I believe very strongly in freedom, honesty and personal responsibility. Plagiarism comes to mind. |
|
|
|
touche.
I assume that's either a typo or someone switched the t and the d on your keyboard touche as in good point. douché <I'm tired of fixin' shit around here--for free  > |
|
|
|
Gage scammed me out of my virginity  . Hence, the VTF (Virginity Trust Fondle). |
|
|
|
Doesn't have to include a goat like what Google suggested to me when I searched for "duck rabbit" sans quotes.  |
|
|
|
|
Here's your chance all! Rumor has it (from a reliable source) that Sonny Vleisides/BFL is in the mist of a full investigation and some very powerful people are looking into their affairs, gleaning all they can from this forum, among other sources.
To make their task at hand a more pleasant experience, consider taking time to place any facts about BFL, et al., you're aware of onto this central location.
|
|
|
|
I'm open to different interpretations, though.
With about as much seriousness as 1/3 of a duck: BFL was incentivized by the donation offer. This caused them to expend significantly more resources (valued at almost $200) to ship faster. (You might not believe it, but they were going to ship later) Without this timely donation, harm has been caused to them (see value above) by Phin's broken promise. Broken promise (fraud) + monetary damage = scam!!!1  Oh, my fuckin' God! If I would've known. Josh was right when he said I harmed people, but he was too humble to express that the harm was toward BFL directly and not having enough Poodle Chow for his hippie mutt indirectly. But the damage is already done, and I'm sure it'll all work out in the end after Josh pays out that 1000K BTC to charity he owes. |
|
|
|
Since Tom is refusing to actually make the bet he himself proposed between us, I am offering up a guarantee of 1000 BTC to charity (I will take suggestions on which charity to donate this to) if BFL does not meet it's power claims within 10% - meaning if BFL's power consumption is more than 66w for a Single SC, we lose the "bet."
Now, I ask if Tom is willing to step up and back the winning side. He is 100% confident that we will not meet our power claims (which is the genesis of the failed bet), and as such I ask that he pony up 1000 BTC to the same charity if we do make our power claims.
So there it is: Tom is confident that we won't make our power claims, I am confident that we will. I am willing to put up 1000 BTC to show my confidence in BFL products. Is Tom confident enough to do the same or is he just blowing hot air?
Unlike Josh, I'm not going to bother the mods by putting this in the scammer section, but somebody else is more than welcome to do such. As any sane person can see, Josh owes 1000 BTC to some charity(s). This has nothing to do with BFL's guarantee, runeks' bet, or not having to honor it because Tom is out of the picture. Reread the very first sentence if you're unsure of Josh's intent. The following two sentences was Josh's way of coercing Tom to act. As many times as this 1000 BTC guarantee, of sorts, has been brought to Josh's attention, he has failed to address it, just like he has failed to readdress the in-two-weeks TM FCC certification from back in November of last year and inform us of who was Sonny K. he spoke with when he first went to BFL's former facility in KC, MO, Sonny's step dad's old photo studio, later referring to said Sonny as Sonny Vleisides. I look forward to Josh's reply once he wakes from his nap and gets on with his daily chat with LukeJr between midnight and 2AM. |
|
|
|
Late last year I promised Josh that I will donate $100 toward a charity of his or BFL's choice (without them having to put anything) once they start delivering ASIC-based bitcoin miners, of which they have. Later, prior to them delivering, I upped it to $200. None of this is in dispute.
I'm still trying to understand - why did you say you would do this? When I made the offer, it was from the kindness of my heart without any ill-intent intended. Basically, you can even call it a bride to hopefully have BFL ship out quicker. That's the best way I can put it. No other real back story to it. |
|
|
|
What, exactly, was the charity bet about? Context is necessary, here. From the limited context in this thread, it's looking like he does deserve a negative trust. I can't really give a proper explanation of why I think that without the context, though.
Late last year I promised Josh that I will donate $100 toward a charity of his or BFL's choice (without them having to put anything) once they start delivering ASIC-based bitcoin miners, of which they have. Later, prior to them delivering, I upped it to $200. None of this is in dispute. I clearly owe $200 toward a charity of Josh or BFL's choosing. This will be paid in the future, at which time I may set up a trust fund prior from which the funds will come from. Pretty cut and dry, wouldn't you say so Maged? ~Bruno K~ |
|
|
|
lol this is going to be good!
I'll go get the goats.............................
 |
|
|
|
Thank your for your post, it is a very insightful read.
I have corrected all sales price of my properties to G$ 500 and made them availabe for sale. If anyone is interested they may buy them with their free sign up money.
Er, wouldn't that be the same as just surrendering the properties?  Yes exactly, we rather not manipulate the database in this case, so instead of buying from the system for the low price you can have mine for the low price. Bravo! Believe me, you'll do much, much better, as you've probably figured out. Please accept my apology if I have caused some burden upon you, but it's for the best across the board. You're well aware that you can still pick up premium grids using an untraceable pseudonym. (best for you to not comment on that aspect) Now, it's time to revisit your wonderful site. Later, bud. ~Bruno K~ |
|
|
|
|
PM psy. He may know which Portuguese mod you're speaking of.
|
|
|
|
Have you seen Josh's cat?  On an on-topic note: This thread is another example of BFL's failure to produce via Josh. Prior to hiring Josh, BFL was later on delivering. After hiring Josh, BFL was really late on delivering. Thanks to Josh, a can of worms has opened, one of which Sonny Vleisides would rather not desired. But BFL set the stage as to how their endeavor has played out. They could've came here with honey oppose to vinegar and would have had virtually the entire community behind them with all of us sucking Sonny's dick instead of the same ol', same ol' Josh, day after day after day after day... Notice how easy it is to pick on Sonny, for we all know he won't be back to post here, even though he promised us he would. That just gave me an idea. Start a scammer tag thread for Sonny Vleisides for reneging on his promise to return. Makes as much sense as this thread, but I'm the one to blame for being the master baiter. Monday morning at BFL: Jody: Morning, Josh. We need... Dave: Morning, Josh. We need... Sonny: Morning, Josh. We need... Warehouse Hand: Hola, Josh. Por favor... Nasser: Matin, Josh. Nous devons... Josh: Morning, all. Will get to it after I take care of an important issue. <click, click, click>Phinnaeus Gage scammer tag request<> That'll work. I'll teach that piece of shit, Bruno, a lesson. Jody: Josh. Another customer wants their money back. Josh: Stall 'em. Another CS: Josh. A customer of ours is posting shit about us again. Josh: Give him an immediate refund. <what could possibly go wrong with this solution?> Book on Josh's desk:  |
|
|
|
|
What a grumpy looking cat! Imagine if it had its own TV show.
|
|
|
|
How about setting up the "BFL Fund is a joke Fund", donating the $200 to that, then having that fund's management (you) decide that they aren't worthy because they are associated with scammers and unprofessionalism?
I'm sure everyone can agree that that would suffice according to Inaba's standards.
Pretty damn close, overall. BFL Trust is a Joke Fund comes to mind. I don't think they'd mind if I use some of the $200 to develop the fund since the moneys will be going to some noble cause yet to be named. I'm pretty ignorant on this and just going buy trusted folk, but did you no tsay, up to josh or something like that? It is up to Josh or BFL as to where the $200 is going to. |
|
|
|
And the deflection continues unabated by the master baiter, Phinnaeus Gage.
Has Josh lost his fuckin' mind? We all know he can do better this post. Maybe his short-bus stop was coming up and the driver told him to put his smart-smart phone up till he got off the bus.  Gage it seems like you owe the man $200. He did his thing you are not? Trust me I have been an ass before and I paid for it... I concur! I owe $200 to a charity stipulated by either Josh or BFL. This is no longer in contention. I desire to start a trust fund to place the $200 in so that I can properly dole it out to them. Does anybody have a catchy name up their sleeve I can use? Perhaps something that rhymes with Trusty.  |
|
|
|
so totalling maybe 100 threads to find satoshi.. how about use one of the others.
how about realise you wont learn any secrets about the coding by finding satoshi.. its open source!!
That is not my goal in the first place. I've pulled up and (misunderstanding [lack of C++ knowledge]) read the Bitcoin source code on the Bitcoin wiki. My goal is to try and find Satoshi. Yes I know others have failed, but who cares. Its for the hell of it really. This thread was mainly to propose that Satoshi may have been in Britain. Also, if he did create the admin account, wouldn't it make sense to host the forums in the country you live in, meaning the time zone default may not mean anything? .. .. now what.. if someone does not want to be found and they have not committed a crime. leave them alone Ashish Gulhati wrote:
>> I agree it sucks. But it works better than a hypothetical
>> private-ownership of infrastructure would work.
>
> Really? What is your evidence for this? Have you ever lived in a
> socialist
> country? Do you really think the state is better able to deliver such
> things
> as water, electricity, telecommunications and education better than the
> market? Or anything, for that matter?
Having lived in the widely socialist France and the often praised
capitalist UK I have to say that I prefer for above mentioned services
definitely in France. Don't belive me? Just catch the tube next time
your are in London, get out at Paddington railway station and try and
grab a train to to a medium sized town say in west Wales. Then try the
same with the metro in Paris, get out to the Gare de Lyon and catch a
train to the south of the country. Thereafter compare price, speed and
comfort. I think that might change your mind. |
|
|
|
Old hosting bills and other expenses (SSL certs, etc.). I concur, for that's what I concluded when I first seen it, hence not making an issue of it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
