I have a really good feeling about Monaco and Takumi too actually, he was one of their most lethal strikers, goals per games and per minutes is one thing but he was actually just really itching for goals just didn't get enough pitch time. I have a feeling he will do really really well there! At last it is not known if Zidane will manage both teams? It would be a great feat on the part of the PSG sheik to have Zidane, but I'm sure Zidane would ask CR7 to strengthen his team, if this happens, I think the other teams would be afraid of them, Zidane is used to dealing with the best stars in the world, at the time he played with the best in the world, so that for him is like a walk.
Probably yes, but he knows he will have the immediate task of winning UCL AND there is also the thing about Mbappe supposedly having a say n the club direction. This isn't clear to me what it is or if a coach like Zidane could tolerate powershare. Having Zidane in the ranks of a team and being the France coach at the same time, this will attract more attention, it is well known the impeccable work he did when he was the technical director of Real Madrid, he did not see any failure, I also remember even when CR7 began to have some problems with the Treasury of Spain and only Zidane managed to keep him for his team. Zidane not only represents being a good coach, I think he can transmit much more to him if he focuses as a player, sometimes when they played some short shots, when they trained, Zidane also got in to play and I miss seeing that mastery and class for his feints, really For me he is a very complete technician. Looking at their performance from this season and with the quality of the players actually I think without saying that it is quite clear that PSG are already the best. But in this case only for the domestic league they claim that because the fact with the squad they have now it doesn't prove anything for the Champions League.
High hopes year after year have brought nothing in the Champions League and they have to think hard again here.
PSG really need to upgrade their game because with the type of players that they have in the squad they should not have done so bad in the champions league. And they also lost a few matches which they should not have lost in the league as well. There are obviously a lot of controversy going on around PSG. The great names that are in the club are just because they are getting paid so well otherwise there would never have stayed in PSG. In terms of performance I don't see a bad one there because indeed their performance was very good but when talking about the Champions League even though they played well but of course we also have to look at the opponents they are playing against clearly have good experience too. In this case I will not blame PSG in terms of performance but in terms of tactics and strategy they clearly lost. Yes, certainly the flaws are still in force, I don't know if the problem is technical, because clearly the players are not, with such quality in a team it is almost impossible, however not everyone knows how to deal with so many stars, who have experience in having many stars in a team is Real Madrid, however if PSG manages to master that detail well, it will be an unstoppable team. |
|
|
|
The truth is I don't see that Butler has enough level to make a fight against Inoue, the other thing is if Inoue accepts it, we all know very well Inoue's style, if Inoue in that case accepts the fight and if he wins Once with a knockout, Butler's reputation will be very low, how could he get it back? The truth is that Butler is good for me, but he needs more preparation. Instead, I would look for fights with less complicated rivals who seem more likely to win, and not leave once and for all because of a big man like Inoue. Butler must reap more wins to that the fans ask for more fights, and the business model is there in having more fights equals more money.
Looking at statistics of Butler with 34-2-0 winnig 15 fight via KO making it a 44% of his fight won via knockout.  Buttler is currently holding the WBO title so I think Inoue will seek a fight with him to be the undisputed champion. That said, I do think that Inoue has the upper hand if ever these two fighters meet. Inoue holding a record of 23-0 with 20 KO's and currently holds IBF WBA and WBC Titles declared interest in becoming the undisputed champion at 118[1]. Inoue beats the future Hall of Famer Nonito Donaire via 2nd round TKO last Tuesday.
[1] https://www.boxingscene.com/paul-butler-naoya-inoue-one-best-ive-seen-20-30-years--166840Yes, in fact if one of the things for which Inoue has been on such a good streak is to be able to reach this boxer, however I think that the one who has to look for this fight the most is Butler, for me Inoue vs. Butler will be a fight very good if we leave the statistics aside, without taking into account that each one has more than the other, I would concentrate only on the level of pique there is to decide who can be the best, one defending and the other hungry for more victories, I would think that if this fight takes place, I would not lose it because it represents one of the fights that would generate the highest world rating, the promoters of these boxers must have future plans, they can get very good profit. I don't mind as the main purpose is for entertainment or possibly a charity event.
You don't mind at all that's why you didn't understand why others are against the worst exhibition matches  The way you speak, it's clear you don't get the point of view of the real boxer's sentiment and real boxers' fan point of view. If exhibition matches are always welcome, why do you think there are lots of issues involved here? If that's your view then I respect it of course but don't speak generally. If that's for a charity event, I will support it. If that's for entertainment only to make money, never mind. Although what they say makes a lot of sense, it's just an exhibition match, but we can't kill the illusion of what a fight is either, because even though it's an exhibition match, it should be taken similarly to how friendly soccer matches are played, that sometimes they are much harder than normal ones. I love that it's for a charity event, but they shouldn't lower the quality, because people still pay and want to see something that entertains them and makes them move emotions. |
|
|
|
The problem is that by using digital ID there are chances of identity theft. Since the IDs will be stored online it might become vulnerable to hackers.
They must have high security on their site if not the outcomes might be disastrous.
Further more, using digital ID the government will be easily tracing the users for how much they gamble.
So that is kind of a privacy issue and the governments can very well take advantage of it.
The only useful thing that I find using digital ID is that it will restrict children under 18 from gambling.
May be if the government put a certain restriction on people from over gambling then may be that can help.
I think that governments are taking advantage of entering people's privacy using the most vulnerable possible excuses of "protection", I respect everything that has to do with security, but I know that trusting governments or banks is suicide, they they want to have total control over people, make sure that no one has their privacy, see and track all the operations that have to do with money, how many people move money and why they move those amounts, I think that will be a trap to apply all the acid in the future, of course as I said before, these are my thoughts. Yes ofcourse, the governments are already doing that by implementing mandatory KYC for bank accounts. So in a way, they are already tracking us and what we do with our money. Cryptocurrency is the only way to get out of this trap yet people are not willing to adopt cryptocurrencies. People are getting used to the comfort of fiat currencies giving away their control over their money instead of owning their money by having an initial struggle to control it. Yes, that's why I think that one way to escape all control is with privacy coins, I really have a very clear criteria about crypto, firstly BTC, then my taste is with ETH and Monero, this is simple, ETH it is considered the second best coin and Monero is for the privacy and anonymity it can offer. If casinos started to offer games with this currency, allowing deposits and withdrawals through it and with records that are somewhat less rigorous in terms of KYC, I think it could become a leading platform, because for now there is a lot of talk about adoption, but when it happens, which is already a fact, the problem of being anonymous and seeking more privacy will begin. That's why cryptocurrencies are created in the 1st place, it gives us another option than just relying upon the fiats alone that the government is controlling. The government surely doesn't want crypto even if it had many benefits and all which is already a fact because of the anonymity it could bring and they couldn't trace people in this industry that's why KYC has been present on the platforms. In some way, governments want to take over a part of gambling, bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, they do not want to lose control, in order not to lose it, they have certain licenses in their possession, certain treaties that make KYC exist, of course in an intelligent way They get in saying that for the protection of the player and so that they are not scammed, but we all know that the true intention is to know which people handle crypto and how much, if KYC did not exist, it would be more difficult for them, it is because of them that even if casinos implemented Monero transactions it would be a bit more tedious for governments to find out. |
|
|
|
A thesis on gambling is possible, but it is an option because it can be difficult to find good variables to do research in certain states that do not legalize gambling. I don't even think it would be possible to do it in my country as the main issue is legality although we can actually do online based research. But here I might be able to think of something about a non-formal, unrelated study of any college on the effects and problems of gambling on some respondents. As hard as it is, I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who are gamblers regardless of what game they like. Of course this can be done, but in the end I think the results of the study may not be as accurate as expected. in addition there is a common thought in many people, which is that they play in casinos to win a lot of money, easy money, and things are not like that either, easy money is a path that few have left well rid, and mostly because they tend to have very good luck. That is the wrong mindset about gambling, I am sure they will get more trouble than expected profit. Different regions have different mindsets about gambling. Those who gamble have no regrets and those who do not have no regret either. A thesis maybe for some readers but it is not for those who want to quit gambling - or who want to start gambling. it depends the kind of gambling in questions. Gambling is gambling in any region you are, except their is a particular game they played for that particular regions. But i know quite well that casino game, poker game, soccer game is general game which you can play it irrespective the environment you found yourself. Secondly i can agree with you assuming you said that we play a game base on the game we know perfectly or some people played game because of individual interest of gaming, it's very simple and understandable. I also understand the point under which you say that it depends on the game, there are many who make sports bets and by pure logic it is more likely that they will win, since then the chances of winning increase, when we play any game in a casino, for example the slots it is known that the casino will always have the advantage, the house has the advantage, then we are already more subject to "luck" and "random" this is something that we must take into account, of course there are other games that reduce the possibility of losing that is poker, especially when it is in tournaments when they play PVP, so if it is that way, I see that it depends on the type of game. The luck and randomness factors which we are taking into consideration when playing slot games have a much higher incentive than when we bet on sport betting.When we bet on some sport betting events chances that we hit x10000 to x30000 of our bet are almost 0 in terms of percentage to achieve that,while in the slot machine we are playing in our gambling session to get that highest winning payline and chances here are somewhat better than in sport betting to get that top payline. So any slot player already knows that they are depending on pure luck when playing slots but they do so because they hope that luck will favor them at least one time with that highest winning payline. yes, it's true that slot machine gambling has an advantage in terms of very high incentives, maybe because of this, slot machines are becoming more trending at this time compared to other gambling. especially slot machines offer a lot of games with a very wide variety of choices if one is lucky one can get maxwin according to the stakes. However, I prefer soccer gambling, even though the incentives are not as big as slot machines, but I can start by analyzing each team one by one to minimize losses. yes all bets I think have their own uniqueness and after all the luck factor is very decisive in gambling Yes, in fact I was a player who liked poker a lot, I still love it, but since I started playing more slots as a measure to de-stress, I like it a lot, especially when new games come out, new slots, in the case of bitcasino.io and stake.com they have a great variety of slots and they care about adding more every week this is something that slots fans love it is a paradise and from there I also think that at some point the player clings to that moment of very good luck that comes while you play so that you have a very large win, it has happened to many. I have seen how in threads of those casinos they publish the millionaire winnings of some players, it is something that can be very inspiring. |
|
|
|
You're right, the solution to this is to have a good VPN, I've seen a couple of casinos that accept the use of VPN, I don't see anything wrong with it if you play and don't cheat in any way,
While this is true and valid, if the VPN was used to access at restricted and prohibited regions by the gambling site, that will subject to violating the terms. The use of VPN should be fine as long as it was accessed at allowed regions. The use of VPN is already very common and it was allow by the gambling site at most of the cases as long as, as you have mentioned, not to cheat or do something unusual. Privacy and anonymity is the only reason why we should used VPN and not the other way around which involves fraud-related schemes. Well, that's an important point, what happens is that we currently have many help tools to be able to guarantee enjoyment, and like everything else, any computer tool or thing that can help can be used to do bad things, that's why it's difficult control that they can do it for bad things, in fact for me in my personal opinion I suppose that in the very near future most casinos and bookmakers will have to accept players who can enter the sites using VPN, and perhaps the licenses they will not have the same weight of importance that they have now. Of course this is just what I think can happen. That would be a good move as that will allow far more players to join these casinos even from jurisdictions that are currently not allowed to gamble.This is also a double edge sword as by using VPN services not all people are the most honest in the world so there is room for abusing bonuses,referral commission and so on.The IT team of the casino should be pretty alert and should monitor the activities coming from users that use VPN in much more detail than users who do not use VPN-s,because VPN-s add a layer of complexity for the IT team to check on. Yes, although I think that in some way the casinos and betting houses will have to fight to be able to accept these requests at some point, as time goes by more people will know Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies (those who do not know) and will take advantage of having casinos online, for this reason they will look for a way to do it and they will want to protect their money and be able to play in peace, whether with bonuses or not, they will want to do it, and many casinos are already beginning to update this idea and will allow this very good option, and with Regarding my personal opinion, I do not agree with prohibitions, I believe that everyone in the world regardless of the country has the right to have fun and I believe that this has to be a sufficient premise to begin the acceptance of VPN. |
|
|
|
~snip~
I was watching a piece of news, but I don't know if it's real or maybe not, but it announced that perhaps for the next World Cup qualifiers, South America would expand the World Cup quotas to 6 places, if this is the case it will be very interesting , the curious thing is that it only said South America, for Europe it would also apply.
The next world cup, 2026, will be hosted in Canada, USA, and Mexico. All those 3 will be qualified because they're hosts. Also, there will be extra slots for all the confederations. The 2026 World Cup will have 48 qualified teams instead of the 32 teams of 2022. So that's going to be an extra 16 teams for the next world cup, selected from all the confederations. It will be the first time that some confederations will be able to qualify directly instead of having to go to play-offs. Here's the detailed table with the new spots:  Excellent information, the fact of doing it in 3 countries is an experiment that FIFA wants to do to see how things can go, however the most benefited are those from Asia and I like that, also the addition of more countries by UEFA could guarantee that teams like Italy, Sweden if they can have more options to go to the World Cup, particularly I still feel sadness because these two teams do not go to QATAR, because they have a very good history and are actually very representative and they make many countries have many fans and want to revive actions that only they could do, as happened in USA94 with the third place of Sweden and the last World Cup that Italy won with a Zidane who hit an Italian. I just realized that for the first time there were six teams from Asia (AFC) who managed to advance to the world cup. I think this is new history. I have high hopes for South Korea and Japan in this world cup. although the real challenge will definitely be felt for Korea and Japan because considering Qatar is a pretty hot country so I hope it won't be a problem. even some of my brothers who work in qatar say it's so hot there even at work there is someone who installs air conditioning outside the room. This will definitely be a challenge for a team from a country that has cold temperatures.
The hosts always gain automatic qualification, and on top of that there are 4 exclusive slots for AFC. Apart from these, Australia managed to win the playoff against Peru. So in total there are 6 countries from the AFC. All that said, South Korea and Japan are a joke. They have huge fanbase, but they never perform in major tournaments. They look completely clueless when they play against top teams such as Brazil or England. And now coming to the weather, I don't think that there needs to be much concern. During evening time, the weather is much more tolerable. On top of that, the tournament is taking place during the winter season. It's true, I think that the match between Australia and Peru was not that exciting, but this time for me, I was more for Australia than for Peru even though I am South American, I think that the kangaroos of the beautiful country need to do a good job in QATAR . The criticism for the oceanic country has been many, but there is still a long way to go before they can fix all those inconsistencies that could have been shown, I think they will give a good show and will be able to go very far in the World Cup. |
|
|
|
Well this is something very interesting, and I hope it happens like this, but I think that the main reason why they want the fight to happen is because of the amount of money that is involved there, I don't see that they do it for the pure interest of boxing, I don't think that it be for that, rather the most logical thing is because of the business model, because the big investors are willing to make juicy millionaire bets, and with respect to the trilogy, that Canelo vs. GGG is something that is good is positive, but in my personal opinion I don't see this fight as exciting, because CANELO has faltered a lot, who I see as good for making good fights is the Russian Bivol. Terence Crawford vs Errol Spence is one of the most awaited fights for several years. It was highly demanded by most boxing fans around the world. Disregarding the money, they will really meet each other no matter what at the end of the line in the Welterweight Division as they are both undefeated. Money is a factor but there's no other way that these fights should not happen. A total of 4 World Titles are at stake here and it's not just about being money. If this is a non-title match and these two didn't target each other, then it's a money matter fight but it's not. It's even a must-watch for me compared to GGG vs Canelo III where the former is now in his retirement period and the latter just came from an embarrassing loss against Bivol that he even wasn't able to make it a close fight as a heavy favorite to win in that match. But to get the date of when they will fight - the purse split matters to their respective promoters. In some cases, the boxers themselves want to fight as soon as possible. But the delays originate from their promoters, who are not in agreement with their split. And yes, Crawford vs Spence Jr, this will definitely happen, only the date is yet to be determined. They will rake huge money, but getting the 4 world titles would be the best to get from this event. Crawford though doesn't have any promoter as of this time, and he should be representing himself in the trade. Maybe that is the hindrance as they want to make the split in favor of Spence, and as we have been discussing, 60-40. So it depends on how Crawford will look at it. Of course, both have the belts and undefeated and this fight might unification in 147 lbs. Well, it is no secret to anyone that Spence is gaining sympathy and more fans, which is a very favorable move for him, especially for the entire business model that can be developed based on it, but following this logic we see that Crawford He doesn't have a promoter yet, I don't know how good he is at representing himself, the scopes as a businessman and as an athlete are standards that can be very demanding, and he may neglect one of the two roles, I know there is a lot of speculation about it In my personal opinion, I say that a good promo is needed to get good fights with many chances of success so that it is done as quickly as possible. |
|
|
|
I think it will take 5 more months before we see any hope however there will not be any flashy up moves coming before Mid 2023. Meanwhile, I wish I had a crystal ball to tell you on what date exactly we will see Bitcoin at $100k but unfortunately, I don't have one. What I think is that Bitcoin may be in 6 digits after 2025. Let's see how it goes.  I hope so, I have looked for ways to predict through Wyckoff theory and I am not looking for patterns, because that is not my style of looking for a price, but I have not found something clear, and seeing the volume of some exchanges it is difficult to predict, however I think that the fundamentals have had a great influence, in addition that many investors are very aware of the inflationary levels of the USA and Europe and this makes them doubt and causes panic, but as you say, after 2025 if there must be a change, and that change will hopefully be favorable, although I hope that BTC can reach $100k well before 2025. |
|
|
|
~snip~
This competition was created with the aim of ending friendly games. Therefore, it is normal for many players to take these games less seriously. As the competition is still very recent, it still doesn't generate much motivation. But with three or four more years of competition, I believe that mentality will change a bit.
I don't think the whole purpose is to completely eliminate friendly games, but to instead provide a more organized structure to all the friendlies that can happen in Europe, where there are many, many great teams. Friendly matches on top of the Nations League will continue to happen, just not as frequently as before. In a way, this makes friendly matches a bit more interesting, because there are less of them. The Nations League is basically a lower tier tournament compared to the World Cup for example, but it's nice to have so many different teams playing with each other all the time. These are valid points, however the risks exist in a pronounced way, but what are the risks? I think that the main thing of all is that one of the best players could be injured and cannot go to represent his team in the World Cup and this is something very sad, both for the player and for the team and this has happened in friendly matches and it affects an entire nation enormously, I have seen how this has happened to Colombia, Peru, with some of the best players they have, some if they manage to recover, others not, but I think that for this competition as well as for friendlies in Europe , the players who are stars should take care and not play in order not to run the risk of getting injured. We were indeed amazed by Hungary's performance when they succeeded in slaughtering the English hosts in front of the public at Wembley Stadium, but for the England national team this is not a tournament that is taken seriously by the three lion squad so this is a natural thing if they have to admit Hungary's superiority because of us. know that they don't take this tournament seriously, especially since it's only a friendly tournament, especially since the England coach himself is trying to find a team strength for the starting line-up ahead of the Qatar world cup next November.
I think that these results of the group of death, because I am also a supporter that it is the group of death, gives a lot to think about, also despite the fact that the English say that this tournament is not so relevant for them because it is considered friendly for some , it is very good preparation for them and to do a good job in the World Cup, I would see it with concern, not hearing the feat of Hungary, but the way the English are playing, with a team when David Beckham and Rooney were there, this was not happening, of that if I am sure, I think that England must again take the reins and be that team that was scary to see them. I don't think that anytime should care about whether the FIFA tournament is important or not. they should have the mentality to perform really well regardless. And it probably wouldn't have mattered so much if they lost by only 1/2 goals. but they lost by 4-goal deference and were also not able to score even one. And that was also against a team like Hungary. so now if they are trying to play the innocent card, and say that it was not important to them, I am going to say that it is just a bunch of bull shit. Well, I just limit myself to thinking that this team had many mistakes that will surely be fully reviewed so that they don't happen again, and it may be a game that has marked the team so that a type of attitude of that style does not come out anymore. |
|
|
|
Most traders get too greedy, they deviate from their trading plan and end up with losses.
I have these written on my wall.
-Always use stop loss
-Use Take Profit, don't be greedy
-Stop overtrading
-Start small and grow
Here are the things to look for when dating here, but here is the key to not doing this, there is a mentality here and there, but if they are able to overcome it, they can avoid the possibility of energy loss and if they gain. It will be seen that traders are likely to suffer losses but here If you can have a good chat from here, then you can have a good amount of talk from here and if a lot of time is wasted here in the hope of making more profit, then the traders here can suffer a lot. I would like to add that the market trader or speculator in most cases does not maximize his profits and cuts them, just as he keeps hope when he is losing, this means that if we are operating and we are watching the market, if we put a stop to a movement but we see that it has the potential to continue growing, we must move the stop higher, the ideal would be to have the stop and take profit at the same time, but if not, it would be better to maximize profits that way, but some traders leave the market with a profit, but they lose movements, this is a common mistake, vice versa with losses, if I see that the market is coming against me, I cut the loss, that is, I let the stop loss do its thing I work and I don't move it with the hope that it will go up in price. |
|
|
|
|
The merchants, or traders, or market speculators, what matters to them is to follow the trend or direction that the market takes, a good market speculator does not care if the BTC market goes up or down, what matters is that in based on any direction it takes, it will win, either in the fall the trader will take advantage of that movement perhaps to make operations with leverage and obtain profits, this is the real difference between a trader or market speculator and an investor, because the investor always You will want the price of BTC to always be rising, because it is generating profitability, and everything will be green.
|
|
|
|
The possibility of Bitcoin drop to $8k all the way from $69k is very low, we know Bitcoin is the world's leading cryptocurrency so by that it has a very high volatility, each time it drops, people gets panics and sells off there BTC, when it rises again dey buy at loss prices which isn't suppose to be so but those who understands crypto and have studied Bitcoin knows no matter how it falls, it'll rise again, it fell from $69k and to $19k, and people are taking advantage of every Single move of it, imagine those who short BTC from $69k to $20k how much profit they'll be on. I'm not saying there's no possibility of it hitting $8k but if it does then it's going to $0 gradually and there's a very strong support at $0 which will skyrocket it upwards. One thing I know is certain. One-day, sometimes Bitcoin will be at $100k+ and we'll still say it's in deep, so as you're holding, also be making profits from the day trade
Bitcoin have dipped in the past months and will continue to dipped because of the high volatility in the market. Bitcoin have breaken all the support and resistance in the structure of technical analysis, experts loses their money in the rapid bearish movement of Bitcoin and some have even withdrawn their money from Bitcoin. In early this month, Bitcoin hits it's ATL price which ranked to $17,588 but presently today it's has climbed to $20k. For Bitcoin to dip to $17k, there's every possiblity that it will still hits $8k in less than no time. We will still be keeping our eyes on Bitcoin as others have a very mindset that it would run down to a $0 while others hope before the end of the year, it would shoots up to a long run of $100k. This space is unpredictable because of the constant bull and bear Market, we are experiencing everytime. At this time it is very possible that anything could happen for BTC, this is not the time to ensure that BTC will not fall any more, at least I do not see it that way, I am a very optimistic person, but I cannot cover the sun with a finger either and obviously if there is still a war in Ukraine and RUSSIA, there will be no peace, and that peace translates into market instability, and a lot of panic, it can also be said that another possible war is at the gates of China and Taiwan, the danger is not Tawan but that the USA enters the conflict to defend Taiwan and that represents that many countries enter NATO, so while there are those risks of war, it is difficult for the price of BTC to rise calmly. |
|
|
|
Before I started cryptocurrency trading I have always hard this friend who is a pro cryptocurrency trader and have always shown me his profits but never told me how long he has been into cryptocurrency trading, but I have known him for crypto trading for close to two years now and in this period I only saw his success stories.
Now I decided to start trading after many persuasion and am beginning to have a rough experience but all the while I have only viewed cryptocurrency trading as an all good venture
Trading is not the same as traditional business, doing trade here in the cryptocurrency is too risky, that is why you need to choose in between to risk your capital or not. If not, that means you are not suitable to stay here in this field business. Probably, you can only fee paradise , if you are earning here nicely something like that. Trading is very complex and when we start trading crypto without any preparation or skills it is very risky, there is a lot to learn before starting to trade and it certainly takes time, what is clear is that trading is not as easy as some people think, who just want instant profits For me, the paradise of every trader or market speculator is to know in which direction the market is going so that they can win, if we start to analyze every market speculator, it does not matter if the BTC rises in price or falls in price, the The market speculator puts aside all sentiment towards the currency and sees it only as money, because if the price falls, I am sure that the market speculator makes money on the fall, as well as on the rise, all this is what I think it could be the paradise of a market speculator or trader, to anticipate the movements of the market, just as the famous Jesse Livemore did, he operated on the line of least resistance to guarantee winning. |
|
|
|
|
Right now I don't see it as possible that the alts are about to make a pump, the reason is simple and most people know it, if the BTC doesn't rise in price, hardly any altcoin will, and as we all know the altcoin that ETH is more famous, ETH is a strong currency, which has a very similar behavior to btc, which is logical, no currency could be above BTC, simply because no currency is older than BTC and they do not have a life of their own They also do not represent everything that BTC has gone through, many at one time classified it as a bubble, but it is clear that BTC is very solid despite the fact that it has no backing, therefore of all the altocns I would lean towards ETH and Monero.
|
|
|
|
First of all, wanna say hi to everybody. I searching on the internet in the last 2 week 24/4 about crypto currency and how to multiply your money. I read article’s about people how can get rich, people who can get brokes and a lot of things about that, and to be honest, if it was possible to become rich after night, all people in the world will do that, so basically in my opinion it is lucky, or tips from billionaires who own some crypto etc. I came there to get some advice from people who really know what crypto it is and how it works. In the last months, I open an Coinbase account, and I saw that, the application pay me like 20 euro ( free coins) for opening an account. It was so nice. After like 1 month, the app do not give any free cryptocurrency. My question for you guys it is, beside Coinbase, it is any other application like that, like give you free stuff or something ? Ps, I think about what you think, a poor guy came there and try to get stuff free, go to work buddy. Ok, it is true, I searching for something free because I have a bad financial status,I was working as an mechanic and I was fire because service closed, and I searching for everything can came. I have 1 baby and I need to put food on the table when I get home  so please, all hate stuff it is not accepted. Thank you for your time guys, and I’m waiting your reply. Dan, Nowadays, it is really not easy to survive at this point of time. Consequently, if you're gonna do some way of earnings here in the cryptocurency you need be more skill full and have knowledge about this crypto space. Also, you must be careful here, don't just get easily believe to any member here in the forum, because you know most of the victim here are the community who are poor and lack of idea in the first place It is important to always improve knowledge and skills because we will be left behind if we do not do that, whenever making an important decision to consider first and carefully, when we are careless then the consequence we have to accept is losing money For me, the greatest poverty is in the mind, we can be rich in the mind, because if we feed our brain with knowledge, even if we are bankrupt, the only one that can get us out of there is our brain, because it is the one that seeks solutions, and as can we be rich? reading books, but the right books, those people who invest reading what they are looking for, such as investment, market speculation, their brain is activated to be able to act differently than the average, that is, they will see opportunities where others never You will see them, and an ideal path for a person who considers that his economy is bad (he is not poor) should use his knowledge to improve it, investment is an option. |
|
|
|
Im buying now good amount , seems bottom reached , BUT i will keep 50% in cash in case bitcoin goes down further .
Im planning to buy btc price around: 19500$ at the time of writting .
Its DONE !
keep 50% of my money in cash in case it goes more down and get good average to put orders like this :
25% @ 15,000$
25% at 11,000$
will have a good average price
Still the best time to buy enough. Many have invested when Bitcoin was priced at $17.5k.That was the best time to invest They want to invest without having a good time investing yet, they can do it right now.The market can go up at any time so I think it is better to invest in the current market than to wait for the market to go down. I have already said it before, it is a good time to buy as long as the money knows how to handle it, it is nice to buy in each dip, but since we do not know if it will go down more or go up in price, it is always better to assume that we are in the worst of the cases (falling) which is good to take into account that it must be bought gradually to take advantage of each dip, of course this is my way of thinking, it is difficult sometimes to deal with volatility and world events, pandemic, wars, all this affects the speculative markets and obviously the BTC market that does not go unnoticed by anyone. |
|
|
|
|
Most people are of many emotions, I agree with the opinion that when BTC is very high, people buy, they do not care about the price, they buy the same because they think they will have profits quickly, but the rich, the millionaires never buy expensive, and those who do it are very likely to lose, it is for this reason that I always analyze the BTC market using the Wyckoff theory, it allows me to see what stage of the market we are in, because it is never good to buy in the distribution stage, and In the short term, it could be said that this has happened, but in the long term, I would not be able to say whether we will return to the accumulation stage or, therefore, we are in a possible re-accumulation stage, which is very valid, but given the fundamentals of war, I would say that You have to be very careful to buy, it is likely to go down, so it is good to buy later to take advantage of each dip.
|
|
|
|
That's right you mentioned some of the points above, but building character as a professional gambler is not easy even though we already know the general things as mentioned in thread or at several other threads, we will always be faced with emotional when gambling at casino. Except spoortsbook, because spoortsbook requires analysis with some notes or news that we have to think about in make a bet.
Controlling our emotions when it comes to our money is something that is always difficult to do and we see another example of this when it comes to trading, and activity that while very different from gambling also includes putting your money at risk. When it comes to trading you are supposed to always remain in perfect control of your emotions and trade just based on what the charts are indicating you, however this is incredibly difficult and once people begin trading with their emotions they face huge losses, in a process which is very similar to what happens when people gamble and lose the control over their emotions. Yes, this is something clear, controlling emotions sounds very easy, but in reality it is very difficult to do it, since sometimes one says that it is controlled but sometimes it is not, this is a bit difficult, it is like in trading, however I consider that when a person is a professional in gambling or trading, he handles an amount equal to or greater than $1M, because it is no longer anything, a movement can lead to a great profit or a great loss, But I know that in the world there are people who manage those amounts of money, that is where I consider them professionals, for me that is the main criterion. |
|
|
|
I know it will be a hard thing to fine a single game base casino most especially slot base, but some of the few i have seen have great features and loads of benefits most especially for players with high rank accounts. So am thinking if one can find new casinos that offer such services.
Then forget looking at that. Why put yourself in trouble by looking at those sites wherein there are lots of reputable sites that have a variety of slots games. I don't know what's even the advantage of using a site with only slots games compare to those with a variety of games. Always prioritize the reputation of the site. They almost have the thing that you are looking for. Instead of just reading here, try those sites in actual for you to experience the real deal and legit self-reviews. For the benefits or perks, you need to manually check these sites and see what suits for you. Reputation and trust rate are the things that you must check on a site and not focus on a single game. It's a good thing if a reputable casino site is offering multiple games so you'll have multiple choices of features to enjoy. There will never be a reputable casino site that will only focus on one game. Yes, it is not just a single game, I think it should be everything, for now you have to give a lot of importance to reputation and to have full confidence in a site, in these cases it is as I have said in some previous threads that are similar to this , the forum is a great reference, which makes us see that through reviews and some reviews that indicate the most experts in the profile of the sites, this for me is enough to trust and not trust, the fight against scammers It is 24 hours, however scammers always keep coming out trying to find a way to continue doing misdeeds. In tamo he has said it before, not only 1 game is the one that must be defined, but all complete. |
|
|
|
What are your current opinions on the cryptocurrency market? This market is very volatile right? So it's always possible to get one of these and it's just up to you which one comes first. I think it all depends on how traders behave in the market because if the selling pressure is higher than the demand then the price will down again. It's true that there is belief among traders that the market is recovering after bitcoin hit $17.7K a while back, but we never really know if this minor recovery is a confirmation that the low is no longer being touched. Until now I still believe that the bitcoin price or market cap can still drop lower as long as the bitcoin halving has not occurred. This cycle seems to be repeating itself and this is the reason why I think the price can still correct this year into next year. Lower price than $17.7K are still possible, so don't be greedy and invest what you can afford to lose. It is good to have an opinion like yours because we cannot ignore that this scenario is very possible, and although the war between Ukraine and Russia is a fundamental factor that affects all speculative markets, it is clear that BTC has been affected, apparently by some investors. they present some panic and the records of btc sales are numerous, however for many this market represents an opportunity to buy, the only thing is that if the market continues to drop in price it is very likely, we have a probably warlike conflict between China and Taiwan, and every drum of war undoubtedly produces falls in the markets, I hope that this scenario does not occur, because if so, the price of btc would fall much more. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
