I've always been saying that patience is overrated (as well as confidence)

The point is, if you lack knowledge and understanding of the market and the situation, then no amount of patience is going to help you. On the other hand, armed with true knowledge and genuine understanding, you don't need patience at all for the simple reason you would know exactly when to trade and when to stay away from trading. Psychologically, impatience is a result of feeling lost, i.e. not knowing what to do and when to do it

They will not offer the most important thing

Which is predictable and controlled supply (read, hard-capped). And this also happens to be the first part of Bitcoin's value proposition, the other part being its decentralized nature (which CBDCs also lack). All the advantages of CBDCs (whatever those might be) will become instantly irrelevant once central banks start printing these "new" currencies like there's no tomorrow. That's a doornail into the coffin of any CBDC out there. Put simply, a CBDC is just fiat on juice

Despite all odds, it makes plenty of sense, however

Indeed, all things considered and equal, you wouldn't spend most of your time on something which pays less (that I certainly agree with). But it still does make sense to put at least some effort into something which pays less even if your total income will suffer. The point is, it is never "all things considered and equal" in real life, and you don't know how it is going to play out in the long run. It may turn out that spending (wasting in your speak) some time and effort on a seemingly less profitable activity will pay back manifold in due course. Especially when they finally ban you from WinDice

Окей, можно подробности в студию?

Без указания имен, времен и так далее. Как записывал и, что самое главное, как потом выписывал из договора купли-продажи. Или по принципу "обещать - не значит жениться"? Ну то есть сначала думал оформить жену как покупателя, а потом вдруг передумал? Если так, тогда почему передумал - уже не вдаваясь в юридические подробности? Интересен сам ход мыслей, и, думаю, что не мне одному. Может жена увидела какой меркантильный муж попался ("обещал - и не женился") и решила сыграть в ящик (зачеркнуто) в ту же игру? Типа живи один в своей халупе

Пора немного освежить память

Напомню, что не так давно, а именно в марте месяце этого года (этого, Карл) биток одномоментно сходил к 4к (а на Bitmex ушел и того ниже). И это был никакой не крах и не апокалипсис, а всего лонг-сквиз. Но самое главное не это, а то, что такие прострелы могут и, скорее всего, будут происходит и дальше -- как только наберется достаточно длинных маржинальных позиций

That's not so for two major reasons. First, tossing a coin does require a lot of knowledge, i.e. if you have enough knowledge, tossing a coin stops being, well, tossing a coin in the sense of a random event. In this way, it is more than applicable to trading. Further, and this is second, your prior research is no guarantee of successful trading at all. Indeed, if you do know the market exceptionally well, have years of valuable trading experience, and enjoy powerful insights into the assets you trade it becomes a kind of informed coin tossing for you

But you will be in minority, like one in a million

Small and big businesses are in the same situation, as we all are

However, it would be a mistake to equal them. Big businesses are big because they have many product lines, and their production capacities are often located in different places, sometimes in different countries or even parts of the world. If something goes wrong with one product or one place, they can always relocate and close that product. For small business, it is more often than not the end of the game. I'm actually curious why people would ever say that big businesses are as vulnerable as small ones

And since monetary aggregates still get published on the Web, it doesn't change much. On the other hand, we only see the stats, not the process itself as it develops and unfolds in real time, i.e. after the damage has already been mostly done, and we are left to face the smoking ruins, so to speak. In this manner, seeing with your own eyes how the central bank starts to pump money into the economy, and steals your purchasing power from you would be tremendously interesting and probably disturbing (unless you hold bitcoins, of course)

That's why it is never gonna happen in real life

It could be interpreted in a different vein, though

This may be a sign of inaction, of course, but it is not necessarily a proof of incompetence. The government officials have probably come to realizing that they can't do much, and doing nothing is the best course of action under given circumstances. Basically, they let everyone decide for themselves what to do and not to do, to stay at home or go outside, perhaps, to visit a couple casinos

They could just peg it to gold or whatever, and get done with that

Indeed, they would most certainly discard this peg eventually (as it happened after Bretton Woods with the US dollar redeemable for gold), but they could just as easily ignore what is written in their constitution. Not even speaking of countries like Russia where the constitution has lost all of its meaning as the legal basis of a nation. And economically, hard-capping fiat doesn't make a lot of sense. It is not the lack of a cap vigorously followed through that turns fiat into a weapon of mass impoverishment, but its misuse by central bankers

Я думаю, что я все правильно понял

Нельзя квартиру взять и "записать" на супругу в качестве собственника. Собственникам она может стать либо выкупив ее, либо получив в дар или в наследство (по завещанию, например, или по факту состояния в браке). Во всех этих случаях шансов успешно оспорить сделку очень и очень немного, и только через суд (например, восстать из могилы, найти другого собственника, предъявить справку из дурки). Поэтому речь на 99% идет о регистрации супружницы на своей жилплощади -- временной или постоянной. Это обычная практика на тот случай, если с тобой что-то случится нехорошее. В этом случае у супруги больше шансов стать наследницей в последующей грызне между родственниками и свойственниками

Если нет детей, то прописка ничего не решает

Собственник может как прописать кого угодно (в разумных пределах, конечно), так и выписать в любой момент. Другое дело, что если квартира была приобретена в супружестве, то тут уже возможны разные варианты. Вполне можно попасть и под иск о разделе "совместно нажитого имущества" (о разделе имущества супругов), а если есть родные дети, то это будет практически дохлый номер выселить -- "прекратить право пользования жилым помещением" (если мамаша, конечно, не алкоголичка или наркоманка)

If they could, they would have done so long ago

Besides, I've heard it a few times that CBDCs would not so much hurt Bitcoin and its brethren but regular banks and financial institutions. The tech that exists today can potentially make many banking jobs redundant. Starting from this reasoning, it can be concluded that bankers should collude or lobby against CBDCs, not cryptocurrencies. Crypto is still a tiny speck in the global financial space, not worth the effort of obliterating it

When I was a child, I had trouble memorizing multiplication tables. Times were difficult

Подтверждаю слова данного постера

У меня подруга (зачеркнуто) соседка постоянно строит коварные бракоразводные планы, даже пару раз заявление в суд подавала (правда, потом забирала). Я даже больше скажу, женщина не только к разводу готовится заранее и незаметно, но и к замужеству, и даже к знакомству. Как говорится, Петя еще только сказал привет, а Маша уже вышла замуж и родила троих детей

I can't actually picture how the government being able to track their citizens is a pro (unless as in professional)

Maybe, it is a good thing for the government but definitely not for the simple folks. I don't think they will be happy about the Big Brother looking over their shoulder into every shekel they spend and every nickel they earn


I don't see either how CBDCs are killing the idea of cryptocurrencies. As explained in the article and further in the thread, CBDCs are not a new form money, it is the same good, or not so good, fiat but in a different package. And if fiat didn't kill crypto, there is no reason to think that CBDCs will. It could be argued that they can somewhat hurt cryptocurrencies but not in the sense of killing their entire concept. They don't offer anything fundamentally new

That was probably meant as a reply to my post

The problem with your reasoning is that you, the abuser, would go for as much as technically possible in every possible place out there. So if you can squeeze 1000 from WinDice, you would go for that. If you can squeeze 1000 from WinDice and extra 500 from Wolf.bet, you would try to do that. And while we are at it, it is not a job for you but your bot. It doesn't really care how many times it has to ask for free coins and in how many places unless there is a 2FA in place, of course, and you can't teach the bot to get around it or through it somehow

See? You just voiced what I had in mind

Even if the supply model of a blockchain-based project like Ethereum can be changed, what about a centralized currency run by a single entity, that is to say, a central bank? So no matter what kind of Bretton Woods they suggest or come up with again, without something that would actually stop them in their pursuit to work around the hard cap or peg they set forth in an agreement, this agreement won't be worth the paper it's written on

The returns are not small

Anyway, if people still claim the faucet every day with their only account, with 500 accounts you can claim x500 that much. It is between 3 and 9 doges daily which makes it 6 doges daily on average, and with 500 accounts you would be able to bag 3k doges every day. I'm not sure if it is a small amount at all considering that 3k doges is around 10 dollars, or 300 dollars a month these days. It kinda makes sense if you live in some really backward place


With WinDice and Wolf.bet you will be able to bag more than with WinDice alone. Simple math

People learn from history... Which is why you should always delete it