 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Religion has never been philosophy or science, at any time in history, and has never produced any thing of worth. I know they love to take credit for good men's achievement's just because they were required to be church members (or killed), and I understand this is why the public believe's it to be connected with science and philosophy at one time, but, as I have demonstrated in this post, that is a falsehood greedily spread by the church.
Yeah, 100% correct! Look up Galileo and what the church did to him. Those who use the terms "Bitcoin" and "religion" in the same breath are acting like Bronze Age primitives. No. It's not 100% correct, it's absolutely incorrect. If you know nothing about philposophy - don't discourse about it. And i want to know, what the church did to Galileo? I'm sorry but is your knowledge of history really that dismal? Take few minutes out of your obviously drab and wretched life and learn a little, mkay? Go here and read!: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/galileoaccount.htmlTry it; you might like it! I have finished philosophy department in my university. I tall you about religion and philosophy, answering on phrase "Religion has never been philosophy" and "it's 100 correct". What do you know about philosophy to say there are no any links? I know history about Galileo and the Church, but they didnt done to him nothing horrify, unlike Giordano Bruno=) So that makes the suppression of knowledge and learning by the church OK? Apologist! I have asked you, what do you know about philosophy? I should enumerate for all list of religious philosophers? It's not enough for you that almost all philosophers from 3-rd cent. till 19 were religious? I am not apologist. I don't like church and religion, i don't believe in god, but your phrases are often incorrect. As a matter of fact, I did know that. I also consider "philosphy" to be merely mental masturbation and a general waste of time. Curiously enough, but I think that it is waste of time too. But it's silly to claim a lack of philosophy's influence on science and culture. As a religion on philosophy. And one more time. It's too off-topic theme. |
|
|
|
Religion has never been philosophy or science, at any time in history, and has never produced any thing of worth. I know they love to take credit for good men's achievement's just because they were required to be church members (or killed), and I understand this is why the public believe's it to be connected with science and philosophy at one time, but, as I have demonstrated in this post, that is a falsehood greedily spread by the church.
Yeah, 100% correct! Look up Galileo and what the church did to him. Those who use the terms "Bitcoin" and "religion" in the same breath are acting like Bronze Age primitives. No. It's not 100% correct, it's absolutely incorrect. If you know nothing about philposophy - don't discourse about it. And i want to know, what the church did to Galileo? I'm sorry but is your knowledge of history really that dismal? Take few minutes out of your obviously drab and wretched life and learn a little, mkay? Go here and read!: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/galileoaccount.htmlTry it; you might like it! I have finished philosophy department in my university. I tall you about religion and philosophy, answering on phrase "Religion has never been philosophy" and "it's 100 correct". What do you know about philosophy to say there are no any links? I know history about Galileo and the Church, but they didnt done to him nothing horrify, unlike Giordano Bruno=) So that makes the suppression of knowledge and learning by the church OK? Apologist! I have asked you, what do you know about philosophy? I should enumerate for all list of religious philosophers? It's not enough for you that almost all philosophers from 3-rd cent. till 19 were religious? I am not apologist. I don't like church and religion, i don't believe in god, but your phrases are often incorrect. |
|
|
|
Religion has never been philosophy or science, at any time in history, and has never produced any thing of worth. I know they love to take credit for good men's achievement's just because they were required to be church members (or killed), and I understand this is why the public believe's it to be connected with science and philosophy at one time, but, as I have demonstrated in this post, that is a falsehood greedily spread by the church.
Yeah, 100% correct! Look up Galileo and what the church did to him. Those who use the terms "Bitcoin" and "religion" in the same breath are acting like Bronze Age primitives. No. It's not 100% correct, it's absolutely incorrect. If you know nothing about philposophy - don't discourse about it. And i want to know, what the church did to Galileo? I'm sorry but is your knowledge of history really that dismal? Take few minutes out of your obviously drab and wretched life and learn a little, mkay? Go here and read!: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/galileoaccount.htmlTry it; you might like it! I have finished philosophy department in my university. I tall you about religion and philosophy, answering on phrase "Religion has never been philosophy" and "it's 100 correct". What do you know about philosophy to say there are no any links? I know history about Galileo and the Church, but they didnt done to him nothing horrify, unlike Giordano Bruno=) |
|
|
|
Religion has never been philosophy or science, at any time in history, and has never produced any thing of worth. I know they love to take credit for good men's achievement's just because they were required to be church members (or killed), and I understand this is why the public believe's it to be connected with science and philosophy at one time, but, as I have demonstrated in this post, that is a falsehood greedily spread by the church.
Yeah, 100% correct! Look up Galileo and what the church did to him. Those who use the terms "Bitcoin" and "religion" in the same breath are acting like Bronze Age primitives. No. It's not 100% correct, it's absolutely incorrect. If you know nothing about philposophy - don't discourse about it. And i want to know, what the church did to Galileo? |
|
|
|
Religion has never been philosophy or science, at any time in history, and has never produced any thing of worth. I know they love to take credit for good men's achievement's just because they were required to be church members (or killed), and I understand this is why the public believe's it to be connected with science and philosophy at one time, but, as I have demonstrated in this post, that is a falsehood greedily spread by the church.
If you know nothing about philosophy - don't discourse about it. For about 2000 year mankind had religious philosophy - From Terthullian, Plotin, Augistin till Hegel and Shopenhauer. And all Middle age's Universities (centers of science) were just a parts of Church institutes. You don't understand. I am not defender of religion. I don't like religion. But science, religion and philosophy were together during a big part of history. |
|
|
|
|
Which guarantee can one prisoner provide to other person, that he will make promised transaction, if they have not any possibilities to certify it legally and officially? Some physical equivalent should be much attractive.
|
|
|
|
Religion should really be called organized crime numero uno. From child trafficking to funding terrorism they are the cause of most of humanities problems and since the Renaissance has long past we all need to be a bit more acquainted with there crimes. Read.
I think, it's too loud words about religion. Many aspects in science, philosophical, musical and cultural progress exist thanks to religion. However, crimes and terrorism too=( A common lie (propaganda undoubtedly spread by the church) is that the church has brought forth advancements in life. That is contrary to the teaching's of the church. If you are well read on the matter you will know that it is a false hood. You want to say, that all arts have not been provided by religion? Ok, but all modern music and harmony grows up from church music. All classical music grows up from the church, because piano and organ grow up from the church. Philosophy grow up from religious philosophers, it mean that a big part of science and culture grows up from religion. It is not result of propaganda, it's just a fact. Historical fact. And a lot of crimes and terrors grows up from religion. And it's just a fact. Significance of religion in science and culture is not same thing as God's existence. We know exact facts about 1-th and can't say anything about 2-nd. Don't argue with history=) Labeling your statement's as fact's does not make them factual. Of course. But phrase "A common lie (propaganda undoubtedly spread by the church) is that the church has brought forth advancements in life" is too debatable and, in my opinion (not only my) is far away from truth. Moreover, this topic is for off-topic category, but not for bitcoin discussion. |
|
|
|
Religion should really be called organized crime numero uno. From child trafficking to funding terrorism they are the cause of most of humanities problems and since the Renaissance has long past we all need to be a bit more acquainted with there crimes. Read.
I think, it's too loud words about religion. Many aspects in science, philosophical, musical and cultural progress exist thanks to religion. However, crimes and terrorism too=( A common lie (propaganda undoubtedly spread by the church) is that the church has brought forth advancements in life. That is contrary to the teaching's of the church. If you are well read on the matter you will know that it is a false hood. You want to say, that all arts have not been provided by religion? Ok, but all modern music and harmony grows up from church music. All classical music grows up from the church, because piano and organ grow up from the church. Philosophy grow up from religious philosophers, it mean that a big part of science and culture grows up from religion. It is not result of propaganda, it's just a fact. Historical fact. And a lot of crimes and terrors grows up from religion. And it's just a fact. Significance of religion in science and culture is not same thing as God's existence. We know exact facts about 1-th and can't say anything about 2-nd. Don't argue with history=) Labeling your statement's as fact's does not make them factual. I take it that The Hundred Years War and the term "The Crusades" mean nothing to you. Both brutal wars started by Christians. Did you hear me? I said that a lot of crimes and terros were provoked by religion. But our culture, science and art are a results of religion. |
|
|
|
Which religion(s) claim we will need a chip(miners) to buy and sell in the future?
LoL
May SERVER protect us all!
EOL
bitcoin jesus was handed 1 fishcoin and 1 breadcoin. and from the POS protocol he was able to feed a whole community with 40 bread coins and 40 fish coin. And from the water Jesus was mining wine-coins. |
|
|
|
Religion should really be called organized crime numero uno. From child trafficking to funding terrorism they are the cause of most of humanities problems and since the Renaissance has long past we all need to be a bit more acquainted with there crimes. Read.
I think, it's too loud words about religion. Many aspects in science, philosophical, musical and cultural progress exist thanks to religion. However, crimes and terrorism too=( A common lie (propaganda undoubtedly spread by the church) is that the church has brought forth advancements in life. That is contrary to the teaching's of the church. If you are well read on the matter you will know that it is a false hood. You want to say, that all arts have not been provided by religion? Ok, but all modern music and harmony grows up from church music. All classical music grows up from the church, because piano and organ grow up from the church. Philosophy grow up from religious philosophers, it mean that a big part of science and culture grows up from religion. It is not result of propaganda, it's just a fact. Historical fact. And a lot of crimes and terrors grows up from religion. And it's just a fact. Significance of religion in science and culture is not same thing as God's existence. We know exact facts about 1-th and can't say anything about 2-nd. Don't argue with history=) |
|
|
|
Religion should really be called organized crime numero uno. From child trafficking to funding terrorism they are the cause of most of humanities problems and since the Renaissance has long past we all need to be a bit more acquainted with there crimes. Read.
I think, it's too loud words about religion. Many aspects in science, philosophical, musical and cultural progress exist thanks to religion. However, crimes and terrorism too=( |
|
|
|
I was having a general discussion with friends regarding the Bitcoin Jesus fella who just recently launched his Passports for Bitcoin service for the rich folks. Let's say if there was someone who claimed himself to be Bitcoin Muhammad of the Muslim world. Do you think it would make the Muslim community furious and rage and most likely try to attack the Bitcoin network? We all know how easy it is to piss off Islamic extremists. Just a thought.
stop mixing religion with bitcoin affairs, friend. and do not look at Islam from a handful of people who do evil to bring the name of Islam. Islam is a peaceful religion, we respect other religions. and mercy for all of nature. however, for things divine we have some limits. I guess your religion was so  That's not about mixing religion and bitcoins, it's about cultural resonance for this frivolous joke. And this is not a secret that such jokes can become a reason for this resonance. When stupid fans throw bananas to football players from Brazil - it is not mixing of football and apartheid or holocaust, but resonance is very high. There are no point for thinking that Islam is agressive and rude religion, because Koran says about mercy. But representatives of modern Islam (and other religions) often behave agressive. And, to my mind, thay can behave agressive if somebody name himself "Bitcoin Muhammad". So. |
|
|
|
|
I have finished university in this year and want to go to bitcoins world=) However, for good trading or mining i have no initial capital. So, i should go on a staff-job to get it. To my mind, it's too high risk to take out a loan in bank for btc-trading. Or somebody have done this high-risk step? If yes - what was a result?=)
Moreover, i dont know now what is better: invest in mining of trading? Mining is too slow, trading is too risky.
|
|
|
|
I was having a general discussion with friends regarding the Bitcoin Jesus fella who just recently launched his Passports for Bitcoin service for the rich folks. Let's say if there was someone who claimed himself to be Bitcoin Muhammad of the Muslim world. Do you think it would make the Muslim community furious and rage and most likely try to attack the Bitcoin network? We all know how easy it is to piss off Islamic extremists. Just a thought.
Given the situation with the recent film of Innocent of Muslims, I can say that public appearance of this guy will cause a huge stir in the Islamic society. But who now cares about this, especially in the field of virtual money?=) |
|
|
|
I'm sure you have hear about this man: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_Cashhttps://twitter.com/HiddenCashhttp://www.c[Suspicious link removed]m/id/101759772 He got good publicising in the news with this intelligent idea, and really cheap. My offer is make something similar with bitcoin (street faucet?), and send some letters to the main means of communication. This could be a great publicity campaign. Emm. I didnt understand two things: for a what is he doing that (this is not philanthropy, because of 30 Angry Birds head it is advertising)? And how do you want to do the similar with bitcoins? Which realization? |
|
|
|
Russians are good in two things: stealing ideas, vodka, bitcoin and hacking No, we are also good in counting  Emm. In counting of what?=) |
|
|
|
Russians are good in two things, stealing ideas, vodka, bitcoin and hacking Its because of vodka its more things  Why do you think that Russians are good in bitcoin? There a lot of miners in Russia, because there are many possibilities for cheap upgrade of video, but it has a local character. To my mind, trade in Russia is on very low level, because there are no good tradition of board trading. And Russia, of course, is not a leader in hacking. |
|
|
|
Admiral Putin said: Bitcoins-----> Gulag
Not admiral, but Secretary-General=) I think that they have not started using brains. If they want to control it - they will be, unfortanetly. |
|
|
|
|
And, of course, level of despotism in China much higher than in Russia. For the nonce=)
So, you think that there are good horisons for btc in Russia, and i can trade without any risk that it will become devaluate and impossible to transfer into rubbles?
|
|
|
|
In China BTCs are much popular than in Russia There are ~40 mln bitcoin addresses most of them are empty There are less than 10 mln non-empty bitcoin addresses (please, correct my number if you know exact value) So, there are less than 10 mln bitcoin-users over the whole world. Are you sure that bitcoin has significant popularity in China with more than 1billion people there? It it eye-drop in the sea. I think, that significance in ablolute value (not in relative) is higher in China than in Russia. I mean for global market but not in local for Russia or China. |
|
|
|
|
