Just a friendly reminder for everyone that those blokes still failed to respond to a single question that were asked here by multiple people + still didnt bother to post any proof of their allegations. (While being super detailed on other cases here in the forum, kinda weird..)
Please stay away from this site!
We appreciate you bringing these issues forward but we must add further context that you failed to mention.
This was not your first account on Rollbit, you've had numerous accounts limited & banned.
Each time, sufficient warnings were given to ensure you understood that future accounts would be actioned and we'd seek to recoup loses from such abuse.
As you correctly identified, we're generally fine with folks having alternative accounts as long as they're not being utilised for nefarious purposes.
This was not the case here, you opened multiple accounts with the sole purpose of abusing our sportsbook, something you were warned previously for.
Following previous warnings, you were permitted or already did withdraw all of your funds.
It's worth noting for the other participants of this thread, this is most definitely not an action we profit from. It's more recouping losses, as we've already lost a significant amount of value through this type of abuse.
Please stay away from this site!
your warning is not likely to be heeded or even noticed. just take a look at their trustpilot to see what I mean. plenty of low reviews but people still keep gambling there. APPARENTLY. people with common sense would have read the reviews on trustpilot before depositing a single satoshi. if you're ok with everything you read there then by all means do whatever you want to.  Trust pilot is kind of a dumpster fire when it comes to using it to judge online casinos. Players lose their money and leave bad reviews because they are mad they lost or didn't get some hand out they wanted. Casinos give incentives to leave good reviews. I'd be surprised if more than 5 or 10% of reviews do not fall into one of these two categories. |
|
|
|
They concluded their "investigation" and closed the ticket without resettling the picks correctly.
BC.GAME is BIG SCAM. STAY AWAY FROM THEM!
Did they give you an explanation? |
|
|
|
I’m just glad that now Twitter is out of the hands of liberal psychos. They were prioritizing silencing conservatives while leaving child porn thriving on the platform. I’m not sure if liberals are mad that conservatives now have an equal playing field or if they’re mad their child porn provider is going away, but one thing is for sure, it’s going to get a lot more difficult for these gender twisting groomers to achieve their goals on Twitter, and I think that’s a huge win for society.
Jesus, how gullible are you? Child porn was never thriving on Twitter or literally any major social media network. You realize that 1) you're wrong & 2) you're literally proving my point. Defending child porn on Twitter by claiming it doesn't exist is either malicious or ignorant. You can pick which one you are, as this is a statement of fact, not an opinion. I get that liberals want to pretend they aren't groomers, but their activity is what matters. Constantly defending child porn. Wanting to censor anyone who disagrees with their lies. Pretending there are more than 2 genders. Trying to cancel anyone who doesn't go along with their fairytale. Trying to say that dressing up as the opposite sex is being your true self and others can't handle it, when it's literally the exact opposite. Even the person in charge of handling this so called child porn issue that you deny was writing in this thesis for his PhD that children should be allowed to use grinder (an app for gays to find each other for sex). What kind of a sick person hires someone like that for a position supposed to exist to weed out child porn? I can't even grasp what sort of a stubborn idiot would still maintain that the way things were going was OK... Then I remember that TwitchySeal is an extortionist troll and it makes sense. I usually don't argue with fools these days, as casuals usually can't tell who is who, but I think in this case it's blatantly obvious who the fool is. So you think the 10s of millions of people in America that identify as liberal have a secret agenda to groom children so that they can have sex with them. I mean that's just insane. Posting child porn on twitter would would be handled in a similar way as posting a bomb threat with law enforcement being involved immediately. You need to quit falling for whoever has been feeding you this nonsense. Liberals are just people that have different political views than you. Having a different opinion on how government should run doesn't make someone a monster and making up ridiculous stories about them trying to fuck children doesn't accomplish anything productive. |
|
|
|
If you did not truly win the bet, why the refund to your account?
They graded the bet as 16 shots on target. With asian totals, that means if you bet under or over 16 it's a push (refund). |
|
|
|
I thought right wing conspiratards stopped posting pictures of words in 2020. |
|
|
|
The equioment is more for attack not for defend
Well it's been long plan it failed many times but now it could be possible.
Russia have all the Nice things such us oil gold gas so USA want this.
The best way to entry in russia Will be trough Baltics countries.
It's not just USA all world dream about to get russian land there is everthing you need oil gas and food fotest.
So NATO together with HIMRas attackers getting ready to go in russia.
Can russia defend ? I dont think so it's likely that russia Will be taken over by USA and Europe Will buy USD to get russian oil.
Anyone who knows about military can see that USA in baltics prepare for attacking not for defending.
Anyways it's logical becouse we all want russian resources gas oil gold and all the food.
The only way for US to get all of Russias "nice things" would result in making those nice things radioactive. |
|
|
|
Child porn was never thriving on Twitter or literally any major social media network.
"gender twisting groomers" (whatever that is) leads me to think that "child porn" might have been redefined in nutcase newspeak just like "shadow banning" was. sEmAnTiCs! |
|
|
|
That's a real danger for sure. Your list neglect to include what most of you guys incorrectly (in my opinion) consider 'anti-semitism'.
You are an anti-semite, fyi. It makes sense that you don't really think they exist, I would expect most anti-Semites to agree with you. Racist people in general rarely consider themselves racist or believe racism is a legitimate issue. Just to support my argument for those who aren't familiar with your post history (I know you will argue this doesn't prove anything. I know it won't, to you.): Nobody is saying anything about 'every Jew'. Not even genuine anti-semites. I'm sure that there are antisemites but they are as rare as hens teeth and I don't think I've ever met one in the flesh. Questioning the truly clown-show details of the so-called 'holocaust' is certainly not antisemitism no matter what the ADL or whoever says. It's simply not being a brainwashed simpleton or a shameful coward who would sell the U.S. 1st amendment down the river to appease some of the most abysmal ethnic supremacists who ever walked the face of the earth.
one needs to be a Jew and/or a kiddie diddler to get AIPAC money.
Some of the most loathsome elements Kabbalistic interpretation seem to be much more broadly disseminated through the Jewish mindset than simply a small set of creepy Rabbis. Things like sufficiently read-in Jews 'creating worlds by speaking Hebrew'. i.e., lying out their asses and making up fictional stories about Russian soldiers war crimes. People who grew up in 'Christian nations' have a hard time getting their minds around such a thing and are thus commonly victimized by such tactics.
Later it was discovered that for a period of time hospitals in certain coastal regions such as Jew York were able to milk over $70,000 dollars per 'covid patient' out of the the government due to certain emergency funding.
|
|
|
|
I’m just glad that now Twitter is out of the hands of liberal psychos. They were prioritizing silencing conservatives while leaving child porn thriving on the platform. I’m not sure if liberals are mad that conservatives now have an equal playing field or if they’re mad their child porn provider is going away, but one thing is for sure, it’s going to get a lot more difficult for these gender twisting groomers to achieve their goals on Twitter, and I think that’s a huge win for society.
Jesus, how gullible are you? Child porn was never thriving on Twitter or literally any major social media network. |
|
|
|
Everyone seems to be ignoring the definition of a shadow ban that was given when the claim was made and using a different definition that would make the statement a lie.
Semantics is the weakest form of argument. Trying to use doublespeak now to pretend they weren't lying is ridiculous. Twitter was lying and got caught red handed. I'm sure the abuse goes even further than what we've already seen, and what we've already seen is enough to distrust our government. When you look into all the details of ex-alphabet boys getting positions in Twitter to make their manipulation easier from the inside and it's clear as day that this has been happening. Although everyone already knew this because it was obvious. Now it's fact instead of conspiracy theory. The really crazy part is that YouTube and Facebook are even worse offenders but have deeper pockets to avoid a buyout. I hope this latest set of events has them terrified and questioning their bad behavior. I hope it all comes to light in the end and liberals are able to digest they've been brainwashed while being mature enough to switch their views based on their new understanding of reality. Try to put your hatred for the libs and love of Elon aside and look at this rationally. They clearly defined 'shadow ban' at the time of claiming they don't shadow ban people. It's a reasonable definition. imo, it's the most reasonable definition. They clearly explained that they did do what people are now claiming is shadow banning (making it harder to discover some tweets without following the user or searching for them). Because they provided the definition when making the claim, there's really no semantic debate on what they meant. We know exactly what they meant. You can't read their statement on shadowbanning and argue in good faith that "they said they didn't shadow ban, now we know they do, they lied about not shadow banning". It's just not logical. Semantics is the weakest form of argument. Irrational, bad faith, uninformed arguments are weaker. |
|
|
|
In 2018, Twitter general counsel Vijaya Gadde denied the usage of shadow banning and suggested it was a conspiracy theory. Nonsense.
Seems like she addressed it pretty accurately when claiming they don't shadow ban: https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/Setting-the-record-straight-on-shadow-banningThe best definition we found is this: deliberately making someone’s content undiscoverable to everyone except the person who posted it, unbeknownst to the original poster.
We do not shadow ban. You are always able to see the tweets from accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly to their profile). And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology. Everyone seems to be ignoring the definition of a shadow ban that was given when the claim was made and using a different definition that would make the statement a lie. I've always thought of shadow bans in relation to chat rooms. If someone gets shadow banned, they see their messages appearing in the chat but nobody else can. I believe this is the original use of the term. The twitter equivalent would be someone tweeting and nobody else being able to see it. Which isn't what's happening at twitter. |
|
|
|
I've been studying the subject a lot lately. It's not particularly easy to just 'switch sides' physically. Even the handful of nations who will sell citizenship (e.g., Turkey) do want upwards of half a million $$$.
You're studying something irrelevant. You don't need citizenship to pursue freedom in the dictatorship country of your choice. Russia will happily hand out permanent resident permits to pretty much anyone, all you need is a job. If he moved to Russia, I would expect him to continue his anti-main stream media/establishment views and ultimately end up in the gulhag for supporting the West, or lgtbq rights, or freedom of speech or something along those lines. |
|
|
|
I wonder how many german citizens would empathize with sentiments of these extremists? Is it a trend exclusively reserved only for elderly age demographics?
Are boomers considered elderly now? |
|
|
|
I already surpass him in this.
Oh really? Despite being unable to articulate an original idea and having the reading comprehension of a middle schooler he's averaged more than 11 posts a day for the past 9 years. Created almost 2,000 threads most frequently about articles from Mike Adams network of literal fake news sites that only exist to sell scam alternative medical supplements to the most gullible people on the internet. (naturalnews is the biggest). |
|
|
|
Ok aside from US political party donations and potential aid to the Ukraine which the media seem to want pushed under the rug. Do you want to grow up to be like BADecker? Because that's what's going to happen if you don't learn how to let a stupid conspiracy theory go. Ok aside from US political party donations and potential aid to the Ukraine which the media seem to want pushed under the rug. Why haven't they arrested SBF for the fraud he committed? Is he too big to jail like the banksters of 2008 we tried to get away from in crypto? Is it because he donated to both parties and by arresting him he can snitch on all of them? Your thoughts?
Well i am stepping in. One reason could be that they need to go trough mountain of evidence to even decide if they can extradite / contain him, and should they yet even do that. And, who is going to arrest him? He lives in bahamas and most likely haven't broke any laws in there, and bahamas likes to protect their criminals, if they would give up people easily, many criminals wouldn't choose it as place to live. Also it was FTX international that failed, didn't accept US customers so i am not even sure if they broke any US law. But this is a huge case and so many people and firms were affected that it can take months or even years to build a case against him. People just think that because ftx went down fast we could arrest him fast as well. Pretty much this. And even if they had everything in order to issue an arrest warrant today, why would they mess up SBFs busy schedule of incriminating himself every other day to a new major media outlet? |
|
|
|
Sam Bankman-Fried says he donated just as many millions to Republicans as Democrats, but didn’t publicize it because reporters would ‘freak the f–k out’“All my Republican donations were dark. The reason was not for regulatory reasons, it’s because reporters freak the fuck out if you donate to Republicans. They’re all super liberal, and I didn’t want to have that fight.”https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/30/ftx-billionaire-sam-bankman-fried-dark-money-republicansSam Bankman-Fried’s FTX Collapse Touches Ukraine, the World Economic Forum, Silicon Valley and Both Sides of D.C. https://www.themainewire.com/2022/11/sam-bankman-frieds-ftx-collapse-touches-ukraine-the-world-economic-forum-silicon-valley-and-both-sides-of-d-c/"Sam Bankman-Fried is a name you’re going to hear a lot about over the next year – and rightly so. The implosion of his cryptocurrency empire is like if Enron and Bernie Madoff had a baby, and that baby became the 2nd largest Democratic Party donor on his 2nd birthday while partnering with the World Economic Forum and the Bank of Ukraine." "According to reporting from Coin Desk, the Ukrainian government partnered with FTX to help convert cryptocurrency “donations” into arms and war supplies. According to some estimates, between FTX and the National Bank of Ukraine facilitated the flow of up to $100 million worth of bitcoin and cryptocurrency for the war effort." Ukraine Partners With FTX, Everstake to Launch New Crypto Donation Website https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/03/14/ukraine-partners-with-ftx-everstake-to-launch-new-crypto-donation-website/"A press release on the Aid to Ukraine efforts reads: The official website for Aid For Ukraine, an initiative that raises funds from the crypto community for the benefit of Ukraine’s military and humanitarian needs, has officially launched. The initiative is powered by the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, FTX, and Everstake. This is the first instance of a cryptocurrency exchange providing a conduit for crypto donations to a public financial institution." Sam Bankman-Fried, FTX Founder: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know https://heavy.com/news/sam-bankman-fried-ukraine-politics-biden/Other than the $25 FTX credit for Ukrainian FTX users, all they did was help converting crypto to fiat. There was no laundering because Ukraine never sent anything back. Everything that was donated to the addresses shared by government officials were converted to fiat and deposited directly into Ukraines National Bank. Also, FTX was only involved for about a month in March/April and was only involved in exchanging a couple million of the couple hundred million. It's just a stupid conspiracy theory from idiots who love to make connections that don't exist but help confirm their bias. The mainewire article you posted isn't false. It explains the conspiracy theory can only be true if Ukraine was somehow investing in FTX. We now know that wasn't happening. The theory no longer makes sense. From the article: However, it’s unclear whether FTX’s relationship with Ukraine involved any Ukrainian investment into FTX. On the surface, it looks like SBF was virtue signaling his anti-Russian credentials by converting cryptocurrency for Ukraine – lending a crypto hand to the war effort. But with so many cryptocurrency shenanigans going on, it’s hard to know for sure what the flow of money really looked like. If Ukrainian relief money was flowing onto FTX’s books, that would raise serious questions for the U.S. government, considering U.S. taxpayers have shelled out more than $60 billion in aid for Ukraine’s war effort. Why The Theory That Sam Bankman-Fried Laundered Ukraine Aid Makes No Sense https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2022/11/15/why-the-theory-that-sam-bankman-fried-laundered-ukraine-aid-makes-no-sensePosts spin baseless theory about FTX, Ukraine and Democrats https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-ftx-ukraine-democrats-laundering-996663874380
|
|
|
|
that was what the mask mandates were about to find out your facial ID even if its obscured.
Didn't put much thought into that theory did you? I didn't have to use any theory because facial recognition is a worldwide reality and no theory unless you are living under a rock. Read what you said again: that was what the mask mandates were about to find out your facial ID even if its obscured.
I'll assume you realize now how silly it would be to implement mask mandates around the world so that "they" could figure out what people looked like with masks on. |
|
|
|
You know that Time magazine had Hitler and Stalin (twice) as person of the year as well... And they deserved it. Whether you've done good or evil is not considered when deciding who wins. Just who had the biggest effect on the news of the year. Its not because Putin wants control of the Ukraine our dear elite that run things behind the scenes want control of this world.
No, Russia invaded Ukraine because Putin wants to control Ukraine. You really think there's a secret club that called up Putin and Zelensky and said "we need you go to war with each other and make it look like Russia wants to control Ukraine and Ukraine doesn't want to be controlled by Russia so that we can control the world". That's ridiculous. Maybe this guy should be included in your post since he laundered I mean "donated" so much to the Ukraine:
Ukraine used FTX to convert all their crypto donations to fiat. That's literally all there is to the story. I don't think SBF even donated money directly to Ukraine. But if he wanted to, he wouldn't have made it a secret (unlike the dark money donations he claims he made to Republicans). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
