I will wait out your investigation. Then I will have someone with a lot of green trust paint you in deep red. For libel. You aren't getting out of this unscathed ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) That could be mighty risky for said account. It would be trust abuse at its finest. There is nothing to be afraid of Wendigo, unless you actually have something to hide.
The fact that you're threatening Timelord publicly with red trust, doesn't score you any points though.
|
|
|
I don't understand where you got the second address from. Did I miss something? They've all signed up for coinroll too... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Maybe it is time to investigate Coinroll participants. My diagram machine is ready!
|
|
|
Miscellaneous: Same address
P.S. always archive the links used as proof (or at least link to quotes). Otherwise, this proof may suddenly *dissapear* and the accounts may come and complain.
|
|
|
Side note; Lauda, if we find alts that are just part of a huge Alt Ring™ do you prefer that we list the new connection and you add it on to the op (if it's already there) or would you prefer the full list of alts after the "Accounts Connected:" rather than in "Miscellaneous:”? See my previous find for what I'm talking about.
I'd prefer that you list the new connection and I add it on top. I think that would give us a better overview. Optimally you could edit your previous post as well (if the earlier discovery was also by you) in order to have the information all present in a singular place (link).
|
|
|
IF IT CAN BE USED TO PROVE THAT THEIR OPAL ADDRESSES ARE FROM THE SAME WALLET THEN THE CONCLUSION IS : All above accounts + boopy = managed by 1 person only ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ? Here is a visual representation in case that someone is having trouble with all of the evidence: https://archive.fo/5Roq6
It all checks out. Nice find!
|
|
|
Opal Address: ocpkMdkqmHuDFMm5qV3Cb9wMYHZ4zJvP7k
My OPAL = ocXBvW8aj1f3baKegMq91eWFjpYMvZsDFY
My Opal Address: oVvTbVM9vDqHJCewd9fb5Z2CYbQ2QLkXKh
Part of opal wallet : https://chainz.cryptoid.info/opal/wallet.dws?18498.htm
IF IT CAN BE USED TO PROVE THAT THEIR OPAL ADDRESSES ARE FROM THE SAME WALLET THEN THE CONCLUSION IS : All above accounts + boopy = managed by 1 person only ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) ? This was easy to prove. All you had to do is look into the transactions. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/opal/tx.dws?388541.htm
QED. Seems all of them are managed by the same person. Time to add to list and tag.
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan. Read the following thread before posting.
|
|
|
For real? May I know your Bitcoin Address and I will send you 1 sat. So that we are now connected. Yehey.
That's not how that works, i.e. it won't make you connected. The chances for false positives are really slim (excluding cases with hundreds/thousands of addresses).
|
|
|
Lauda=Lutpin=Yahoo=Actmyname=Avirunes ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) Here, I'll help you with the investigation: Lauda -> Lutpin.So obviously the Alt calling itself quickseller has modified one of the posts above
The correction isn't even valid. Looks like someone doesn't know what a root seed is (such discussion would be off-topic though). This looks like it is no longer the case. According to the trust rating left by knightkon, they are now in possession of that account.
|
|
|
Another day, another shady coin creator. Nothing surprising here. I've given them a negative rating. Even if they repay you said amount, the rating should stay due to very shady behavior (IMO).
|
|
|
|