Was there any end to that lawsuit that was goin on?

It is not a game of strategy but luck. It really is the luck in the spin not by strategically placing your chips on the numbers that you are sure the ball is going to land on. That is  less than 10% chance that it land on that number or a 50/50 percent chance that it will land on a color that you are hoping that it will land on. Then of course you have the dreaded 0 that nobody in their right mind would pick as that is house number that kills any plans for a false sense of strategy anyways. 

yeah the edge on roulette are on 0 isn't it? i usually choose odd or even , red or black, high or low and 1/3 number only.
just mixed all option i choose above and sometimes just do a random bet. not sure there is a strategy to earn from roulette.

OK Wait a minute.
Uncle Stu poured money in, crafted a press release, put his name on it.....and then what?  There was hardly any advertising.  None of the TV interviews or magazine articles, ever surfaced, besides those planted by Scott Fargo....so....where did all of Uncle Stu's PR $$$$$ go??

Newbie member asking for investment to gamble and give fixed return, sounds really fishy. Nobody gonna trust you bro, you should atleast provide detail about your plan or atleast your past work detail on OP.

However truth is nobody even big gambler can't gaurantee profit on gambling, it totally depends upon luck and not upon strategy. I will suggest everybody not to make follish move and give him bitcoin in a hope of return. Be careful guys.

Umm, Joshie, a 'mining address' is supposed to show newly minted coins from the blocks you are mining. Anyone managed to find any in that address?

THis is not new , Many people have tried to do this before , I have seen a person who shared some dice stats and asked people to invest in it , HE said he will give back 30% per hour , DOnt believe in all this .  dont fall to this .

https://imgur.com/a/xJqlV

A fair point.  My strongest game right now is PLO cash.  In dec. of 2015 I was staked to play PLO cash and did pretty well, winning for my backer 3k (and 3k for myself).   As you can see in the above screenshots I've been winning at a statistically significant sample size for PLO levels .10/.25 - .5/1.  I use an aggressive game selection methodology "bum hunting" as well as the myriad skill set that every professional player has at their disposal.  I observe my opponents carefully.  Sometimes I'll be in a three handed game with two fish, and I do something I call 'opposition research', which is I flip through all the hands I have on them in hold'em manager, often hundreds, in order to pick up patterns.  Some people never bluff, or don't value bet light; if they don't value bet light, but then are somewhat aggressive, you have to wonder, is he a frequent bluffer?  I adapt to fish and crush them.  I'll sit alone at 24 tables, if a reg sits I sit out, if a fish sits I'll play and sit out my other 23 tables (sometimes I wait to get 2 heads up games vs fish just so I can quit if a reg sits).

We could get started for as little a $75 USD (a somewhat risky 'hail mary' 15 buy in bankroll for PLO 5).  This is a great investment for whoever chooses it because you are only risking whatever $75 or $150 USD.  I am going to inputting 40-50+ hours a week.  And over time your investment will snowball, as I safely move up limits and reinvest our winnings.

Looks like it's game time.


That stuttering retard "...so...so...so release the kraken muahahaha..." Homero doesn't have the balls to stand in front of the court eh. Reminds me of the "debate" with the litecoin guy from tough bravado to sniveling cowering coward "..well let's do it in writing instead.." 

We need a reporter in there. So how does that work if all the shit is supposed to be sealed, surely you have a right to sit in the court and listen to it all , then report it or what?


Still cannot quite fathom who and why. Who is paying for this and why.  It has to be Uncle Stu trying to ensure Homero doesn't get to testify or speak or say a word in case he spills the beans from under his apron? There really is not much discussion or interaction in the email dump about or between Cantor Fitz. Just one meeting is all but of course the emails are not everything.  Can it simply be to protect Uncle Stu Jr where maybe he knowingly lied pretending to sell or own or whatever it was that was false with ZenMiner?

Been looking real hard in the email dump for "something" between Uncle Stu and Homero, indeed there are some borderline SMS's simple one liners like "love you" and "wish you were here" nothing blatant about anything but all put together a certain creepiness to there communications overall.

The other thing I found which was quite surprising was that Uncle Stu in fact authorized that press release which was worded in such a way to appear as though Cantor Fitz. was behind the launch of Paycoin. That very cleverly crafted Press Release.  This is quite clear in a 3 way discussion between him Homero and the public relations company, it even goes further where Uncle Stu is insisting he be referred to as a co-founder of Paycoin.  This surprising because at the time it was thought Homero and his in-house con team butchered some independent quotes of Uncle Stu's to craft that bullshit Press Release. Now it is clear Uncle Stu authorized it and even wanted more to be said namely that he was a co-founder of paycoin.  Fool! Look were that got you, full time detention and the boys camp up North in the sticks 

It is quite the story and will be very interesting how it all plays out. Absolutely there is some deep dark secret somewhere that while trying to poke its head out, keeps being suppressed. At great expense mind you.

Where's Mike from Coinfire, last peep from him was he retired and is writing a book about this all? Hope he is getting down every single juicy detail and its not going to be some glossed over summary of the affair. Might even have to make it a 3 part series at this rate.

Homero says: "hey do want my Tesla"
Muggles say: "hey do want my napkin"

 

You can do easily find how much money I have won, base bet is always same from me 0.0032 BTC or 0.032 BTC choose which you like, average odd in that thread is more than 1.55 but I am letting you do your math with 1.55 which is with an example of 0.032 BTC base bet

34 WIN X 0.0175 BTC per win with odd 1.55 equal to 0.595 BTC
14 LOSES X 0.032 BTC per base bet equal to 0.448 BTC

Total profit 0.595 BTC - 0.448 BTC equal to 0.147 BTC almost 0.15 BTC profit in 2 months in that thread.

And you have taken as an example 1.40 minimum odd, while the average will be over 1.55 be sure about it


And I have only counted 34 wins, while there are more, if you check the above thread

The iGot scam hit the mainstream media in Australia yesterday with a serious investigative expose on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's 7:30 current affairs and news program.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-11/australian-bitcoin-exchange-igot-on-verge-of-collapse/7315894

Watch the embedded video to see what has been broadcast.

DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THIS EXCHANGE AS YOU WILL MOST LIKELY NEVER SEE YOUR FUNDS AGAIN.

If you're already embroiled in the web of broken promises and lies that characterises everything Rick Day does, contact the relevant authorities and lodge formal reports about what money you're owed.

Missed this part before, but "selecting a single wager amount" is not a great idea. Not every bet has an equal chance of winning, so not every bet should be the same value. You would need to have limits to how much the bets could be (and watch them to avoid them from screwing you over about) but not allowing either side to bet more on a bet they feel better about is a bad idea, and not a good way to win money with betting.
Eventually i'd like to tests this out...

Getting completely ripped off by cryptsy was a risk that all of cyptsy's customers walked into with their eyes wide open. At this point, you guys should work on accepting that it is extremely unlikely that anyone will get anything back. If you put thousands of dollars into a risky exchange like this and got burned, sure I feel bad for you. It's a real shame. Crypto suffers across the board everytime this kind of thing happens. With regard to each of Paul's victims, keep in mind that you are lying to yourself if you didn't know that losing all you coins wasn't a definite possible outcome. I liken this to banging a prostitute without a condom and then getting angry when you find out she gave you herpes. This is one instance where your greed, laziness, poor decision making, or a combination of these caught up with you and you paid the price.

Imagine this scenario: 3 neighbors loan a 4th neighbor collectively a chainsaw, a leaf blower, and a lawn mower. Unfortunately, the neighbor's home gets robbed and someone steals the lawn mower. Does that give the neighbor the right to sell his other neighbors' chainsaw and leaf blower, then split the proceeds between all 3? Of course not. So stop with that "they stole from all of us" bullshit. Only a handful of coins were stolen. The rest of the coins could have been fully returned to their rightful owners.


2 crimes occurred here. Someone hacker or insider stole BTC, Doge, LTC, whatever. Then Paul stole all the rest of his depositors coins after bizarrely and seemingly arbitrarily releasing several types of altcoins.

As the developer of casinocoin, we have considered two possible options to recover those coins. The first was to identify cryptsy's wallets, make them unspendable, and generate new coins to distribute to those who could prove their casinocoin balances. We chose not to do this because of the requirement for a hardfork and we would like to urge Cryptsy to return casinocoins to their rightful owners. The second option was to create a new coin and kickoff a program of exchanging current CSC for a new blockchain one by one with personal verification. Paul and anyone associated with Cryptsy or their shill bankruptcy would not be allowed to participate in this and ultimately the coins cryptsy is holding would cease to exist. This is an option that I would still be open to, but again I would rather avoid any sort of centralized action and would rather give those clowns some time to do the right thing and return the CSC to their rightful owners. However, they should be aware that any altcoin could decide to take back their coins trapped in Cryptsy if they decide to do so as a community. The dev can produce a wallet to recover them and the community can endorse the action by the majority simply adopting the modified wallet. If you want this, talk to your devs. Get your coins back. The BTC, LTC, DOGE, whatever holders that were robbed. You're not likely to get anything back if these altcoin communities want their coins back anyway.

Of course he gave the property to his wife (soon to be ex) He was leaving ( read fleeing) the country and would not be coming back.
Add to that fact the feds will track down the money and prove it was stolen, they will sell the property to recover the money, leaving the ex wife with nothing.

Would Paul fuck over his family like that?
Yes, yes I believe he would.

bitebi9 will collapse as everyone knows its pauls, and people will not invest there. when he has no other source of income, he will be on the street doing favors for sailors, and charging a small amount for handjobs.

<EDIT>

bitebi9   24 Hour Volume:   19.6490 CNY
19.649 Chinese Yuan equals 3.04 US Dollar


He is rocking the joint! Why with all that volume, I bet he is on the street swallowing every day already...

Viborg missed the penalty in 94 minute, so final result is DRAW.