 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Is it true that Evan Duffield from DarkCoin proposed a merger to Shadow? Rynomster, can you comment on this?
Why would DRK offer to merge with SDC? From this post it looks like DRK wanted to merge with SDC... AND...XC wanted to merge with SDC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg9423672#msg9423672Wow! SDC is a hot commodity right now. |
|
|
|
|
Anyway...im done with u lying, ignorant peices of shit. I sold all my cinni at 16,000sat...enjoy your 800sat cinni.
Edit: 600sat cinni.
|
|
|
|
DevCove please ask digit about it I think he is an expert with that issue.
And that is why all started.
Are you kidding? This guy isn't interested in the truth - only in insulting people and doing whatever else he thinks he needs to do to defend rynomster and Shadowcoin. By all means, feel free to ask digit to comment on this thread. Again, I'm most familiar with the anon tech issue - not the bug issue which, if 100% true, may be much more serious/fundamental than what I've been talking about. ...says the guy who outright lies, persents information in a missleading way, ignores facts, attempt to implicate an honest man with quotes made by others, does not accept cinnidev collaboration of events, so basically pulls shit out of his ass and calls it history. QUOTES ARE ONLY INFORMATIVE IN CONTEXT. This dumbfuck is the worst kind of individual. Lies about an honest man because he is butthurt over a loss... HEY DUMBFUCK LOOK UP UTCLOVER HE OWNED 1/2 OF CINNI. HE SOLD AND THE PRICE DROPPED. Yes thank you for pointing that. "...says the guy who outright lies, persents information in a missleading way, ignores facts" that is exactly what Rynomster did at Crypto Asian webside. Are all u cinni holders such dumbfucks? Cinnidev confirmed rynomster fixed one of tne staking bugs. Check your own thread. |
|
|
|
Hello,
For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread).
Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned.
As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code.
Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened.
Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin.
battbot
I can confirm that what Battbot is saying is correct. ^
or copy of the email that ryno/sdcdev sent to Cinnicoin dev containing the fix to implement?
No one has been able to provide a link to the commit that relates to this. I hope digit don't mind me quoting him here Yes there was confirmation. Cinnidev confirmed it. Check the cinni thread. |
|
|
|
DevCove please ask digit about it I think he is an expert with that issue.
And that is why all started.
Are you kidding? This guy isn't interested in the truth - only in insulting people and doing whatever else he thinks he needs to do to defend rynomster and Shadowcoin. By all means, feel free to ask digit to comment on this thread. Again, I'm most familiar with the anon tech issue - not the bug issue which, if 100% true, may be much more serious/fundamental than what I've been talking about. ...says the guy who outright lies, persents information in a missleading way, ignores facts, attempt to implicate an honest man with quotes made by others, does not accept cinnidev collaboration of events, so basically pulls shit out of his ass and calls it history. QUOTES ARE ONLY INFORMATIVE IN CONTEXT. This dumbfuck is the worst kind of individual. Lies about an honest man because he is butthurt over a loss... HEY DUMBFUCK LOOK UP UTCLOVER HE OWNED 1/2 OF CINNI. HE SOLD AND THE PRICE DROPPED. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....and you have the nerve to try to claim the high road. You are a slander and a lier. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....and you have the nerve to try to claim the high road. You are a slander and a lier. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....and you have the nerve to try to claim the high road. You are a slander and a lier. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....and you have the nerve to try to claim the high road. You are a slander and a lier. |
|
|
|
Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?
I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is. Sorry DevCode but: Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence. How you call it HONESTY ? I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point. No. That is the point Rynomster fixed MAJOR Cinni Pos bug. Is that makes him honest ? I guess I consider the anon tech the "original sin", and I'm much more familiar with the facts in that story, but you're right - from what little I've read of the bug allegations, including what rynomster told cryptoasian, that bug issue might be a much bigger, much more serious and much more fundamental issue than the anon tech issue I'm most familiar with. If the facts on that matter are 100%, feel free to post another thread to get the truth out there. Even cinnidev said rynomaster fixed the one staking bug. There are many more because cinni code is garbage. You are such tools. |
|
|
|
Cinnicoin Trolls - stop the smear campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."-rynomster Situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the CINNI dev so he made his own coin....there is no problem with that. It is time you give the man the respect he deserves. The ShadowCoin EM and Stealth projects are open source, you can check for yourself that the code is original. Use the ShadowCoin EM and stealth system, or the full feature staking android and iOS wallets, you will see they work flawlessly. Time for you trolls to respect a real developer and stop this smear campaign. The OP is being dishonest in the way he constructed this "history". The OP is attempting to implicate rynomster by using quotes from battbot.You have constructed the OP in attempt to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is called a guilt by association fallacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.
You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to slander him.
List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.
You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.
|
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^ I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....that is the dishonesty on your part. |
|
|
|
Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?
I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^ I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....that is the dishonesty on your part. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^ I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing. The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person. Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness. Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....there is the dishonesty on your part. |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^ |
|
|
|
I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster? There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster. This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest, then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.
Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty. List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character. You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts. It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate. This is so true. He posted all quotes from that battbots guy and then tried to say rynomaster was a part of it. There are like 2 quotes from rynomaster in the OP and 25 from battbots. The quotes from rynomaster don't say anything dishonest at all. He is trying his hardest to bring rynomaster down. Common troll move. |
|
|
|
Cinnicoin Trolls - stop the smear campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."-rynomster Situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the CINNI dev so he made his own coin....there is no problem with that. It is time you give the man the respect he deserves. The ShadowCoin EM and Stealth projects are open source, you can check for yourself that the code is original. Use the ShadowCoin EM and stealth system, or the full feature staking android and iOS wallets, you will see they work flawlessly. Time for you trolls to respect a real developer and stop this smear campaign.
|
|
|
|
Ok. I'm saying grow up, situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the cinnidev so he made his own coin to implement those ideas. You are on a smear campaign against the wrong guy for the wrong reasons. Grow up!
That's not at all clear. Everything rynomster said/proposed at the time appeared to be welcome by everyone. There was nothing stopping him from doing whatever he wanted. Cinnicoin is not a real dev and deferred completely to him. What is he saying now about how his freedom was restricted - ridiculous. Obvious nonsense to anyone who reads the history on the CINNI thread.
Ok. I'm saying grow up, situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the cinnidev so he made his own coin to implement those ideas. You are on a smear campaign against the wrong guy for the wrong reasons. Grow up!
And you, sir, are on a whitewashing campaign. Open up! To the truth. A smear campaign against a dev that was not even the dev of CinniCoin...this is one of the most ridiculous FUD attempts yet. Good luck...have fun. |
|
|
|
Hello,
For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread).
Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned.
As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code.
Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened.
Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin.
battbot
THE DEV OF CINNICOIN CONFIRMED THIS POST.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8513205#msg8513205Who cares what CINNIcoin dev says - he is a passive, non-existent, non-dev "dev" who seems to have decided to allow CINNI to die, whatever his reasons. Don't care about him or give any weight to his words. My post is a direct copy of battbot and rynomster's own words with a clear chronology. For all I know, Cinnicoin is in bed with these guys, figuratively speaking. When you get out of diapers you will realize the world is a little more complex than you see it now. Situations change with time. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."-rynomster I leave it to readers to read what these two had to say and when in their own words, as it happened. I'm not interested in what battbot and rynomster have to say now to try to make themselves look better and protect their new or future investments. I'm just documenting the history while they, their proxies and guys like you try to whitewash it. Unlike you, I don't have to insult anyone - I can simply let readers come to their own judgements and visit the links if they like. Ok. I'm saying grow up, situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the cinnidev so he made his own coin to implement those ideas. You are on a smear campaign against the wrong guy for the wrong reasons. Grow up! |
|
|
|
|
