Please delete

[miningfool]

Cinnicoin Trolls -  stop the smear campaign  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514

"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."

-rynomster


Situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the CINNI dev so he made his own coin....there is no problem with that.

It is time you give the man the respect he deserves. The ShadowCoin EM and Stealth projects are open source, you can check for yourself that the code is original. Use the ShadowCoin EM and stealth system, or the full feature staking android and iOS wallets, you will see they work flawlessly. Time for you trolls to respect a real developer and stop this smear campaign.

The problem with all these devs is they make a living off alt coins. Sticking to one coin won't make them rich. Creating new coins with news features will until they dump and start a new project.
Apparently the cloak dev made himself a lot recently.

:shrug:  I'm not too happy with the FUD in the cloak thread by some large SDC holders, but on the other hand this thread is kind of a WTF moment.  Devs don't owe you a damn thing.  rnymonster or whoever are free to work on whatever they want.  These are open source decentralized projects, not "stocks" or companies, you aren't paying salaries to these devs.  If you're not happy with some aspect of development on say CINNI coin, write some code and submit pull requests on github and contribute.

[DevCoder]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

[sdersdf2]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

I started this thread as an open thread (not moderated and heavily censored like SDC/Shadowcoin) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress. I'm not afraid of the truth, unlike you people.

[sdersdf2]

:shrug:  I'm not too happy with the FUD in the cloak thread by some large SDC holders, but on the other hand this thread is kind of a WTF moment.  Devs don't owe you a damn thing.  rnymonster or whoever are free to work on whatever they want.  These are open source decentralized projects, not "stocks" or companies, you aren't paying salaries to these devs.  If you're not happy with some aspect of development on say CINNI coin, write some code and submit pull requests on github and contribute.

You're right - they don't owe us a damn thing. And we, as potential buyers, don't owe them our ignorance or our compliance with supression of the truth of what they did. I don't owe them anything either. I do feel I owe other buyers or potential buyers a counterpoint to their attempted whitewashing of what happened and when. I've posted the historical record, which is what apparently scares these people.

So, who's next? More tennis, "DevCoder"?

[pawlo74]

The problem with all these devs is they make a living off alt coins. Sticking to one coin won't make them rich. Creating new coins with news features will until they dump and start a new project.
Apparently the cloak dev made himself a lot recently.

Apparently, and that's their prerogative, but its our prerogative as buyers or potential buyers to familiarise ourselves with their patterns and past behavior/actions, inform others and invest (or not invest) accordingly.

+1

"these devs" won't be able do this forever their end will come soon.

How many times you can scam someone ? one o or two that's it.

[DevCoder]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524


I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress.

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness.

Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....there is the dishonesty on your part.

[sdersdf2]

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

I'm going to re-post the post at issue to give you and anyone else an opportunity to point out exactly what is dishonest in any of this. I really look forward to that.

[DevCoder]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524


I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress.

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness.

Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....that is the dishonesty on your part.

[pawlo74]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?
Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

[sdersdf2]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

These guys are laughable and their remarks/behavior just expose them all.

[DevCoder]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

[DevCoder]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524


I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress.

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness.

Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....that is the dishonesty on your part.

This dumbfuck OP is afraid you will see this.^

[sdersdf2]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

Sorry DevCode but:

Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

How you call it HONESTY ?

I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point.

[sdersdf2]

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness.

Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....that is the dishonesty on your part.

This dumbfuck OP is afraid you will see this.^

Maybe because you added it after I responded to the previous version.
This is an open, unmoderated thread - nothing is hidden here. This isn't the censored Shadowcoin thread. Don't you get it?

People are free to visit the CINNI thread to see all the message traffic that was going back and forth, including the many reassurances that were repeatedly given to CINNI investors to hold on to their coins - that development was ongoing.. until it wasn't.

I challenge anyone to look at the history I posted and look at the full CINNI thread and maintain that my simmary isn't an accurate summation of that facts. Someone else here even complained my copy-paste of the history was too long.

Oh, and keep posting and raising the post and view count - and therefore the visibility - of this thread. I'll leave it to other readers to conclude who's the dumbass here (and a rather vulgar one).

[DevCoder]

Cinnicoin Trolls -  stop the smear campaign  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700087.msg8142514#msg8142514

"I was not the original developer of CinniCoin, I just built the encrypted messaging system. My team and I decided to create the ShadowCoin project so we would have the freedom to implement our innovations as we saw best."

-rynomster


Situations change as time passes. It's pretty clear to almost everyone that Rynomster was not in control of the development path at CINNI because he was not the original dev. He probably had ideas not in line with the CINNI dev so he made his own coin....there is no problem with that.

It is time you give the man the respect he deserves. The ShadowCoin EM and Stealth projects are open source, you can check for yourself that the code is original. Use the ShadowCoin EM and stealth system, or the full feature staking android and iOS wallets, you will see they work flawlessly. Time for you trolls to respect a real developer and stop this smear campaign.



The OP is being dishonest in the way he constructed this "history". The OP is attempting to implicate rynomster by using quotes from battbot.

You have constructed the OP in attempt to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is called a guilt by association fallacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to slander him.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

[sdersdf2]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

Sorry DevCode but:

Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

How you call it HONESTY ?

I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point.

No. That is the point Rynomster fixed MAJOR Cinni Pos bug.

Is that makes him honest ?

I guess I consider the anon tech the "original sin", and I'm much more familiar with the facts in that story, but you're right - from what little I've read of the bug allegations, including what rynomster told cryptoasian, that bug issue might be a much bigger, much more serious and much more fundamental issue than the anon tech issue I'm most familiar with.

If the facts on that matter are 100%, feel free to post another thread to get the truth out there.

[DevCoder]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

Sorry DevCode but:

Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

How you call it HONESTY ?

I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point.

No. That is the point Rynomster fixed MAJOR Cinni Pos bug.

Is that makes him honest ?

I guess I consider the anon tech the "original sin", and I'm much more familiar with the facts in that story, but you're right - from what little I've read of the bug allegations, including what rynomster told cryptoasian, that bug issue might be a much bigger, much more serious and much more fundamental issue than the anon tech issue I'm most familiar with.

If the facts on that matter are 100%, feel free to post another thread to get the truth out there.

Even cinnidev said rynomaster fixed the one staking bug. There are many more because cinni code is garbage.  You are such tools.

[pawlo74]

Funny, they don't care about battbot reputation anymore, why ?
They try to make them separate.
All SDC tread was so happy that battbot posted his reply.
Not friends any more with battbot ? don't like him ? why ?

I dont know battbots. I do know that the OP is trying to implicate rynomaster with quotes from battbots. OP has the total lack of regard for honesty by attempting to set a contex for rynomaster's quotes where they would appear to be in collusion with battbots. Easy to see. He thinks he is much more smart than he is.

Sorry DevCode but:

Rynomster is a coder so he is even worst than battbot he knew about all problems with Cinni code but he didn't say anything and left in silence.

How you call it HONESTY ?

I didn't even focus on the bug issue - the anon tech stuff alone is damning - but good point.

No. That is the point Rynomster fixed MAJOR Cinni Pos bug.

Is that makes him honest ?

I guess I consider the anon tech the "original sin", and I'm much more familiar with the facts in that story, but you're right - from what little I've read of the bug allegations, including what rynomster told cryptoasian, that bug issue might be a much bigger, much more serious and much more fundamental issue than the anon tech issue I'm most familiar with.

If the facts on that matter are 100%, feel free to post another thread to get the truth out there.

Even cinnidev said rynomaster fixed the one staking bug. There are many more because cinni code is garbage.  You are such tools.

DevCove please ask digit about it I think he is an expert with that issue.

And that is why all started.

[DevCoder]

I read that link. Again, what are the dishonest posts from rynomster?  There are no dishonest posts from rynomster in that link.
You have wrongly said posts from battbot somehow show dishonesty by rynomster.  This seems dishonest on your part. Please list the dishonest posts by rynomster, not posts by battbot.
I am saying you are being intellectualy dishonest in the way you constructed the OP. You say rynomster is dishonest,  then you list posts made predominantly by battbot and attempt to attribute them to rynomster.  

Please specify anything I've said -- for the most part copied -- that isn't true:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You have constructed the OP in attemp to implicate rynomster using quotes from battbot. This is a guilt by association falacy. You include rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

I am presenting the chronology as it was -- and allow readers to draw their own conclusions, which seem obvious to me and many others -- while you repeat vague accusations about my dishonesty. I leave the record to speak for itself. This is what battbot and rynomster said and did when they said and did it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524

You included rynomster in an undesirable list of quotes made by other people in attempt to implicate him. This is by definition, intellectual dishonesty.

List the dishonest quotes from rynomster or stop attacking his character.

You clearly dont care at all about honesty or you would not play these games. Im sure this will be abundantly clear to anyone reading these posts.

It is now clear to me that intellectual honesty is not your goal, you are just attempting to bring down an honest man. This is shameful on your part and I will no longer participate.

I think you are afraid of the whole quote. This guy was dead on ^

I just found it redundant - he repeatedly accuses me of dishonesty but doesn't challenge a single part of the historical record:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=755834.msg8523524#msg8523524


I started this thread as open (not moderated, unlike SDC) to allow a free flow of facts/opinion that SDC allies/proxies/sockpuppets like you are desperately trying to supress.

He says you presented the information and quotes dishonestly....you did. Easy to see the game you are playing.
The "didn't challenge the record" bullshit is no defense for your honesty. Your dishonesty was your presentation of the quotes in a purposeful way to implicate rynomaster with the quotes of another person.

Oh BTW, you are yet to answer his challenge. List the dishonest quotes by rynomaster, not the quotes by battbots...of rynomaster. Just list them below so all can see the dishonesty in its rawness.

Noooo, you want to leave the quotes in the context you presented them....and you have the nerve to try to claim the high road. You are a slander and a lier.

[sdersdf2]

DevCove please ask digit about it I think he is an expert with that issue.

And that is why all started.

Are you kidding? This guy isn't interested in the truth - only in insulting people and doing whatever else he thinks he needs to do to defend rynomster and Shadowcoin. By all means, feel free to ask digit to comment on this thread. Again, I'm most familiar with the anon tech issue - not the bug issue which, if 100% true, may be much more serious/fundamental than what I've been talking about.