Bitcoin is not money.
I agree.
Funny thing when you ask different people what ''money'' factually is they will give you different answers:
If you ask me I will tell that factually money is pieces of paper.
Somebody else will tell you it's pieces of round metal.
Yet a banker will tell you it's digits stored in a server.
A hooker in Nepal will tell you money is her body - that's how she pays for food, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can something be at the same time a piece of paper and a piece of metal and a body? I rather doubt it.
Can something be at the same time a human and a desk and a brick? I rather doubt it.
If someone disagrees, can they empirically prove it is possible for them to be at the same time a human and not a human?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe ''money'' as described / defined by the regulators, scholars is a bit flawed / imperfect / completely wrong? Just food for thought.
It's time we grow a pair of testicles here.
I agree, FoBoT is gutless.