lol. You may call those apps as you like. Word games may change perception. But the don't change reality. A pig with lipstick remains still a pig. Even if you rename it to Tiffany.
And I don't see that Lisk has to switch from JS to another coding language. Why? If you know what you are doing, you are "safe" as every coder is (no matter what language you are using), if not, better don't write an app.
That you don't understand why Javascript is the wrong design language is your problem but not mine.
If you don't trust in a app developer, don't give him/her your money. That's it. Just to make it clear: If an app in the Apple store fails, because an app developer did mistakes when coding it, it has NO effect on Apple. I think we can say nearly the same for Lisk. But I am not a core dev and not a app dev, so it's just my view. Proof me wrong.
Comparing Lisk to Apple is incorrect. If Apple would make all its money with its app store by selling exactly one app then your comparison had more value.
I won't prove your wrong.You will be proven wrong by Mr. Market who after the DAO fiasko will do a lot more DD before betting big money on an inherently insecure system.
This pretty much, Lisk is gonna be the Microsoft of Cryptos not Apple. Solidity is what objective-c(apple) is to programmers, a bloated , difficult to learn pos.
Javascript all the way!