Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 10:31:37 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 [407] 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 ... 471 »
8121  Economy / Speculation / Re: I am a pro-Core, pro-Segwit small blocker who has a hard decision about BCC on: August 10, 2017, 01:48:12 AM
I have my BCC ready in Bittex for selling but when I was checking the BitcoinCash community, they were all very optimistic about the chances of BitcoinCash to become one of the most successful coins in the world of cryptocurrencies.

Now I am thinking of holding them instead. I want to know what would you do? Hold or sell, and why?

It's possible that BCH will have some more pumps in the future, but eventually it will die, simply because it's a shitcoin with zero innovation. Big blocks is not something new, lots of altcoins have different block sizes, block times, and other minor tweaks. The market has proven that all that stuff doesn't work and can only make the network less secure if it will start hitting transaction cap. Don't listen to hype, don't get investment advice from strangers, study how crypto works to make your own judgement. 95% of big price moves are caused by whales to just fill their own pockets.
8122  Economy / Gambling / Re: ★Crypto-Games.net ★ 9 coins ★ 7 games ★ Since 2014 ★ Largest Crowdfunded Casino on: August 09, 2017, 07:45:25 PM
Finally! Sometimes it takes half an hour or more for miners to find a block, so I'm very happy that it's back to 1 confirm for deposits!

Don't forget that Crypto-Games has exchange feature with only slightly lower rates (around 3%). So, if you are depositing/withdrawing small sums in Bitcoin (10-20 mBTC for example), it might be faster/cheaper to deposit/withdraw this sum in some altcoin and exchange it for Bitcoin. This heavily depends on the current state of Bitcoin's mempool, so you need to do the exact calculations if you want to use this method.

8123  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-08-02]Could SegWit2x Lead to Three Different Bitcoins? on: August 09, 2017, 06:53:32 PM
~snip~

I don't think that anyone here argues that Bitcoin protocol is permissionless and open, and no one can't dictate others what to do.

But the current situation is that in November there will be 2 blockchains, and developers/users/miners of both will call their chain "Bitcoin".

It will be very inconvenient for users, especially for newcomers, so it's in the best interest of both sides to find some consensus. And currently, crypto community hasn't established any unwritten consensus rules regarding blockchain names after split. To my knowledge, there wasn't any crypto civil war previously, because new developers were adopting new names for their forks.
8124  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How much fee for a $2 Coffee transaction at the end of this Aug month? on: August 09, 2017, 05:44:26 PM
I mean after segwit is activated of course.

Also how does this fee compares to bitcoin cash fee? Which will be cheaper to the consumer?

Also if bitcoins are worth $millions in the future and 1 satoshi equals $1 then how do you buy 50cents gum/candy? Or does bitcoin anticipate that in the future fiat inflation is norm meaning cents pricing will be gone in the future.

Cryptocurrency fees are very flexible, and their size determine how fast they will get their first confirmation. If your coffee merchant agrees to accept 0 confirmation and low fee payments, than you can buy coffee with Bitcoins with just a few cents in fees. But it's not a secret that transaction fees of any altcoin are cheaper than in Bitcoin for one simple reason - their networks process very small amounts of transactions, because no one really uses them, since their usage comes with security, volatility and conversion costs.

Currently:
On BSegwit chain around $1.1
On BCash chain around $0.15

So draw your own conclusion

With this kind of reasoning you should promote Dogecoin instead, since it has only $0.003 average transaction fee.
8125  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin vs Bitcoin2X - November, whats it gonna be for you? on: August 09, 2017, 04:01:46 PM
When people invest in some cryptocurrency, they are essentially investing in developer team behind that coin. This is the reason why no altcoin has ever flipped Bitcoin's marketcap - Bitcoin Core is the biggest and the best dev team in all crypto space, while most alts have some few amateur devs, who can only copy Core code and tweak it on very basic levels. This is why alts like Viacoin, Vertcoin, Syscoin, Groestlcoin, and Digibyte implement SegWit in attempt to get attention. Now, if you think about SegWit2x coin and Bcash coins as alts, it becomes clear that they are no different from Dogecoin, because they lack something that makes Bitcoin valuable - strong developer team.
8126  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Challenge: Give solution for an Organization to hold safely on: August 09, 2017, 05:41:27 AM
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Multisignature

This pretty much answers your question. You can come up with different configurations for multisig to create levels of authorization for accessing your wallet. Multisig can also be used for escrow transactions.
8127  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bitcoin is unstoppable on: August 09, 2017, 02:19:17 AM
even when attacked from the inside by blockstream/core it just forks and offers two chains. at least one will continue delivering p2p electronic money to the people with low fees.  maybe both?  we'll see. Smiley

Literally every other cryptocurrency offers "p2p electronic money with low fees", yet merchants and users are not switching to alts, because the result would be just the same as with Bitcoin - fees will skyrocket. Cryptocurrencies as of now can't compete with traditional payment processors in terms of capacity. If you can't achieve at least 3000 tps with low fees, you can forget about becoming global p2p cash.
8128  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Segwit locked in on: August 09, 2017, 01:19:41 AM
Now this is the news we all(bitcoin community) wants to hear, the rising price shows that Segwit Locked in. Now the good days are coming when the price will touch the sky.

This is what we are waiting for. Now we can relax from those stressful  FUD news and watch bitcoin prices to shoot up Smiley I think its quite stable now but we expect more increase in the coming months.

This is not over yet, now miners might try to push a 2mb hardfork in November, and since this fork comes with no replay protection and has more support from miners and some businesses than Bcash, it might have a good chances of dropping Bitcoin's price in short term. So, stay tuned for the news, check what important people on both sides are saying and trade carefully, because we still might see some big volatility.
8129  Economy / Reputation / Re: A list of people trying to sell accounts, Potentially hacked/bought accounts. on: August 08, 2017, 08:02:13 PM
Potentially bought account

Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=106205

Activity gap: May 25, 2017 - August 07, 2017

Was active on Nederlands (Dutch) board, but now speaks fluent Russian

Tries to hire people to post on his ICO thread from multiple sockpuppet accounts - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2073441
8130  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-08-08] Dear Bitcoin: I’m Sorry, Fees Will Rise on: August 08, 2017, 04:09:11 PM
I still do not understand this blocksize war. I have seen the posts of our Saint himself and he even said that the 1MB blocksize was a temporary measure and that 2/4/8MB would be used in the future. That was 7 years ago. Why the heck is there all this trouble simply moving to a 2MB blocksize? Is it all really simply due to the blockchain increase? Who cares?! Full nodes can run 8TB+ drives for a trivial amount of USD these days and checkpointing/snapshotting the blockchain is a completely viable thing..

If I am wrong please point me to reading that directly disproves these things..

Even with very big blocks and pruning Bitcoin won't be able to scale on-chain to the levels of payment processors like Visa. Bitcoin Cash is still a "digital gold", because it can't process 5000 transactions per second.

Running a node takes different resources - RAM, bandwidth, storage, CPU, so different users might have different bottlenecks. Since there's is economic inequality in the world, increasing requirements for running a node will push 95% of nodes to wealthy countries. This will make Bitcoin less secure and permissive, because you'll had to invest thousands of dollars every few years to get full Bitcoin experience of trustless transactions. Poor people would have to use SPV and online wallets and be vulnerable to different attacks.

8131  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockstream employee delivers the bad news for BitcoinCore coin. on: August 08, 2017, 03:45:45 PM
https://medium.com/@rusty_lightning/dear-bitcoin-im-sorry-fees-will-rise-b002b1449054

Looks like Blockstream, leaders of BitcoinCore coin (BTC) are warning of an impending fee disaster that could cripple their chain.

Whatever you do, hold onto your BitcoinCash. Things are about to get a little crazy.

Edit: Bitcoin Cash promises cheaper and cheaper fees: https://zander.github.io/posts/bcc-fees/

You are just spreading FUD and shilling for your shitcoin, instead of trying to present some technical argument. I can only feel sorry for newbies who get influenced to buy shitcoins by posts like this.

Now, in reality what that article was saying is that there are hardware limitations that don't let Bitcoin's network to process as much transactions as PayPal or Visa. Big blocks increase capacity at expense of decentralization and security, and this is why no one really wants them. There are countless shitcoins that have bigger and/or faster blocks, time has proven that this does not work, and no one really wants it.
8132  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How Can Core Counter the Emergency Difficulty Adjustment of Bitcoin ABC? on: August 08, 2017, 03:15:17 PM
How can Bitcoin Core prevent miners from switching en masse to mining the Bitcoin Cash chain?

They can release better software, which will reinforce confidence in Bitcoin, cause it's price to rise and make miners switch back to it, as it will be more profitable to mine Bitcoin instead of Bcash.
And Bitcoin hodlers can help this process by dumping their Bcash, causing it's price to crash and making miners to switch back to Bitcoin.
8133  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-08-02]Could SegWit2x Lead to Three Different Bitcoins? on: August 08, 2017, 02:38:19 PM

Here we get to the crux of the matter.  Who decides what constitutes "strong community support"?  Are we making the argument that no one should be allowed to even propose a rule change unless it seems like people might agree?  How do we determine that for certain?  If only we had some kind of way to measure who supports what...



This is one of the problems in Bitcoin community, there is no good way to vote for proposals before they happen. Core tried to solve this when they introduced signalling, but miners only represent their selfish interests.




It's built into Bitcoin.  So we don't need to worry about trying to guess who supports what, because you can just run the software enforcing the rules you want and it'll all be taken care of.  If there is strong support for a rule change, it'll happen.  If there isn't strong support for a rule change, it won't happen.  Whichever ruleset builds the longest chain gets to be called Bitcoin.  If there is a split and your preferred ruleset doesn't build the longest chain, you are free to continue using it, but you have to accept that consensus doesn't agree with you, so you'll be using a minority chain, otherwise known as an altcoin.  However, you can compromise and continue using (or developing for) Bitcoin if you want as well.  The choice is yours.  Everyone's free to do what they want.



Longest chain  Cheesy
I can just fork Bitcoin, drop difficulty and block time and solo mine the longest chain on my CPU.
Longest chain consensus establishes consensus within network with the same rules, it doesn't apply to chains with new rules.
If you wanted to cite Satoshi, you should have said "chain with the most PoW", but this means that miners decide what is Bitcoin at this current moment, and users need trading to establish economic majority.
The problem is, establishing economic majority will take some time, it will be messy because newbies will be losing money to replays, ticker confusion, potential network disruptions, etc. Online wallets will be deciding chain names for their users, which again makes newbies very vulnerable. In the end, we will have new economic consensus on what chain is Bitcoin, which might or might not be the better software. No one argues that this process is permissionless.

What would be great for Bitcoin community (regardless of their views on the future of Bitcoin) is if we had some etiquette rules regarding forks, and maybe some mechanisms to signal your economic intentions, like for example signalling with coins you hold. This could help us avoid months of "civil war" in cases of economic splits in Bitcoin community.
8134  Economy / Economics / Re: Government/Bankers Gold Blockchain Obviously Coming! on: August 07, 2017, 10:20:33 PM
It is difficult to entertain the idea of combining gold with blockchain without a thorough understanding of each. Government needs to assume responsibility for protecting and insuring our money considering how critical it is to the health of the country. A gold blockchain system will give great faith in the health and security of our economic engine....read more: http://cryptoinvesting.net/gold-blockchain/ I could write a lot more but, poor attention spans:) ask questions, let's talk about this!

Private/state-owned blockchains are just snake oil or distractions, blockchain is good not because it's secure, but because it's decentralized and consensus-driven, and allows to perform trustless transfers and guarantees immutability. When you try to create blockchain system with permissions, you quickly lose any trustlessness of transactions.
8135  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-08-02]Could SegWit2x Lead to Three Different Bitcoins? on: August 07, 2017, 09:07:51 PM
So by introducing modified Bitcoin software and hoping that people adopt it, are people "taking over" or "attacking" Bitcoin?  Or are they attempting to gain consensus for what they believe is right?


It's all about succession of the "Bitcoin" name after the chain split. Usually, people who introduce modified software, that is incompatible with current versions, are taking new name for their project.
There are no rules and regulations regarding names for cryptocurrency projects, and there shouldn't be, but if you don't have strong community support behind you, you shouldn't try to take over project's name, it would be a dick move.

BCH split has already caused problems for some newibes, they got tricked into installing malware, sent their coins to wrong chains, got confused about the price, etc.
If 2x fork will happen, it will be much worse, because it will come without replay protection, and different services (most importantly, exchanges) might have different stances about names for both chains.

And I feel like crypto community is pretty bad at consensus for names, Bitcoin Cash just took BCC ticker, even though it already belong to Bitconnect.
Perhaps we should agree to name coins by their clients to avoid fighting for names, i.e. current Bitcoin would be Bitcoin Core, Grazik's SegWit2x would be BTC1.
8136  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: UASF coin failed, but how about a real LukeCoin? on: August 07, 2017, 07:34:59 PM
Big Blockers have their own coin now called Bitcoin Cash.

But this guy is extreme as well and should create his own coin now, otherwise this toxic ideas breakes bitcoin finally.

Small blocks and PoW change, go ahead Luke, "the community" will follow and the good thing, you can mine yourself, hows that?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6s73q3/luke_dashjr_the_1_reason_segwit2x_will_fail_is/

Should we call that Bitcoin Luck?

You (big blockers) can all other chains whatever you want in your pathetic attempt to scam newbies, but it's a matter of fact fact that todays economic majority of Bitcoin users runs Core software, and there are no reasons to believe that they will switch to Garzik's software in November. In crypto world, users shows their trust in dev teams by trading coins on free markets. Bcash failed to drop Bitcoin's price, meaning no one lost confidence in Core so far.
8137  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using Dark Net Markets as Coin Mixers? on: August 06, 2017, 09:44:41 PM
I was just reading through the news of BitMixer.io shutting down their business.
While there are other alternatives, I was wondering what stops anyone from using a dark market (such as now-defunct AlphaBay) to mix their coins?

Using such markets over other alternatives will surely provide some benefits:
- Traditional mixers such as bitmixer.io have high fees
- We can use exchanges like Poloniex to mix coins but they require KYC for high volume deposit/withdrawals. Moreover there are chances they'll blacklist any addresses associated with hack/ransom attacks and won't accept coins from such address.
- Traditional exchanges can also have cooperative relationship with governments which can expose you

Dark nets being TOR-based services, once can just deposit some BTC in their account and then withdraw after some time. Won't this be a safer way to mix coins which are associated with hacks/ransom attacks?

First, you should be careful with amounts of BTC you withdraw when you try to use some service like exchange or casino as your mixer. For example, if you deposit 20 BTC, and than just withdraw 20 BTC to a new address, it's easy to notice it on something like walletexplorer. And when you withdraw to different addresses, you should be careful to not accidentally spend-link them (or their children) in the future. Also, more and more people now rely on Monero for mixing, so you might want to take a look at that.
8138  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-08-05] 150 Bitcoin ATMs Coming to Ukraine on: August 06, 2017, 04:08:05 PM


I know that Ukraine is having a high adoption of Bitcoin. But even then, I need to ask a few questions. Isn't it better to start with two or three Bitcoin ATMs first and then expand it to 150? Also, few people are using Bitcoin ATMs nowadays due to the high fees.

This launch of BATM's is planned by kuna.io as part of their ICO roadmap (other steps include some Visa BTC cards and IaaP project). I'm personally a bit skeptic about ICO's in general, but these BATM's seem to be a real thing, here's their video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh-vJYLf_0A
They plan to launch 20-30 BATM's in Kiev in this month, and increase think that this number can be increased to 150 by the end of the year.
As for fees, they should be equal to fees of their exchange, which is 1% for fiat deposits and 0.0001 BTC for BTC withdrawals.
8139  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: There is only one Bitcoin! on: August 06, 2017, 03:14:38 PM
The scam coin that tried to steal our name and our reputation and the scammers behind this will soon find out what hubris and greed gets you.


This attempt to steal Bitcoin's name for their altcoin shouldn't be overlooked, because it damages Bitcoin by creating a field for confusion and errors for newbies. Noobs are already mistakenly sending coins to wrong chains, outsiders gets confused by prices (some think that Bitcoin has dropped to $200). This is why we should name it Bcash and pressure exchanges and services to use this name too, and use only BCH as a ticker, because BCC is already taken (even though Bitconnect is also a scam). And if miners will try to fork in November, we should find a name for 2x chain, something like 2xCoin, or GarzikCoin.
8140  Economy / Economics / Re: Monkeys trading rocks on: August 06, 2017, 02:08:31 PM


Also, commie or capitalist (capitalist myself), WHY should the top 1% own 80% of the currency supply?

There's no good reason for it, but also no way to stop it. This happens nearly every time.

I'm saying no one has the answer, because we are all monkeys trading rocks.



How can you be "capitalist" if you think that distribution of value via voluntary exchange is flawed because it leads to inequality?

People are not equal, some can create huge amounts of value and sell it for money, others produce very small amounts of value with their simple work. There's nothing wrong with X% of people owning Y % of economy, as long as the market is 100% free. Socialists who cry about top 1% just have a very childish understanding of fairness.


I'm saying no one has the answer, because we are all monkeys trading rocks.


Subjective theory of value is the answer. Marxists base their theory on presumption that labor and resources have some intrinsic value. If you understand that value is subjective, than you should advocate for 100% free unregulated markets.
Pages: « 1 ... 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 [407] 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 ... 471 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!