The game industry give a big apportunities. Gamers spends a lot of money for games and in this industry there are a lot of money.
The problem is that to get this money you yourself must first start investing something. That is why ICO is being conducted. By the way, some games are made based on crowdfunding. But usually this is done after the demo version of the game or if there is a team that already has experience in creating games. |
|
|
|
Something can change maybe they add facebook and twitter.
I really hope that they do this. It really hel them to promote their project.
At the moment, a very interesting bounty campaign in its structure. I wonder what it's based on, after all I think this is the first stage of the campaign and further changes are possible. |
|
|
|
And at the moment more expensive. It's like a new level of enthusiasm. So far, not everyone can afford it, but the situation will change with time.
Yes, mass production cheapens everything to surprising values. Therefore, one should never stop at what has been achieved. Right now, the BP industry is before the start of take-off. A very good point. If my analysis is correct, then this sphere will develop rapidly. |
|
|
|
Tokens per article:
High quality - 300 CANDYCOIN tokens
Good quality - 150 CANDYCOIN tokens
Tokens per video:
High quality - 600 CANDYCOIN tokens
Good quality - 300 CANDYCOIN tokens
+ 150 CANDYCOIN tokens bonus if article gets viewed 1000+ times
+ 300 CANDYCOIN tokens bonus if video gets viewed 1000+ times If all the articles of the participants are popular, will it lead to the fact that the bounty pool will be in short supply? Or will you monitor the possibility of such a situation in advance? |
|
|
|
I do not have a telegram. Are you yourself a member of a group? Are there any news about the bounty campaign? |
|
|
|
Many people play games and gamers are ready to spend a big money for games and different things in the games. VR techologies make the games more attractive for the gamers.
And at the moment more expensive. It's like a new level of enthusiasm. So far, not everyone can afford it, but the situation will change with time. |
|
|
|
In the future, when the platform has a significant equity capital, many development options are possible. By the way, this information is in the WP.
There really is a lot of information about global plans. Very ambitious approach. Stimulates trust and confidence in the long-term nature of the project. Although this is still a distant prospect, but this part of the project I really like. Only those projects that think about the future globally have a chance to succeed. |
|
|
|
I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?
Standard shares, nothing unusual. I think the developers will later describe in more detail the mechanism of interaction with the advisers. Well, if their share is justified by something concrete then I have no questions. It just seemed to me that usually the advisers are given less. |
|
|
|
And what about those countries where the economy is not as developed as in the rest? Do you really think that they have no chance at all?
It's not a matter of whether the country has a chance or not. Simply, the transaction fee should be set to the level that will suit all participants of the transaction. |
|
|
|
500 000 CANDYCOIN tokens will be distributed in the Bounty Program. What is the price of the token on ICO? I would like to imagine how much i can expect to earn in this campaign. They expect that the price will grow. From 02.02.2018 to 12.02.2018 — 0.0005 Eth per Candy
From 12.02.2018 to 22.02.2018 — 0.001 Eth per Candy
From 22.02.2018 to 28.02.2018 — 0.0015 Eth per Candy
It turns out that the bounty pool is more than half a million dollars? Not bad. I'll try to take part in this campaign. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that based on the ratio of costs and profits, it's more profitable to develop games. Plus of this area is in that no investment in infrastructure is required.
Sometimes, in order to make a game popular, such marketing investments are required, that they exceed investments in infrastructure. Do not forget about it. There are also opposite examples - when the game became megapopular even without any marketing. Yes it happens, but then after the developers get access to the big money they start to spend on marketing. For some reason, they do not hope to repeat the path again without advertising. |
|
|
|
A good and important question. I'll try to assume that since the platform tries to provide the best conditions, the amount of payments for transactions should be lower than that of banks for similar transactions.
In different countries interest rates in banks vary in a wide range, therefore the commission is very different. So this indicator should not be guided. I think we should focus on developed countries, and not on all countries in a row. Just in the developed countries the lowest commission. |
|
|
|
|
I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?
|
|
|
|
The other often question about SmartValley's ICO supply is: how much tokens are there?
The total supply depends on: collected amount, conditions under which tokens were purchased (i.e. bonuses), and tokens distribution. If we are talking about specific figures, then the maximum value of total supply is 450 million SVT, but we are counting on an approximate value of the upper limit of 380 million SVT - taking into account the achievement of the hard cap.
Here is a brief comment to token distribution and its impact on the total supply - mathematics is primitively simple: if collected amount is equivalent to 5 000 000 (in USD), then in accordance with section 4.4 of SMART Valley white paper - the number of tokens sold (excluding bonuses) will be 50 million SVT, and the total supply will be 66,7 million SVT.
If the hard cap is reached, then the bounty hunters will receive a fairly large reward. Lucky those who know how to recognize a promising project on time. Some spend a lot of time analyzing. Some are just lucky. But on the average, of course those who analyze earn more. As in the Smart Valley system, by the way. |
|
|
|
Which direction do you consider more promising - game development or business with game parks? I understand that in an ideal it is necessary to combine both these directions plus to add development of own devices. But in any business there are some more profitable directions, and some less.
It seems to me that based on the ratio of costs and profits, it's more profitable to develop games. Plus of this area is in that no investment in infrastructure is required. Sometimes, in order to make a game popular, such marketing investments are required, that they exceed investments in infrastructure. Do not forget about it. |
|
|
|
I wonder when the starting post will be updated. Information seems to be irrelevant and can mislead new campaigners.
The better for those who are already involved - fewer competitors, more stakes in the bounty pool. |
|
|
|
I would suggest that the franchise. I think opening a park in Dubai at own expense is quite an expensive task.
It is not necessary. I heard that there is a very friendly attitude of the authorities towards business. Everything is very fast and transparent. These factors reduce the price of doing business. I also heard this opinion. It is more effective to pay a higher price for a good product or service than a low price for a bad product or service. |
|
|
|
The other often question about SmartValley's ICO supply is: how much tokens are there?
The total supply depends on: collected amount, conditions under which tokens were purchased (i.e. bonuses), and tokens distribution. If we are talking about specific figures, then the maximum value of total supply is 450 million SVT, but we are counting on an approximate value of the upper limit of 380 million SVT - taking into account the achievement of the hard cap.
Here is a brief comment to token distribution and its impact on the total supply - mathematics is primitively simple: if collected amount is equivalent to 5 000 000 (in USD), then in accordance with section 4.4 of SMART Valley white paper - the number of tokens sold (excluding bonuses) will be 50 million SVT, and the total supply will be 66,7 million SVT.
What do you think is the probability that a hard cap will be reached? After the fall in the market, not much free money. |
|
|
|
Well, in this part of the question you are right. Many sellers, getting a good rating and a large stream of orders, relax and approach their duties less carefully.
There are situations even worse - scammers first make themselves an excellent rating by trading themselves at a loss, and then they deceive a huge number of buyers. Yes, I completely forgot about this option, although personally I came across this. I think the blockchain will help with protection from various kinds of unreliable sellers. |
|
|
|
Judging by the volume, you did a good amount of work. Thank you and I hope you will make an English version. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
