Hiding that , like you try to hide your real address.
Fail on both vod. That's great. I was wondering where you shipped in your substance from. It must be some faraway land because it has yet to arrive. The implication that I'm Vod is untrue and unfounded. Not only that, it doesn't make sense. Why would Vod disagree with Vod on the Anduck negative rating? Cover up, as many know you to be the same. As they say, you do protest too much, sensing the tide is turning against your vod screen name. You joined lauda , too many times to be anyone but vod. Plus you are the same child molester, actmyname is a play upon actmyage, since you are obsessed with young children. The semantics in yours and vod posts show you are the exact same son of a bitch.You are fooling no one.  |
|
|
|
Vod = actmyname I would love to say that I, Vodactmyname am the developer and proprietor of BPIP. That would be lying. Hiding that , like you try to hide your real address. Fail on both vod. |
|
|
|
no personal vendetta
Is it a business vendetta, then? pms coming of supporters adding list but stay private
progress
That didn't save Zin-Zang from my red paint. My spies are everywhere.  Thanks, you are so insignificant, that I had not noticed you. Gave you a neg to fix your status.  You bunch of thug asshats , that work with Lauda to censor free speech and exclude others so you can make more from escrow and those ridiculous banners have only earn my contempt. Since updating my trust ratings, the only asshats with red are you bitches. I also deleted default trust to avoid the wait time, until the majority grow a spine and kick lauda and her bitches out of DT again. DT serves no purpose and once Lauda and her gang of bitches are removed , theymos will probably remove it or change it again. As he himself has proven to be untrustworthy due to his repeated underhanded Lauda support over the past few years. Observe a added merits system observe the copper memberships, all point to bounty farming and the growing lack of money btctalk is earning, of which Theymos is probably taking part in, and it is thanks to Lauda and her gang of censor pricks greedy grabbing more for themselves that is killing this forum. I never offer any services or trades on this crap forums, only used free speech to enlighten the ignorant , once that was attacked with me as it had been already for so many others, this forum serves no purpose. You always have the same gang of lauda bitches start red tagging in a group, and most like Foxpup, just another ass licker. Most are just ignoring btctalk as the continued conversations have become retarded in all of the other forums due to censorship, there is just no interesting conservation left due to the repeated censorship condoned by theymos by his inaction. FYI: Funny the ones pretending they have a moral status are the first to gang up and red tag anyone as a way to divert a truthful trust ratings system. FYI2: Lauda = owlcatz Vod = actmyname Tman aka Virgin Boy= Fudster They have a lot more sock puppets than above. Giving the pretense they are supported , when in truth they are few, just many fake accounts. |
|
|
|
Considering how badly the forums mods are censoring my posts. This is my last post in this shithole. Vod, Who cowardly refuses to post his real address.Hey you'll be burning in hell soon enough for what you did to those kids. Lauda Fuck off Bitch, I hope your STDs gets worse. Tman, I say grow the fuck up, but that would still take you 20 years, and you still be an idiot also minifrij sockpuppet To the rest of Lauda & Bitches SockPuppets, FUCK OFF. achow101, you're a piece of shit, in case you were uncertain. |
|
|
|
The Problem with DT is the members are Judge , Jury and Executioner with NO APPEALS PROCESS WHATSOEVER, their word is Law and you have no recourse. Without an appeals process the whole DT is a Sham and always will be. No they are not judge jury and executioner. The people who judge you are the people who read the comment. The appeals process is in reputation.Like with a court process if you go in yelling and screaming it is likely to get a worse outcome. A red tag is not the end of the world. It is one opinion. There are many things that happen in life that you cannot appeal elsewhere. Love, friendship, trust and respect are all things that if you lose it you cannot appeal to an external authority to regain. You have to negotiate with those directly involved.
DT has no real appeals process.Otherwise all of the Lauda Topics would not even exist , because she would have been removed years ago. Her name is mentioned more than all others and your ignoring her misdeeds , make you more part of the problem than solution. FYI: If you truly believe a red tag means so little, then why the dissent at just scraping the whole useless DT system, because useless it is. |
|
|
|
I have to say Zin-Zang, you are quite the selfish asshole, just like Quickseller.
You believe children are being sexually assaulted, you have the person's name and city, and you refuse to contact the local police.
I hope you can sleep at night. On ignore you go.
Foolish VOD , Post your Full address coward and then try and explain to the ones that arrive why it is ok the evil you have committed? The Authorities I will be sending are not the Police. (That was your mistake.)The Police have proven useless, it is a higher power , and you will cower before them like the little bitch you are.
Still Waiting Full Street Address & Apt# ? |
|
|
|
I would be willing to bet a couple BTC that Vod and actmyname are not the same person.
You called Hhampuz an ass-kisser for enjoying the change in Default Trust, which is baffling to me; everyone who approves of the change is an ass-kisser?
It's easy to make a monster out of the person calling you on your nonsense, but in reality (where the rest of us are) it's more likely than not something about your behavior and personality that is accumulating so much distaste. You're experiencing something along the lines of delusional referencing.
Similar to a young man that is unable to get laid, it's not everybody else, so let's stop pretending.
Well you lose that BTC, because actmyname=vodDude, you have no idea of my true mindset, so keep your bad dime store shrink analyses to yourself, because frankly you're not very good at it. Could you link your other accounts, please? I won't do anything, pinkyswear! Sure ZIN - ZANG There you go dumbass.  You think I would have been as peeved, if I was using multiple account like all of you lauda bitches. Doubtful. I would have just dropped this one and used the others. But since I am not cheating and stealing from people like you guys, one account name to speak my mind was all I needed. |
|
|
|
I would be willing to bet a couple BTC that Vod and actmyname are not the same person.
You called Hhampuz an ass-kisser for enjoying the change in Default Trust, which is baffling to me; everyone who approves of the change is an ass-kisser?
It's easy to make a monster out of the person calling you on your nonsense, but in reality (where the rest of us are) it's more likely than not something about your behavior and personality that is accumulating so much distaste. You're experiencing something along the lines of delusional referencing.
Similar to a young man that is unable to get laid, it's not everybody else, so let's stop pretending.
Well you lose that BTC, because actmyname=vodDude, you have no idea of my true mindset, so keep your bad dime store shrink analyses to yourself, because frankly you're not very good at it. |
|
|
|
your time is over zin-zang , you had more than you deserve. sending you to ignore zoo , right where you belong.
I would expect your 9 year old ass to still watch the Muppets. Scram kid, you bother me. FYI: Funny when you point out that these SOBs, are using an alias, they no longer want to talk. |
|
|
|
BY everyone excluding the bad apples, it makes certain they Lose DT Status and their reign of abuse ends. Sadly it is the best that can be done, preferable wold be to scrap the whole useless DT system. All adding members does is create default trust gangs, that will still abuse the system for their personal gain. DT is a corrupt system, no matter how it is managed. And it harms more than it ever helped. I disagree. It is only a warning system. If I see a warning for trolling I would react differently to that user than if I saw a warning for an actual scam where people lost funds. Even with a scam warning - different people have different opinions as to what happened and what constitutes a scam. So the details and description is important. Lauda is one of the DT members that I don't know & haven't communicated with. But I do know that it was a mess when Lauda got removed from DT because many real scammers (my definition) were no longer identifiable as such. Hopefully the new system will be an improvement of sorts and encourage users to create better trust networks based on actual trust. From what I have seen is that it is a curse to be on the DT list. It appears to attract the wrath of trolls and scammers. Exactly you use the red tag alone , never bothering to read what events actually conspired. Lauda is one of the Major Scammers on BTCtalk, you think Theymos kicked her off the staff because she was innocent , come on guy , you can't be that naive. Scan the Bitcoin Cash Thread, and you find multiple people red tagged by lauda merely for the fact they prefer BCH over BTC , no other reason. * My own red tag was merely for pointing out known flaws in LN, so much for freedom of speech on this forums. * How do you justify such an extreme abuse of the DT system? The Problem with DT is the members are Judge , Jury and Executioner with NO APPEALS PROCESS WHATSOEVER, their word is Law and you have no recourse. Without an appeals process the whole DT is a Sham and always will be. |
|
|
|
@cabalism13 Even thru most of Lauda Bitches are popping in as sock puppets, Feel free to fuck off. Because I would just kick your ass to pass the time. |
|
|
|
Dude, if you're too stupid to see what is front of you , not my problem. You the one blind to the evidence, so if you don't care , why did you even ask?
Look at the Lauda threads, there are more than just me pointing out she is a crook. You want solid proof, when she steals your money that should do it. I know she steals money, which is why i would never use her escrow service, i don't have to learn the hard way. i have more important things in life to do than having to search the forum for some bullshit you another person might have posted, it only makes sense that when you accuse someone you post the evidence on the same post,you don't ask people to "go look for the evidence". i have been only been active on the forum the past couple months ,new members come every hour and see your topic, you are stupid to assume that everybody knows what happened before. I am not going to waste anymore time on your B.S before you post the evidence right here "not ask me to go find it" Did your mommy tell you to get off the computer, TMAN aka virgin boy. Yeah, you little prick , i know it is you. Scram kid , you bother me. |
|
|
|
I don't agree with all the negative feedback left by DTs but I certainly would strongly advise against ~[insert name of default trust member] because feedback is meant as a warning to other users.
By eliminating all feedback left by a DT because just some of it is controversial leaves users unaware of potential identified risks.
Ultimately using a ~[insert name of default trust member] just means that you won't be ware of the potential risks.
I recommend adding as many users that you trust to your trust list (and leave them positive feedback) and only exclude people if your really don't trust them (not if they just have a few differences of opinion). That is how the system was designed to work.
By everyone excluding the bad apples with a ~, it makes certain they Lose DT Status and their reign of abuse ends. Sadly it is the best that can be done, preferable wold be to scrap the whole useless DT system. All adding members does is create default trust gangs, that will still abuse the system for their personal gain. DT is a corrupt system, no matter how it is managed. And it will always harm more than it ever helped. |
|
|
|
Tell you what, you seem to want to deny the apparent, so use Lauda escrow service , and we'll see if you feel that way in a few months, after she steals from you. Go ahead, some people have to learn the hard way. i was only asking you a simple question, and now you went about what you think i want , it's pretty much the same shit i had with cryptohunter before, i am not sure how you view the "apparent" from my side , the apparent to me now is that you are accusing someone for something without a solid proof. you asking us to exclude that member from our trust list, i am more than willing to do so if you provide your evidence. i have no reason to try to prove Lauda is legit simply because i do not give a fuck, it's you who need to prove the opposite, so why not use his/her escrow service and document the scam process and present it before everyone to win this war once and forever? the more evidence-less accusations on Lauda the more people want to trust him/her, ever heard of "whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you stronger"? so pull the trigger on 1 solid proof "assuming you have any" and end Lauda's career on the internet instead of giving her more power and reputation. Dude, if you're too stupid to see what is front of you , not my problem. You the one blind to the evidence, so if you don't care , why did you even ask?
Look at the Lauda threads, there are more than just me pointing out she is a crook. You want solid proof, when she steals your money that should do it. I know she steals money, which is why i would never use her escrow service, i don't have to learn the hard way. |
|
|
|
Your sweet-talk seems fake, shoo retard. Ah, you are so correct! I shan't have a contrary position against only theymos. The true path towards a fair system is for every reply to be of dissent, rejection and to throw the pittance of virtue signalling out of this existence! Our qualms needn't be sullied by the burden of agreement, nay, reality demands contradiction. It demands chaos! So I declare unto you: no. I disagree with your opinion. I expect nothing else from one of lauda's bitches. Anyone else also know you are vod? |
|
|
|
cough cough ASS KISSER. Finally, someone speaks the truth! It behooves all of Bitcointalk to develop a contrarian opinion against theymos, for dissent is king when it comes to debate. No more shall this wretched king reign supreme, striking down all contrary opinions. No more shall we see any agreement towards this malevolent ruler! Down with theymos! Down with theymos! Your sweet-talk seems fake, shoo retard. |
|
|
|
if you got a complain make it to theymos, he designed the crappy DT system. Where is your well-articulated thread targeted at theymos addressing the issues of DefaultTrust? Surely, your strong opinion is based on a foundation of deep research and analysis which can be thoroughly explained. I look forward to seeing your logical conclusion derived from the many facts you've no doubt accumulated during your time on the forum. You're actually too stupid too understand or a lauda sock puppet. Lauda was on DT, she extorted money, she stole air dropped coins from her escrow service. It is all out there, go look for it yourself, but odds are you one of her bitches and as such , no proof will be good enough for you. |
|
|
|
i expect the answer to be too complicated
Tell you what, you seem to want to deny the apparent, so use Lauda escrow service , and we'll see if you feel that way in a few months, after she steals from you. Go ahead, some people have to learn the hard way. |
|
|
|
I thought that I had a good idea for limiting each individual truster when handling the last two criteria: set it up as a circulation problem as below, and then find the maximum flow. The "user tX"s through whom flow passes would be the DT1s selected.
~snip
(The orders of the users would be randomized on each run.)
There are efficient algorithms for maximizing the flow in problems similar to this, which is why thinking about it in this way occurred to me. However, it turns out that the "exactly 0 or exactly 10" requirement on the rightmost edges makes finding an exact solution too difficult.
I might try to write an algorithm for finding an approximate solution to this, but I probably won't get to it in the near future. Anyone else want to give it a try? You might also be able to structure it as a knapsack problem or something else, but I haven't gotten around to thinking about that yet.
I like this. Seems to be the correct way (If possible to make it work) to make it as decentralized as possible. I'll patiently sit back and see if we have any Mr. Robots that can take it on  cough cough ASS KISSER. |
|
|
|
If you want to see red tags on Lauda screen name
then add just
Zin-Zang
~Lauda
There's clearly a " Show ratings" link to see untrusted feedback. There's no need for anyone to add you to their trust list in order to see the (totally inane) feedback you've left other forum users. This sounds like an attempt to manipulate inexperienced users into adding you to their trust list. Hey, ~Zin-Zang is ok with me, just as long as ~Lauda is also added. Untrusted feedback is rarely noticed, and if you got a complain make it to theymos, he designed the crappy DT system. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
