|
Who would have guesses that ASICMiner would have been the first one to fully operates their ASICs?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I want to add to the current discussion about the blocksize, that the security of the network does NOT only depends of the tx fees.
People forget that a lots of people are today buying ASICs, and will in the future. This is what render the network secure on the longterm.
Or does it?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What pool accept mining through the port 80?
|
|
|
|
If the share's height >= current diff, then it would solve a new block if solo mining?
I use cgminer 2.7.5, since what version can we look at the highest share found?
New versions -> 2.8.7, 29th October 2012
The best share difficulty is now displayed in the status window at the top, and in the summary on exiting.
New versions: ->2.9.3, 11th November 2012
Solo mining will now show the best share diff as well, even if they're all below target.
What's wrong with just updating to the newest 2.10.5? I've set up my rig for 24/7 mining since months now, with automatic scripts. Why break things when they work perfectly? So this "best share" thing, if it's >= current diff it would theoretically discover a new block if solomining? |
|
|
|
|
If the share's height >= current diff, then it would solve a new block if solo mining?
I use cgminer 2.7.5, since what version can we look at the highest share found?
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a Hackberry (ARMHF) Allwinner A10 dev board.
Where can I find the 32bit binaries of cgminer? Do I have to compile them for ubuntu 12.10, likely 32bit, if these don't exist?
There are no 32 bit linux binaries, so yes you do have to compile them. Ok, thanks. First time I'm going to compile something for an AllWinner A10 (ARMv7 apparently). Does it differ a lot from a 32bit x86 compile process? |
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a Hackberry (ARMHF) Allwinner A10 dev board.
Where can I find the 32bit binaries of cgminer? Do I have to compile them for ubuntu 12.10, likely 32bit, if these don't exist?
|
|
|
|
What the hell is up with you Luke-Jr, using the tonal system is complicating things for nothing. Nothing.
How is confusing newcomers/everyone doing anything good?
What the heck is up with you hahahafr, using the Bitcoin currency is complicating things for nothing. Nothing. How is confusing newcomers/everyone doing anything good? Obviously US dollars work fine, so we should all just keep using that. (reality: there is more to gain from tonal adoption, than from bitcoin adoption) Sorry, I didn't know you had 16 fingers. I will now stop spamming this thread. |
|
|
|
Get in/out while you can!  Best advice in this forum. |
|
|
|
|
What the hell is up with you Luke-Jr, using the tonal system is complicating things for nothing. Nothing.
How is confusing newcomers/everyone doing anything good?
|
|
|
|
|
Satoshi Nakamoto is not one person. It's the group of people that gave birth to this Bitcoin idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't listen to the angry trolls here, please keep us updated as much as possible Inaba! This is good.
I just hope you are real and not scammers.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
2 quick points on Bitcoin (as a network of exchanging money):
Security: We know the Bitcoin network is secure for now, and I believe it will stay so, I trust Gavin more than anything on this subject (being an early adopter has to be a good motivation to always have security as priority #1, and this is good).
Usability and Philosophy: I believe in Bitcoin, and so do we all here (almost), it is our duty to somehow make something out of it. People will eventually see the use in the Bitcoin as we see it, it's just a matter of time. I just happen to have one problem with that: The "official" embargo the Bitcoin "officials" (read important persons here) have imposed against Iran, just like US dollars. What the fuck is that? Why wasn't there an uproar against that? This is part exactly why bitcoin was created, this is the roots of the idea of Bitcoin, and yet people do the same things all over again. If Bitcoin can't be used in Iran because of the MIT licence of the source code of the original client, then people we have a much bigger issue than the network security to address.
|
|
|
|
|
I rate this investment AAA+
I would trust this guy with my life and the ones of my children
Can you feel the trust radiating from this thread? How comforting for Bitcoin, finally legit investments!
|
|
|
|
|
Time for the scammer tag.
I think that after the recents hacks on the website, the webmaster told himself "fuck it, I'm gonna steal from my users too".
Bitcoin value decreases when you do that. That's no good.
|
|
|
|
|
1st wave: thieve selling stolen coins because he sees that we are gonna stay at $13.x for a while.
2nd waves: panic people.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
