adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
September 17, 2014, 02:34:39 PM |
|
Any problems with the network?
For some reason I can't sync with the block chain, it keeps saying "loading blockchain data" and nothing happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
nongdanvoz
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2014, 02:58:34 PM |
|
I like this coin. Hold and pumb
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2014, 05:35:10 PM |
|
Any problems with the network?
For some reason I can't sync with the block chain, it keeps saying "loading blockchain data" and nothing happens.
Do you use windows version ? I guess i know what the bug is, try to download blockchain from website: http://boolberry.com/downloads/windows/blockchain.bin (if you use windows) and load GUI from that. Next build will be with fix for this problem.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
September 17, 2014, 07:41:03 PM |
|
I sent a transaction 18 hours ago of 32 BBR. My network died just as I hit the send button and the transaction has failed.
In my wallet the transaction is unconfirmed, but the TXID does not appear in the blockchain explorer. The funds have been locked.
I have tried redownloading the blockchain to no effect.
Will the transaction eventually clear of it's own accord or do I need to do something else?
Try this http://boolberry.com/howto.html#rebuild_wallet_datafile and let us know if you solved problem! Worked perfectly, thanks Zoidberg, brilliant as usual
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 17, 2014, 08:17:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127
Whimsical Pants
|
|
September 17, 2014, 08:31:42 PM |
|
Unless Monero devs changed the core CN ring stuff then I would say all Cn coins are at risk. Then again BBR is the only other coin that needs to care.
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2014, 08:52:34 PM Last edit: September 17, 2014, 09:13:54 PM by crypto_zoidberg |
|
Are we affected of what ? He didn't say anything concrete. Atm it looks like classic FUD, because i can't see any other goal behind this post. But still, every cryptocurrency has a possibility to have flaws - with his post or without, devs should always keep our eyes open. We do.
|
|
|
|
drawingthemoon
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:20:31 PM |
|
Unless Monero devs changed the core CN ring stuff then I would say all Cn coins are at risk. Then again BBR is the only other coin that needs to care. Awwwww the monero shills are here to protect their future.
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:22:30 PM |
|
Are we affected of what ? He didn't say anything concrete. Atm it looks like classic FUD, because i can't see any other goal behind this post. But still, every cryptocurrency has a possibility to have flaws - with his post or without, devs should always keep our eyes open. We do. how it is possible for a locally encrypted wallet to be compromised is beyond me. conveniently he says there is a workaround to this unlikely result that just happens to require losing the anonymity however, it also seems unlikely that losing anonymity will solve any wallet stealing without any specifics, this is artful FUD It might almost be possible to prove that a local wallet cannot be stolen externally via the blockchain unless the encryption of the wallet is cracked and that the wallet contents are somehow able to be transferred to the attacker! I can see the theoretical possibility of unspent funds being spent without the wallet, which is what happened to XCP. Still for someone to be making such claims, he is either the top cryptonote dev in the world or it is FUD James
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:28:12 PM |
|
Trying to compile Wolf cudaminer https://github.com/wolf9466/bbr-cudaminer on Ubuntu 14.04 Installed CUDA 6.5 + NVdrivers 340 gcc -std=gnu11 -Ofast -c cpu-miner.c -o cpu-miner.o cc1: error: unrecognized command line option вЂ˜-std=gnu11’ make: *** [all] Error 1 Can comeone help me?
|
|
|
|
otila
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:44:00 PM |
|
Trying to compile Wolf cudaminer https://github.com/wolf9466/bbr-cudaminer on Ubuntu 14.04 Installed CUDA 6.5 + NVdrivers 340 gcc -std=gnu11 -Ofast -c cpu-miner.c -o cpu-miner.o cc1: error: unrecognized command line option вЂ˜-std=gnu11’ make: *** [all] Error 1 Can comeone help me? Use gcc which supports -std=gnu11 (gcc 4.7+) or change -std=gnu11 to -std=gnu99 in Makefile
|
|
|
|
Windoze
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:48:24 PM |
|
Are we affected of what ? He didn't say anything concrete. Atm it looks like classic FUD, because i can't see any other goal behind this post. But still, every cryptocurrency has a possibility to have flaws - with his post or without, devs should always keep our eyes open. We do. how it is possible for a locally encrypted wallet to be compromised is beyond me. conveniently he says there is a workaround to this unlikely result that just happens to require losing the anonymity however, it also seems unlikely that losing anonymity will solve any wallet stealing without any specifics, this is artful FUD It might almost be possible to prove that a local wallet cannot be stolen externally via the blockchain unless the encryption of the wallet is cracked and that the wallet contents are somehow able to be transferred to the attacker! I can see the theoretical possibility of unspent funds being spent without the wallet, which is what happened to XCP. Still for someone to be making such claims, he is either the top cryptonote dev in the world or it is FUD James I thought the wording was strange as well, "under the right conditions" and "To fix this, anonymity will need to be sacrificed" seem not to mix in the same sentence. The claims seem contradictory.
|
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127
Whimsical Pants
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:13:43 PM |
|
An interesting development... A couple quick notes. Is "rune" not a single syllable as opposed to two? It has a mystical connotation. I think it is my fav of the three. Vortex could have a negative connotation as it is associated with drains, tornados and used as "caught in a vortex". Is the poll ONLY open to the three candidates?
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:15:11 PM |
|
An interesting development... A couple quick notes. Is "rune" not a single syllable as opposed to two? It has a mystical connotation. I think it is my fav of the three. Vortex could have a negative connotation as it is associated with drains, tornados and used as "caught in a vortex". Is the poll ONLY open to the three candidates? Yes. The poll is open to 3 choices. You need to make the vote on the voting thread.
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:22:01 PM |
|
change -std=gnu11 to -std=gnu99
thx, this is help. But strange, I am using gcc 4.8... Why i can`t find shares? ./cudaminerd -o stratum+tcp://54.186.95.94:4025 -u {wallet} -p x -k http://54.186.95.94/scratchpad.bin -t 1 [2014-09-17 22:09:30] Using JSON-RPC 2.0 [2014-09-17 22:09:30] wildkeccak scratchpad cache /home/ubuntu/.cache/boolberry/scratchpad.bin [2014-09-17 22:09:30] hugetlb not available [2014-09-17 22:09:30] loaded scratchpad /home/ubuntu/.cache/boolberry/scratchpad.bin (29342112 bytes), height=88218 [2014-09-17 22:09:31] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://54.186.95.94:4025 [2014-09-17 22:09:31] 1 miner threads started, using 'wildkeccak' algorithm. [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88218 --> 88219 11 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88219 --> 88220 10 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88220 --> 88221 8 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88221 --> 88222 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88222 --> 88223 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88223 --> 88224 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88224 --> 88225 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88225 --> 88226 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88226 --> 88227 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88227 --> 88228 8 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88228 --> 88229 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88229 --> 88230 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88230 --> 88231 10 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88231 --> 88232 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88232 --> 88233 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88233 --> 88234 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88234 --> 88235 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88235 --> 88236 8 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88236 --> 88237 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88237 --> 88238 8 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88238 --> 88239 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88239 --> 88240 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88240 --> 88241 8 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88241 --> 88242 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88242 --> 88243 10 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88243 --> 88244 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88244 --> 88245 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88245 --> 88246 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88246 --> 88247 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88247 --> 88248 10 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88248 --> 88249 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:09:31] Pool set diff to 5005789 [2014-09-17 22:09:31] Stratum detected new block [2014-09-17 22:09:32] GPU #0: GRID K520: 2098201 hashes, 4204811.52 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:10:32] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88249 --> 88250 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:10:32] Stratum detected new block [2014-09-17 22:10:32] GPU #0: GRID K520: 3776691657 hashes, 62804.39 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:10:32] GPU #0: GRID K520: 3768265801 hashes, 9989809.15 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:10:40] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88250 --> 88251 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:10:40] Stratum detected new block [2014-09-17 22:10:40] GPU #0: GRID K520: 3062654473 hashes, 380270.91 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:12:56] GPU #0: GRID K520: 4294967265 hashes, 31515.76 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:12:57] GPU #0: GRID K520: 1890946201 hashes, 9979344.90 kh/s [2014-09-17 22:12:59] ADDENDUM APPLIED: 88251 --> 88252 9 blocks added [2014-09-17 22:12:59] Stratum detected new block [2014-09-17 22:12:59] GPU #0: GRID K520: 2756916521 hashes, 1135569.54 kh/s
|
|
|
|
5000Bitcoins
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:23:26 PM |
|
Ok so sell me on this. Why shouldn't I buy XMR over this
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:33:43 PM |
|
Ok so sell me on this. Why shouldn't I buy XMR over this
a - this developer is moving faster b - this coin is part of the superdupernetwork c - the emission curve is fairer d - it's cheaper i'm not a blueberry fan but those are the reasons.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:48:01 PM |
|
An interesting development... A couple quick notes. Is "rune" not a single syllable as opposed to two? It has a mystical connotation. I think it is my fav of the three. Vortex could have a negative connotation as it is associated with drains, tornados and used as "caught in a vortex". Is the poll ONLY open to the three candidates? Yes. The poll is open to 3 choices. You need to make the vote on the voting thread. Boolberry has just been added to new exchanges. Boolberry is a cool and unusual name that can build a strong 'brand' identity. Their is nothing wrong with the boolberry name or the current boolberry logo. The 3 proposed name changes are all terrible when compared to boolberry - in my honest opinion. At best I'm thinking to stop mining BBR for now and at worst ? Although the technical fundamentals are mostly their - does this project actually have a clear direction moving forward ? Is a 2nd name change and re-branding really worthwhile at this stage ?
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2014, 10:49:26 PM |
|
An interesting development... A couple quick notes. Is "rune" not a single syllable as opposed to two? It has a mystical connotation. I think it is my fav of the three. Vortex could have a negative connotation as it is associated with drains, tornados and used as "caught in a vortex". Is the poll ONLY open to the three candidates? Yes. The poll is open to 3 choices. You need to make the vote on the voting thread. Boolberry has just been added to new exchanges. Boolberry is a cool and unusual name that can build a strong 'brand' identity. Their is nothing wrong with the current boolberry name or the strong boolberry logo. The 3 proposed name changes are all terrible when compared to boolberry - in my honest opinion. At best I'm thinking to stop mining BBR for now and at worst ? Although the technical fundamentals are mostly their - does this project actually have a clear direction moving forward ? Is a 2nd name change and re-branding really worthwhile at this stage ? listen. I think boolberry/blueberry is kinda a silly name. but these are all far worse imo. any posts that say boolberry in that thread auto get deleted. dude is major power tripping
|
|
|
|
|