Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Many exchangers are demanding now ID verification, but they notified their users and gave the opportunity to withdraw their funds for a certain deadline as seen on Poloniex. I fear, there will be no othet way as to make a criminal complaint against them.
sadly bittrex omited to notify its users until after the said accounts were allready disabled and the notice i seen was hidden in an edited post from 2016.
|
|
|
the risks he was talking about is the risk of you actualy going on the wrong site made by scammers to steal your keys. if you dont do this it looks very similar to the my ether wallet that can be used offline in a cold wallet manner. guess a differance here if you want to use offline is with neo you probably need to make a new wallet and transfer all coins each time you claim gas.
|
|
|
Bittrex is a ponzi scheme. They are long gone. The site is on automatic. What they are doing is very illegal. It may not have completely collapsed yet, as some people can still withdraw, and that is their plausible deniability, for now, but make no mistake. They do not have your funds and they are not planning to give you your coins back, ever. They have stolen your crypto tokens. It has nothing to do with regulations. They are scammers. Period. The best we can do is launch a lawsuit and hope to settle for a fraction of what is owed to us. Stop defending these criminals.
those regulations they are talking about do exists but they only go into effect in may 2018 , so bittrex did not need to lock out unverified legacy accounts or anyone else yet they being assholes in forcing people to get verified now. thats why poloniex gave a warning to legacy accounts thats regulation is coming so we can get our coins. so imo its a real possibility that bittrex is getting ready to scam everybody , bittrex even edited old msgs to suit thers current needs thats scammy.
|
|
|
i was trading on bittrex for a few years then early november my acount was disabled without warning all locked out cant take my coins out nor trade. they disabled my acount before posting the notice about legacy acounts. all i got from suport was 2 msg about getting verified and some crap then all i got was your account is under review bla bla even when i sent an other ticket from a unrelated issue seems support is locked out aswell internaly. so they are a scam for some people you could be next. here is proof of the shady pratices i found. as you can see in web archives here dated 18 octobre 2017 its a notice from bittrex from 2016 https://archive.fo/19xjq you can clearly see it states . Please check below to see what limit your account falls under. Unverified Accounts created before 08/01/17: 0.025 BTC (or equivalent) per day. so legacy accounts had no reason to think they would be locked out of funds . here is the updated notice from 30 nov 2017 after most people having problems accounts were locked out https://archive.fo/VXjZm here is states lease check below to see what limit your account falls under. New/Unverified Accounts: Unverified accounts have a 0 BTC withdrawal limit. as you can see they again updated an old msg from 2016 like if they posted this over a year ago . me like many others did not think an old over 1 year old notice was worth reading because we expected to allready have done so , bittrex clearly is doing something shady by editing an old msg multiple times to suit thers current needs. Editing old messages is definitely scammy. A big clue something was wrong was the way they increased their withdrawal fees too. Even bitcoincash had high withdrawal fees when it costs a cent to move money. That was pretty much the scam Cryptsy pulled before they disappeared. i did not notice the fee's i did not transfer coins alot would do all at once then take back at end of day usualy all in a single crypto. i know those laws and new regulation about know your consumers and having to get resistered the deadline is may 2018 thats when it goes into effects i have no clue why they lock people out now this early thats wrong they dont need to yet :/
|
|
|
i was trading on bittrex for a few years then early november my acount was disabled without warning all locked out cant take my coins out nor trade. they disabled my acount before posting the notice about legacy acounts. all i got from suport was 2 msg about getting verified and some crap then all i got was your account is under review bla bla even when i sent an other ticket from a unrelated issue seems support is locked out aswell internaly. so they are a scam for some people you could be next. here is proof of the shady pratices i found. as you can see in web archives here dated 18 octobre 2017 its a notice from bittrex from 2016 https://archive.fo/19xjq you can clearly see it states . Please check below to see what limit your account falls under. Unverified Accounts created before 08/01/17: 0.025 BTC (or equivalent) per day. so legacy accounts had no reason to think they would be locked out of funds . here is the updated notice from 30 nov 2017 after most people having problems accounts were locked out https://archive.fo/VXjZm here is states lease check below to see what limit your account falls under. New/Unverified Accounts: Unverified accounts have a 0 BTC withdrawal limit. as you can see they again updated an old msg from 2016 like if they posted this over a year ago . me like many others did not think an old over 1 year old notice was worth reading because we expected to allready have done so , bittrex clearly is doing something shady by editing an old msg multiple times to suit thers current needs.
|
|
|
ZenCash has a few strengths. It has committed devs - that hasn't shown through the last fortnight because of the nightmare resulting from one individual's conduct - but over months it should show through. Masternodes also should definitely offer support for price increase, although my view is the number of coins required to be held needs to be higher than the 42 so far suggested to effectively support price.
Zcash has lots of support, and also a great developer team. At about $400 a coin though, my view is that ship has already sailed - I personally would find it higher risk to invest in Zcash at $400 versus ZenCash at around $8.80. Zcash could spike some more, it could even double, but in my view it's got more room to crash too. I expect ZenCash to stabilise and rise slowly over the short term - when incentivised nodes come in or other developments, that's when I see it rising faster.
Please increase the Masternodes coin requirement to 100-200. Since the Masternodes "limit" is 1000, it makes sense. At $200/Zen each Masternode will cost $20,000(100),$40,000(200). Seems reasonable considering the current price of a DASH Masternode($175,000~). i might be wrong but from what i recall seeing in white paper the 1000 secured nodes was not a limit but what the devs wanted to have soon after launch , dont think thers a limit . making a limit doesnt make sense anyway since market will decide when thers enough nodes on its own . the only point in making big coin minimums like 100-200 or more for a secured nodes is to make money for the select few who can afford it , (ponzi scams) kinda what i consider dash / pivx and the likes are , imo.
|
|
|
could be a while , they sould be in maintenance until they fix the replay attack issue , could be weeks who knows
|
|
|
If there is a hard fork of ZEN, what prevents miners staying on the original chain and creating a new coin like ETH/ETC?
Can we get some clarity on this??
We can't have another new coin....
if thers a hardfork nothing prevents miners or anyone from staying on the original chain that's what a hardfork is , it would create a new coin. all i heard personally was the possibility of a fork on zcl to prevent the replay attack , guessing a fork on zen would only need to happen if the replay attack was exploited meaningfully , i am not a blockchain expert in anyway though.
|
|
|
I laughed really hard yesterday when the price fell to 0.0019 (still too high). To the ones that lost money on this -you actually bought at over 17$ expecting not to lose money? -why did you do not do proper research? (the so called "secure node" concept not a good idea). -why did you not buy before the fork when the price was ok?
THANKS A LOT, i am now 280$ richer.
everytime you trade in crypto's to fiat you get less rich , you just dont know it yet
|
|
|
keeping this information secret until solution is found seems sensible to me unless thers clear evidence the attack is being exploited , assuming of course those with the knowledge dont dump and profit from this privileged information , imo anyway
|
|
|
may i ask what indicators your talking about ? only 1 person involved in this issue was allways the case nothing changed from past news.
|
|
|
no dev went back to zcl hence the zcl price recovery
|
|
|
i deposited some coins at crypsy vtc , doge , leaf , meow pretty much at the same time an hours or so ago nothing came in , seems more then 1 coin has slow deposits
|
|
|
not sure i understand what all this multipool fuss is all about imo if a coin can't sustain its price then by all means go down , whats the problem ? ps i was enjoying mining leaf aswell but i am not sure why everyone is crying
|
|
|
gratz coinmarket.io being using your site last 2 days works like a charm , on my end no problems at all
|
|
|
wow guess i was wrong btc-e added it Oo
|
|
|
jcrubino that would indeed be sensible thing to implement or we will end up with 50 useless altcoins on exchanges
|
|
|
this is my first post ever , i have a feeling this coin might actually die off before btc-e adds it because of bad rep it will have after so many people lost money buying them , only to get dumped over by us miners
|
|
|
|