"... there has to be a force ..."
the coulomb force   when we have moving charges we get magnetic fields, the lines depicted above this is fluid flow dynamics and the "fluid", a superfine gas-like material called aether is what flows |
|
|
|
|
^^^ You are being lied to.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ There's no fucking gravity, the atmosphere your sack of shit displaces pushes you down. Your sack of shit causes the entire earth's atmosphere to rise up slightly and it reacts by pushing your shit down.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ What if you're passionate about balls? Will you allow reason to govern and limit your passions?
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies and Gentlemen, Paris Is Burning.
|
|
|
|
^^^ They had you in mind when the term kook was coined.  Space is fake and the globe is a tri-city criminal conspiracy (The New World Order) between Jews (City of London | financial center), Jesuits (The Vatican | religious center) and Freemasons (Washington DC | military center). Maybe if we ask them nicely they'll stop being criminals?  |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Another fish flapping around on dry land.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ The only one fighting established and meticulously documented science is you and your appeals to some imaginary authority or engineered consensus. Dufour was Sagnac's successor at the university of Paris, he was not some random crackpot off the street.
The Sagnac Effect via micro-mechanical aether displacement is how the MEMs gyroscope chip in your smartphone works. You can put you fingers in your ears and scream "LA LA LA LA LA THERE'S NO AETHER BECAUSE RELATIVITY" all day but that's not how shit works. Go blow it out your asshole!
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ These French scientists (Dufour & Prunier), their credentials, published works and achievements speak for themselves. The one dude invented the oscilloscope for crying out loud. As their experiments established a static aether and proved that "its interpretation in relativistic theory is problematic" and, they receive nothing but slander and ignorance form powerful and secretive groups like the Jesuits and the Jews of whom Eisenstein was both. They refuse to stop pushing the Copernican model on anybody who isn't part of their club; it's a conspiracy and yes, the Freemasons are in bed with the Jesuits and the Jews on this; they're all massive hypocrites.
Sources:
/Science-Journals/Historical Papers-Mechanics / Electrodynamics/Download/2470
MEETING OF 28 JUNE 1937., 1925 OPTICS. - On the observation of the phenomenon of Sagnac by an observer not entrained. Note by Messrs. Alexandre Dufour & Fernand Prunier.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ You should kill yourself instead of being a massive cuck.
They took rotating frames of reference into account and falsified relativity with their replication of the Sagnac experiment, if you want details then read their fucking work.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Actually I just quoted the entries from Wikipedia on the two French scientists who falsified relativity.  FLAT EARTH Talkin Bout Revolution -- https://youtu.be/TiYqPpAjUtM
Alexandre Dufour is the inventor of the oscilloscope.  |
|
|
|
Fernand Prunier is a French antirelativist engineer born in 1897 and died in 1971 who played a role in the history of the theory of relativity.
Summary
1 Books
2 Publications
3 References
4 External links
Books
Newton , Maupertuis and Einstein , reflections on relativity (1929)
On a displacement of fringes recorded on a platform in uniform rotation , with Alexandre Dufour (1940)
Some new observations and experiments and their consequences for theories of physics (1946)
On discrete numerical relations between the elements of the stars of the solar system and on their interpretation (1950)
On Fermat's theorem, did Fermat prove it? (1966)
Publications
On an experiment of Georges Sagnac which would be made with flows of electrons (January 1935)
On the observation of the Sagnac phenomenon with an untrained illuminating source (May 1937)
On the observation of the Sagnac phenomenon by an untrained observer (June 1937)
On the Sagnac effect (October 1937)
On the effect observed on a rotating Sagnac disc when part of the optical circuit is not trained (March 1939)
We Have Displacement of Fringes Recorded on a Platform in Uniform Rotation (September 1942)
References
Alex Moatti , Alterscience: postures, dogmas, ideologies , Odile Jacob, 2013, p.21.
Eric Gourgoulhon , Special Relativity in General Frames: From Particles to Astrophysics , Springer, 2010, p.469.
External links
Authority records: National Library of France ( data )
-- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernand_PrunierAlexandre Dufour is a French physicist who succeeded Georges Sagnac as lecturer in physics for the PCN certificate ( 1st year of medical studies) at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Paris in September 1920. He obtained the title of professor without a chair on April 1 , 1927 , then was appointed full professor on October 1 , 1931 .
He was the inventor of the cathode oscillograph , whose process he described as early as 1914, before publishing the details of the apparatus in 1920.
A group of marginal scientists, defenders of theories for some of the pseudo-science, bore his name (the Physics Circle Alexandre Dufour). He met at the home of the Centralians from 1949 to 1983. Among its members was René-Louis Vallée, the inventor of Synergistic Physics .
Summary
1 Notes and references
2 See also
2.1 Bibliography
2.2 External links
Notes and references
↑ Reports of the sessions of the Academy of Sciences [archive] on Gallica
MA Dufour, " Cathodic Oscillograph " [archive] , on archives-ouvertes.fr
↑ Mentioned in particular by David Larousserie on lemonde.fr [archive]
Alexandre Moatti - SPS n ° 292, October 2010 [archive]
See also
Bibliography
Alexandre Moatti , Alterscience: Postures, dogmas, ideologies , Paris, Odile Jacob, coll. "Sciences", 2013 , 334 p. ( ISBN 978-2-7381-2887-4 ) , "Antirelativist Engineers: The Physics Circle Alexandre Dufour", p. 57-68.
External links
Research Resource: Professors of the Faculty of Sciences of Paris [archive]
-- https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandre_Dufour_(physicien) |
|
|
|
^^^ Special Relativity has been falsified, deal with it.
Because... you say so? Where is the evidence for that? I googled what you said and I saw no results supporting your statements, even if there was 1 or 2 sites somewhere saying that, why should we trust them? Are you a scientist? How are you judging their results? In 1939 Dufour & Prunier performed a replication of the Sagnac Experiment that accounted for rotating frames of reference and it falsified special relativity. This is where the theoretical argument for gravity and black holes ends. There's no retreating to Newtonian gravity either, it's over. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Special Relativity has been falsified, deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ your first link is garbage:
"We've picked up some unusual traffic from your network and have temporarily blocked access from your IP address."
The Michaelson interferometer was 10x more sensative than it needed to be to detect if the earth was rotating. So unless you've got any specific arguments from that site you're just spamming garbage links that are making false claims.
As for the wiki link it's also trash because it fails to address the fact the Dufour & Prunier replication took rotating frames of reference into account and falsified special relativity.
|
|
|
|
Black holes are fake news, research flat earth! Research the Sagnac Experiment and how the Dufour & Prunier replication took rotating frames of reference into account and falsified special relativity.  |
|
|
|
|
^^^ There is no distant past, no globe, no planets, no gravity and no outer space in the Bible, you're a heretic!
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ There are no "planets" just wandering stars. The Sun, Moon and stars are all small, close projected lights; they're not solid objects.
|
|
|
|
 The Earth is a stationary plain and the Sun is a small, optically projected object off of a mirrored dome that moves in an circular path above us. It's about 32 miles wide with an altitude of about 3,000 miles according to direct measurement with a sextant. As the Sun does its 24 hour daily cycle, throughout the year it moves closer to the central point at the north pole, then back again. This yearly cycle back and forth creates the various seasons and the changing length of day and night. 
"... Bible scholars and notable believers also accept evolution ..."
No, no they don't the Bible says man was created. If you're contradicting the Bible then you are by definition an inept biblical scholar and not a believer. Dinosaurs are a hoax, fossils form rapidly like concrete and giants once roamed a young Earth.  |
|
|
|
... in notbatman's quoted post, above - where it talks about the four corners of the earth. So we see that the wording of this paragraph - verses 7 thru 10 - is very figurative, as is the whole chapter. It doesn't have anything to do with describing the shape of the earth. Rather, it is used to denote peoples from all around the earth. But not the shape of the earth.
...
@BADecker, Your argument is changing the definition of earth from dry land to one that encompasses the entire surface including the sea. You then claim the statement is figurative based on your modified definition. You've changed the meaning of what the author was trying to convey to one which supports the Satanic globalist agenda. You're literally acting out the role of "... the devil who had deceived them ..." - rev 20:10.    The Bible (rev 20:9) says the Earth is flat. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
