Anytime Trump loses you convince yourself he won. |
|
|
|
The brainwashing is real. Imagine trying to blame J6 on Trump when he told people not to do it, requested additional security, and begged people to be peaceful.
The brainwashing is real. J6 happened because people believed a bunch of lies about the election being stolen. Trumps lies. Imagine believing that because he said "peacefully and patriotically" in a speech before going on to tell them to "fight like hell or you're not going to have a country any more" absolves him of blame. Meanwhile Pelosi denied the security request The brainwashing is real. The National Guard doesn't report to Nancy Pelosi. On a federal level they report to a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Guess who that guy reports to? What a stupid conspiracy theory. Twitter censored his pleas to the people at the government’s request. Capitol employees killed someone as a result. The brainwashing is real. None of his tweets were removed until long after the Trump supporter trying to climb through a broken window next to a barricaded door to the speakers lobby was shot. Imagine how brainwashed you’d have to be to blame Trump. People in this country aren’t well and I don’t know why they push false narratives to punish innocent people. It’s despicable. Thank god for what’s coming. Get your Kleenex ready for November.
You're post is just one lie after another, and they're all so easy to disprove. Literally no reasonable non-brainwashed person could believe any of your claims after spending 10 minutes doing their own research The brainwashing is real. Think of how many lives have been destroyed by people that were drinking that convicted felons Koolaid. |
|
|
|
^^^ And the point is, he admitted that he was under the law, and thereby condemn himself to the mercy of the court... which didn't execute him... so the court was merciful. Where is the document that I signed that obligates me to be under a law. If your neighbor makes a new law for you to obey, do you have to obey it? Don't you only have to obey it if you sign the paperwork accepting it? Where is the paperwork that you signed that shows that you are required to obey the laws that a bunch of people in Washington, D.C., made? Or are you being forced into it by dictatorial force of the courts? Remember. 13th Amendment. No involuntary servitude. If they force you to do something - like obeying a law - you should be paid. Ross volunteered by signing up with an attorney. Prior to that, where did he sign that drug and money laws applied to him? I'll bet it was nowhere. And I'd bet that if average people looked the laws that they are supposed to obey, they would find dozens or hundreds of them that were against what they believed in their free living of life.  Where's the paperwork that says your signature on paperwork means anything? If you live in a society that has laws and the means to enforce them, you can't just decide that they don't apply to you after you're caught breaking them (at least in most cases, depending on who you are) and then go back to enjoy all the benefits that come with living somewhere with law and order and a functioning government. You'd have a lot more to cry about if there were no laws. We're talking US, right? It's the foundational law of the US, the Constitution, that says you have the right to oppose every law the government makes. It's in the Contract Clause and the adjudications about the Contract Clause. It's the right to contract. If you can contract in, you can contract out. Are you saying you're obligated to live "under the foundational law of the US, the Constitution"? Did you sign a document or something? ' I didn't sign a document, am I obligated to live under this law? Don't I only have to obey it if I sign the paperwork accepting it? |
|
|
|
Is there like a peer-reviewed study and a scientific journal that will prove that because that's the only thing that would make me believe that Ivermectin is a cure for cancer, it's hard to believe that a horse pill can just be a cure for humans and I'm pretty sure that there's some people in the past that would've tried this and would've seen the same results, I don't trust the media saying all of this medical breakthrough unless backed by science. Cancer aren't parasite per se, they're cells that was supposed to die but refused to do so and so they become a problem for other cell because the cell regeneration of this cell is just too much that it grows in size, your own cells isn't a parasite. In BADeckerville all Bombshell reports are peer reviewed (by his conspiratard peers) to make sure that the only scientists involved are the ones that have little or no respect among scientists that are employed by establishments like Governments, or Universities or anywhere else that is well funded - bc deepstate!!11 A world where everything BADecker wishes is true is actually true might sound like hell to most people. But, hey, at least they cured cancer. |
|
|
|
^^^ And the point is, he admitted that he was under the law, and thereby condemn himself to the mercy of the court... which didn't execute him... so the court was merciful. Where is the document that I signed that obligates me to be under a law. If your neighbor makes a new law for you to obey, do you have to obey it? Don't you only have to obey it if you sign the paperwork accepting it? Where is the paperwork that you signed that shows that you are required to obey the laws that a bunch of people in Washington, D.C., made? Or are you being forced into it by dictatorial force of the courts? Remember. 13th Amendment. No involuntary servitude. If they force you to do something - like obeying a law - you should be paid. Ross volunteered by signing up with an attorney. Prior to that, where did he sign that drug and money laws applied to him? I'll bet it was nowhere. And I'd bet that if average people looked the laws that they are supposed to obey, they would find dozens or hundreds of them that were against what they believed in their free living of life. Where's the paperwork that says your signature on paperwork means anything? If you live in a society that has laws and the means to enforce them, you can't just decide that they don't apply to you after you're caught breaking them (at least in most cases, depending on who you are) and then go back to enjoy all the benefits that come with living somewhere with law and order and a functioning government. You'd have a lot more to cry about if there were no laws. |
|
|
|
In the US... A man or woman being accused and going to court should never have an attorney. In fact, he should never represent himself. Rather, he should stand present, unrepresented. The accused has the right to face his accuser. If Ross had been unrepresented, he would have the right to get his accuser on the stand under oath or affirmation, so that he could question his accuser. Who was his accuser? The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Call 3 times for your accuser to get on the stand. Nobody called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA could ever get on the stand. Case dismissed. Ross, like most of us, had attorneys. So, he shot himself in the foot - head. Consider what a client of an attorney is >>> https://www.youarelaw.org/Download/CorpusJurisSecundum-AttorneyClient.pdf. And look here to find more - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=corpus+juris+secundum+-+client+of+an+attorney&ia=web.Ross needs to rescind his signature off all paperwork regarding his case, and require a new trial without attorneys. Success would be difficult for him now that things have gone this far. But outside of Trump pardoning him, it might be the only way. Any examples of your legal strategy being used successfully? Or even unsuccessfully? no Fixed your post. |
|
|
|
Even IF Trump did something wrong like you suggest, it almost is nothing
He broke the law to help himself become president during a campaign that one of his main promises was to prosecute and lock up his political opponent. There's literally no evidence that Biden is directly involved in any of Trumps indictments while Trump openly pushed for Hillary to be charged, and when the DOJ eventually convinced him that they didn't have a strong enough case he ordered them to indict someone. So they did. And the jury acquitted him in like an hour.Quit being such a crybaby. If you don't want the DOJ to be weaponized, don't vote for Trump.
Looks like the case will go to the jury in a matter of hours...  |
|
|
|
In the US... A man or woman being accused and going to court should never have an attorney. In fact, he should never represent himself. Rather, he should stand present, unrepresented. The accused has the right to face his accuser. If Ross had been unrepresented, he would have the right to get his accuser on the stand under oath or affirmation, so that he could question his accuser. Who was his accuser? The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Call 3 times for your accuser to get on the stand. Nobody called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA could ever get on the stand. Case dismissed. Ross, like most of us, had attorneys. So, he shot himself in the foot - head. Consider what a client of an attorney is >>> https://www.youarelaw.org/Download/CorpusJurisSecundum-AttorneyClient.pdf. And look here to find more - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=corpus+juris+secundum+-+client+of+an+attorney&ia=web.Ross needs to rescind his signature off all paperwork regarding his case, and require a new trial without attorneys. Success would be difficult for him now that things have gone this far. But outside of Trump pardoning him, it might be the only way. Any examples of your legal strategy being used successfully? Or even unsuccessfully? |
|
|
|
Yeah that's definitely his daughter. She said he's a pedophile also, so that's true too. Just like he's definitely an undercover FBI agent that made all the magatards attack the police by saying whatever he said to that guy on the video. And if the video of him saying something to someone else isn't proof, then the fact he was the only one never arrested is proof enough. And if that's not enough proof, how about the fact that he was arrested, but only got 1 year of probation and 100 hours community service - obviously a cover up - only because all the magatards were on to him. I wonder if he eats children also, like Hillary and Nancy. I bet he does. |
|
|
|
It's like they're campaigning specifically to BADecker. Mind bogglingly dumb liars.  I am convinced now that dumBAss is a Chinese agent pretending to be from Texas. I always imagine him wishing he could be a Russian agent from his mothers house in one of those areas in the south where they eat squirrels and drink moonshine that was made in a neighbors bathtub. Just to show you who is winning, where is the war being fought? Mother Russia isn't being threatened at all. It's the Ukraine that is in turmoil.
|
|
|
|
It's like they're campaigning specifically to BADecker. Mind bogglingly dumb liars. |
|
|
|
You jokers still don't get it, do you.
Hey remember the discussion was about the evidence in Trumps criminal trial. First you acted as if you were very following the details of the trial very closely. That's the point. You are not following it. Did you read the transcripts that I posted?
You jokers still don't get it, do you.
And went on to make a bunch of claims like this: Just to show that you haven't been following it, the paper trail was simply standard, general payments made to the attorney firm by Trump. If the attorney firm did something bad with the funds, that's their problem, not Trumps. Cohen might have used the loan funds for anything.
My question is this: What made you claim those things? Did you make them up, or are you repeating what you heard somewhere else? If you didn't make them up yourself, will you consider thinking twice before repeating whatever the source says in the future? If you did make them up, shame on you. |
|
|
|
You jokers still don't get it, do you. Even if money went to Stormy, this doesn't necessarily mean that it was hush money for a Trump affair with her... or anything of the sort. It might simply have been a request for her to NOT do the thing that she is doing. Or he might be covering for someone else. Or maybe it was payment for a job that she did for Trump a different way. Money switches hands all the time. Until it is proven that it was to pay her off for an affair, we simply don't know what it was for. Remember, in the past she said that she did NOT have an affair with Trump. You can't trust what she is saying. All you jokers are really trying to do is keep a murdering presidential team in office. I don't know why you would do that, but it sure looks like you enjoy warmonger worldwide killing, and wrecking the US economy at the same time... something that Trump did just the opposite of while in office. Can you begin to provide justification for your actions? You should be supporting Trump to bring about world peace, because as it stands, now, he's the only one who can. Cool story. But not a good excuse to make things up to defend him like this one example of mannny: Cohen might have used the loan funds for anything. When it comes down to it, "I like Trump/I hate Biden" iis really at the heart of any Trumptards argument about why Trump, the billionaire scam artist that inherited a bunch of money and his business and then proceeded to fuck over pretty much everyone he came in contact with for the next 50 years, is now the victim because it looks like he might only get away with most of the crimes, not all. |
|
|
|
You really are clueless about reality. I'm not going to waste my time on refuting every one of your ignorant claims, but I'll explain one example: Cohen might have used the loan funds for anything.[/b]
The paper trail shows that on October 26, 2016 - minutes after speaking with Trump, Michael Cohen opened a bank account in the name of the LLC he had just created a few days earlier and funded it with a $131,000 using a home equity line of credit on his home. The funds became available that same day at 4 pm. LOAN FUNDS GO DIRECTLY INTO NEW LLC BANK ACCOUNT The next day, October 27, 2016 at 10:01 am, Cohen submitted the paperwork required to wire $130,000 to Keith Davidson and Stormy Daniels attorney-client trust. LOAN FUNDS GO DIRECTLY FROM NEW LLC BANK ACCOUNT TO STORMY DANIELS You know how to find the transcripts, and I've already given you a link to the documents. If you were interested in the truth, you would have already figured it out. Cohen might have used the loan funds for anything.
^^FALSE |
|
|
|
Just to show that you haven't been following it, the paper trail was simply standard, general payments made to the attorney firm by Trump. If the attorney firm did something bad with the funds, that's their problem, not Trumps.
No, it wasn't standard and Cohen didn't even have a firm - these were personal payments to reimburse the loan he took out on his house. Obviously you will never admit you're wrong or believe something that makes your favorite politician look like a criminal but paper trail shows that: Michael Cohen took out a loan on his house for $130,000 and created a shell company to pay Stormy Daniels.  In order to compensate Cohen for the payment, he had to be repaid double so that he could pay taxes as if it were earned income. In addition to the 130k, Trump also owed him $50k for rigging some polls using a company called Red Finch (you were right, some polls are lies). So he was owed ($130k + $50k) X 2 = $360k. $180k to reimburse the payments he made, $180k to pay income tax to make it look like income. He was also paid a $60k "bonus" for his actual work. So the final total was $420k, and they agreed to pay him $35k monthly for 1 year. ($35k * 12 = $420k). Here's the Trump org ceo doing the math (he's currently in Rikers island for perjury during Trumps last criminal trial, he also served time for fraud before that - Trump surrounded himself with criminals) The bonus is noted as $50k, but ended up being changed to $60k later.  Here's one of the 12 checks Trump signed over the next year to make it look like Cohen was working for him, even though he was not:  All the holes have been filled in. Trump micromanaged his company, not even the CEO was authorized to make a payment for more than $10k without Trumps blessing. And there's no reason to double a reimbursement for taxes, unless you want to make it look like earned income. Document Dump: https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rchcAZNAFo_U/v0There is no reasonable scenario where all this happened without Trumps explicit approval. And if prosecutors had case as strong as this one against Hillary, and there were no technicalities that caused a mistrial or reversal on appeals, she'd be a convicted felon today - and rightfully so. Squirm away. |
|
|
|
I thought you thought the polls and pollsters lie... Hillary might be winning in the polls, but the polls and pollsters lie.
Trump is winning the popular vote by a big margin, even though the polls don't show it. But it doesn't matter.
Did being wrong about the popular vote convince you that you were wrong about the polls? lol jk I know you'll just pretend to never be wrong when it comes to your favorite politicians. And yeah, these trials are really helping Trump swing things hard....looks like a total blow out (prob no reason to even vote if you have something better do)  |
|
|
|
As for Donald Trump... I can't believe that Sleepy Joe Biden is actually going to debate him.
Pretty sure you're supposed to call him Crooked Joe or Slow Joe or something other than sleepy Joe since Trump has pretty much been falling asleep every day of his criminal trial. By the way, I'm surprised you never decided to start up a collection from other btctalk members to "help" Steve Bannon " build the wall". Seemed right up your alley. |
|
|
|
~ Bill Maher makes some good points. ~
“Trump whines he’s the victim of ‘selective prosecution,’ the truth is he’s the beneficiary of selective non-prosecution,” Maher said, arguing that Trump should have been charged with breaking campaign finance laws, instead of duking it out in state court on charges of falsifying business records.
~
LOL, Lol. Everybody in the world is a 'victim' of selective non-prosecution. Especially in the US, anybody can prosecute anybody for ANYTHING, any time, any place, in any way. Doesn't guarantee they will have success. Doesn't guarantee it won't backfire on them. But they can do it... at least the start of it. Reminds me of when I completely disprove some idiotic claim you made and you respond with "AnYoNe CaN mAke ChArts aNd GrAphS!!!!" |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
