It does not matter, read he's wording above he wrote owners. He implied that owning 60% of shares in profits is having 60% ownership. Anyway good luck, I'm done go read the 10 pages that you started.

For anyone who has a high amount invested in here, I would save this whole thread on your harddrive and save LabCoins BTCT page, for representations made by LabCoin.

He can say whatever he wants, the way he worded it makes it share of ownership.

If ActiveMining has a total of 25,000,000 total shares, and the Active Mining Corporation owners hold 15,000,000 and they are considered keyword here OWNERS if you hold the same type of shares they do, guess what you are an owner also.

In the example above they own 60% and the others own 40% which totals 100% of the ownership of ActiveMining.
The wording is being represented as ownership.

It's common sense. If a company is made up of stock virtual or real, and they are offering a piece of that stock you are a virtual or real owner of the company. It's not rocket science.

Now that we have wasted 10 pages to achieve this amazing enlightened breakthrough, I'm going to go ponder the deeps of life, after what has occurred on this thread.

Another company, Active Mining:

Currently, it is expected for interested ActiveMining's public investors to hold 10,000,000 ActiveMining shares (40% of the profits), while Active Mining Corporation owner(s) shall hold 15,000,000 ActiveMining shares (60% of the profits), for a total of 25,000,000 ActiveMining virtual shares that represent 100% of the global profits of ActiveMining.

Not that hard to find

LMFAO the trolling on you is hard. Find another what about LabCoin or another company?

Are you fucking serious?? lmfao, this will make me never even consider any word that ever spews out of your mouth. You have been wrong before, I just thought maybe you missed over a few things but to not even look at the companies offering page is just hilarious.

https://btct.co/security/LABCOIN click under details.

If you think knowing your rights when investing in something is useless and dribble, good luck in life dumbass lol

- Regularly communicate the project financials to share holders in a way that lets share holders evaluate the performance, capital outlay and future of the project.

- Pay regular dividends amounting to a percentual share of ownership in the company on a bi-weekly basis. The dividends paid will consist of between 70-80% all profits while 20-30% of profits will be held as a reinvestment fund for development, marketing and manufacturing. ALL share holders have the right to an equal share of dividends directly based on their ownerhsip.

God your to fucking dumb it's not even funny,

This right here you useless space of molecules verifies that share holders are owners, it admits that owning shares ties into ownership: "ALL share holders have the right to an equal share of dividends directly based on their ownerhsip. "

Not to mention that the founders own the same shares we do and they are considered owners. The fact that being a shareholder is represented as being an actual owner in the company, these are all representations made for the contract.

If you can't see that like i said please stop wasting molecular space.

clearly it's not to the geniuses such as physalis and eruptor who post dribble nonsense, and always argue with people because they feel entitled, and clog up the thread with countless pages.

I'm glad at least one person isn't brain dead and understands the simple legalities of a contract.

You do have virtual equity in the virtual company, because that is what you agreed upon. In the contract you agreed upon virtual equity therefore you have it. How is this so hard to understand?

It does not need to be regulated by the SEC! it's regulated by universal contract law which almost every country in the world recognizes. You have virtual ownership, in this virtual company, and you will get paid out profits in virtual currency.

If I say Lucky, I have an imaginary virtual company, and it has 10,000,000 shares. I will give you 7,000,000 shares for x amount of money. It does not matter that this is done person to person, on NasDAQ, on BtCT, or anywhere else. It does not matter that it's a virtual company, a legal binding contract has been formed, and you are required by law to honor your end of the contract, even that it's virtual.

You have ownership through the legal contract that was established.

Of course he would, he is talking about it in the constructs of trading.

If homeless person was a better trader, I would hold him in higher opinion, even though his networth might be low, but given time his networth will grow. High networth means that these people invested properly, and given enough time the homeless man will achieve a high networth also.

AJK go and watch TV like you planned on doing, release your mind from these idiots, who can't even grasp simple concepts. Going to go also, my IQ always drops on this forum from the responses on here.

Doesn't need to be on NASDAQ, it can be on myballz.com, it is still a legal binding agreement that is represented as such that the founders shares and the public's shares are the same, hence the public owns 70% of the company.

How do you know how many shares I own or don't own? Make wild speculations much?

Yes get mad, when children lose they get mad, according the the SEC yes you do have ownership as the virtual offering is considered a security.

Only issue is you might not have ownership according to Hong Kong where the company is established and therefore have to rely on another country to protect your legal ownership rights. You still end up having ownership through the agreement and wording of the contract, which again becomes a legal contract.

Secondly, when the company itself writes about ownership, it therefore becomes ownership as they their language is representing it as such. Since the Owners own the same Virtual shares of the company that the other 70% own, therefor there is ownership. Given the fact that they declare their shares make them 30% owners of the company, and that the other 70% owned by the public are the same identical shares, we own 70% of the company.

"I believe we have decided that we will be selling a form of 'Board Seats'. A board seat share holder will be any share holder that owns 200.000 shares at any point. If the ownership falls below 200.000 shares the owner will no longer be considered a 'board seat' owner. "

"We place all available IPO shares on the market initially and retain a far lower percentage of ownership, we also have no plans of selling any secondary offering and will not dilute ownership with additional shares post IPO. Because of this, we do not feel that any dividend incentive is needed for investors."

"Important to remember is that the entire Labcoin team has a vested interest in the success of the company through their ownership and have every reason to maximize profitability and longevity of the company."

The End I've found my own answer again, as you and Volcanic again have proven to be completely useless and trolls.

End of the day If I say John, I will give you 5% of profits from my operations paid in Virtual Currency, if you invest x amount of money. Even though it's virtual you can go to court and sue for your promised virtual goods, since you have made a binding contract.

But NAW yo, cause I'm superior than governments, and even though they say otherwise I say NAW

Yes Physalis, you are right, and the American Judicial system that said the above is wrong. I guess you can come to america and say "This is all virtual" lmao

These are actual legal cases going on now, while these trolls reply with no because I said, that's usually the first sign of mental retardation.

You are right every since I came here and posted actual concerns, they respond with an elitist sense of entitlement, it's ok though arrogance doesn't usually get people very far.

Nah you're clearly fucking morons, im posting actual legal cases while you guys just say naw cause I said so, fucking idiot trolls. Adults post actual arguments backed up by facts, kids say NAW cause.

Agreeing to pay you dividends on profits for x amount of ownership you own, is a legal binding contract.