i have 2 reason for it.
1. a common reason, people have no interest since just small amount traded on bakkt, also maybe people just waiting for the exact time. and that make price going deep, soo deep.
2. a unique reason, I try to equalize the time when the trade is opened and bad events in the hastrate btc. and as a result, it happened almost simultaneously. so i just have argument,bakkt market is not the main reason for the falling price of btc.

---
about bakkt itself, well, although no big enthusiasm as many people expected, but somehow i just think opened on the end of the year, is a quite good step. wait and see may is a primary option for the professional broker.
so the point, even now bakkt showing a slow start,it's doesn't mean bitcoin futures conract completely failed.
Even expert analysts say it's some kind of the normal things.

do we need to do it again?
because almost all over the world people who know the internet must have heard or often heard about btc.
even my stupid uncle also know about bitcoin, i just a little suprised about it because internet for him just facebook and porn.
and i guess ur statement wrong, price down but people knowing bitcoin still grow everyday.


1. i also participated during that time, I cannot say that is absolutely true, because mostly the bounty hunters using hashtag about project. not another cryptocurrency, even btc.
2. well, i can agree about this one, its like a virus, infecting so fast. since they have a screen shot of their asset grow so fast , people try to following them, well, for example Ian ballena.

really ? u want to comparing TON with Libra ?
they have different mission, also Libra just a piece of stable coins.
and also, besides it, TON its really have a great opportunity, even 3,5 each people still enthusiastic  to buy it.

hello Libra , how are you ? 
did u fine after that news ? , i guess not.
well, hope it can be happened, because as far i've read , paypal still considering of leaving from Libra project.
however, even if paypal leaving, i guess Libra still strong with another partner such as mastercard,visa,uber,etc.
but, somehow, i just think , Libra project not dedicated pure for blockchain ecosystem. i mean its just like "mask".
just imagine by yourself, big companies in the world associate with each other to create a new project,and it will be mass adopted by the world directly.
monopoly the world or conqueror the world ?
or maybe i just too paranoid about zuckerberg 

well, i never using mixer service before.
but, based on my knowledge, mixer have more privacy and anatomy after all.
for example : u deposited some btc to binance, then u withdraw ur asset from it.
of course, they have track record about ur transaction,ur data as well.
although they will never share ur history to anyone, but it doesn't make u cant be tracked.
since the history of blockchain can be viewed,and transfer between the exchanges to the users have a simple transaction with original transactions and the final address of the coins.
and the simple explanation about mixer works is attempts to sever the links between your old address and a new address by sending coins from you to other people and coins from them to you with randomizes transaction amounts and sometimes adds time delays to the transactions.

i dont know why telegram allowed such market like exmarket to sell their token.
well,i just have speculation, probably owner of exmarket buying some amount of gram on previous sale, then he/she sell again with same price like on liquid.


indeed.
and for sure, the token sale no more opened.
i just warned about exmarket, since no data on coinmarketcap.

well, recently we hear about TON, the telegram ico project.
many many controversion come from this ico
since from when exactly this ico started i dont know for sure,and then japan exchange offered TON with highly prices , almost 3.50 bucks/each .
however, the private sale from liquid is complete. i quite sure the project will be top by this year.
but now,according from some source ,TON blockchain will be launched in late october.
and also the good news , the telegram blockchain Will Support Ethereum dApps.
so, how u think guys about this one ?
for me, somehow i just speculate TON more promising than LIBRA.
from Any Side.

yes, because that not easy problem after all.


indeed, that why they clarify it for sure on the interview.


it was, on the beginning.
then everything goes changed so far, also In March 2017, various blockchain start-ups, research groups, and Fortune 500 companies announced the creation of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA) with 30 founding members.
then what i imagine, how the dev think it going so fast.
even for investor.



even me, like a dummy person after seeing that the short video was real from Lupin.


even they already removed scalability problem on their pages.

first, i guess this thread should be in speculation.
well,in this case, it's impossible for now, i just speculation,  it may will bring more damage to the value of their local currency.
to make their digital currency have a "value" , of course must be backed by real assest.
and in this case , did goverment dare to create a new thing such as digital currency to be same as real money ?
I just thought, maybe the fluctuation tends to be stable , but as time goes,it will be make inflation on their country.
the point, it just a reckless thing to do.

indeed, but after i see this ,"Youre saying the concept of launching something that doesn't scale then rebuilding it as something thats scalable was part of initial the plan",
then lubin just say : "We knew it wasn't going to be scalable for sure" , and what point i get (maybe its wrong) scalability seems be ETH problem for eternity.
so i just think, ETH 2.0 still have no scalability inside.
clearly disappointing, considering they discussed scalability in their documents.


source image

well, its a old news btw, and for me yes, its sad news for privacy coins.
however, there a 2 point regarding that statement.
first, there indirectly, the government began to think not to ignore crypto from all side. and that its a good point for me.
second, well , then no true anatomy anymore for privacy coins.
and i believe someday, all of crypto holder will be fully tracked by goverment.
yep, no more privacy,because in the end , goverment will treat crypto like gold.

well, recently i read some article,and then, i am quite surprised about it. because Vitalik Buterin and Joesph Lubin says ethereum blockchain was never designed for scalability.
firstly i think, it's just ridiculous statement. but well, since we know exactly what happened on ethreum blockchain, i guess that statement have some true point.
they maybe never think before, ethereum will have tremendous popularity in the crypto industry.
oh yeah , this their statement.

well, any thoughts ?

i just think , mostly investor came not from USA , but from Asia and europe indeed.
and also , since many many regulations created by USA goverment, it will be make some , well let's say "stuck" for USA investor.
about angel investor, are u believe there still have a good project for angel investor ?
considering angel investor assest is one of the longest lock up period.

well, how can be ?
its seems no sense to me,
let me explain based on my mind.
first,its just a project with banking system,no interest
second, although libra backed by multi holy big company, easy to get mass adoption over the world,it will not make libra dominate the market.
why ?
because libra fully organized,centralized.
for good reason, they may have low fluctuactive.
but for another reason, what's the point of hoarding a tons of libra ?
its worth nothing.
or did they have stake reward for holding ? no,i guess.
and the last reason.
i dont like libra project btw.

if u talking, well
i have a skyrocketing project, of course, they have already a "real" product.
its MONACO.
Monaco itself is a project with financial category,
well, its a common thing,right?, but the different its no one surpasses monaco at this time.
has been partnership with Visa its a big thing where no one project can do that right now.
currently they have some of product,
MCO Visa Card, a card that allows users to spend cryptocurrency anywhere Visa is accepted;
MCO Wallet App, a mobile wallet that allows users to buy, exchange, and send four cryptocurrencies and seven fiat currencies, and track over 200 coins in the cryptocurrency markets;
MCO Crypto Invest, a robo-advisory cryptocurrency investment tool;
MCO Crypto Credit, a crypto credit service that allows customers to deposit their cryptocurrency and receive credit to spend with their MCO Visa Card.

well, i guess that enough, btw,i am not a part of that project.
for more info , may u check here

Well , i wonder how it not to be big issues , its will be fully centralized from all of the world. its not just about asia bro. and also,what kind of people want to throw their btc for some stable assets.

hmm.. it will be interesting, considering the most haters for LIBRA is came from USA, and now, coinbase itself support what the government hates.
however, as far i know, although US goverment hate them so much, they seems won't ban libra for sure.
i just think it seems Not a wise thing to do in an industry where the typical advantages of the US market.
moreover ,the coinbase's attitude in favor of libra makes the government must be more prudent in dealing with it.

basically they all same,pegged to other assets.
on my opinion, the difference just where they came from.
like PAX , based from binance article PAX issued by the Paxos Trust Company, and approved and regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services.
and the next USDC , USDC was created by Circle and Coinbase in order to provide a more financially transparent stablecoin.
but i am not sure what company behind USDT tether btw.
however,That doesn't seem to matter to Tether.
they still popular.


i just suggest stable coins backed by real company like pax or usdc.
dont ask why.

Lmao , so what u want to say its pure pump and dump ?
then, what do you mean 3 monthly cycles?
Did u think people just stupid throw everything after fail to pushing price like u speculation ?
it is baseless thinking.
And also , what a kind of people try to create a super massive money game with dumped almost 50.000.000.000 USD ?

Basicaly ,bullrun is not something we should believe or not.  but those are things that we have to understand as traders, you know, studying charts, reading the news routinely, paying attention to sentiment, those are some of the important things to see whether bullrun is really coming or not.