. It does not matter, those coins sold to the buy wall will be burned, instantly raising the value of the remaining coins.  I didn't buy in nor I intend to. But let me ask you this. Is 5 btc - or whatever it was - enough for you? How many coins have you made so far? What are you going to do with your profits? Do you also steal in real life or only behind the computer under an unregulated market? |
|
|
|
There are also some false claims such as their staking being more energy efficient, when it is an exact line for line clone of Peercoin, just rewritten in C++ 11. Videlicet was referring at that time to the code that John Connor had uploaded to github. John later revealed that it was 'fake' code designed to throw off haters or whatever. So, videlicet was correct about the code that he saw. But it turned out that it wasn't the actual code of the coin. Just a trick to throw off haters/catch people out/waste the time of code reviewers. No, john was referring to the zerotime test code and fake whitepaper for zerotime, not the committed code that has been open sourced and able to be compiled for some time. why would a dev post a fake whitepaper / code? fudding his own project? its been bothering me since i read that. If he's just one person, with the speed he pumps out lines of code, he's truly a genius in my opinion; but sometimes he does things I don't understand, like that. I believe his reasoning was that he would get a lot of devs to attack him because of obvious flaws and then when the real paper and code were released, they'd have to really look into it. I agree it's pretty impressive. But in my opinion he shouldn't be trying to put out fire with fire. He's clearly better at coding than dealing with the community. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
