^^^ There's water droplets in the air that cause a magnification to occur and the bottoms of the enlarged buildings are cut off by the horizon.



"The view of Chicago, Illinois from the bluff in downtown Saint Joseph, Michigan was the most clear I have ever seen it tonight. May 4, 2019. I am amazed at the detail for being ~60 miles away." -- @JoshuaNowickiPhotography

There are days when the effect of refraction is minimized and you can see for hundreds of miles with an infrared camera and zoom lens. The globe dictates that a physical horizon exists three miles from an observer at sea level; this simply doesn't exist. Even with an unmodified P900 you can bust the globe and put the horizon so far beyond three miles there's no where to go but a planar model.

@Astargath, just because you're too stupid to understand the Sagnac effect doesn't make me a liar for claiming the inventor of oscilloscope successfuly replicated it while taking rotating frames of references into account. You've obviously got some kind of cognitive impairment or you're a paid shill who needs to be raped to death with a gasoline powered chainsaw.

^^^ The box wasn't enough, this ZOG puppet insisted that Google cuck its AI and make YouTube serve up an endless list of 'flat earthers are the stupidest people alive' videos. The target audience was looking for videos from flat earthers to explain why they believe the earth is flat, instead they got absolute crap videos full of clowns.

The ad doesn't play if the user doesn't click on the video they were looking for, Google's primary source of revenue didn't get what they were looking for; they dumped Google causing it to lose $70 bn in value.

I can tell, nobody actually clicked on the video link.

Congressman Deutch is dictating to Google's lawyer that putting a box that says the Earth isn't flat above flat Earth videos isn't enough. Google's lawyer responds by stating that they'll intercept and filter the videos then promote videos that claim the Earth is spinning.

The results of tampering with YouTube's finely tuned artificial intelligence recommendations, were financially devastating; GIGO. It should also be noted that Theodore Eliot Deutch is a Democrat.

NASA, Eisenstein and the globe all come as a set. Astronauts are hanging from wires and relativity has been experimentally falsified; there's no argument to be had. This is not a case of two side having a legitimate argument.

^^^ Since you insist on discussing sunset, atmospheric magnification via refraction counteracts convergence and keeps the Sun roughly the same size while the perspective of an observer at sea level causes the sun to go beyond the horizon line. This is how these three factors work in conjunction to create a sunset on an average day. On a hot and humid day additional refractive effects come into play causing the entire visual field to become distorted and shifted up a bit. When viewed atop a very tall mountain with cool dry conditions convergence will shrink the Sun to a point as it sets.

Alphabet had more than $70 billion in market cap wiped out, and it says YouTube is one of the problems

"Ruth Porat was probably referring to changes YouTube made to curb the spread of fake news and conspiracy theories. It shows YouTube is willing to forego some short-term ad revenue for the long-term health of the company globe."
FTFY

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/30/youtube-algorithm-changes-negatively-impact-google-ad-revenue.html
            ^{http://archive.is/XdjsC}





Clown world folks.

Check it out, there's video. | https://youtu.be/P5lIz13R7go

"Theodore Eliot Deutch /ˈdɔɪtʃ/ (born May 7, 1966) is an American politician and Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives for Florida's 22nd congressional district. He first won election to Congress during a special election in April 2010 in Florida's 19th congressional district. He previously served in the Florida Senate. In 2012, due to redistricting, he ran for and won re-election in Florida's 21st congressional district." -- wiki

"Juniper Downs
Global Director of Public Affairs at Google
San Francisco Bay Area
Law Practice" -- https://www.linkedin.com/in/juniper-downs-5245879
                        ^{http://archive.is/uxFH9}
There's a whole deck full of cards.

@Darooghe,

   This argument ultimately boils down to the refraction tables provided by NASA who are proven liars and hoaxer. You act like it's a simple matter to obtain atmospheric refraction data but that couldn't be farther from the truth. Temperature,  pressure, humidity, aerosols, etc, etc are all factors that effect the refraction of light in the atmosphere that can't be determined by a small sample of air processed in a lab.

Toss in perspective and convergence and there isn't a single object in the sky that's exactly where it appears to be with the exception of objects directly above the observer. This isn't "my science" it's just science based on the scientific method.


@odolvlobo,

   I stated refraction, perspective and convergence causes the Sun to have an apparent position. How the fuck is that backwards?

---

---

In other news Google just reported they lost $70 billion dollars in market cap due to YouTube censoring conspiracy related content such as flat earth.



Meta:
I'd post the link but my IP addresses keep getting banned faster than I can navigate to the cnbc link, hahaha. I'll keep trying to get the link and i'll stuff it in the archive....


"Access Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.cnbc.com/" on this server."

LOL

My question now is how much ad revenue and viewers are cnbc losing due to blocking potential readers?

"This site can’t be reached
The webpage at http://archive.is/ might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address."

Holy crap. ...

OK on the link I can access the page formatting is all garbled, the text is unreadable...

It's like somebody is freaking out, jeez it's only 70 billion dollars US guys. Just explain to the stock holders that their investment in the copernican universe is the real pay-off, who needs money when they can sleep soundly knowing their investment is saving the globe?

You're a fucking retard or a paid (or otherwise compensated) shill; a refractometer is for testing samples in the laboratory.

@odolvlobo,

   BTW we're discussing the position of the Sun on the equinox not sunsets but hey, thanks for trying derailing the discussion by moving the goalposts, misrepresenting the broad spectrum of distortion effects caused by refraction and, ignoring that perspective and convergence are involved.



@Darooghe,

   IIRC refraction tables are produced by the proven hoaxers and liars at NASA. If the object you're viewing isn't directly above you at 90° then, it's going to be affected by refraction to some degree.

^^^ We're inside an engineered high-tech structure lit by a holographically projected light source.

An NPC claims there's no free will, how charming.

"About 489,000,000 results (0.45 seconds)" -- Google

It's really shame that with Google's advanced technology it can't perform the relatively simple task of filtering out the spam sties that populate the first page of results. These spammers promote the false religion of earth curvature and ignore actual science like the physics of water because they're trying to trick you and scam you. Earth curvature can't be observed or measured; it's a faith based belief system.

@odolvlobo,

   Saying the Sun is a spotlight is an over-simplification, you're just knocking over a strawman. The Sun is a holographic projection off of a concave mirror (the dome or firmament) and that's exactly the pattern one would expect to see. Not only that, the animated cycle you've shown appears to be in the southern summer and, it perfectly illustrates how 24-hour light works in Antarctica on a flat Earth; it wraps around.

Get a lighter and a metal bowl and observe the reflection of the light inside the bowl as you move the lighter around, it's not the most accurate simulation but you'll get the idea.




@Darooghe,

   As I stated you're seeing an apparent Sun (not the Sun's actual position) from the perspective of an observer on the ground. The atmosphere creates a lensing effect due to refraction and, perspective along with convergence also effects the apparent position of the Sun or any celestial objects that are visible. The only time refraction doesn't come into play is when viewing an object directly above you at 90 degrees.

The next time you're swimming dive underwater and look up at objects on the surface, again it's not the most accurate simulation but you'll get an idea of how refraction works. Try to grab objects above the water, you'll find they're not where they appear to be.

OK I researched it:

   The apparent position of the Sun during the equinoxes (caused by atmospheric lensing combined with the perspective of an observer at sea level) is consistent with an approximate distance of 3,000 miles as measured directly by a sextant.

---

---

The crazy life and crazier death of Tycho Brahe,
history's strangest astronomer




   "He lived in a castle, where he kept a rather unusual group of regular entertainers. He employed a little person called Jepp, who Brahe believed possessed psychic powers. Jepp was his court jester, and spent most dinners under the table. It's probably best not to speculate on just why Brahe preferred that arrangement. Then there was Brahe's elk, a tame beast that Brahe kept as a prized pet. The elk met a rather bizarre end, reportedly drinking a lot of beer while visiting a nobleman on Brahe's behalf, after which it fell down the stairs and died. Yes, that entire sentence was about an elk."
   ^{Source: https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-crazy-life-and-crazier-death-of-tycho-brahe-histor-5696469}



CLOWN WORLD CONFIRMED!
CLOWN WORLD CONFIRMED!
CLOWN WORLD CONFIRMED!



To learn more about please see the following YouTube video:
   THE GENIUSES THAT MEASURED THE SUN'S DISTANCE -- https://youtu.be/j2ClsgdFCB8

^^^ I'm not ignoring anything you absolute twat. Images taken with a fisheye lense are proof you're a fucking retard or a shill, that shit isn't science goofy. You should have the steel wire the astronauts are hanging from wrapped around your neck with one end tied to the back of a truck.

There's a famous quote stating that "nature abhors a vacuum", oddly enough its author is credited (by the perpetrators of the globe hoax) with discovering outer space IIRC.

A vacuum is forbidden, it does not and can not exist. You can remove all the atomic matter but aether is the finest possible material and it can't be removed, the lowest possible state is non-zero.

^^^ Relativity/Gravity has been falsified by Sagnac and Dufour & Prunier, the rug has been pulled out from under your counter-argument of muh grabity; you've got no valid explanation for why objects fall/sink. As a bonus Sagnac confirmed experimentally the existence of a static aether, it's this aether (a superfine gas-like material) that gets displaced in a vacuum and pushes on objects.

A compass works inside a Faraday cage so clearly it doesn't remove all electromagnetic influences.

^^^ Air and aether are interchangeable to some degree, the latter being the finer of the two.

---

NUCLEAR WEAPONS DO NOT EXIST The Documentary By Edmund Matthews -- https://youtu.be/jo7Ytg9ckC0