The full-scale war in Ukraine has been going on for three and a half years. Over the past two years, Russia has managed to capture approximately one percent of Ukraine's territory. No progress has been seen in the negotiation process to end the war due to Trump's position, who, in his six months as president, has not yet decided whether Putin wants to end this war, and therefore does not put pressure on him. Seeing Trump's weakness, Putin is becoming impudent and setting unacceptable conditions just for the start of the negotiation process. But time is against Putin's Russia. The economy there is already beginning to fall apart, and any steps it takes will only make the situation worse. If Putin drags out this war, it is almost a guarantee that the Russian Federation will disintegrate into a number of independent states. The previously conquered nations will finally gain their long-awaited freedom, and Ukraine will have the credit for this.

Putin's Russia, having launched a full-scale attack on Ukraine in February 2022, was counting on a quick and victorious war, but it fell into a trap from which it has no good way out. Further prolongation of the war for at least another six months threatens an economic catastrophe and the disintegration of the Russian Federation into a number of small states, in which Muscovy will remain within the borders of several regions and will lose its former greatness and international influence.

This is already starting the process of global redistribution of influence in the world and will have a great impact on the countries of Europe. They are already drawn into this war in a certain way and Russia's defeat in it opens up certain positive prospects for them.

Even in the distant future, oil and gas will have significant value, but not as energy sources, but as raw materials for various industries. Other chemical elements and their compounds will be made from these hydrocarbons, which will be used as food, in the chemical industry, in construction and other industries. Their use as a traditional source of energy will gradually be prohibited.

By launching a large-scale attack on Ukraine in February 2022 with the aim of eliminating it as a state, the Russian Federation signed its own death warrant. Most likely, in a few years, the Russian Federation will cease to exist and disintegrate into a number of sovereign states. All the peoples that Russia has conquered over the past few centuries will leave its composition, taking advantage of the weakening of the central government as a result of this protracted war.

Russia currently occupies about 20 percent of Ukraine's territory. Moreover, over the past two years, it has managed to occupy only about one percent of Ukraine's territory, which indicates its inability to capture Ukraine.

Ukraine is rapidly developing a new branch of the military - the Unmanned Systems Forces, which burn out everything that moves on the front line to a depth of 30 kilometers. The Armed Forces of Ukraine have already successfully recorded fully robotic attacks, when only ground and air robots, controlled by people many kilometers from the front line, go on the offensive. That is why the US recently signed a contract with Ukraine to purchase relatively cheap drones worth several billion dollars, since the US is already seriously lagging behind in this type of weaponry.
Ukraine now attacks military and energy facilities of Russia almost every day with drones up to 2000 kilometers deep into its territory, and this is very painful for it.

Of course, Russia is also gaining invaluable experience in waging modern warfare. But it has already lost over 1,064,000 of its troops, virtually the entire professional army, more than 11,000 tanks and 23,000 armored vehicles, more than 31,000 artillery systems, that is, almost the entire arsenal of armored vehicles from the times of the USSR, everything that was accumulated for decades for a future war with NATO. Now about 40 percent of the shells that Russia uses on the front are already supplied from North Korea.

Russia continues to attack with continuous waves of manpower, mostly on foot or on motorcycles and scooters, but they are not endless. Therefore, the wounded are sent into repeated assaults, often on crutches. The battles are fierce on both sides, when they try not to take prisoners, and those captured are often shot on the spot.

Putin will try to pass off any outcome of this war as a victory. Therefore, the Kremlin is already preparing to present its vision of its end to the people, banning certain social networks and the Internet.

It seems to me that the quarrel between Elon Musk and Trump has gone too far to be considered just a small quarrel between two famous people in the US. There is information on social networks that Trump ordered the arrest of Musk for violating immigration laws by him and his family and even gave an unofficial order to the secret services not to take him alive. In addition, Trump allegedly wants to nationalize Musk's companies - Tesla and SpaceX - in the shortest possible time. And the Russian authorities have officially confirmed that Musk has asked Russia for political asylum and may become the head of Roscosmos. We will see in the near future what is true and what is not.

The fact that Ukrainian President Zelensky is not a trusted person of the United States is evidenced by the current extreme aggravation of relations between him and Trump due to the fact that Zelensky does not want to sign the predatory draft agreement on rare earth minerals of Ukraine proposed by Trump and consistently defends the interests of Ukraine. Russian President Putin, who readily offered Trump Russia's rare earth resources, can already be called a trusted person of the United States.

The Russian Federation has abruptly changed its political orientation and the United States has suddenly turned from the main enemy in the NATO alliance into an ally, and Putin and Trump began to jointly pressure Ukraine in order to force it to conclude a peace treaty that is disadvantageous to it, which would actually mean its capitulation in the imposed war with Russia. Therefore, the Kremlin's assertion that they are fighting NATO in Ukraine, where the United States has always played a leading role, has suddenly lost its relevance. But Putin will have to continue to change his orientation, since events are developing very quickly and he has fewer and fewer ways out of the critical situation associated with this war.

And why, in your opinion, did Zelensky become a Zionist? Zionism is a Jewish national movement that aims to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland. Zelensky has Jewish roots, but how is he connected to the Zionist movement? Kremlin ideologists are now looking for any clues to somehow discredit Zelensky, who does not want to "surrender" Ukraine, including spreading a far-fetched version of his illegitimacy as president of Ukraine.

And what is surprising about this, if the former commander-in-chief of Ukraine Zaluzhny has repeatedly outdone the current president Zelensky regarding the support of the people of Ukraine. According to the results of a survey conducted in March of this year, Zaluzhny is trusted by 62% of Ukrainians. Of these, 35% of respondents definitely trust the former commander-in-chief, another 27% answered that they rather trust him.
https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/23564531

50.5% of Ukrainians trust Zelensky, and 42.8% do not trust him.
https://tsn.ua/ru/ukrayina/komu-ukraintsy-doveryayut-bolshe-vsego-i-na-kakoy-stupenki-zelenskiy-opros-2799152.html

It seems that the interests of Great Britain and the Ukrainian people coincide here.

It is unlikely that Putin is an agent of a foreign state. Many of those who have been in power for a long time (and Putin has been in power for 25 years, and all the country's government bodies are completely subordinate to him) sooner or later begin to suffer from delusions of grandeur. In addition, due to a pathological fear for his life, he does not communicate with the people, surrounded himself with sycophants, as a result, he misperceives the situation, and therefore makes the wrong decisions. In addition, Russia clearly did not count on the stubborn and heroic resistance of the Ukrainian people, and this became a turning point in this war. If Ukraine had wavered in the first months of the attack on it, no one would have come to its aid.

Despite the fact that Trump has now started to play his own game, more than 70 percent of Ukrainians believe that it is necessary to defend their territory even if aid from the United States stops altogether. European countries are ready to continue to support Ukraine, and with such support, Ukraine is capable of finishing off Russia.

Having realized that Ukraine is beyond his reach, Putin can conclude a truce with it and in any case call the results of the war a victory, but it is already dangerous for him to disband his army: the economy is on the verge of collapse and this can cause large-scale riots. Therefore, he can further direct the anger of the military to the Baltic countries, counting on a small victorious war. This is especially dangerous for Lithuania, where Russia can try to seize the Suwalki corridor in order to have access to the Kaliningrad region. The countries of this region are well aware of this and therefore are now trying with all their might to help Ukraine so that Russia will no longer have the strength.

Putin is doing everything he can to destroy Russia. Irrecoverable losses in the war with Ukraine have already amounted to over 900 thousand Russian soldiers and officers. Putin and his entourage believed that the capture of Ukraine would be an easy walk for a few days or weeks. But having miscalculated, he found himself in a situation from which there is no acceptable way out. In Russia, there is less and less hope for a miracle.

The main reason for the current critical situation in the country's economy is the colossal military spending, as well as the growing sanctions pressure, cutting Moscow off from its usual sources of income. Revenues for the first two months of the year amounted to only 3.9 trillion rubles with expenses of almost 7.8 trillion, that is, in fact, the country spends twice as much as it earns. Putin is used to bluffing, but he can do this until the fall of this year at the latest. And it is unlikely that Trump, on whom the Kremlin has recently been counting, will help him here. Russia will not be saved even by handing over Russian rare earth metals to the US, which they have seized on so that Trump can put more pressure on Ukraine and force it into an unfavorable peace.

It is impossible to violate an agreement that has not yet entered into force. Ukraine has not violated anything, since no agreement has been signed yet. Ukraine accepted the US proposal for a mutual truce to attack energy facilities and infrastructure facilities without any reservations. However, Russia did not give its consent to this, and began to put forward additional demands to Ukraine that have nothing to do with the ceasefire. Due to the fact that Russia refused to sign it, there is no agreement to this day. If someone claims that such an agreement existed and Ukraine violated it, let them indicate when it was signed, by which parties, from what time it entered into force, and most importantly, let them indicate which facilities cannot be attacked according to the agreement. Representatives of the parties have not yet decided on this issue, and there are those who accuse Ukraine of violating the future agreement.

Ukraine supported the ceasefire terms put forward by Trump without any reservations, although they are not very suitable for Ukraine, and Russia puts many additional demands on any peace proposals, and first of all, the lifting of at least some of the sanctions. This is precisely what shows how sanctions work and that they do not strengthen Russia, as the Kremlin has constantly stated, but slowly destroy its economy.
At the same time, Trump's team and he himself are increasingly convinced that it is Russia that does not want to negotiate and Trump must make a decision on this matter.

It is also worth voicing that Russia has been attacking Ukraine every day with missiles and hundreds of drones until recently, targeting schools, hospitals and simply residential buildings of civilians, and after reaching agreements on the obligation not to attack energy infrastructure, it has struck it six times.

The issue of sending European soldiers to Ukraine will be discussed by EU countries directly with Kiev, and not with an eye on Moscow's opinion on this issue. This follows from the statements made by French President Macron during his conversation with the media on Saturday, March 15.
"Ukraine is sovereign. If it asks to deploy allied troops on its territory, whether to accept it or not is none of Russia's business," Macron said.

https://www.ukr.net/ru/news/details/politics/110180268.html

Russia is currently in a very difficult situation. It is running out of armored vehicles and artillery. The Russian military admits that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have an advantage in drones, which destroy Russian tanks and armored vehicles even before they reach the attack line. Therefore, in some significant areas of the front, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have noted the absence of armored vehicles during assault operations since last year. There are a lot of people in Russia, but they also tend to run out. The irretrievable losses of Russian soldiers on the Ukrainian front have already exceeded 900,000 and this number continues to grow.

At the same time, Putin cannot refuse to continue the war, since the Russian economy has long been rebuilt on a war footing, and a return to a peaceful economy already threatens riots in Russia itself, when the military begins to return home, where the economy and key industries are on the brink of collapse.

More than 30 countries, including NATO countries France and Great Britain, have agreed to deploy their troops on the territory of Ukraine after the conclusion of a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia.
https://www.dw.com/ru/london-bolee-30-stran-gotovy-k-ucastiu-v-mirotvorceskoj-missii-v-ukraine/a-71956228

Currently, specific conditions and locations for the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine are being discussed, and issues of responding to possible provocations and shelling of Ukrainian territory by Russia are being worked out. It is assumed that they will have the right to use weapons in the event of Russia violating the terms of the ceasefire.

At the same time, Ukraine's allies are considering sending two peacekeeping missions to Ukraine at once if a sustainable ceasefire is achieved between Kiev and Moscow. We are talking about the UN mission and the mission of the "Coalition of the Willing".

The UN peacekeeping force will consist of military personnel from India, Brazil, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. They will be deployed on the Russian-Ukrainian border.

The military from the European "Coalition of the Willing" will control the borders between Ukraine and the EU. These could be soldiers from Great Britain, France, Germany, Canada and Italy.

The Italian La Stampa writes that one of the scenarios for deploying troops, which the "Coalition of the Willing" is working on, is to create four levels of interaction.
It is assumed that UN peacekeepers from non-European countries will be deployed in the demilitarized zone to monitor compliance with the ceasefire. This will be the first line of demarcation. Ukrainian troops will be on the second line. On the third line - a contingent of volunteers and not necessarily within Ukrainian territory. The fourth line is American protection.

https://24tv.ua/geopolitics/ru/mirotvorcy-ukraine-budut-sostojat-iz-sil-oon-koalicii-zhelajushhih_n2781967

Why should Ukrainian citizens explain to you whether they are currently fighting against an enemy that has attacked their country or not? Moreover, should they provide you with any evidence on this matter? Who are you collecting such information for? Do you by any chance work for the Russian FSB? And you certainly cannot be called an outsider, observing the war in Ukraine from the sidelines.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces are still present in the Kursk region of Russia, although they currently control a relatively small area. Recently, the best units of the Russian Federation have been deployed there, and there were so many Russian drones on fiber optics that the Ukrainian Armed Forces decided to retreat to more advantageous positions and not lose soldiers and equipment. The figures you cited for Ukrainian Armed Forces losses in the Kursk region are greatly exaggerated. I will only say that Russia lost more there, although not many times more.

At the same time, on March 19, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked the neighboring Belgorod region of Russia, broke through the defenses and went about 12 kilometers into this region. This is primarily a war of strategies, and Ukraine is very inventive in this regard.

https://www.dsnews.ua/politics/rosiyski-voyenkori-povidomili-shcho-zsu-zayshli-ta-zakripilisya-v-demidivci-na-byelgorodshchini-20032025-518831

https://www.dialog.ua/war/311245_1742532510

The war in Ukraine cannot end without the participation of Ukraine and Europe, unless, of course, Russia withdraws its occupation troops from Ukrainian territory. All other conditions for ending the war will require the consent of Ukraine and the EU, regardless of what Trump and Putin agree on.

According to media reports, Trump was very disappointed with the telephone conversation with Putin. That is why he refused to hold a press conference, since there is nothing victorious to report. Trump hoped that Putin would agree to a full-fledged ceasefire for 30 days, which Ukraine and the United States proposed, but Putin only agreed to a ceasefire on energy infrastructure facilities, but in this case he demands that Ukraine stop mobilizing and rearming the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Moreover, this means stopping any military supplies and the transfer of intelligence.

In other words, Putin refused to stop hostilities for 30 days and, as always, at the same time puts forward demands that Ukraine cannot fulfill.

The US predicts further negotiations between representatives of the parties on March 23 in Jeddah, but so far there is no end to the war in Ukraine in sight. Today, Russia attacked Ukraine with 6 missiles and 145 drones, Ukraine, in turn, hit another oil refinery in the city of Kropotkin in the Krasnodar region of Russia.

You see, you have no worthy arguments to prove that the current war in Ukraine is a NATO war against Russia. This myth was invented in the Kremlin to somehow explain Russia's heavy defeat by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the battlefield.

However, global changes are currently taking place in NATO due to the fact that Trump is moving away from the principles of NATO's functioning and even threatening to leave this alliance. In this regard, the role of NATO has begun to diminish and in its place another defensive military alliance may emerge, led by European countries, where Ukraine will play a significant role with its technological solutions in the field of unmanned systems, missile programs, invaluable military experience and a significant army.

What Trump and Putin decide between themselves without European countries and Ukraine will have no consequences for them and they have already directly stated this. Trump is sharply moving away from democratic values and, following Putin, wants to make an empire out of the United States. He will not succeed, so in the near future we may see that due to the influence of external factors, he may leave the presidential chair.

Your comparison with the guys beating up is a bit unfortunate. The thing is that even if Russia loses this war, it will not mean death for its citizens or the country's elite. It will only mean actual death for the instigators of the war, and there are still various other options for them. For Russia itself, if it does not disintegrate into many independent states, this will be a good chance to pursue a different policy and a chance to eventually join the civilized states. Therefore, sensible people will not grab a nuclear club. Otherwise, the preparation for the use of nuclear weapons will definitely become known to the intelligence services of the world's states and then a preventive non-nuclear strike will be carried out on Russia and in this case physical death for many will become real.

As for the use of North Korean troops in the war against Ukraine, they showed themselves poorly only at the first stage, using the tactics of the Second World War, when the infantry went on the attack in large units. But they learn quickly and in the latest battles have already proven themselves to be a serious opponent. In addition, North Korean soldiers are very physically resilient, shoot accurately with small arms, are fearless and almost never surrender, preferring death. During the fighting, only a few North Korean soldiers were captured by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and only because they were wounded. There is information that all the relatives of those captured by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in North Korea were shot.

In fact, you confirm my words that there were and are no NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine. If regular NATO troops are not waging a war with Russia on the territory of Ukraine, then on what basis do you think that this is a war between NATO and Russia?
There are two possible scenarios here: the war between NATO and Russia is not taking place on the territory of Ukraine, or the war is not being waged by military actions, but is being waged economically, technologically, or some other way. Please clarify your position.

The possibility of introducing NATO troops into Ukraine as peacekeeping forces is currently being discussed in Europe. Great Britain is ready to send at least 10,000 of its troops to Ukraine, and France, Germany, and a number of other countries are also ready to introduce their troops, placing them in Kyiv, Lvov, and Odessa. In the event of a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, these forces should deter Russia from a new invasion.

https://www.ukr.net/ru/news/details/politics/110180072.html

https://glavred.info/war/skolko-mirotvorcev-strany-soyuzniki-napravyat-v-ukrainu-starmer-nazval-cifry-10647746.html

Firstly, this is not a war between Ukraine and Russia, but between Russia and Ukraine, since it was Russia that attacked Ukraine, and not vice versa.

Secondly, during the 11 years of military actions between these states, no regular military units of NATO member states have been deployed on the territory of Ukraine. If NATO troops had fought on the side of Ukraine, this war would have ended with Russia's defeat long ago. Ukraine receives various types of assistance in defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity from many states, including NATO members, but this assistance, especially weapons and military equipment, is very weak and does not allow Ukraine to achieve a relatively quick victory over the aggressor that attacked it.

And now an interesting question - who is Ukraine fighting with now? Because Russia does not have enough strength to seize the relatively small Ukraine, it uses elite units of the North Korean troops on the battlefield against Ukraine, as well as armored vehicles, air defense systems and millions of shells from North Korea. Therefore, in fact, there is a war between Russia and North Korea against Ukraine.

If Trump's plan was to have European countries step up their purchases of weapons and military equipment from the US, then it can be said that this plan failed miserably. After Trump and his team began to threaten their allies with economic sanctions and even war, Europe realized that the US is an unreliable partner and therefore it is dangerous to use American military equipment. After all, military equipment now contains electronics with numerous software controls. For example, in order to put pressure on Ukraine, the US turned off some functions on air defense systems and aircraft, as a result of which they at least lost their effectiveness. Therefore, Europe began to think that if the US wanted, it could make it so that, for example, the American F-35s supplied to them might not even take off. Then why would they take such a risk?

There is a way out and it is that Europe will build its own factories to produce its own military equipment, and will now gradually get rid of the American one.