4 hrs after I started 2 instances of xptminer on 2 different machines, I noticed a chain of "Reason: CheckProofOfWork() : n not prime" on my I7 4770, compiled to AVX. My other machine, Quad core Q9550, compiled to SSE, no chain of msg yet.

CPU only didnt last long, very true. But Heavycoin has demonstrated desirable and differentiating qualities in GPU mining, cooler temps and lower power use. HVC seems to be re-branding itself to take advantage of its new-found strengths.

That has ZERO effect on the main purpose of this coin.. GPU mining just takes power away from the botnets. And HEFTY1 is still 100x better than just another scrypt clone!

1. It's not cracked - just made reasonably efficient to run on a GPU.
2. Google?  C'mon now.  You didn't even try, did you?

I know - but I built entirely on his codebase from xptMiner.  I've only changed one file in there - riecoinMiner.cpp.  All of the rest, from the threading and #cpu detection to the xpt protocol, is his.  I think it's right to have part of the dev fee go to jh00-the-developer, and for the pool fees to go to jh00-the-pool-creator/maintainer.

(I realize they're the same person and that jh00 benefits twice, but the way I mentally worked through this decision was to ask what I'd do if I'd based my code on someone else's miner -- I'd give part of the dev fee to them, too, so I figured it shouldn't be any different simply because jh00 also maintains the pool.)

This is the same reason the dev fee is split a little more for the Windows version -- Clintar did the patching and the makefile in his version for getting it to compile under the mingw framework, and helped me out getting my cross compilation environment working.

-b9 has been reduced to 7% dev fee.  6.5% me, 0.5% jh00.  Windows build is 6% me, 0.5% jh00, 0.5% Clintar.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/crypto/ric/

Just to clarify this, the info is not fake. Or at least not on purpose. All data is correct except the company name. When we registered the domain we tried to think ahead and it turned out that "ypool gmbh" is not the company name/form that we settled for. It will be corrected of course. The problem is that Miki (primer-) doesn't even want to hear our explanation. He just came here to make us look bad. I have no idea what I did wrong to make him this angry.

Hi, Miroslav Petrovic -

I trust you have applied the same due diligence to maintaining your own domain registration information in an up-to-date fashion. :-)

http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/smscentar.com

I think that nobody get a bounty for accepting HVC.  
Devs promise bounty on first page  for sites that accept HVC, but no one
receive anything. I wrote to devs to tell him about Bitscraper,
but no respond.

Yes, the fee goes to Your_Address...

To remove the 10% dev fee on b8 version just edit the binary using vi editor :

vi xptminer-sse4-b8

:,$s/RUhMA8bvsr48aC3WVj3aGf5p1zytPSz59o/Your_Address/
(ENTER)
:wq

well 10% looked a bit extreme guys...dont you think?

when clintar had 2% fee i mined for 10 days even after removing his fee

but dont you think that 10% is too much? and we already know that you guys mine with optimized miners before us...

I dont say if it is bad or not to have a fee. or mine with optimized miners. after all those that have the skills must gain. I am saying that if fees are extreme people dont like that and will find their way to not pay it... it needs an equilibrium.

It appears that the kernel is filtering out too many shares for your hashrate (please note it is beta and WIP). Please edit the heavy140312.cl file changing RESULT_MASK on line 1603 to 0xF8000000U or even 0xF0000000U, remove .bin files and try running cgminer again.

2>myfile.txt should do the trick (it does in Linux fwiw)

Please run it with debug and protocol enabled (-D -P) and PM me some of the output to investigate.

However, most probably it is non-GCN card (hashrate too low), the kernel is known to not work properly on these.

Due to vardiff, you submit higher difficulty shares with faster miner, they are harder to find but cost more. For hashrate display, please mine for 15 minutes as displayed hashrate is averaged over this time.

You guys seeing what I am seeing?  Price is moving up quick.

Try intensity 3 or xintensity 102 to 105.

Thank you!

For the impatient, here is HVC cgminer version that works on 1gh: https://github.com/reorder/cgminer_skein

It currently only works with GCN cards (or so I believe). No binaries are available as it is a WIP, and I will not provide support for this version.

Please configure with './autogen.sh --enable-heavy --enable-opencl' and run with '--heavy --vote 1024' (or your preferred vote). Best intensity setting seems to be 3 for all cards, but you may have luck with higher values.