Consider Bitcoin benefiting in the same way that Evan benefited when the bitcoin codebase was there and available on the day Evan decided to fork from it and create something that would one day come to really be something great. As for the shitcoins, they can't fork Evan

The community is tired of your antics. What ya gonna try next?

Maybe another press release? hah!

Why would you call the guy a scammer and use his words to defend the coin in the same sentence? Also, why not just post this in a thread about the topic that already exists? Do you need a new topic every single time you want to say something?

Also, you forgot about everyone's favorite lone developer:


I think you're getting scared that your taunting will yield nothing.

I thought the wording was strange as well, "under the right conditions" and "To fix this, anonymity will need to be sacrificed" seem not to mix in the same sentence. The claims seem contradictory.

No:


If they spent all of their time addressing every single unicorn claim lacking any technical detail about some dooming flaw, then they wouldn't really get anywhere. They're not after your money and they're not gonna pander to investors. Anyone buying this knows it's alpha level software and the value could go to zero tomorrow.

If legitimate technical details surface, then they will be shared as anyone would hope. Just as they've done in the past.

No, he talked about a difficulty adjustment exploit. This one's new.

I'll be looking through his posts to find what we're both talking about, and update it here. Unless you get to it first.

here it is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=522235.msg7998410#msg7998410

here again: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=522235.msg8020920#msg8020920

No mention of a keyring exploit.

If you're really as anti-troll as you're claiming, then please address this issue below. Nobody knows if it's FUD trolling or fact, and I figured someone of your potential would be able to address this. My concern is that BBR is a CN coin, and would have the same fatal flaw:

Just part of the same sequence that the coin has adhered to within ~90% since its inception. Time will tell me if i'm wrong, and in fact I've actually lost money on trying to prove myself wrong doing so.


Let it piss you off. I've said it from about the first ten posts since I've been here, they only want your tears. Nothing more.

Consider the stunted excitement as part of a process that otherwise would have been premature. You know this, just as well as anyone buying this knows this. Without it, I would have walked away months ago.

Remember, CZ himself made the statement that most likely the creators of the technology were paid by the  ones who wanted the technology. The conclusion this leads me to is that the creators of the technology found out about the plans of the ones paying them prematurely and reacted. This would explain why he needs to remain anonymous, for fear of his life or extortion. Money and world-changing events do not always invite the best of company, perhaps in this case some of the better ones took a chance on intervening..

If this is what quite a few people think it really is, then a few months are nothing to wait for. Personally, I'm waiting to see what happens around 90%, measured in days of December 6th to see the next (add: Price) event. Just me though.

The worst part is that Monero is comprised of so many people who would have otherwise supported Bytecoin if not for the 82% premine. Mindfuck.

Will take months to sort out, likely to be resolved before Dec 6th IIRC